10 results on '"Matsunaga, Shunji"'
Search Results
2. Contributors
- Author
-
Abel, Mark F., primary, Abumi, Kuniyoshi, additional, Adams, Mark S., additional, Alberstone, Cary D., additional, Alexander, Joseph T., additional, Anson, John A., additional, Apfelbaum, Ronald I., additional, Arnold, Paul M., additional, Babat, L. Brett, additional, Bailes, Julian E., additional, Baisden, Jamie, additional, Baldwin, Nevan G., additional, Ball, Perry A., additional, Barolat, Giancarlo, additional, Batjer, H. Hunt, additional, Bauer, Thomas W., additional, Bean, James R., additional, Beerle, Brion J., additional, Bell, Gordon R., additional, Bennett, Gregory J., additional, Benzel, Edward C., additional, Bergey, Darren, additional, Bertrand, Marc L., additional, Bilsky, Mark H., additional, Birch, Barry D., additional, Biscup, Robert S., additional, Blaylock, Kevin, additional, Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba, additional, Boakye, Maxwell, additional, Boden, Scott D., additional, Bohlman, Henry, additional, Bolesta, Michael, additional, Bondy, Mary B., additional, Boxell, Christopher M., additional, Bridwell, Keith H., additional, Brodke, Darrell S., additional, Butler, James, additional, Cahill, David W., additional, Cantu, Robert C., additional, Carl, Allen L., additional, Carrino, John A., additional, Caruso, John R., additional, Chenelle, Andrew G., additional, Cheng, Joseph S., additional, Cho, Yong-Jun, additional, Choudhri, Tanvir F., additional, Conguista, Frank, additional, Connolly, Edward S., additional, Cooper, Paul R., additional, Coumans, Jean-Valéry C.E., additional, Cram, Albert E., additional, Crockard, H. Alan, additional, Crownover, Richard, additional, Cunningham, Bryan W., additional, Curry, William T., additional, Cusick, Joseph F., additional, Daffner, Scott D., additional, D'Alise, Mark D., additional, Deshmukh, Vinay, additional, DiAngelo, Denis, additional, Dickman, Curtis A., additional, Ducker, Thomas B., additional, Dull, Scott T., additional, Dunsker, Stewart B., additional, Ebersold, Michael J., additional, Eckhardt, Jason, additional, Ehni, Bruce L., additional, Eichenbaum, Matthew, additional, Eichholz, Kurt M., additional, Eichler, Marc E., additional, Elbabaa, Samer K., additional, Emery, Sanford E., additional, Epstein, Nancy E., additional, Erdos, Jennifer, additional, Errico, Thomas J., additional, Faciszewski, Tom, additional, Fehlings, Michael G., additional, Ferrara, Lisa A., additional, Fessler, Richard G., additional, Foley, Kevin T., additional, Galler, Robert M., additional, German, John W., additional, Ghanayem, Alexander J., additional, Ghogawala, Zoher, additional, Goel, Vijay K., additional, Goffin, Jan, additional, Gokaslan, Ziya L., additional, Gollogly, Sohrab, additional, Gonzalez-Martinez, Jorge, additional, Greensmith, James E., additional, Gross, Jeffrey D., additional, Haid, Regis W., additional, MD, Andrea L. Halliday, additional, Hamilton, Allan J., additional, Hanbali, Fadi, additional, Harms, Jürgen, additional, Harrop, James S., additional, Hart, Blaine I., additional, Hart, Robert A., additional, Heary, Robert F., additional, Henderson, Fraser C., additional, Hitchon, Patrick W., additional, Hollowell, James P., additional, Holman, Paul J., additional, Houten, John K., additional, Isaacs, Robert E., additional, Ito, Manabu, additional, Jane, John A., additional, Johnson, J. Patrick, additional, Kager, Christopher, additional, Kalfas, Iain H., additional, Kaptain, George J., additional, Khairi, Saad, additional, Kim, Daniel H., additional, Kim, David H., additional, Kopitnik, Thomas A., additional, Kowalski, Robert J., additional, Krishnaney, Ajit A., additional, Lancon, John A., additional, Lanzino, Giuseppe, additional, Larson, Sanford J., additional, Lastra-Power, Jorge, additional, Lebwohl, Nathan H., additional, Lieberman, Isador H., additional, Long, Donlin M., additional, Luciano, Mark G., additional, Luevano, Charles A., additional, Madsen III, Parley M., additional, Maiman, Dennis J., additional, Malik, Jacek M., additional, Malone, David G., additional, Maroon, Joseph C., additional, Massicotte, Eric M., additional, Matsunaga, Shunji, additional, Mazanec, Daniel J., additional, McAfee, Paul C., additional, McCormack, Bruce M., additional, McCormick, Paul C., additional, McCormick, William E., additional, McGuire, Robert A., additional, McLain, Robert F., additional, Mekhail, Nagy, additional, Melton, D. Mark, additional, Miller, Carole A., additional, Miller, Jared H., additional, Min, Sung, additional, Mitchell, William, additional, Mizuno, Junichi, additional, Modic, Michael T., additional, Morgan, Howard W., additional, Morlock, Robert J., additional, Morone, Michael A., additional, Mueller, Wade M., additional, Mummaneni, Praveen V., additional, Myseros, John S., additional, Naderi, Sait, additional, Nair, Dileep, additional, Nakagawa, Hiroshi, additional, Nieto, Jaime H., additional, Nockels, Russ P., additional, Northrup, Bruce E., additional, Ohaegbulam, Chima, additional, Oktenoglu, Tunc, additional, Ordonez, Bernardo Jose, additional, Owen, Jeffrey H., additional, Özer, A. Fahir, additional, Papadopoulos, Stephen M., additional, Paramore, Christopher G., additional, Pashman, Robert S., additional, Peacock, Warwick J., additional, Pelofsky, Stanley, additional, Perin, Noel I., additional, Pham, Christopher J., additional, Placide, Rick J., additional, Prpa, Branko, additional, Przybylski, Gregory J., additional, Ragab, Ashraf A., additional, Rampersaud, Y. Raja, additional, Rasmussen, Peter A., additional, Raynor, Richard B., additional, Rea, Gary L., additional, Rechtine, Glenn R., additional, Regan, John, additional, Rengachary, Setti S., additional, Resnick, Daniel K., additional, Rhines, Laurence D., additional, Rhoton, Albert J., additional, Rodriguez, Donna J., additional, Rodts, Gerald E., additional, Rosner, Michael J., additional, Sah, Alexander, additional, Salinsky, Jared P., additional, Santiago, Paul, additional, Sarkarati, Mehdi, additional, Saunders, Richard L., additional, Sawin, Paul D., additional, Scheid, Edward H., additional, Schmidt, Meic H., additional, Schneier, Michael, additional, Sengupta, Dilip K., additional, Shaffrey, Christopher I., additional, Shaffrey, Mark E., additional, Sharan, Alok D., additional, Sharan, Ashwini D., additional, Shields, Christopher B., additional, Simeone, Frederick A., additional, Singh, Kern, additional, Singh, Ran Vijai P., additional, Smith, Donald A., additional, Smith, Maurice M., additional, Sonntag, Volker K.H., additional, Sosa, Ivan J., additional, Speck, Micheal J., additional, Spetzler, Robert F., additional, Sridharan, Sudhakar T., additional, Staudt, Loretta A., additional, Steinmetz, Michael P., additional, Stillerman, Charles B., additional, Suda, Kota, additional, Suys, Sonia, additional, Sypert, George W., additional, Tator, Charles H., additional, Theodore, Nicholas, additional, Thomas, Ajith J., additional, Thomas, Nicholas W.M., additional, Tibbs, Robert E., additional, Togawa, Daisuke, additional, Tomecek, Frank J., additional, Toselli, Richard M., additional, Traynelis, Vincent C., additional, Trost, Gregory R., additional, Truumees, Eeric, additional, Tye, Gary W., additional, Uddin, Abm Salah, additional, Vaccaro, Alexander R., additional, Vaicys, Ceslovas, additional, Valadka, Alex, additional, Vardiman, Arnold B., additional, Virella, Anthony A., additional, Vitarbo, Elizabeth, additional, Vitaz, Todd W., additional, Vollmer, Dennis G., additional, Voyadzis, Jean-Marc, additional, Ward, John D., additional, Watson, Joseph, additional, Webb, John K., additional, Weinstein, Philip R., additional, Weiser, Martin W., additional, Welch, William C., additional, Weller, Simcha J., additional, Westerlund, L. Erik, additional, White, Jonathan A., additional, Whitfield, Melvin D., additional, Wiggins, Gregory C., additional, Wilberger, Jack E., additional, Wilke, William S., additional, Wiseman, Diana Barrett, additional, Wolcott, W. Putnam, additional, Woodard, Eric J., additional, Yazback, Philip, additional, Yoganandan, Narayan, additional, Yonemura, Kenneth S., additional, Yonenobu, Kazuo, additional, Yuan, Hansen A., additional, Zeidman, Seth M., additional, Zide, Barry M., additional, and Zileli, Mehmet, additional
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The impact of diabetes mellitus on spinal fracture with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A multicenter retrospective study.
- Author
-
Yamamoto T, Okada E, Michikawa T, Yoshii T, Yamada T, Watanabe K, Katsumi K, Hiyama A, Watanabe M, Nakagawa Y, Okada M, Endo T, Shiraishi Y, Takeuchi K, Matsunaga S, Maruo K, Sakai K, Kobayashi S, Ohba T, Wada K, Ohya J, Mori K, Tsushima M, Nishimura H, Tsuji T, Koda M, Okawa A, Yamazaki M, Matsumoto M, and Watanabe K
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Diabetes Mellitus epidemiology, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal complications, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal diagnostic imaging, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal surgery, Spinal Fractures complications, Spinal Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Background: Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are susceptible to spinal column injuries with neurological deterioration. Previous studies indicated that the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with DISH was higher than that in patients without DISH. This study investigates the impact of DM on surgical outcomes for spinal fractures in patients with DISH., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 177 spinal fractures in patients with DISH (132 men and 45 women; mean age, 75 ± 10 years) who underwent surgery from a multicenter database. The subjects were classified into two groups according to the presence of DM. Perioperative complications, neurological status by Frankel grade, mortality rate, and status of surgical site infection (SSI) were compared between the two groups., Results: DM was present in 28.2% (50/177) of the patients. The proportion of men was significantly higher in the DM group (DM group: 86.0% vs. non-DM group: 70.1%) (p = 0.03). The overall complication rate was 22.0% in the DM group and 19.7% in the non-DM group (p = 0.60). Poisson regression model revealed that SSI was significantly associated with DM (DM group: 10.0% vs. non-DM group: 2.4%, Relative risk: 4.5) (p = 0.048). Change in neurological status, mortality rate, instrumentation failure, and nonunion were similar between both groups. HbA1c and fasting blood glucose level (SSI group: 7.2% ± 1.2%, 201 ± 67 mg/dL vs. non-SSI group: 6.6% ± 1.1%, 167 ± 47 mg/dL) tended to be higher in patients with SSI; however, there was no significant difference., Conclusions: In spinal fracture in patients with DISH, although DM was an associated factor for SSI with a relative risk of 4.5, DM did not negatively impact neurological recovery. Perioperative glycemic control may be useful for preventing SSI because fasting blood glucose level was high in patients with SSI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Tatsuya Yamamoto, Eijiro Okada, Toshitaka Yoshii, Tsuyoshi Yamada, Kei Watanabe, Keiichi Katsumi, Akihiko Hiyama, Masahiko Watanabe, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Motohiro Okada, Teruaki Endo, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Kazuhiro Takeuchi, Shunji Matsunaga, Keishi Maruo, Kenichiro Sakai, Sho Kobayashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Kanichiro Wada, Junichi Ohya, Kanji Mori, Mikito Tsushima, Hirosuke Nishimura, Takashi Tsuji, Masao Koda, Atsushi Okawa, Masashi Yamazaki, Morio Matsumoto, and Kota Watanabe were received a Japanese Health Labor Sciences Research Grant No.038. The other doctor has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Risk factors for delayed diagnosis of spinal fracture associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A nationwide multiinstitution survey.
- Author
-
Kobayashi K, Okada E, Yoshii T, Tsushima M, Yamada T, Watanabe K, Katsumi K, Hiyama A, Katoh H, Watanabe M, Nakagawa Y, Okada M, Endo T, Shiraishi Y, Takeuchi K, Matsunaga S, Maruo K, Sakai K, Kobayashi S, Ohba T, Wada K, Ohya J, Mori K, Nishimura H, Tsuji T, Watanabe K, Okawa A, Matsumoto M, and Imagama S
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delayed Diagnosis, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal diagnosis, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fractures diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fractures epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Patients with DISH are susceptible to spinal fractures and subsequent neurological impairment, including after minor trauma. However, DISH is often asymptomatic and fractures may have minimal symptoms, which may lead to delayed diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for delayed diagnosis of spinal fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)., Methods: The subjects were 285 patients with DISH surgically treated at 18 medical centers from 2005 to 2015. Cause of injury, imaging findings, neurological status at the times of injury and first hospital examination, and the time from injury to diagnosis were recorded. A delayed diagnosis was defined as that made >24 h after injury., Results: Main causes of injury were minor trauma due to a fall from a standing or sitting position (51%) and high-energy trauma due to a fall from a high place (29%) or a traffic accident (12%). Delayed diagnosis occurred in 115 patients (40%; 35 females, 80 males; mean age 76.0 ± 10.4 years), while 170 (60%; 29 females, 141 males; mean age 74.6 ± 12.8 years) had early diagnosis. Delayed group had a significantly higher rate of minor trauma (n = 73, 63% vs. n = 73, 43%), significantly more Frankel grade E (intact neurological status) cases at the time of injury (n = 79, 69% vs. n = 73, 43%), and greater deterioration of Frankel grade from injury to diagnosis (34% vs. 8%, p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, a minor trauma fall (OR 2.08; P < 0.05) and Frankel grade E at the time of injury (OR 2.29; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with delayed diagnosis., Conclusion: In patients with DISH, it is important to keep in mind the possibility of spinal fracture, even in a situation in which patient sustained only minor trauma and shows no neurological deficit. This is because delayed diagnosis of spinal fracture can cause subsequent neurological deterioration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, Eijiro Okada, Toshitaka Yoshii, Mikito Tsushima, Tsuyoshi Yamada, Kei Watanabe, Keiichi Katsumi, Hiroyuki Katoh, Akihiko Hiyama, Masahiko Watanabe, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Motohiro Okada, Teruaki Endo, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Kazuhiro Takeuchi, Shunji Matsunaga, Keishi Maruo, Kenichiro Sakai, Sho Kobayashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Kanichiro Wada, Junichi Ohya, Kanji Mori, Hirosuke Nishimura, Takashi Tsuji, Kota Watanabe, Atsushi Okawa, Morio Matsumoto, and Shiro Imagama were received a Japanese Health Labor Sciences Research Grant No.038. Tsuyoshi Yamada, Akihiko Hiyama, Hiroyuki Katoh, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Kazuhiro Takeuchi, Kenichiro Sakai, Kanichiro Wada, Kota Watanabe, and Morio Matsumoto were received a Japan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentJP15ek0109136., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale predicts postoperative fall risk in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
- Author
-
Kimura A, Takeshita K, Inoue H, Inose H, Yoshii T, Maekawa A, Endo K, Miyamoto T, Furuya T, Nakamura A, Mori K, Seki S, Kanbara S, Imagama S, Matsunaga S, Yamazaki M, and Okawa A
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Locomotion, Prospective Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Spinal Cord Diseases diagnosis, Spinal Cord Diseases surgery
- Abstract
Background: Falling is one of the main reasons for which older adults require nursing care. Locomotive syndrome (LS) predicts the need for nursing care; however, the relationship between falling and LS remains unclarified. This study aimed to determine whether the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5) predicts postoperative fall risk in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)., Methods: This study is a post hoc analysis of the data from a prospective cohort of patients undergoing surgery for DCM. Participants recorded their falls in a fall diary from the time of study enrollment (baseline) to 1 year postoperatively. Functional assessments were conducted at baseline, hospital admission for surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Outcome measures included the GLFS-5, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Risk factors for falls were investigated, including previous falls, number of medications, and grip strength. Fallers were divided into two categories: all fallers (≥1 falls), and recurrent fallers (≥2 falls). Variables that were significant in univariate analyses were applied in multiple logistic regression models to adjust for confounders., Results: From the initial group of 168 participants, 159 attended the 1-year follow-up, and 132 fall diaries were retrieved and analyzed. Of these 132 patients, 42 (32%) reported at least one fall, while 25 (19%) reported recurrent falls during the postoperative observation period. The GLFS-5 significantly increased from baseline to admission, and significantly decreased from admission to 1 year postoperatively. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of postoperative recurrent falls were previous falls and a higher baseline GLFS-5. The optimal cut-off value of GLFS-5 for predicting all falls/recurrent falls was 12., Conclusions: The GLFS-5 reflected time-dependent functional changes in patients undergoing surgery for DCM. Previous falls and a higher baseline GLFS-5 were independent predictors of postoperative recurrent falls., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Spinal fractures in patients with Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis:A nationwide multi-institution survey.
- Author
-
Okada E, Yoshii T, Yamada T, Watanabe K, Katsumi K, Hiyama A, Watanabe M, Nakagawa Y, Okada M, Endo T, Shiraishi Y, Takeuchi K, Matsunaga S, Maruo K, Sakai K, Kobayashi S, Ohba T, Wada K, Ohya J, Mori K, Tsushima M, Nishimura H, Tsuji T, Okawa A, Matsumoto M, and Watanabe K
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Fracture Fixation, Humans, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal diagnostic imaging, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Spinal Fractures diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fractures surgery, Spinal Fusion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal complications, Spinal Fractures etiology
- Abstract
Background: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) increases the spine's susceptibility to unstable fractures that can cause neurological deterioration. However, the detail of injury is still unclear. A nationwide multicenter retrospective study was conducted to assess the clinical characteristics and radiographic features of spinal fractures in patients with DISH., Methods: Patients were eligible for this study if they 1) had DISH, defined as flowing ossification along the anterolateral aspect of at least four contiguous vertebral bodies, and 2) had an injury in the ankylosing spine. This study included 285 patients with DISH (221 males, 64 females; mean age 75.2 ± 9.5 years)., Results: The major cause of injury was falling from a standing or sitting position; this affected 146 patients (51.2%). Diagnosis of the fracture was delayed in 115 patients (40.4%). Later neurological deterioration by one or more Frankel grade was seen in 87 patients (30.5%). The following factors were significantly associated with neurological deficits: delayed diagnosis (p = 0.033), injury of the posterior column (p = 0.021), and the presence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (n = 241, 84.6%) were treated surgically, most commonly by conventional open posterior fixation (n = 199, 69.8%). Neurological improvement was seen in 20.0% of the conservatively treated patients, and in 47.0% of the patients treated surgically., Conclusions: Minor trauma could cause spinal fractures in DISH patients. Delayed diagnosis, injury of the posterior column, and the presence of OPLL were significantly associated with neurological deterioration. Patients with neurological deficits or unstable fractures should be treated by fixation surgery., (Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale predicts the risk of recurrent falls in postoperative patients with cervical myelopathy.
- Author
-
Kimura A, Takeshita K, Inoue H, Seichi A, Kawasaki Y, Yoshii T, Inose H, Furuya T, Takeuchi K, Matsunaga S, Seki S, Tsushima M, Imagama S, Koda M, Yamazaki M, Mori K, Nishimura H, Endo K, Yamada K, Sato K, and Okawa A
- Subjects
- Accidental Falls prevention & control, Aged, Area Under Curve, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Geriatric Assessment methods, Humans, Japan, Male, Neurosurgical Procedures methods, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications physiopathology, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Spinal Cord Diseases complications, Spinal Cord Diseases diagnosis, Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Accidental Falls statistics & numerical data, Locomotion physiology, Neurosurgical Procedures adverse effects, Spinal Cord Diseases surgery, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Abstract
Background: Fall-induced injuries represent a major public health concern for older individuals. The relationship between risk of falling and the severity of locomotive syndrome (LS) remains largely unknown., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone surgery from January 2012 to December 2013 and completed at least 1 year of follow-up at 12 participating institutes. Patients completed a questionnaire survey regarding their fall experience during a routine postoperative follow-up. Questionnaire items included the number of falls during the prior postoperative year and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). The severity of cervical myelopathy was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. We analyzed the association between the incidence of falling and the severity of LS measured by the GLFS-25., Results: Of 360 patients, 61 (16.9%) experienced 1 fall; 31 (8.6%), 2-3 falls; 4 (1.1%), 4-5 falls; and 6 (1.7%), ≥6 falls during the first postoperative year. Thus, 102 (28%) patients experienced at least 1 fall, and 41 (11%) experienced recurrent falls (2 or more falls) during the time period. The mean GLFS-25 score was 30.2 ± 22.7, and 242 (62%) patients had GLFS-25 scores of 16 or higher, which fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for LS. When subjects were categorized into recurrent fallers and non-recurrent fallers, recurrent fallers had a significantly higher GLFS-25 score and a significantly lower extremity motor function score of the JOA score than non-recurrent fallers. The GLFS-25 and lower extremity motor function score of the JOA score yielded the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.674 and 0.607, respectively, to differentiate recurrent fallers from non-recurrent fallers., Conclusion: Postoperative patients with cervical myelopathy had a 62% prevalence of LS. The GLFS-25 may be useful to predict the risk of recurrent falls in patients with cervical myelopathy., (Copyright © 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers.
- Author
-
Hashizume H, Konno S, Takeshita K, Fukui M, Takahashi K, Chiba K, Miyamoto M, Matsumoto M, Kasai Y, Kanamori M, Matsunaga S, Hosono N, Kanchiku T, Taneichi H, Tanaka N, Kanayama M, Shimizu T, and Kawakami M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Back Pain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Orthopedics, Reference Values, Societies, Medical, Young Adult, Low Back Pain diagnosis, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Abstract
Background: In 2007, the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was established to overcome the limitations of the original JOA scoring system developed in 1986. Although this new self-administered questionnaire is a more accurate outcome measure for evaluating patients with low back pain, physicians were unable to as certain the exact status of a patient at a single time point because of a lack of reference values. This study aimed to establish the reference values of JOABPEQ in different age and gender groups using data obtained from healthy volunteers., Methods: This study was conducted in 21 university hospitals and affiliated hospitals from October 2012 to July 2013. The JOABPEQ includes 25 questions that yield five domains to evaluate individuals with low back pain from five different perspectives. A total of 1,456 healthy volunteers (719 men, 737 women; age range, 20-89 years) answered the questionnaire. The differences in scores according to age and gender were examined by non-parametric tests., Results: The JOABPEQ scores significantly decreased with age in the domains of lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, and social life dysfunction. In these three domains, the median scores approached the 100 possible points in individuals aged 20-70 for both genders. However, the median scores for lumbar spine dysfunction and social life dysfunction decreased to 83.0 and 65.0-78.0 points, respectively, in individuals in their 80 s and 70-80 s, respectively; and the scores for gait disturbance decreased to 93.0 and 71.0 points for males and females in their 80 s. Overall, the median scores for pain-related and psychological disorders were 100 and 60.0-72.0 points, respectively., Conclusion: The reference values for JOABPEQ according to age and gender were established herein. Patients with low back pain should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking these reference values into account.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. New classification system for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament using CT images.
- Author
-
Kawaguchi Y, Matsumoto M, Iwasaki M, Izumi T, Okawa A, Matsunaga S, Chiba K, Tsuji T, Yamazaki M, Fujimori T, Yoshii T, and Toyama Y
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament classification, Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament diagnostic imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Abstract
Background: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is most frequently seen in the cervical spine. The types of cervical OPLL are classified into continuous, mixed, segmental, and other based on plain lateral X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is often used in clinical practice for evaluating ossified lesions as it can detect their precise location, size, and shape. However, to date, no CT classification of OPLL lesions has been proposed., Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with cervical OPLL by plain radiograph were included in this study. Sagittal and axial CT images of the cervical spine were obtained. We propose three classification systems: A, B, and axial. Classification A comprises two lesion types: bridge and nonbridge. Classification B requires examiners to describe all vertebral and intervertebral levels where OPLL exits in the cervical spine. Axial classification comprises central and lateral lesions identified on axial CT images. Seven observers evaluated CT images using this classification system, and intra- and interrater reliability were examined., Results: Averaged Fleiss' kappa coefficient of interrater agreement was 0.43 ± 0.26 among the seven observers, averaged intrarater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 72.4 ± 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.5-76.8]. Fifty-four patients (37.5%) had the bridge type and 90 the nonbridge type according to Classification A; 102 (70.8%) had central and 42 (29.2%) lateral OPLL in the axial classification. Four representative cases defined according to the three classification types are reported here., Conclusion: Subcommittee members of the Investigation Committee on the Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare propose three new classification systems of cervical OPLL based on CT imaging: A, B, and axial.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): an average score of healthy volunteers.
- Author
-
Tanaka N, Konno S, Takeshita K, Fukui M, Takahashi K, Chiba K, Miyamoto M, Matsumoto M, Kasai Y, Kanamori M, Matsunaga S, Hosono N, Kanchiku T, Taneichi H, Hashizume H, Kanayama M, Shimizu T, and Kawakami M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Humans, Japan epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Spinal Cord Diseases epidemiology, Spinal Cord Diseases psychology, Young Adult, Health Status Indicators, Healthy Volunteers, Orthopedics, Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods, Societies, Medical, Spinal Cord Diseases diagnosis, Surveys and Questionnaires standards
- Abstract
Background: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of patients with cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score) and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients' satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health, which can be affected by cervical myelopathy. In 2007, a new outcome measure, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), which is a self-administered questionnaire, was developed. However, the influence of age and gender on the scores has not been fully examined. The purpose of this study was to establish the standard value of the JOACMEQ by age using healthy volunteers., Methods: This study was conducted in 23 university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals from September to December 2011. The questionnaire included 24 questions for evaluation of physical function of the cervical spine and spinal cord. A total of 1,629 healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. The ages ranged from 20 to 89 years old., Results: The volunteers comprised 798 men and 831 women. In the elderly healthy volunteers, the JOACMEQ scores decreased with age. In general, the scores for cervical spine function and upper/lower extremity function were retained up to the 60s, then decreased in the 70s and 80s. The scores for quality of life were retained up to the 70s; however, the score for bladder function was retained up to the 40s, then declined with age from the 50s to 80s., Conclusion: The standard values of the JOACMEQ by age were established. Differences in the scores were found among different generations. Patients with cervical myelopathy should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking into account the standard values according to different ages.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.