Search

Objectives: Recently, the Omicron strain of SARS-CoV-2 has spread and replaced the previously dominant Delta strain. Several Omicron sublineages (BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2) have been identified, with in vitro and preclinical reports showing that the pathogenicity and therapeutic efficacy differs between BA.1 and BA.2. We sought to develop a TaqMan assay to identify these subvariants., Methods: A TaqMan assay was constructed for rapid identification and genotyping of Omicron sublineages with 171 samples. We analyzed three characteristic mutations of the spike gene, Δ69-70, G339D, and Q493R, by TaqMan assay. The accuracy of the TaqMan assay was examined by comparing its results with the results of whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis., Results: A total of 171 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were analyzed by WGS and TaqMan assay. The 127 samples determined as BA.1/BA.1.1 by WGS were all positive for Δ69-70, G339D and Q493R by TaqMan assay. A total of 42 samples, determined as BA.2 by WGS, were negative for Δ69-70 but positive for G339D and Q493R by TaqMan. Two samples with G339N were determined to be inconclusive by the TaqMan method. Except for these two samples, the concordance rate between WGS and the TaqMan assay was 100% (169/169)., Conclusion: TaqMan assays targeting characteristic mutations are useful for identification and discrimination of Omicron sublineages., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Previously, the accuracy of the quantitative LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was demonstrated using samples collected retrospectively. In this study, the LUMIPULSE antigen test was clinically validated using prospective samples., Methods: In total, 1033 nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected from 1033 individuals, and an additional 275 follow-up samples were collected from 43 patients who subsequently tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). All 1308 samples were subjected to quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) and the antigen test. The antibody response was investigated for patients with discordant results to clarify if seroconversion had occurred., Results: RT-qPCR identified 990 samples as negative and 43 as positive, while the antigen test identified 992 samples as negative, 37 as positive and four as inconclusive. The overall concordance rate was 99.7% (1026/1029). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the antigen test were 92.5% (37/40), 100% (989/989), 100% (37/37) and 99.7% (989/992), respectively, after exclusion of the four inconclusive results. The kappa coefficient was 0.960 (95% confidence interval 0.892-0.960), suggesting excellent agreement between the two tests. Seropositivity in five of seven patients with discordant results suggested that the discrepancy was caused by samples collected during the late phase of infection. Using follow-up samples, correlation was observed between the antigen level and the viral load or cycle threshold value. The concordance rate between these test results tended to be high among samples collected 0-9 days after symptom onset, but this decreased gradually in samples collected thereafter., Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrated that the LUMIPULSE antigen test is a highly accurate diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Various diagnostic tests utilizing different principles are currently under development for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, these tests can occasionally produce discrepant results, causing confusion in their interpretation. Here, we evaluated the performance and features of three diagnostic assays: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) v2.1, and the LUMIPULSE antigen test. Twenty-seven serial nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from a prolonged viral shedding patient who had been hospitalized for 51 days. We examined the SARS-CoV-2 detection rates of the three tests. The overall agreement rate was 81% between RT-qPCR and FilmArray RP v2.1, 63% between the antigen test and FilmArray RP v2.1, and 59% between the antigen test and RT-qPCR. We obtained concordant results in samples with high viral loads (low threshold cycle values) by all three tests. RT-qPCR and FilmArray RP v2.1 accurately detected SARS-CoV-2 at the early to intermediate phases of infection, but the results varied at the late phase. The antigen test also produced a positive result at the early phase but varied at the intermediate phase and consistently produced negative results at late phase of infection. These results demonstrated FilmArray RP v2.1 could detect SARS-CoV-2 with accuracy comparable to RT-qPCR. Further, there were discrepant results using different types of diagnostic tests during the clinical course of prolonged viral shedding patient. We provided insights into how to utilize different types of kits to assess and manage SARS-CoV-2 infections., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In routine clinical practice, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is determined by reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR). In the current pandemic, a more rapid and high-throughput method is in growing demand. Here, we validated the performance of a new antigen test (LUMIPULSE) based on chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay. A total of 313 nasopharyngeal swabs (82 serial samples from 7 infected patients and 231 individual samples from 4 infected patients and 215 uninfected individuals) were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) and then subjected to LUMIPULSE. We determined the cutoff value for antigen detection using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and compared the performance of the antigen test with that of RT-qPCR. We also compared the viral loads and antigen levels in serial samples from seven infected patients. Using RT-qPCR as the reference, the antigen test exhibited 55.2% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity, with a 91.4% overall agreement rate (286/313). In specimens with > 100 viral copies and between 10 and 100 copies, the antigen test showed 100% and 85% concordance with RT-qPCR, respectively. This concordance declined with lower viral loads. In the serially followed patients, the antigen levels showed a steady decline, along with viral clearance. This gradual decline was in contrast with the abrupt positive-to-negative and negative-to-positive status changes observed with RT-qPCR, particularly in the late phase of infection. In summary, the LUMIPULSE antigen test can rapidly identify SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with moderate to high viral loads and may be helpful for monitoring viral clearance in hospitalized patients., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in solid tumors and is a predictive biomarker for remarkable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Detection of MSI status has been conventionally conducted by PCR-electrophoresis-based assay (MSI-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair proteins. However, these approaches require visual confirmation and involve some difficulties in determining MSI statuses from equivocal results., Methods: We performed amplicon-based targeted sequencing of 76 microsatellite loci (MSI-NGS) in 184 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues and baseline control samples. A bioinformatics tool, MSIcall, was used to calculate the quantitative values based on the aligned sequence reads and evaluated MSI status. Furthermore, we examined the concordance between the results from MSI-NGS and MSI-PCR/IHC. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. For validation cohort, we studied additional 50 tumor samples to determine the MSI status., Results: Of 184 tumor samples, MSI-PCR and IHC analysis classified 161 tumors as MSS/pMMR and 23 as MSI-H/dMMR. Using MSI-NGS combined with MSIcall, we predicted MSI status with high accuracy (98.9%), specificity (91.3%), and sensitivity (100%) in 25 types of cancers. This method achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.9986. Furthermore, we achieved the 100% concordant results using additional 50 samples for validation., Conclusion: We demonstrated newly developed MSI-NGS with MSIcall accurately determines the MSI status of FFPE tumor tissues thorough sequencing of tumor samples alone without patient-matched normal controls. This approach can be applied to all types of solid tumors to determine responders to immune-oncology therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)