Search

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil involves primary radiation therapy (RT) or surgical resection. Historically, if RT was the primary or adjuvant treatment modality, most of the bilateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) were treated electively with a therapeutic dose for subclinical disease, regardless of whether radiographically pathologic lymph nodes were seen on initial diagnostic imaging. De-escalation strategies include the incorporation of transoral surgery with the goal to either eliminate or reduce the dose of adjuvant RT or chemotherapy. Transoral surgery does not include elective removal of the RPLNs, and no guideline or outcome paper recommends adjuvant RT specifically to electively treat RPLNs. In this Topic Discussion, we discuss pertinent literature and suggest management decisions. The management decisions discussed in this Topic Discussion pertain to only tonsillar primaries and not those of the soft palate or base of the tongue., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOH) can influence access to cancer care, clinical trials, and oncologic outcomes. We investigated the association between SDOH, distance from treatment center, and treatment type with outcomes in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [HPV(+)OPSCC] patients treated at a tertiary care center., Study Design: Retrospective review., Methods: HPV(+)OPSCC patients treated surgically from 2006 to 2021 were selected from our departmental Oropharyngeal Cancer RedCap database. Demographic data, treatment, and oncologic outcomes were extracted. Distance was calculated in miles between the centroid of each patient zip code and our hospital zip code (zipdistance)., Results: 874 patients (89 % male; mean age: 58 years) were identified. Most patients (96 %) reported Non-Hispanic White as their primary race. 204 patients (23 %) had a high-school degree or less, 217 patients (25 %) reported some college education or a 2-year degree, 153 patients (18 %) completed a four-year college degree, and 155 patients (18 %) had post-graduate degrees. Relative to those with a high-school degree, patients with higher levels of education were more likely to live further away from our institution (p < 0.0001). Patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy elsewhere lived, on average, 104 miles further away than patients receiving radiation at our institution (Estimate 104.3, 95 % CI 14.2-194.4, p-value = 0.02). In univariable Cox PH models, oncologic outcomes did not significantly differ by zipdistance., Conclusions: Education level-and access to resources-varied proportionally to a patient's distance from our center. Patients travelling further distances for surgical management of OPSCC were more likely to pursue adjuvant radiation therapy at an outside institution. Distance traveled was not associated with oncologic outcomes. Breaking down barriers to currently excluded populations may improve access to clinical trials and improve oncologic outcomes for diverse patient populations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Early identification of human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+)OPSCC) is challenging and novel biomarkers are needed. We hypothesized that a panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) found in HPV(+) cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) will have similar discrimination in HPV(+)OPSCC tissues., Materials and Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained from patients with primary HPV(+)OPSCC or HPV(+)CSCC; control tissues included normal oropharynx palatine tonsil (NOP) and cervix (NCS). Using a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, 21 previously validated cervical MDMs were evaluated on tissue-extracted DNA. Discrimination between case and control cervical and oropharynx tissue was assessed using area under the curve (AUC)., Results: 34 HPV(+)OPSCC, 36 HPV(+)CSCC, 26 NOP, and 24 NCS patients met inclusion criteria. Within HPV(+)CSCC, 18/21 (86%) of MDMs achieved an AUC ≥ 0.9 and all MDMs exhibited better than chance classifications relative to control cervical tissue (all p < 0.001). In contrast, within HPV(+)OPSCC only 5/21 (24%) MDMs achieved an AUC ≥ 0.90 but 19/21 (90%) exhibited better than chance classifications relative to control tonsil tissue (all p < 0.001). Overall, 13/21 MDMs had statistically significant lower AUCs in the oropharyngeal cohort compared to the cervical cohort, and only 1 MDM exhibited a statistically significant increase in AUC., Conclusions: Previously validated MDMs exhibited robust performance in independent HPV(+)CSCC patients. However, most of these MDMs exhibited higher discrimination for HPV(+)CSCC than for HPV(+)OPSCC. This suggests that each SCC subtype requires a unique set of MDMs for optimal discrimination. Future studies are necessary to establish an MDM panel for HPV(+)OPSCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Messrs. Taylor and Mahoney, and Drs. Van Abel, Routman, Ma, and Kisiel have disclosed inventions of Mayo Clinic intellectual property that are licensed to Exact Sciences (Madison, WI) for which they could earn royalties, paid to Mayo Clinic., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate and describe the patterns of regional metastases and recurrences after surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC)., Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OPSCC from 2006 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Only patients treated with surgery including a neck dissection were included. Patients with unknown human papillomavirus (HPV) status, prior head and neck cancer, distant metastases, or synchronous head and neck cancer were excluded., Results: A total of 928 patients were included. 89% were males, the average age was 58.6 years (range: 25.2-87.5), 874 (94%) were HPV(+), and 513 (55.3%) had a tonsil cancer. Among cN + patients, the most commonly involved levels at presentation were level II (85.2%), level III (33.3%), and level IV (9.4%). In cN0 patients, metastases were only observed in level II (16.2%) and level III (9.2%). Nodal recurrence occurred in 48 (5.2%) patients after a median time of 1.0 years (interquartile range: 0.6-2.0). Nodal recurrence incidence was similar in HPV(+) and HPV(-) patients (5.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.44). The most common levels for regional recurrence were ipsilateral level II (45.8%), contralateral level II (43.8%), and ipsilateral level V (25.0%). Multivariable analysis revealed that pN was a significant predictor for regional recurrence (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: There is no difference in the distribution of regional metastases and recurrences in HPV(+) and HPV(-) OPSCC patients. Our findings align with the established understanding that regional metastases predominantly manifest in the ipsilateral level II-IV at presentation. Moreover, the data support the clinical recommendation to restrict elective neck dissection in cN0 patients to ipsilateral levels IIa and III, excluding level IIb. Regional recurrence is significantly associated with pN status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The purpose of this article is to summarize the literature and practical recommendations from experienced centers for close margins after transoral robotic surgery for human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Our purpose was to dosimetrically compare volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice radiation therapy (LRT), brass, and proton grid therapy planning techniques and suggest potential clinical applications for each., Methods and Materials: Four plans delivering 20 Gy in 1 fraction were created for each of 22 patients. Brass and proton grid plans used a single static field and the same beam angle. Proton grid plans used the same beam size and spacing as the brass block. Two VMAT LRT plans were generated for each patient: one with 1-cm diameter lattice points spaced 2-cm center-to-center (2-cm VMAT) and another with 1.5-cm diameter lattice points spaced 3-cm center-to-center (3- cm VMAT). Maximum, minimum, mean, and equivalent uniform dose and the dose to 90%, 50%, 20%, 10%, and 5% (D90%[%], D50%[%], etc) of gross tumor volume (GTV) were reported. D10%/D90% characterized dose heterogeneity. Normal tissue dose was generalized by the maximum dose and volume in cubic centimeters of tissue outside the GTV receiving 30% and 50% of prescription (body-GTV V30%[cm 3 ]; body-GTV V50%[cm 3 ])., Results: VMAT LRT plans delivered the highest maximum GTV doses while brass and proton plans delivered higher D5%(%), D10%(%), and D20%(%) values. D50%(%), D90%(%), and minimum dose varied little between plan types. Proton and brass plans had the highest dose heterogeneity. Two-centimeter VMAT and brass grid plans had the highest mean GTV doses. Two-centimeter VMAT plans had the highest equivalent uniform dose, followed by 3-cm VMAT, brass, and proton plans. VMAT LRT plans exhibited the lowest normal tissue maximum and body GTV V30%(cm 3 ) and body GTV V50%(cm 3 ) values., Conclusions: An in-depth comparison of target and normal tissue dosimetric parameters for common photon and proton grid therapy planning techniques was made. Strengths of each plan type were noted leading to general recommendations on usage., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in locoregional tumor control for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). Due to its rarity, RT guidelines for ATC are lacking. We describe ATC patterns of nodal disease at presentation and progression and propose corresponding RT target volumes., Methods and Materials: We identified all patients with ATC treated at our institution with definitive or adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy from 2006 to 2020. We identified in-field, marginal, and out-of-field sites of locoregional recurrence and progression (LRR)., Results: Forty-seven patients met inclusion. Median follow-up was 6.6 months (interquartile range, 1.9-19.6). Nodal levels involved at presentation included: IB (2.1%), II (23.4%), III (21.3%), IV (21.3%), V (12.8%), VI (34%), and mediastinal (6.4%). All patients received elective nodal RT to levels II-IV and VI. RT volumes also included: IA (23.4%), IB (44.7%), V (87.2%), retropharyngeal/retrostyloid (RP/RS) (27.7%), and mediastinal 1 to 6 (53.2%). Cumulative incidence of LRR at 3- and 12-months was 26.1% (95% confidence interval, 15.9-42.8) and 35.7% (23.9-53.4). Isolated LRR risk at 3- and 12-months was 6.5% (2.2-19.8) and 8.9% (3.4-22.9). Fourteen (29.8%) patients experienced in-field LRR in the thyroid gland or postoperative tumor bed, II-IV, VI, and mediastinal 1 and 3A. Four (8.5%) patients had marginal LRRs, 3 of whom progressed in the mediastinum at 2, 3P, 4, and 6. Two (4.3%) patients experienced out-of-field LRRs. Throughout the pretreatment and follow-up period, no patients had disease at IA, and 1 (2.1%) patient each had disease at IB and RP/RS. No baseline or treatment characteristics, including RT dose (stratified by < or ≥66 Gy), were significant predictors of LRR on univariate analysis., Conclusions: Isolated LRR risk in patients with ATC treated with comprehensive RT and chemotherapy is low. Aggressive multimodality therapy should be reserved for willing, fit patients with no or limited distant disease burden. When treating comprehensively, complete inclusion of mediastinal levels 1 to 6 may be warranted to avoid marginal disease progression. Omission of levels I and RP/RS can be considered., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe a novel and practical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning approach for grid therapy., Methods and Materials: Dose is prescribed to 1.5-cm diameter spherical contours placed throughout the gross tumor volume (GTV). Placement of spheres is variable, but they must maintain at least a 3-cm (center to center) separation, and the edge of any sphere must be at least 1 cm from any organ at risk (OAR). Three concentric ring structures are used during optimization to confine the highest doses to the center of the spheres and maximize dose sparing between them. The end result is alternating regions of high and low dose throughout the GTV and minimal dose to OARs. High-intensity flattening filter-free (FFF) modes are used to efficiently deliver the plans, and entire treatments typically take only 15 to 20 minutes., Results: The approach is illustrated with 2 examples treated at our institution. Patient #1 had a 1703-cm 3 mediastinal mass and was prescribed 20 Gray (Gy) to 24 spherical regions within the GTV. Patient #2 had a 3680-cm 3 abdominal tumor and was prescribed 18 Gy to 32 spherical regions within the GTV. Both patients received additional consolidative radiation approximately 1 week after the initial VMAT grid treatment. Each patient experienced marked reduction in tumor size and symptomatic relief without treatment-related complications., Conclusions: We have described in detail a planning approach for VMAT grid therapy treatments that can typically be delivered in a clinically practical time span. The VMAT approach is especially useful for tumors that are surrounded by sensitive critical structures. As many centers offer VMAT treatments, the approach is widely accessible and can be readily implemented once appropriate patient selection and delivery processes are established., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We investigated T cell clonality (TCC) and T cell fraction (TCF) in human papilloma virus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+)OPSCC) progressors [cases] vs. non-progressors [controls]., Methods: This nested case-control study included patients undergoing intent-to-cure surgery ± adjuvant therapy from 6/1/2007-10/3/2016. Patients experiencing local/regional/distant disease (progressors), and a consecutive sample of non-progressors were matched (2 controls: 1 case) on tumor subsite, T-stage and number of metastatic lymph nodes. We performed imunosequencing of the CDR3 regions of human TCRβ chains., Results: 34 progressors and 65 non-progressors were included. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline TCF (range: 0.039-1.084) and TCC (range: 0.007-0.240) (p > 0.05). Female sex was associated with higher TCF (p = 0.03), while extranodal extension (ENE) was associated with lower TCF (p = 0.01). There was a positive correlation between tumor size and clonality (R = 0.34, p < 0.01). The strongest predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) was TCF (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.66-0.96, p = 0.02). The strongest predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) were TCF (HR0.69, 95%CI 0.47-1.00, p < 0.05) and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) score (p < 0.05). Similarly, the strongest predictors of overall survival (OS) were TCF (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.43-0.91, p = 0.01) and ACE-27 score (p = 0.03). On multivariable modeling, TCF ≥ 0.4 was independently associated with PFS (HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.14-0.85, p = 0.02) while an ACE-27 score of ≥ 2 independently predicted CSS (HR 3.85, 95%CI 1.07-13.85, p = 0.04) and OS (HR 3.51, 95%CI 1.10-11.20, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: In patients with HPV(+)OPSCC, TCF was higher in female patients and those without ENE, suggesting differential immune responses. Lower TCF was significantly and independently associated with disease progression. Better ACE-27 scores appear to predict improved oncologic control., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The natural history of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity (OC) in young adults is unknown. We sought to provide an updated report on treatment outcomes of patients with OC SCC who were 40 years or younger., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 124 consecutive patients with primary OC SCC treated at Mayo Clinic (1980-2014). Patient and tumor characteristics and treatment approach were abstracted from patient charts., Results: Median patient age was 35 years (range, 19-40 years). The most common primary site was oral tongue (107 patients; 86.3%). Most patients (101; 81.5%) underwent wide local excision. Surgery alone was curative in 77 patients (62.1%); 47 (37.9%) received radiotherapy, and 26 (21%) received chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 78.1%; 10-year OS was 76.9%. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 66.6%; 5-year local control was 87.6%; and 5-year locoregional control was 78.5%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS and DFS were higher pathologic T stage (P = .008), lymph node positivity (P < .001), and disease recurrence (P < .001)., Conclusion: Young adults with primary OC SCC may be treated with a similar treatment approach as older adults., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the outcomes and toxicities of minimally-invasive surgery with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy (AT) compared to definitive surgical therapy (ST) in a contemporary cohort of HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)., Methods: From 2005 to 2013, a consecutive cohort of 190 HPV-positive OPSCC patients was retrospectively reviewed from multi-institutional databases maintained by the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Radiation Oncology. A total of 116 AT patients and 42 ST patients with intermediate or high risk pathologic features were included in the final analysis. All patients received minimally invasive surgery. Time to recurrence and time to death from the onset of surgery were evaluated. Toxicity data collected included dysphagia or xerostomia requiring feeding tube placement >6 months, or mandibular osteonecrosis requiring surgery or hyperbaric oxygen., Results: All AT patients received IMRT to a median dose of 60 Gy. Chemotherapy delivered to 67.2% of AT patients. AT group included more high-risk patients given higher nodal classification (p = 0.005) and extracapsular extension (p = 0.0005). AT improved disease-free survival (HR 2.77, CI 1.22-6.28; p = 0.02) and local-regional control (HR 14.83, CI 3.240-67.839; p = 0.001). Disease-free survival with AT and tumor extracapsular extension was improved when compared to ST (HR of 4.34, CI 1.540-12.213; p = 0.006). Dysphagia or mandibular osteonecrosis toxicity after AT vs. ST of 19.0% vs. 2.4%., Conclusions: AT improved local-regional control and disease-free survival but was associated with greater toxicity. The recurrence benefit was most pronounced in tumors with extracapsular extension., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immunosuppression after solid organ transplant prevents graft rejection, but leads to increased incidence of various malignancies including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Outcomes of patients with post-transplant HNSCC are unknown., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who developed HNSCC after solid organ transplant between 1995 and 2010. Adults with pathology-proven HNSCC and adequate follow up were included. Median overall survival and progression free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic effect of variables was studied with Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Thirty-three patients met study inclusion criteria. The median time to diagnosis of HNSCC after transplant was 5.9years. The primary site was oral cavity in 15 patients, oropharynx in 10, larynx in 3, hypopharynx in 2, parotid in 2 and unknown in 1 patient. Eighty-eight percent underwent upfront surgical resection. Of those, sixty-six percent received adjuvant therapy. Six percent of patients had definitive chemoradiation. Treatment was well tolerated and did not lead to graft rejection. The 5-year overall survival rate was 45% and 37% for localized and locally advanced disease respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients with oropharyngeal tumors were HPV-positive and they had better outcomes (5-year overall survival rate of 67%). In multivariate analysis, age ≥60years was a negative predictor of survival (HR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.5; P=0.03)., Conclusions: Patients with post-transplant HNSCC have relatively poor survival and high risk of locoregional and distant recurrence. HPV- positive oropharyngeal tumors continue to have better outcomes in this population., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atypical meningioma is a World Health Organization grade II tumor with intermediate prognosis and risk of recurrence. Optimal management after gross total resection (GTR) is controversial, with observation versus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) contentiously debated., Methods: Pathologic review was performed of all atypical meningiomas diagnosed at our institution from 1988 to 2011. Retrospective chart review documented patient demographics, extent of surgical resection, history of radiation therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A supplemental systematic literature review was completed in which English-language articles published since 1979 comparing observation and RT after GTR of atypical meningioma were surveyed., Results: Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-one underwent observation, and 8 received RT. Overall, 15 observation and 3 patients undergoing RT experienced tumor recurrence (5-year PFS 79% vs. 88%; P = 0.67); 19 observation and 2 patients undergoing RT died (5-year OS 89% vs. 83%; P = 0.68). Systematic review identified 9 preceding studies reporting extractable data comparing observation and RT outcomes after GTR. Recurrence was 18% and 19% after observation and RT (P = 0.9); total survival was 84% and 93% (P = 0.2). At 5 years, PFS was 81% after observation and 88% after RT (P = 0.2), whereas survival was 87% after observation and 96% after RT (P = 0.4)., Conclusions: Observation alone after GTR of atypical meningioma was not associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence or mortality. Although some preceding authors advocate for RT based on empiric experience, a systematic review also suggests that observation may provide equivalent PFS and OS to RT. Taken together, these findings indicate that observation after GTR may be a safe alternative to RT., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Establishment of standards within a practice and across disease site groups for nomenclatures, prescription formatting, and measured dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics is a key enabling step for creating software and database solutions to make routine aggregation of dosimetric data for all patients treated in a practice, practical. A process of physician-driven, iterative dialogs coupled with development of technical tools is required to implement the cultural and procedural changes. The cumulative reward for this effort is a database that can be used for defining practice norms, benchmarking against national standards, and tracking dosimetric effects of longitudinal practice pattern changes., Methods and Materials: A 4-year project was carried out to develop and introduce standardizations, modify processes, and develop computer-based tools for reporting, aggregation, and analysis of prescription and DVH metrics. Physician disease site groups developed 42 target and 81 normal tissue templates. From the database of 32,002 DVH metrics, benchmarking was illustrated for a subgroup of breast (281) and prostate (324) patients treated with conventional fractionation over a 16-month period. Breast patients were segregated according to prescription template used: simple (S, tangents only) vs complex (C, tangents + supraclavicular ± intramammary nodes) and left (S-L or C-L) versus right (S-R or C-R)., Results: Prostate patients' median and 50% confidence intervals (CIs) for bladder, stated according to the nomenclature: the percentage of bladder volume receiving doses of ≥40 Gy (V40[%]), V65Gy[%], V70Gy[%], V75Gy[%], and V80Gy[%] were 45.5 (24.9-57.0), 15.6 (9.0-23.8), 7.6 (3.3-13.6), 2.0 (0.0-7.9), and 0.0 (0.0-1.4), respectively. Values for rectum: V50Gy[%], V60 Gy[%], V65Gy[%], V70Gy[%], and V75Gy[%] were 37.1 (27.8-43.5), 21.8 (15.6-25.5), 14.6 (9.6-18.0), 7.7 (1.9-12.3), and 1.0 (0-7.0), respectively. For breast patients, heart:mean Gray values were 1.5 (1.0-2.0), 3.1 (2.2-4.8), 0.4 (0.3-0.7), and 1.1 (0.8-2.2) for S-L, C-L, S-R, and C-R, respectively. Longitudinal, moving window plots of median, 50% CI, and 90% CI for 6-month periods demonstrated the effect of practice changes to reduce heart doses., Conclusions: Standardization was challenging as a practice change, but has resulted in significant improvements for both our clinical and research efforts., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Standard treatment for patients with poor-risk, resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is adjuvant radiation therapy combined with high-dose cisplatin. Many patients are treated with weekly cisplatin; it is not known whether weekly and high-dose cisplatin are equivalent. This study compares the outcomes of patients with locally-advanced HPV-negative HNSCC and HPV/p16-positive oropharynx HNSCC treated with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with either high-dose or weekly cisplatin., Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of patients with Stage III/IV HNSCC who had surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation therapy at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. HPV and/or p16 status was available for all oropharynx patients., Results: 104 Patients (51 high-dose, 53 weekly) were analyzed. The 3-year overall survival was 84% and 75% for patients who received high dose and weekly cisplatin, respectively (p=0.30). The 3-year recurrence free survival was 71% and 74% in the high dose and weekly cisplatin group, respectively (p=0.95). Patients with HPV/p16-positive oropharynx cancer who received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with high-dose and weekly cisplatin had three-year overall survival rates of 91% and 86% (p=0.56), and 3-year recurrence free survival of 84% and 82% (p=0.93). Extracapsular extension did not affect prognosis in either group., Conclusions: No significant survival difference was seen between patients with locally advanced HNSCC treated with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with high-dose or weekly cisplatin, although there was a trend for improved survival with high-dose cisplatin. Weekly cisplatin in the adjuvant setting may be a better treatment for patients with HPV-positive oropharynx cancer to preserve survival and minimize toxicity., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)