Search

Objective: The transition of Step 1 to pass/fail has generated concerns over selecting promising candidates. Holistic reviews integrate other proficiencies, including extracurriculars such as sports. Grit - defined as perseverance and passion for long-term goals - has been positively associated with competitive activities and is predictive of academic success. The prevalence and impact of sports participation and its relationship to grit in the general surgery resident population has not been described and was investigated in this study., Design: Surveys measuring sports participation and grit were distributed after the 2021 ABSITE. Grit was assessed through the short grit scale. Inferential statistics were performed., Setting/participants: General surgery residents in all US training programs who completed the 2021 ABSITE., Results: Of 5468 respondents (response rate 59.6%), 2,548 (46.7%) were female, 917 (17.4%) URiM, 2171 (39.8%) married, and 1,069 (19.6%) parents. About 4284 (83.8%) residents reported being involved in competitive sports. Grit was higher in residents with a competitive sports history (3.67 ± 0.58 versus 3.60 ± 0.61, p = 0.0022). Greater time commitment and being part of a team was positively correlated to grit (both p < 0.0001). Individuals that self-identified as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) had higher grit (3.71 ± 0.59 versus 3.65 ± 0.58 for non-URiM, p < 0.0001) as did female (p = 0.0016), married residents (p < 0.0001), and parents (p < 0.0001). Being an athlete was associated with significantly higher grit for nearly all demographic subgroups, including URiM (p = 0.0068), married (p = 0.0175), and parents (p = 0.0487)., Conclusions: Higher grit was found in athletes and marginalized groups including females, URiM, and residents that were married or parents. Our data suggests that recruiting applicants of diverse backgrounds and experiences will result in a grittier cohort; a group potentially equipped to weather the arduous surgical residency training path. Recruiting residents with characteristics associated with higher grit can potentially impact diversity of the surgical workforce., (Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with Stage IV breast cancer are living longer but breast reconstruction in this setting remains controversial. There is limited research evaluating the benefits of breast reconstruction in this patient cohort., Study Design: Drawing from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) dataset, a prospective cohort study that involved 11 leading medical centers in the US and Canada, we compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed utilizing the BREAST-Q, a condition-specific, validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for mastectomy reconstruction, as well as complications between a cohort of patients with Stage IV disease undergoing reconstruction and a control group of women with Stage I-III disease also receiving reconstruction., Results: Among the MROC population, 26 patients with Stage IV and 2613 women with Stage I-III breast cancer underwent breast reconstruction. Preoperatively, the Stage IV cohort reported significantly lower baseline scores for satisfaction with breast (p = 0.004), psychosocial well-being (p = 0.043) and sexual well-being (p = 0.001), compared with Stage I-III women. Following breast reconstruction, Stage IV patients' mean PRO scores improved over baseline and were not significantly different from those of Stage I-III reconstruction patients. There were also no significant differences in overall/any (p = 0.782), major (p = 0.751) or minor complication (p = 0.787) rates between the two groups at two years following reconstruction., Conclusions: The findings in this study suggest that breast reconstruction offers significant quality-of-life benefits for women with advanced breast cancer with no increase in postoperative complications and thus may be a reasonable option in this clinical setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no Competing Financial or Non-Financial Interests., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Residency program faculty participate in clinical competency committee (CCC) meetings, which are designed to evaluate residents' performance and aid in the development of individualized learning plans. In preparation for the CCC meetings, faculty members synthesize performance information from a variety of sources. Natural language processing (NLP), a form of artificial intelligence, might facilitate these complex holistic reviews. However, there is little research involving the application of this technology to resident performance assessments. With this study, we examine whether NLP can be used to estimate CCC ratings., Design: We analyzed end-of-rotation assessments and CCC assessments for all surgical residents who trained at one institution between 2014 and 2018. We created models of end-of-rotation assessment ratings and text to predict dichotomized CCC assessment ratings for 16 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones. We compared the performance of models with and without predictors derived from NLP of end-of-rotation assessment text., Results: We analyzed 594 end-of-rotation assessments and 97 CCC assessments for 24 general surgery residents. The mean (standard deviation) for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.84 (0.05) for models with only non-NLP predictors, 0.83 (0.06) for models with only NLP predictors, and 0.87 (0.05) for models with both NLP and non-NLP predictors., Conclusions: NLP can identify language correlated with specific ACGME Milestone ratings. In preparation for CCC meetings, faculty could use information automatically extracted from text to focus attention on residents who might benefit from additional support and guide the development of educational interventions., (Copyright © 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) after bariatric surgery may incur significant costs with no additional benefit., Objectives: To characterize patients who presented to the ED but could have been treated in an alternative setting., Setting: University hospital, United States., Methods: We identified 131 patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a single-center academic institution between 2006 and 2016 who also presented to the ED within 30 days of surgery. Preventable ED visits were identified by excluding patients with life-threatening presentations and/or use of emergent ED-specific resources. Patients with preventable ED visits were matched 1:1 to controls (no ED visit) based on procedure type and preoperative patient characteristics. Independent risk factors among patients with preventable ED visits were identified., Results: A total of 80 patients (61%) were identified as having a preventable ED visit after bariatric surgery. After multivariable logistic regression, independent risk factors associated with preventable ED visits included anxiolytic prescription at discharge (odds ratio [OR] 5.4 [95% confidence interval 1.6-18.6]; P = .007), electrolyte abnormalities (OR 4.3 [1.9-9.6]; P < .0001), and leukocytosis (OR 2.2 [1.0-4.9]; P = .048) at discharge, and number of ED visits preoperatively (OR 2.0 [1.3-3.1]; P = .001). Severe complications, reoperation rates, and 1-year patient reported outcomes did not differ between patients with preventable ED visits and their matched cohort., Conclusions: Preventable ED visits are common after bariatric surgery and are associated with risk factors that can be identified perioperatively. Identifying and triaging patients at risk for preventable ED visits may decrease unnecessary and costly visits to the ED after bariatric surgery., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) may reflect a systemic dysplastic arteriopathy, independent of a recognized connective tissue disease. It is hypothesized that RAAs are associated with an increased risk of intracranial aneurysms (IcAs). The objective of this study was to better define the association of IcAs in women with RAAs., Methods: Women aged 20 to 60 years who presented with RAAs at the University of Michigan from 2001 to 2016 were included in the study. Their clinical status and radiologic images were retrospectively reviewed, with particular attention directed to the prevalence of IcAs. Phenotypic characteristics predictive of associated cerebrovascular lesions were assessed using various statistical analyses, including binomial logistic regression., Results: Among 83 women with RAAs, the average age at the time of RAA detection was 45.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 20-60 years). Hypertension affected 56 (67.5%) patients and poorly controlled hypertension prompted imaging for suspected renal arterial disease in 12 (14.5%) patients. Multifocal fibromuscular dysplasia occurred in 12 (14.8%) of patients, and unifocal stenosis affected 7 (8.4%) patients. Imaging of the intracranial vasculature (n = 31) documented 12 aneurysms in 9 women, with the cavernous internal carotid artery being the most commonly affected artery. Among the study's patients, 20 (24.1%) had an "at-risk disorder for IcA formation," although the frequency of relevant "at-risk disorders" in those with and without IcAs was not statistically different (P = 0.21). Rupture risk defined by PHASES score was less than 1% for 10 IcAs, but 2 IcAs carried a 2.4% and 7.2% rupture risk, respectively, over a 5-year time period. Surgical management was pursued in 6 (50%) of the study's IcAs., Conclusions: Coexisting RAAs and IcAs may reflect a systemic arteriopathy. IcAs appear to occur with greater frequency in women with RAAs than the general population. This observation warrants prospective investigation as to the clinical appropriateness and relevance of cerebrovascular imaging in women with RAAs. Furthermore, this study's findings prompt further investigation of the underlying pathogenesis of what appears to be a broader and more complex arterial disease than previously recognized., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Evaluate the relationship between medical school factors (including preclinical mentorship, order of clerkships, and clerkship grades) and matching into surgical specialties., Design: Clerkship information, match data, and data on structured preclinical research obtained from 2010 to 2015 for a single institution was obtained and analyzed using multivariate analysis., Setting: University of Michigan Medical School., Participants: Seven hundred and forty-six students who took both the Internal Medicine and Surgery clerkships between 2010 and 2015 and have since participated in the match., Results: Among 740 students studied, 243 matched into a surgical field. Higher Shelf scores were associated with higher clerkship grades in Surgery and Internal Medicine. Honors or High Pass in Surgery were associated with matching into a surgical field. Structured preclinical research in Surgery and order of clerkship were not associated with matching into a surgical field., Conclusions: Students who went into surgery were more likely to receive Honors or High Pass. Preclinical choices geared toward a surgical specialty (e.g., order of clerkship and structured research) were not associated with matching into a surgical field. These data may help guide school specific advice for students., (Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bariatric surgery is underutilized., Objectives: To identify factors associated with eligible patient dropout from bariatric surgery., Setting: University hospital, United States., Methods: Eligible candidates were identified after a multidisciplinary review committee (MRC) of all patients (n = 484) who attended a bariatric surgery informational session (BIS) at a single-center academic institution in 2015. We compared patients who underwent surgery within 2 years of BIS with those who did not (i.e., dropped out) by evaluating patient, insurance, and program-specific variables. Univariate analyses and multivariable regressions were performed to identify factors associated with patient dropout among eligible candidates., Results: We identified 307 (63%) patients who underwent MRC. Thirty-three (11%) patients were deemed poor candidates and surgery was not recommended. Among eligible candidates, 82 (30%) dropped out from the program. Factors independently associated with eligible patient dropout included coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR] .13 [.02-.66]; P = .014), hypertension (OR .46 [.24-.87]; P = .017), time from BIS to MRC (OR .99 [.99-.99]; P = .002), 3 months of medically supervised weight loss documentation (OR .09 [.02-.51]; P = .007), endocrinology clearance (OR .26 [.09-.76]; P = .014), hematology clearance (OR .37 [.14-.95]; P = .039), urine drug screen testing (OR .31 [.13-.72]; P = .006), additional psychological evaluation (OR .43 [.20-.93]; P = .031), and required extra sessions with the dietician (OR .39 [.17-.92]; P = .032). Thirty-three (6.8%) patients underwent surgery at another institution, and 42% of these patients lived more than 50 miles from attended BIS site., Conclusions: Twenty-seven percent of patients did not undergo bariatric surgery at their initial site of evaluation despite being considered eligible candidates after MRC. Dropout was independently associated with patient, insurance, and program-specific variables that may represent barriers to care amenable to improvement., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Bile duct injury remains a serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy despite established criteria for the critical view of safety (CVS). Using surgical videos, we compared surgeons' willingness to divide critical structures based on their assessment of the CVS dissection., Design: Participants reviewed 20 operative videos lasting 1 minute each, edited at various points of the CVS dissection. Participants stated whether the structures were safe to divide, and if not, what steps they would take to achieve an adequate dissection. Videos were independently scored using a validated scale and categorized as an "adequate" or "inadequate" dissection based on the score. Participants were blinded to CVS score and adequacy. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement and responses were compared by univariate analysis., Setting: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Tertiary care university hospital., Participants: General surgery residents (n = 13) and faculty (n = 13) at the study institution., Results: There was minimal agreement on willingness to divide critical structures among all participants (κ = 0.25), among faculty (κ = 0.30), and among residents (κ = 0.21). Participants were more willing to divide critical structures when videos showed an adequate CVS dissection (CVS score ≥ 4) than an inadequate dissection (CVS score ≤ 3) (60.4% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.043). For inadequate dissections, participants most commonly recommended further dissection of the hepatocystic triangle (30.8%). There was no significant difference in the rate of unsafe practices (choosing to divide critical structures for videos with an "inadequate" dissection) between faculty and residents (14.2% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.781)., Conclusions: There was minimal agreement on what constituted a safe CVS dissection and there was no difference in the rate of unsafe practices between trainees and faculty. Education may play a more important role than experience when building a culture of safety for laparoscopic cholecystectomy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Feedback is critical to the development of medical students. To enhance feedback, we created a web application, the Minute Feedback System (MFS). This app allows students to request precise, timely, written feedback from residents and staff without the burden of vague, end-of-rotation surveys. In this study, we investigate variations in response rates and feedback fatigue based on sex and rank (resident/fellow vs. faculty)., Design: Data were collected from May 2015-October 2016. The MFS stores student requests for feedback along with faculty responses allowing for analysis of feedback response rate as well as sex and rank identification. Variation in response rate was analyzed using Chi-square and log-rank testing. Feedback fatigue was assessed using Cox regression modeling., Setting: University Affiliated, Tertiary Care Center., Participants: Medical Students, Residents and Faculty., Results: About 98.6% of students (138 women, 140 men) used the MFS on their surgery clerkship. They requested feedback from 159 trainees (residents or fellows) and 114 surgical faculty. Feedback was requested more from faculty (26.3 requests per individual) compared to trainees (16.4 requests per individual). The overall evaluator response rate was 60%. Male students were 13% less likely to receive feedback than female students. There was a higher prevalence of feedback fatigue among female faculty (11% less likely to respond) and residents (23% less likely to respond). Regression analysis showed that the overall hazard of nonresponse over time was 1.05, indicative of overall feedback fatigue among all respondents., Conclusions: The MFS is a novel tool for feedback used by nearly all M3 students during their surgery clerkship at our institution. Evaluation of response rates demonstrated feedback fatigue, especially among women faculty and residents. Feedback fatigue was more likely to affect male students, although the reason for this is unclear. Further analysis is necessary to understand this sex-associated response disparity and its effect on student feedback in the learning environment., (Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)