Search

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has been associated with cardiac rhythm device (CRD) implantation with intracardiac lead insertion. However, data on the incidence of postdevice TR are limited and largely from retrospective studies. We hypothesized that permanent lead implantation would be associated with an increase in TR., Methods: We prospectively included consecutive patients with a clinical indication for CRD. Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography 1 month before and 1 year after CRD implantation., Results: A total of 328 patients were prospectively enrolled (69 ± 15 years, 38% female). Echocardiograms before and 1 year after CRD were available in 290 patients (15 died, 23 lost to follow-up). Compared with baseline, there was a significant change in TR grade 1 year after CRD insertion (no/trivial TR: 66% vs 29%; mild TR: 29% vs 61%; moderate TR: 3% vs 8%; severe TR 2% vs 2%; P < 0.001 for an increase in TR by at least 1 grade). Compared with baseline, there was a higher prevalence of moderate or severe TR in the 247 patients with CRD without cardiac resynchronization therapy (4% vs 10%, P = 0.004), but no progression in the 43 patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (14% vs 11%, P = 1). Multivariable analysis in the patients with less than moderate TR at baseline (n = 274) showed that only a history of atrial fibrillation was independently associated with progression to moderate or severe TR after correction for baseline TR grade (P = 0.013)., Conclusions: One year after endocardial lead insertion, there was a 5% increase in the prevalence of moderate or severe TR, which may be clinically relevant., (Copyright © 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Angiographic and clinical parameters are poor predictors of in-stent restenosis. Bone marrow-derived CD34(+) cells that coexpress a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (kinase insert domain receptor [KDR]) are committed to endothelial lineage. Mobilization and infusion of CD34(+)/KDR(+) cells accelerates re-endothelialization and reduces neointimal thickness in vascular injury models. Bioengineered stents capturing CD34(+) cells also show expedited re-endothelialization. We examined whether circulating CD34(+)/KDR(+) cell counts can be used to predict restenosis in a bare-metal stent (BMS)., Methods: CD34(+)/KDR(+) cells were counted by flow cytometry in 124 nondiabetic patients before BMS implantation and the relation to in-stent late luminal loss (LLL) was examined by angiography at 6 months (primary end point). Neointima was also quantified as the maximum percentage area stenosis (M%AS) and percentage volume intima hyperplasia (%VIH) on intravascular ultrasonography (secondary end points)., Results: Multiple linear regression analysis, taking into account implanted stent length and diameter, revealed no relation between CD34(+)/KDR(+) cell counts and LLL (partial regression coefficient b = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.19-0.42; P = 0.46). Similarly, no relation between CD34(+)/KDR(+) cell counts and M%AS or %VIH could be demonstrated. Moreover, the increase in CD34(+)/KDR(+) cell counts over 6 months was unrelated to LLL (b = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.42-0.12; P = 0.28), M%AS, and %VIH., Conclusions: Although our study does not exclude a pathophysiologic role for CD34(+)/KDR(+) cells in the formation of neointima, cell counts before percutaneous coronary intervention proved to be unrelated to LLL or intravascular ultrasonographically derived restenosis parameters in coronary BMSs at 6 months., (Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bare-metal stents trigger a foreign body reaction, resulting in neointima formation and restenosis. Silicon carbide (SiC) coating shields the metal from circulating blood and vessel wall, both potential sources of neointima smooth muscle cells., Methods: We investigated whether SiC-coated stents (PRO-Kinetic) have lower clinical target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates than do uncoated bare-metal stents (Vision). Stents were implanted in 2731 patients during 2 consecutive 18-month periods. Clinical TLR was evaluated at 1 year., Results: In the PRO-Kinetic group, TLR was significantly higher (9.0% vs 5.6%; unadjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.08; P < 0.001) compared with the Vision group. After adjustment for postintervention minimal luminal diameter (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42-0.73), total implanted stent length (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina at initial presentation (AOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.41-2.54), and triple vessel stenting (AOR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.02-7.05), the use of PRO-Kinetic stents remained an independent predictor for revascularization (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.18-2.10; P = 0.002). Because strut thickness is lower in 2.0- to 3.0-mm PRO-Kinetic stents, a subgroup analysis (n = 2382 lesions) was performed. Even in this subgroup, PRO-Kinetic implantation proved an independent predictor of TLR (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17-2.23; P = 0.003)., Conclusion: In contrast to theoretical expectations, the SiC-coated PRO-Kinetic stent was associated with greater target lesion revascularization rates at 1 year compared with the uncoated Vision stent., (Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)