Search

Loud acoustic noise from the scanner during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can affect functional connectivity (FC) observed in the resting state, but the exact effect of the MRI acoustic noise on resting state FC is not well understood. Functional ultrasound (fUS) is a neuroimaging method that visualizes brain activity based on relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), a similar neurovascular coupling response to that measured by fMRI, but without the audible acoustic noise. In this study, we investigated the effects of different acoustic noise levels (silent, 80 dB, and 110 dB) on FC by measuring resting state fUS (rsfUS) in awake mice in an environment similar to fMRI measurement. Then, we compared the results to those of resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) conducted using an 11.7 Tesla scanner. RsfUS experiments revealed a significant reduction in FC between the retrosplenial dysgranular and auditory cortexes (0.56 ± 0.07 at silence vs 0.05 ± 0.05 at 110 dB, p=.01) and a significant increase in FC anticorrelation between the infralimbic and motor cortexes (−0.21 ± 0.08 at silence vs −0.47 ± 0.04 at 110 dB, p=.017) as acoustic noise increased from silence to 80 dB and 110 dB, with increased consistency of FC patterns between rsfUS and rsfMRI being found with the louder noise conditions. Event-related auditory stimulation experiments using fUS showed strong positive rCBV changes (16.5% ± 2.9% at 110 dB) in the auditory cortex, and negative rCBV changes (−6.7% ± 0.8% at 110 dB) in the motor cortex, both being constituents of the brain network that was altered by the presence of acoustic noise in the resting state experiments. Anticorrelation between constituent brain regions of the default mode network (such as the infralimbic cortex) and those of task-positive sensorimotor networks (such as the motor cortex) is known to be an important feature of brain network antagonism, and has been studied as a biological marker of brain disfunction and disease. This study suggests that attention should be paid to the acoustic noise level when using rsfMRI to evaluate the anticorrelation between the default mode network and task-positive sensorimotor network.

Functional ultrasound (fUS) imaging is a method for visualizing deep brain activity based on cerebral blood volume changes coupled with neural activity, while functional MRI (fMRI) relies on the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent signal coupled with neural activity. Low-frequency fluctuations (LFF) of fMRI signals during resting-state can be measured by resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI), which allows functional imaging of the whole brain, and the distributions of resting-state network (RSN) can then be estimated from these fluctuations using independent component analysis (ICA). This procedure provides an important method for studying cognitive and psychophysiological diseases affecting specific brain networks. The distributions of RSNs in the brain-wide area has been reported primarily by rsfMRI. RSNs using rsfMRI are generally computed from the time-course of fMRI signals for more than 5 min. However, a recent dynamic functional connectivity study revealed that RSNs are still not perfectly stable even after 10 min. Importantly, fUS has a higher temporal resolution and stronger correlation with neural activity compared with fMRI. Therefore, we hypothesized that fUS applied during the resting-state for a shorter than 5 min would provide similar RSNs compared to fMRI. High temporal resolution rsfUS data were acquired at 10 Hz in awake mice. The quality of the default mode network (DMN), a well-known RSN, was evaluated using signal-noise separation (SNS) applied to different measurement durations of rsfUS. The results showed that the SNS did not change when the measurement duration was increased to more than 210 s. Next, we measured short-duration rsfUS multi-slice measurements in the brain-wide area. The results showed that rsfUS with the short duration succeeded in detecting RSNs distributed in the brain-wide area consistent with RSNs detected by 11.7-T MRI under awake conditions (medial prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex in the anterior DMN, retrosplenial cortex and visual cortex in the posterior DMN, somatosensory and motor cortexes in the lateral cortical network, thalamus, dorsal hippocampus, and medial cerebellum), confirming the reliability of the RSNs detected by rsfUS. However, bilateral RSNs located in the secondary somatosensory cortex, ventral hippocampus, auditory cortex, and lateral cerebellum extracted from rsfUS were different from the unilateral RSNs extracted from rsfMRI. These findings indicate the potential of rsfUS as a method for analyzing functional brain networks and should encourage future research to elucidate functional brain networks and their relationships with disease model mice.