Search

Background: The PRODIGE-23 study showed a higher benefit for FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) as induction chemotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) respect to neoadjuvant CTRT alone both followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The added value of treatment intensification with irinotecan, over the doublet induction with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin is still debated., Objective: To assess survival, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and safety from phase II-III trials comparing triplet and doublet induction both followed by CTRT and TME in LARC., Methods: After a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings' libraries, data from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were extracted from phase II-III clinical trials. Phase II-III trials including at least one treatment arm with doublet or triplet induction chemotherapy without biological agents administered for a minimum of 3 months followed by long-course CTRT and TME and with at least 48 months of follow-up were selected. When available, the neoadjuvant CTRT alone arms of the selected studies were included as a comparator reference treatment. Individual patient DFS and OS data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots of original trials through graphical reconstruction between April 10th and May 19th, 2024. A pooled analysis was conducted, and results were validated in a subsequent network meta-analysis (NMA). pCR rates and grade ≥ 3 adverse events rates were also collected. Primary endpoints were DFS and OS between triplet and doublet induction. Secondary endpoints were DFS and OS between neoadjuvant CTRT alone and triplet or doublet induction as well as pCR rates and safety profile among different arms., Results: Out of 674 patients enrolled in 3 trials, 231, 161 and 282 were treated with FOLFIRINOX or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) followed by CTRT or neoadjuvant CTRT alone, respectively. 5-year DFS rates were 73.1 % [95 %CI: 67.2 % - 79.0 %], 61.7 % [95 %CI: 53.9 % - 69.5 %] and 65.1 % [95 %CI: 59.4 % - 70.8 %] for triplet induction, doublet induction, and neoadjuvant CTRT alone, respectively. 5-year OS rates were 86.8 % [95 %CI: 82.3 % - 91.3 %], 74.7 % [95 %CI: 67.6 % - 81.8 %], and 79.6 % [95 %CI: 74.9 % - 84.3 %] for FOLFIRINOX, CAPOX, and neoadjuvant CTRT alone, respectively. Triplet induction showed longer DFS and OS respect to doublet induction (HR for DFS: 0.67 [95 % CI 0.47 - 0.96], p = 0.03; HR for OS: 0.49 [95 % CI 0.31 - 0.78], p = 0.003) with a trend for superiority when compared with neoadjuvant CTRT alone (HR for DFS: 0.77 [95 % CI 0.57 - 1.05], p = 0.10; HR for OS: 0.67 [95 % CI 0.45 - 1.01], p = 0.06). No difference was observed between the doublet induction and neoadjuvant CTRT groups. pCR rates were higher for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (27.7 %) respect to subjects receiving CAPOX (19.7 %, p = 0.02) or neoadjuvant CTRT alone (12.5 %, p < 0.0001). Triplet was associated with higher rates of severe neutropenia (17 % vs 1 %, p < 0.0001) and nausea-vomiting (11 % vs 3 %, p = 0.02) respect to doublet induction., Conclusions: Induction with FOLFIRINOX showed better survival outcomes and pCR rates respect to CAPOX at the price of increased G3-4 neutropenia and nausea/vomiting. A randomized study comparing triplet and doublet chemotherapy in the frame of a total neoadjuvant treatment strategy is widely warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. C.C. has received honoraria for speaker or advisory roles from Bayer, Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Mirati, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Nordic Pharma and Takeda; and research grants from Bayer, Servier, Merck and Amgen.G.M. has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaux, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, MSD, Eisai, Terumo, Amgen, Merck Serono; support for attending meetings and or travel from Roche, MSD, Eisai, Terumo, Amgen, Merck Serono; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Roche,MSD, Eisai.R.M., G.V., M.C., P.C. declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy and surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly feasible and its benefit is questionable. In the last years, several total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) strategies, moving the adjuvant chemotherapy to the neoadjuvant setting, have been investigated with the aim of improving compliance to systemic chemotherapy, treating micrometastases earlier and then reducing distant recurrence., Patients and Methods: ShorTrip (NTC05253846) is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase II trial where 63 patients with LARC will be treated with short-course radiotherapy followed by intensified consolidation chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI regimen and surgery. Primary endpoint is pCR. Among the first 11 patients who started consolidation chemotherapy, a preliminary safety analysis showed a high rate of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (N = 7, 64%) during the first cycle of FOLFOXIRI. Therefore, the protocol has been emended with the recommendation to omit irinotecan during the first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy. After amendment, in a subsequent safety analysis focused on the first 9 patients treated with FOLFOX as first cycle and then with FOLFOXIRI, grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was reported in only one case during the second cycle., Aim of the Study: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and activity of a TNT strategy including SCRT, intensified consolidation treatment with FOLFOXIRI and delayed surgery. After protocol amendment, the treatment seems feasible without safety concern. Results are expected at the end of 2024., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor chances of long term survival, being < 15% of them still alive after 5 years from diagnosis. Nonetheless, patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be eligible for metastases resection thus being able to achieve long-term disease remission and survival. The likelihood for patients with CRLM of being or becoming eligible for liver metastasectomy is increasing, thanks to the evolution of surgical techniques, the availability of active systemic treatments and the widespread diffusion of experienced multidisciplinary boards to manage these patients. However, disease relapse after liver surgery is common and occurs in two-thirds of resected patients. Therefore, adequate radiological staging and risk stratification is crucial for the optimal selection of patients candidate to surgery in order to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of liver metastasectomy and to individualize the treatment strategy. Based on the multidimensional assessment, three possible approaches are available: upfront liver surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy preceding and following liver surgery, and an upfront systemic treatment including chemotherapy plus a targeted agent, both chosen according to patients' and tumours' characteristics, then followed by liver surgery if indicated. In this review, we describe the most important factors impacting the therapeutic choices in patients with resectable and potentially resectable CRLM, and we discuss the most promising factors that may reshape the future decision-making process of these patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A recent phase II randomized Japanese study reported better survival with regorafenib followed at progression by cetuximab ± irinotecan compared with the reverse standard sequence in chemo-refractory and anti-EGFR-naïve, RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC patients. Nowadays the use of anti-EGFR antibodies is more frequently anticipated to the first-line of therapy especially in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wt tumours. However, retrospective analyses and phase II single-arm trials showed promising activity of re-using anti-EGFRs in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who previously achieved benefit from a first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment. Post-hoc analyses of these trials revealed that the detection of RAS mutations in circulating tumour DNA (ct-DNA) at the time of re-treatment may be useful to identify resistant patients., Patients and Methods: PARERE (NCT04787341) is a prospective, open label, multicentre phase II study in which 214 RAS/BRAF wt chemo-refractory mCRC patients with previous benefit from first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment and RAS/BRAF wt ct-DNA in the liquid biopsy collected at the time of inclusion will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive panitumumab followed after progression by regorafenib versus the reverse sequence. Primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints are 1st-progression free-survival (PFS), 2nd-PFS, time to failure strategy, objective response rate, and safety., Aim of the Study: The aim of this study is to validate the role of anti-EGFR retreatment and its proper placement in the therapeutic route of mCRC patients selected according to the analysis of ct-DNA in liquid biopsy. Results are expected at the end of 2023., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Prolonging survival, achieving symptoms palliation and preserving quality of life are the primary therapeutic goals of treatments administered after disease progression in mCRC. Even if the impact of these therapies on the prognosis of affected patients is less relevant than the impact of the upfront treatment, tailoring the optimal second-line therapy is increasingly important. Several therapeutic options are available, and different factors including not only patient- and disease-related characteristics, but also the first-line treatment received (i.e., type, timing of disease progression, observed outcome and reported toxicities) may drive this choice. Herein, we describe the current state of the art in the landscape of treatments after progression in mCRC. Based on a critical review of the literature, we built a patient-oriented therapeutic algorithm, aiming to guide clinicians in their daily decision-making., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: On the basis of retrospective analyses and phase 2 studies, metastatic colorectal cancer patients whose disease responded to a first-line regimen containing an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agent may experience benefit from anti-EGFR readministration in later therapy lines. While the analysis of circulating tumor DNA seems a promising tool to select the best candidates for this strategy, identifying clinical predictors of anti-EGFR sensitivity would be useful to drive treatment choices in daily practice., Patients and Methods: A real-life database of 5530 patients treated at 6 institutions was queried. Included were patients who were retreated with anti-EGFRs, who had RAS/BRAF wild-type-status tissue samples, who had received a first-line anti-EGFR-based regimen with at least stable disease as best response, and who had received at least one further line of therapy before anti-EGFR retreatment. The association with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of variables potentially related to anti-EGFR sensitivity was investigated., Results: A total of 86 patients were identified. The ORR during anti-EGFR retreatment was 19.8%; median PFS and OS were 3.8 and 10.2 months, respectively. No significant association of clinical features of anti-EGFR sensitivity with ORR, PFS, and OS was observed. Among the 56 patients with a time from the last anti-EGFR administration to first-line progressive disease of < 3 months (rechallenge group), > 2 prior therapy lines and a longer anti-EGFR-free interval were associated with higher ORR, but not with longer PFS or OS., Conclusion: Clinical features we deemed surrogates of anti-EGFR sensitivity were not reliable predictors of benefit from anti-EGFR retreatment., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To understand the immune landscape of deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer (dMMR CRC) tumor microenvironment, gene expression profiling was performed by the nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. This study was conducted retrospectively on 89 dMMR-CRC samples. The expression of CD3, CD8, programmed death-1, and programmed death ligand-1 protein was evaluated on a subset of samples by immunohistochemistry, and lymphocyte density was calculated. A subset of deregulated genes was identified. Functional clustering analysis performed on these genes generated four main factors: antigen processing and presentation, with its major histocompatibility complex-II-related genes; genes correlated with the cytotoxic activity of immune system; T-cell chemotaxis/cell adhesion genes; and T-CD4 + regulator cell-related genes. A deregulation score (DS) was calculated for each sample. On the basis of their DS, tumors were then classified as COLD (DS ≤ -3) to select the samples with a strong down-regulation of the immune system and NOT COLD (DS ≥ -2). The COLD group of patients showed a worse prognosis in terms of survival considering all patients (P = 0.0172) and patients with metastatic disease (P = 0.0031). These results confirm that dMMR-CRCs do not constitute a homogeneous group as concerns the immune system activity of tumor microenvironment. In particular, the distinction between COLD and NOT COLD tumors may improve the management of these two subsets of patients., (Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adenocarcinoma with mucinous histology or mucinous component are histologic subtypes of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) with limited benefit from cytotoxic agents. Their sensitivity to anti-epithelial growth factor receptors (EGFRs) is not clear., Patients and Methods: The activity and efficacy of anti-EGFRs was retrospectively evaluated among patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC with or without mucinous histology or mucinous component. Subgroup analyses according to primary tumor location were conducted., Results: Overall, the study population included 22 mucinous or with mucinous component tumors (11 right- and 11 left-sided tumors) and 83 not mucinous tumors. One patient experienced partial response among mucinous tumors, whereas in the not mucinous group, 42 patients experienced partial response, with an overall response rate of 4% and 51%, respectively (P = .003). The median progression-free survival was 2.8 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.59; P < .001), and the median overall survival was 6.5 and 16.7 months (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.00; P = .022), for the mucinous and not mucinous groups, respectively. Similar results were observed in subgroup analysis according to primary tumor location., Conclusion: Anti-EGFRs may not provide clinically meaningful benefit in mCRCs with mucinous histology or mucinous component compared with those without mucinous component, irrespective of sidedness., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: No tools to predict the probability of extrahepatic disease progression (ePD) of initially unresectable, liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are currently available. To estimate the likelihood to develop ePD and to identify clinical and molecular factors that could predict extrahepatic progression-free survival (ePFS), we conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study., Methods: We retrospectively identified a cohort of 225 patients with initially unresectable liver-limited disease (LLD), treated from January 2004 to December 2017 with first-line doublets or triplet plus a biological agent at two Italian institutions., Results: 173 (77%) patients experienced ePD which occurred within 1, 2 or 3 years from the diagnosis of mCRC in 15%, 49% and 66% of patients, respectively. Globally, 164 (73%) patients underwent a liver resection at some point of their disease history, and 54 (33%) of them underwent a subsequent locoregional treatment. Age > 70 years, locoregional nodal involvement at diagnosis of colorectal cancer and ≥4 liver metastases were significantly associated with higher risk of ePD while liver resections were associated with reduced risk of ePD. In the multivariable model, number of liver metastases (subdistribution HR, SHR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.36; p = 0.01) and liver resections (SHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63; p = 0.001) were still associated with ePD. Number of liver metastases < 4, no nodal involvement at diagnosis and liver resections were also associated with prolonged ePFS., Conclusions: The identified clinical factors could help physicians in personalising the intensity and aggressiveness of liver-directed treatments in patients with mCRC with initially unresectable LLD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is considered a standard option in the upfront treatment of clinically selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer irrespective of RAS and BRAF molecular status. The randomised MACBETH and VOLFI studies showed that a modified FOLFOXIRI regimen in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, respectively, achieved high therapeutic activity in RAS and BRAF wild-type patients with an acceptable toxicity profile. Drawing from these considerations, we designed TRIPLETE study aiming at comparing two different chemotherapy backbones (mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6) in combination with panitumumab in the first-line treatment of patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, multicentre phase III trial in which initially unresectable and previously untreated RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients are randomised to receive a standard treatment with mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab or an experimental regimen with modified FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 , oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , L-leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 , 5-fluoruracil 2400 mg/m 2 48-hour continuous infusion) plus panitumumab up to 12 cycles, followed by panitumumab plus 5-fluorouracil and L-leucovorin until disease progression. The primary endpoint is overall response rate according to RECIST 1.1 criteria., Discussion: The relative benefit of chemotherapy intensification when using an anti-EGFR-based regimen in molecularly selected patients is unknown; TRIPLETE study aims at filling this gap of knowledge. The study is sponsored by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest Cooperative Group and is currently ongoing at 42 Italian centres., Clinical Trial Information: NCT03231722., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: BRAF V600E mutation defines a specific colorectal cancer (CRC) subgroup with poor prognosis. Promising preclinical data showed synthetically lethal activity of mitotic spindle poisons on BRAF- mutated and BRAF -like CRC models. We designed a phase II trial to test the activity of vinorelbine in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic CRC (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: Patients progressed to or not deemed eligible for standard treatments received oral (60 mg/sqm) or intravenous (25 mg/sqm) vinorelbine, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled; 75% of them were highly pretreated. No responses were observed (0%); only one patient had a confirmed disease stabilisation (5%). Median progression-free survival was 1 month (95% CI 0.8 to 1.8), median overall survival was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.6 to 3.7). No serious adverse events were observed., Conclusions: Despite encouraging preclinical data, our study did not show signs of clinical activity for vinorelbine in this patients' population. Further investigations on molecular heterogeneity and dynamic evolution of BRAF V600E mutated mCRC are needed., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: The standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (clinical tumor, node, metastases [TNM] stage II or III) is radiotherapy before surgery (with or without concomitant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) followed by surgery. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting of patients is controversial in terms of the overall benefit on survival, the subgroup of patients who might not need it, and the best regimen (combination regimens vs. fluoropyrimidine alone)., Patients and Methods: Based on the retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome of all patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma treated at our institute during the past 9 years, we comment on prognostic factors for local and distant metastases of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery, and the scientific evidence that can help to decide the adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: We conclude that pathological TNM stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (ypTNM) stage after surgery significantly affects disease-free and overall survival. In particular, patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes (ypN+) after surgery have a high probability of developing distant metastases., Conclusion: ypN+ patients are candidate for intensified adjuvant chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)