Search

Background: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for peritoneal metastases. However, HIPEC with cisplatin is associated with renal toxicity. Sodium thiosulfate (ST) has been shown to prevent cisplatin-induced toxicity., Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated curatively for peritoneal surface malignancy, who underwent cytoreductive surgery with cisplatin-based HIPEC between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the management of cisplatin-induced renal toxicity: preoperative hyperhydration alone (PHH), preoperative hyperhydration with ST (PHH + ST), and ST alone. Renal function and complications, in terms of Acute (AKI) and chronic kidney injury (CKI), were monitored and analyzed during 3 postoperative months., Results: This study included 220 consecutive patients. Mean serum creatinine levels were 95, 57 and 61 mmol/L, for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) were 96, 94 and 78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively (p < 0.001). AKI and CKI are respectively for PHH, PHH + ST and ST groups were 21 % (n = 46), 1 % (n = 2) and 0 % vs 19 % (n = 42), 0 % and 0 % (p < 0.001), for pairwise analysis did not show any difference between PHH + ST and ST alone combination, regarding nephrological outcomes. All patients were followed 3 months postoperatively., Conclusion: There is no need for preoperative hyperhydration when sodium-thiosulfate is used to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. These findings have implications for improving and simplifying the management of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing HIPEC with cisplatin., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. All authors have no financial or personal relationships with individuals or organizations that could potentially bias or influence the research findings or the interpretation of the data presented in this work., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: PIPAC (Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy) is a minimally invasive approach relying on physical principles for improving intraperitoneal drug delivery, including optimizing the homogeneity of drug distribution through an aerosol. Feasibility and safety of the new approach are now consolidated and data on its effectiveness are continuously increasing. Although any surgical procedure associated with PIPAC had always been discouraged due to the high risk of complications, surgical practice is constantly changing: with growing expertise, more and more surgical teams associate PIPAC with surgery., Methods: PLUS study is part of the retrospective international cohort studies including 10 centers around the world (India, Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland) and 96 cases of combined approaches evaluated through a propensity score analysis., Results: the procedures most frequently associated with PIPAC were not only adhesiolysis, omentectomy, adnexectomy, umbilical/inguinal hernia repairs, but also more demanding procedures such as intestinal resections, gastrectomy, splenectomy, bowel repair/stoma creation. Although the evidence is currently limited, PLUS study demonstrated that PIPAC associated with additional surgical procedures is linked to an increase of surgical time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p < 0.001) and medical complication rate (p < 0.001); the most frequently reported medical complications were mild or moderate in severity, such as abdominal pain, nausea, ileus and hyperthermia. No difference in terms of surgical complications was registered; neither reoperation or postoperative deaths were reported., Conclusions: these results suggest that PIPAC can be safely combined in expert centers with additional surgeries. Widespread change of practice should be discouraged before the results of ongoing prospective studies are available., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We have no financial interest in the products presented in this work. My coauthors and I do not have any conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background and Aim: The greater omentum(GO) is a common site of residual disease in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The presence of tumor in the GO could predict presence of disease in other peritoneal regions. The goal of this study was to perform a correlation between the greater-omentum lesion-score(GOLS) and presence of disease in different peritoneal regions and determine its potential utility in guiding interval cytoreductive surgery(CRS)., Methods: This prospective study included 134 patients undergoing interval CRS from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020. Each region of Sugarbaker's Peritobneal Cancer Index(PCI) was given a lesion score(LS) from 0 to 3 according to the diameter of the largest tumor in the region. The GOLS was recorded separately from other structures in the region. Correlation between the GOLS and surgical and pathological LS in each region was performed., Results: As the GOLS increased, the incidence of disease(surgical LS) in other regions of the peritoneal cavity increased. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves showed area under curve more than 80% for regions 1-2 and 7-8 indicating a high probability of disease in these regions in patients with GOLS 1-3. The positive predictive value(PPV) of preoperative imaging for GOLS was 95.7%. No cut-off of the GOLS could predict presence of disease on pathology with more than 70% accuracy., Conclusions: Presence of disease in the GO warrants performing upper abdominal exploration and/or cytoreduction and interval CRS should be planned accordingly in these patients. Imaging has a high PPV in detecting disease in the GO., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: PIPAC is a recent approach with promising results for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). We aimed to evaluate survival and postoperative outcome of patients with unresectable PM from gastric origin treated with chemotherapy and PIPAC., Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective maintained PIPAC database was queried for all patients diagnosed with unresectable PM from gastric cancer who underwent PIPAC before 2018. PIPAC with Cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 were given for 30 min at 6-week intervals. Outcome criteria were overall survival and adverse events according to (CTCAE) version4.0., Results: One hundred Sixty-three PIPAC were done in 42 consecutive patients. Twenty-two (52%) of the patients were female. Signet-ring cells were observed in 33/42 patients (78.6%). At the first PIPAC, median age was 51.5 years (32-74). Median PCI was 17 (1-39). Twenty (47.6%) patients underwent more than 2 lines of pre-PIPAC chemotherapy. All patients had systemic chemotherapy alternating with PIPAC. Median consecutive PIPAC procedures were 3 (1-12). Overall and major complications (CTCAE - III, IV) occurred in 10 (6.1%) and 5 procedures (3.1%), respectively. Two patients (4.7%) died within 30 days of a PIPAC procedure, one related to small bowel obstruction and a pulmonary embolism for the other. Overall Survival was 19.1 months. Six (14.3%) patients became resectable during treatment and underwent curative intent CRS and HIPEC., Conclusions: PIPAC with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin is safe and feasible in association with systemic chemotherapy for gastric PM. Survival data are encouraging and justify further clinical studies in this indication., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: PIPAC is a recent method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients who became amenable to CRS & HIPEC after PIPAC treatment., Methods: All patients diagnosed with unresectable PM who became resectable throughout PIPAC treatment were included. Outcome criteria were adverse events following PIPAC procedure and rate of secondary CRS and HIPEC., Results: Four hundred thirty-seven PIPAC were done in 146 consecutive patients. Among them, 26 patients (17.8%) who underwent 76 PIPAC were scheduled for CRS and HIPEC after reduction of the peritoneal burden. PM were from gastric, peritoneal mesothelioma, ovarian, colorectal and small bowel in 13, 7, 4, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. At the time of the first PIPAC, median age was 58.6 years (32-76.3). Median PCI was 16 (1-39). All patients had systemic chemotherapy in between PIPAC session. Median consecutive PIPAC procedure was 3 (1-8). Complications occurred in 3 PIPAC session (4%) and there was no major complication (CTCAE III or higher). Complete CRS and HIPEC was achieved in 21 patients of the 26 scheduled (14.4%). The remaining 5 patients were considered unresectable at the exploratory laparotomy. Among patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC, with median follow-up of 7 (1-26) months, 14 patients (66.7%) were alive without recurrence, 2 patients (9.5%) were alive with recurrence and 5 patients (23.8%) died., Conclusions: Complete CRS and HIPEC can be achieved in strictly selected patient with unresectable PM at diagnosis after repeated PIPAC session with palliative intent., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising technic for unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have demonstrated their efficacy in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this bidimensional therapeutic association., Methods: A prospectively maintained PIPAC database was retrospectively analyzed from December 2015 to March 2018. All patients who underwent PIPAC for unresectable PM were selected. Patients with systemic chemotherapy including bevacizumab (BEVA group) were compared with patients with systemic chemotherapy without bevacizumab (NON-BEVA group). Major morbidity and mortality were analyzed., Results: 134 patients underwent 397 PIPAC in Lyon Sud University Hospital. 26 Patients had 88 PIPAC in the BEVA group were compared to 108 patients who had 309 PIPAC in the NON-BEVA group. Patients in the BEVA group demonstrated a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI 20 vs. 16, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in overall 30-day morbidity (BEVA: 13 (14.8%) vs NON-BEVA: 29 (9.4%); p = 0.147). There was no statistical difference for grade III-IV complications (BEVA: 4 (4.5%) vs NON-BEVA 10 (3.2%); P = 0.521). Major complications from BEVA group were as follow, 2 bowel obstructions, one hematoma and one severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum compound. There was no 30-day mortality in the BEVA group compared to 6 (5.5%) mortality in the NON-BEVA group., Conclusion: PIPAC associated with bevacizumab is feasible, safe and well tolerated. The potential oncologic benefit of the concomitant use of bevacizumab and PIPAC remains to be evaluated., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: PIPAC is a new treatment modality for peritoneal cancer which has been practiced and evaluated until very recently by few academic centers in a highly standardized manner. Encouraging oncological outcomes and the safety profile have led to widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to assess current PIPAC practice in terms of technique, treatment and safety protocol, and indications., Methods: A standardized survey with 82 closed-ended questions was sent online to active PIPAC centers which were identified by help of PIPAC training centers and the regional distributors of the PIPAC-specific nebulizer. The survey inquired about center demographics (n = 8), technique (n = 34), treatment and safety protocol (n = 34), and indications (n = 6)., Results: Overall, 62 out of 66 contacted PIPAC centers answered the survey (response rate 93%). 27 centers had performed >60 PIPAC procedures. A consensus higher than 70% was reached for 37 items (50%), and higher than 80% for 28 items (37.8%). The topics with the highest degree of consensus were safety and installation issues (93.5% and 80.65%) while chemotherapy and response evaluation were the least consensual topics (63.7 and 59.6%). The attitudes were not influenced by volume, PIPAC starting year, type of activity, or presence of peritoneal metastases program., Conclusion: Homogeneous treatment standards of new techniques are important to guarantee safe implementation and practice but also to allow comparison between cohorts and multi-center analysis of merged data including registries. Efforts to avoid diversification of PIPAC practice include regular update of the PIPAC training curriculum, targeted research and a consensus statement., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Residual disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneum is seen in nearly 30% of the patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer. The goal was to study the sequence of response in different regions, the commonest sites of occult residual disease, its incidence in different peritoneal regions and the potential therapeutic implications of these., Methods: This was a prospective multi-centre study (July 2018-June 2019). Pathological evaluation of cytoreductive surgery specimens was performed according to a fixed protocol. Prevalence of residual disease in different regions was used to study patterns of response and distribution of residual disease., Result: In 85 patients treated between July 2018 to June 2019, microscopic disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneal regions was seen in 22 (25.2%) and in normal peritoneum around tumor nodules in 30 (35.2%) patients. Regions 4 and 8 of Sugarbaker's PCI had the highest incidence of occult disease and regions 9 and 10 the lowest. The response to chemotherapy occurred in a similar manner in over 95%- the least common site of residual disease was the small bowel mesentery, followed by upper regions (regions 1-3), omentum and middle regions (regions 0, 4, 8), lower regions (regions 5-7) and lastly the ovaries., Conclusions: During interval CRS, based on the disease mapping provided in this manuscript, regions that have a high probability of residual disease should be explored and dissected. Complete resection of involved the peritoneal region can completely address the occult disease. The role of resection of the entire region as well as 'normal appearing' parietal peritoneal regions should be prospectively evaluated., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All the authors have no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Selected patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer may benefit from cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The aim was to study the pattern of peritoneal involvement in these patients that has not been done before., Methods: A comparison was made between the surgical and pathological findings in 60 patients undergoing salvage CRS from July 2018 to December 2019. The sites of residual disease, correlation with surgical and pathological peritoneal cancer index (PCI), small bowel involvement and regional lymph node involvement were studied., Results: Fifty-eight (96.6%) had serous carcinoma and 2 (3.4%) clear cell carcinoma. The median surgical PCI (sPCI) was 7 [range 0-27] and median pathological PCI (pPCI) 4 [range 0-21]. CC-0 resection was performed in 81.6%. The upper regions (region 1,2,3) were the commonest sites of residual disease (63.3%) followed by lower regions (region 5,6,7) in 55.0%, middle regions (regions 0,4,8) in 53.3% and small bowel regions (regions 9-12) in 26.6%. Small bowel involvement was associated with a higher sPCI and pPCI (p < 0.001 for both). Regional nodes were involved in 46.6%. A pathological complete response was seen in 8 (13.3%) patients of which 2 had residual disease in regional nodes. Microscopic disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneum was seen in 21%., Conclusions: The parietal peritoneum was the commonest site of recurrence. Small bowel involvement occurred late and was associated with more extensive disease. Regional lymph node involvement was seen nearly 50% and was a common site for occult disease. The role of more extensive parietal peritoneal resection for recurrent disease should be evaluated prospectively., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest. The authors received no funding for this study., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim was to study the patterns of target region (greater omentum, lesser omentum, falciform and umbilical round ligament) involvement in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) from various primary tumors, factors affecting involvement and implications on surgical practice., Methods: All patients undergoing CRS from July 2018 to December 2018 were included in this prospective study. The incidence of target region involvement in presence and absence of visible disease and the impact of primary tumor site, PCI and other variables on target region involvement was evaluated., Results: In 191 patients, greater omentum was involved in over 15% of patients irrespective of the primary tumor type and in 15.7% in absence of visible disease. 75% of these had PCI <20. The involvement of the other three target regions was higher than 20% in ovarian cancer, appendiceal tumors and peritoneal mesothelioma. Involvement of these 3 regions was associated with a higher PCI (p < 0.001 for all) and omental involvement (p < 0.001for all). 2.1% of colorectal cancer patients had umbilical round ligament involvement, 4.2% had falciform ligament involvement and none had lesser omentum involvement., Conclusions: Target region involvement varies according to primary tumour site and disease extent. Resection of the greater omentum should be performed during CRS for PM arising from all primary sites. Resection of other target organs may be performed for selected patients with ovarian cancer, peritoneal mesothelioma and mucinous appendiceal tumors in absence of visible disease. For other patients, it should be done only in presence of visible disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no disclosures or conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new drug delivery method used in patients with peritoneal cancer (PC) of primary or secondary origin. Intraperitoneal use of oxaliplatin raises concerns about toxicity, especially abdominal pain. The objective of this study was to assess the tolerance of PIPAC with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-Ox) in a large cohort of patients and to identify the risk factors for high grade toxicity, discontinuation of treatment and impaired survival., Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated with PIPAC-Ox (92 mg/m 2 ) in five centers specialized in the treatment of PC. The procedure was repeated every 6 weeks. Outcomes of interest were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), symptoms and survival (Kaplan-Meier). Univariate risk factors were included in a multinominal regression model to control for bias., Results: Overall, 251 PIPAC-Ox treatments were performed in 101 patients (45 female) having unresectable PC of various origins: 66 colorectal, 15 gastric, 5 ovarian, 3 mesothelioma, 2 pseudomyxoma, 10 other malignancies (biliary, pancreatic, endocrine) respectively. The median PCI was 19 (IQR: 10-28). Postoperative abdominal pain was present in 23 patients. Out of the 9 patients with grade 3 abdominal pain, only 3 needed a change of PIPAC drug. CTCAE 4.0 toxicity grade 4 or higher was encountered in 16(15.9%) patients. The patients had a mean of 2.5 procedures/patient (SD = 1.5). 50 subjects presented with symptom improvement., Conclusions: Oxaliplatin-based PIPAC appears to be a safe treatment that offers good symptom control and promising survival for patients with advanced peritoneal disease., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). In case of ovarian, Fallopian tube or primitive peritoneal cancer of FIGO III-IV stages, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan with injection (grade B) is recommended. Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A)., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been introduced over the last decade for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this procedure, heated cytotoxic drugs are administered directly into the abdominal cavity, ensuring cancer cells to be exposed while reducing systemic toxicity. More recently, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), where the chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure, has been proposed to patients in palliative situation, as a new approach. The amount of drug used is up to 10 fold lower than in HIPEC. The use of cytotoxic drugs poses an occupational risk for the operating room personnel. This study investigated the potential exposure of the medical staff by biomonitoring and surface contamination measurements, during a HIPEC procedure and a PIPAC procedure., Method: Wipe samples were collected from various locations in operating rooms including gloves, hands, devices and floor. Urines samples were collected from 10 volunteers of the medical staff and from a control group. The platinum analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry., Results: Significant contaminations were observed on the floor, gloves, shoes and devices. However, urinary platinum was below the limit of quantification (<10 ng/L) for more than 50% of samples from the healthcare workers performing HIPEC and PIPAC. Concentrations did not differ significantly from those reported for the control group., Conclusion: There appears to be little risk of exposure to platinum drugs during HIPEC and PIPAC providing the adequate safety measures are implemented., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new drug delivery method offered in selected patients suffering from non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). As reported experience is still limited, we conducted a survey among active PIPAC centers aiming to report their technical approach and clinical findings., Methods: An online survey was sent to active PIPAC centers worldwide. The questionnaire consisted of 34 closed questions and was conducted over a period of 3 months beginning in March 2017., Results: Nine out of 15 contacted centers completed the questionnaire totaling 832 PIPAC procedures in 349 patients. Most common indications for PIPAC were PC from gastric, ovarian and colorectal origin. The mean time between each PIPAC procedure was 6-8 weeks. Seven of nine (77.8%) centers evaluate the PCI at every PIPAC procedure. At least four tissue samples for histopathology analysis were retrieved in 5 (55.6%). All centers (100%) use the same chemotherapy protocol: oxaliplatin at a dosage of 92mg/m 2 for PC of colorectal origin and a combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin at a dosage of 7.5mg/m 2 and 1.5mg/m 2 , respectively, for other types of PC. Eight centers (88.9%) perform routine radiological evaluation before first PIPAC and after third PIPAC., Conclusion: These data confirm that PIPAC procedures are homogeneously performed in established centers. Standardization of the procedure will facilitate future international multicenter prospective clinical trials., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Uterine sarcoma (US) is a rare tumor representing 1% of female genital tract malignancies. Peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) after US, diminishes median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) alone, with or without systemic chemotherapy is <1 year and 6 months, respectively. A multi-institutional review of PS from US was conducted to evaluate CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and effects on survival outcomes., Methods: A retrospective review of 36 patients from 7 specialized international centers was performed. Selection criteria included PS of uterine origin with CRS/HIPEC treatment. Clinical data were analyzed. OS and PFS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Thirty-six patients underwent a total 38 HIPEC procedures performed from 2005 to 2014; 35 previous treatment and 1 primary treatment. Twenty-nine (81%) LMS patients, 3 (8%) endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 3 (8%) adeneosarcoma (AS), and 1 (3%) categorized as other. Median PCI was 16 (range: 2-39), 10 patients had PCI ≥20. Thirty-four patients (94%) had complete cytoreduction (CC 0-1), 19 patients recurred. CRS/HIPEC OS at 1, 3, and 5-years was 75%, 53%, and 32% respectively, with median OS of 37 months (CI 95%: 20-54). PFS in 32 patients with CC at 1, 3, and 5-years was 67%, 32% and 32%, respectively with median PFS of 18.9 months (CI 95%: 6.7-31)., Conclusions: CRS/HIPEC is a promising treatment modality for patients with PS. Histological subtype may influence survival. A global prospective registry of patients to further assess the efficacy of CRS/HIPEC is needed., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcome of PIPAC in patients with non-resectable PC during our initial experience of the technique., Methods: All patients who underwent PIPAC for non-resectable PC in three centers were analyzed regarding postoperative outcomes., Results: Seventy-three patients underwent 164 PIPAC. PC was from colorectal, gastric, ovarian, malignant mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei or other origins in 20, 26, 13, 8, 1 and 5 patients respectively. Forty-five (62%), 31 (42%), 8 (11%), 6 (8%), 1 (1%) patients underwent a second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth PIPAC respectively. At the time of the first PIPAC, the median PCI was 17 (1-39), 57 patients presented with symptomatic PC (pain: 33; ascites: 35; transit disorder like diarrhea and constipation: 11). PCI improved in 64.5% of patients, 63.5% of patients presented with complete disappearance of symptoms. Major complications occurred as the outcome of 16 PIPAC (9.7%) and 5 (6.8%) patients died within 30 days of the PIPAC procedure. Rate of mortality and major complications 40% and 62% respectively occurred in first 20 treated patients. For 64 (88%) patients, systemic chemotherapy was associated with PIPAC and could be administered after PIPAC with a median delay of 14 days (2-28)., Conclusions: Implementing a PIPAC program in association with systemic chemotherapy is feasible and is associated with a risk of postoperative morbidity, even in teams highly experienced in PC management and requires a learning curve in patient selection., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Based on the importance of assessing the true extent of peritoneal disease, PeRitOneal MalIgnancy Stage Evaluation (PROMISE) internet application (www.e-promise.org) has been developed to facilitate tabulation and automatically calculate surgically validated peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and other surgically validated scores as Gilly score, simplified peritoneal cancer index (SPCI), Fagotti and Fagotti-modified scores. This application offers computer-assistance to produce simple, quick but precise and standardized pre, intra and postoperative reports of the extent of peritoneal metastases and may help specialized and non-specialized institutions in their current practice but also facilitate research and multicentre studies on peritoneal surface malignancies., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are considered the only curative treatment for many peritoneal surface malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of CRS combined with HIPEC by laparoscopy for patients with limited peritoneal disease and to compare postoperative outcomes with those for an open procedure., Methods: Between January 2011 and November 2012, all patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or multicystic mesothelioma (MM) and limited peritoneal disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index [PCI] less than 10) underwent CRS and HIPEC by a laparoscopic approach. The study cohort was matched with a historical cohort of patients with the same characteristics (completeness of cytoreduction, HIPEC agent, PCI ± 11 and age ± 20 years) treated with CRS and HIPEC by laparotomy., Results: Eight patients (five low-grade PMP and three MM) treated by a laparoscopic approach were compared to eight patients treated by laparotomy. All patients underwent complete cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC, and no conversion to laparotomy was needed. The median surgical length was 210 min (150-300) vs 240 (210-360), with a median hospital stay of 12 days (9-18) vs 19 (13-33). One patient had a postoperative complication (intraperitoneal haematoma treated by radiological drainage) vs four in the laparotomy group., Conclusion: Laparoscopic CRS combined with HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment of strictly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy and might reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have demonstrated promising results in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this combined procedure on quality of life (QoL)., Materials and Methods: A prospective single centre study of 216 consecutive patients treated with CRS and HIPEC was conducted using the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index questionnaire (GIQLI), completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months., Results: Questionnaire compliance was 81%, 90%, 89%, 89% and 74% at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. QoL was significantly decreased up to 6 months and returned to baseline at 12 months. In multivariate analysis, factors decreasing QoL were origin of PC at 3 months, presence of stoma at 6 months and length of surgery over 270 min and disease recurrence at 12 months., Conclusions: Despite morbidity associated with CRS and HIPEC, QoL returned to baseline at one year after surgery. This treatment strategy should be considered for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite a high response rate to front-line therapy, prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. Approaches that combine Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with this strategy., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort multicentric study from French centres was performed. All consecutive patients with advanced and recurrent EOC treated with CRS and HIPEC were included., Results: The study included 566 patients from 13 centres who underwent 607 procedures between 1991 and 2010. There were 92 patients with advanced EOC (first-line treatment), and 474 patients with recurrent EOC. A complete cytoreductive surgery was performed in 74.9% of patients. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity rates were 0.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median overall survivals were 35.4 months and 45.7 months for advanced and recurrent EOC, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with chemosensitive and with chemoresistant recurrence. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) that evaluated disease extent was the strongest independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in all groups., Conclusion: For advanced and recurrent EOC, curative therapeutic approach combining optimal CRS and HIPEC should be considered as it may achieve long-term survival in patients with a severe prognosis disease, even in patients with chemoresistant disease. PCI should be used for patient's selection., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition, histologically identical to ovarian serous carcinoma and often diagnosed at late stage. There is not any standardized treatment for PPSC. A retrospective multicentric study was performed in French speaking centers to evaluate cytoreduction surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from different origins. The manuscript's aim was to study the particular population with PPSC., Methods: Between September 1997 and July 2007, 36 patients with PPSC from 9 institutions underwent 39 procedures., Results: Mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6% and 20.6% respectively. The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years are respectively 93.6, 71.5 and 57.4%. The median overall survival was not reached. By univariate analysis, the only factor that had prognostic value was PCI (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: The therapeutic approach combining cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PPSC., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We present two cases of severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG>10g/l) in pregnancy. The first reports the case of a primigravida with mild HTG before conception. Triglycerides (TG) increased thereafter (20.9g/l) during pregnancy causing pancreatitis and in utero fetal death at 24 weeks' gestation (WG). The second deals with the de novo occurrence of a severe HTG (19g/l) diagnosed incidentally at 34 WG and complicated by acute renal failure. Severe HTG in pregnancy threatens maternal and fetal prognosis. We have summarized the curative and preventive management of gravidic HTG.