Search

Although each autoimmune disease is associated with specific tissue or organ damage, rheumatic diseases share a pro-inflammatory pattern that might increase cardiovascular risk. Retrospective and prospective studies on patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) highlighted the concept of "accelerated atherosclerosis". Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is the assessment of symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiovascular events among patients with rheumatic diseases as RA and SLE. The literature research obtained all manuscripts published in the English language between 2015 and 2019 for a total of 2355 manuscripts. After selection through inclusion and exclusion criteria, four articles examined cardiovascular risk in RA patients, 8 in SLE patients, and 2 in RA and SLE patients. Patients with SLE had a RR of 1.98 (95% CI: 1.18-3.31) of symptomatic cardiovascular events compared to the unexposed cohort. The meta-regression analysis showed that younger patient (age per year increase β = -0.12 95%CI: -0.20, -0.4), belonging to studies conducted in continent different from America (β = -0.89; -95% CI: 1.67, -0.10), after 2000 (β = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.09, 1.65) and with a higher quality score 0.80 (95% CI: 0.31, 1.29) had a higher risk of cardiovascular events. In patients with RA, the RR of cardiovascular events was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.18-2.02). These data are helpful to implement cardiovascular preventive strategies among people suffering from rheumatologic diseases to decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events. However, these implementation needs to build a higher network between rheumatologists and primary care healthcare workers to furnish the same information to patients and monitor their preventive practice compliance., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Incidence of tricuspid prosthesis replacement was 1.9% of all valvular operations performed between June 6, 1966 and April 18, 1996. Many series report similar figures, but institutional experience is limited and the consensus on treatment modalities is lacking., Methods: One hundred tricuspid operations were performed on 83 patients (46 female). A primary operation was performed in 64 cases, 13 patients had one previous operation, 4 patients had two previous operations, and 2 patients had three previous operations. Seventeen patients required a tricuspid prosthetic valve rereplacement. There were 2 emergent and 17 urgent operations. The New York Heart Association class was IV in 13 patients (mean pulmonary artery pressure, 41 mm Hg), III in 66 patients (mean pressure, 38 mm Hg), and II in 21 patients. The most frequent operation was simultaneous replacement of the mitral and tricuspid valve (41 patients). Seventy biological and 30 mechanical prostheses were used. Total follow-up time was 613 years, mean 7.4 years (median 4.2 years), with a maximum of 27.8 years, and was 92% complete., Results: Operative mortality was 24%. Survival was 0.54 (0.48 to 0.59, n = 39) at 5 years, 0.38 (0.32 to 0.44, n = 27) at 10 years, 0.31 (0.25 to 0.36, n = 19) at 15 years, 0.29 (0.23 to 0.34, n = 11) at 20 years, and 0.17 (0.098 to 0.26, n = 3) at 25 years. Early mortality was increased from higher New York Heart Association class (hazard ratio = 2.2), congenital disease (hazard ratio = 6.9), and valvuloplasty failure (hazard ratio = 4.3). The constant risk phase (4%/patient-year) after 2 years was enhanced by older operative age (hazard ratio = 1.4). Prosthetic type had no independent effect. Biological prostheses were at risk for 300 years and had a reoperation incidence of 4.7%/ patient-year (14 events); mechanical prosthesis were at risk for 137 years with a rate of 2.2%/patient-year (3 events) (p = 0.21). Three valve thromboses were observed in old-design mechanical prosthesis. Bioprosthetic degeneration showed a steeper rate after 7 years., Conclusions: This study does not show a clear superiority of biological versus mechanical prostheses. In the long run survival with mechanical prostheses could be superior, given the high rate of bioprosthetic degeneration after 7 years.