Search

Background: No randomised controlled trial has ever been done in patients with metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Preclinical and first clinical evidence suggested beneficial effects of sunitinib. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas., Methods: FIRSTMAPPP is a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial done at 14 academic centres across four European countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with sporadic or inherited progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral sunitinib (37·5 mg per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified according to SDHB status (mutation present vs wild type) and number of previous systemic therapies (0 vs ≥1). Primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival at 12 months according to real-time central review (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1). On the basis of a two-step Simon model, we aimed for the accrual of 78 patients, assuming a 20% improvement of the 12-month progression-free survival rate from 20% to 40%, to conclude that sunitinib is effective. Crossover from the placebo group was allowed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01371201, and is closed for enrolment., Findings: From Dec 1, 2011, to Jan 31, 2019, a total of 78 patients with progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas were enrolled (39 patients per group). 25 (32%) of 78 patients had germline SDHx variants and 54 (69%) had used previous therapies. The primary endpoint was met, with a 12-month progression-free survival in 14 of 39 patients (36% [90% CI 23-50]) in the sunitinib group. In the placebo group, the 12-month progression-free survival in seven of 39 patients was 19% (90% CI 11-31), validating the hypotheses of our study design. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia (seven [18%] of 39 and one [3%] of 39), hypertension (five [13%] and four [10%]), and back or bone pain (one [3%] and three [8%]) in the sunitinib and placebo groups, respectively. Three deaths occurred in the sunitinib group: these deaths were due to respiratory insufficiency, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and rectal bleeding. Only the latter event was considered drug related. Two deaths occurred in the placebo group due to aspiration pneumonia and septic shock., Interpretation: This first randomised trial supports the use of sunitinib as the medical option with the highest level of evidence for anti-tumour efficacy in progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas., Funding: French Ministry of Health, through the National Institute for Cancer, German Ministry of Education and Research, and the German Research Foundation within the CRC/Transregio 205/2, EU Seventh Framework Programme, and a private donator grant., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EB has received grants from Novartis and HRA; consulting fees from Novartis; support from HRA, Novartis, and Enterome; has been on the Board or Advisory Board for Ipsen, Novartis AAA, Pfizer, and Hutchinson Ph; has a leadership role for the French ENDOCAN network; and is a recipient of the interventions used in this study (sunitinib and placebo) from Pfizer. AB has received payment or honoraria from Novartis AAA and HRA; and has been on the Board or Advisory Board for Novartis AAA, Amgen, Bayer, and Ferring. JH has received consulting fees from Roche, Lilly, Pharma Mar, and EISAI; payment or honoraria from Novartis AAA; support from Ipsen and Novartis AAA; and has been on the Board or Advisory Board for Lilly. TD has received support from Recordati; has been on the Board or Advisory Board for Recordati; and has a leadership role for the German Pituitary Group. LL has received payment or honoraria from EISAI, Lilly, and ROCHE; and has been on the Board or Advisory Board for Bayer, EISAI, and IPSEN. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Numerous retrospective studies and reviews have reported a positive association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). However, some results are controversial and the studies, whose results converge, should be interpreted cautiously because most of them do not deal appropriately with the immortal-time bias. Here, we report an observational real-life study of the association between prospectively collected irAEs and survival of patients treated with ICBs while dealing with the immortal-time bias., Methods: Data from patients treated at Gustave Roussy from June 2014 to October 2017 with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies for a melanoma or NSCLC have been prospectively collected in the REISAMIC database, a pharmacovigilance registry dedicated to irAEs. Adverse events of grade 2 and higher were collected prospectively. To study the association between the occurrence of irAEs and survival, we used both a landmark analysis and a Cox regression model with time-dependent covariate., Results: 577 patients were treated with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies for melanoma (60.3 %) or NSCLC (39.7 %). The occurrence of an irAE was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS): HR 0.56, 95 % CI [0.41; 0.75], p = 0.0001 and progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.63, 95 % CI [0.47; 0.83], p = 0.001 using a Cox regression model with time-dependent covariate. In a 12-week landmark analysis, median OS was 21.2 months (95 % CI, 12.2 to 35.7) and 16.4 months (95 % CI, 12.4 to 21.3) p = 0.26 and median PFS was 14.3 months (95 % CI, 9.5 to 24.6) and 13.4 months (95 % CI, 10.2 to 18.3) p = 0.66, for patients with and without irAEs, respectively., Conclusions: In our real-life study of patients with melanoma and NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies, we confirm that irAEs are associated with improved survival using a time-varying Cox regression model. Analysis with a landmark method showed no difference in OS or PFS between patients who experienced irAE during the first 12 weeks of treatment and those who did not. Retrospective analysis and reviews including studies that do not deal with the immortal-time bias and studies insufficiently powered for a landmark analysis should be interpreted with caution., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a high unmet medical need. The first line standard-of-care therapy comprises concurrent chemotherapy-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. Concurrent irradiation with pembrolizumab has been shown to significantly improve survival benefit compared with immunotherapy alone in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized phase 2 trials. We present the rationale and study design of the "PD-1 iNhibitor and chemotherapy with concurrent IRradiation at VAried tumor sites in advanced Non-small cell lung cAncer" (NIRVANA-Lung) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03774732). This study is a national multicenter 1:1 randomized phase III trial testing in 460 patients, the addition of multisite radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC treated with standard immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab)-chemotherapy in first line. The primary objective of the trial is to compare the overall survival between the 2 arms at year 1 of the study. The secondary objective is to compare the progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival at year 1 and 2, as well as to determine quality of life, local and distant control in irradiated and nonirradiated sites at 6 months and year 1., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Evaluation of EGFR Mutation status for the administration of EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung Carcinoma (ERMETIC) was a prospective study designed to validate the prognostic value of EGFR/KRAS mutations in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), all receiving a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. ERMETIC2 was an ancillary project evaluating the clinical value of common EGFR/KRAS-mutated subclones regarding prognosis using highly sensitive molecular detection methods., Materials and Methods: Tumor samples from 228 patients with NSCLC (59% adenocarcinoma, 37% women, and 19% never/former smokers) were available for reanalysis using alternative highly sensitive molecular techniques. A multivariate Cox model was used for prognostic analysis., Results: Using alternative highly sensitive techniques, 16 EGFR and 51 KRAS supplementary mutations were newly identified, all still exclusive, leading to an overall rate of 12.3% (n = 28) and 33.3% (n = 76), respectively. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction (hybridization probe), they were significantly associated with progression-free survival (P = .02) and overall survival (OS) (P = .01), which were better for EGFR-mutated patients for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.78) and OS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1), and worse for KRAS mutations and OS (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.09-2.44). Using the most sensitive technique detection for KRAS-clamp polymerase chain reaction-KRAS mutated subclones did not impact OS., Conclusions: KRAS and EGFR mutations were detected in higher proportions by alternative highly sensitive molecular techniques compared with direct Sanger sequencing. However, minor KRAS-mutated subclones offered no prognostic value when representing less than 1% of the tumor cells., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The authors use a transposition island skin flap from the nasal dorsum for repair of the ala nasi. It is a modification of the stalk-flap advocated by Edgerton in 1967 to augment the columella. The flap is vascularized by branches of the anterior ethmoidal artery. The main modifications are;-the size of the flap which is 50 mm long and 15 mm wide;-the vascular pedicle is not dissected; this makes the flap very reliable;-the outstanding vascularization of this flap is corroborated by the fact that, in the same stage, it may be lined with a partially composite chondrocutaneous graft. The composite graft is taken from the concha and repaired with the Masson procedure. This flap is a very easy procedure for alar cutaneous repair for partial alar reconstruction, it is possible to fold the flap onto itself after resecting a 2 mm transverse skin strip, making the distal extremity a secondary skin island flap which ensures the lining of the proximal part. For total alar reconstruction and hemi-rhinoplasty; the flap is lined with a composite graft, which allows a one-stage thin reconstruction. The flap was used in 9 patients. In one case, there was a total skin necrosis, while half of the fasciomuscle layer survived.

The nasolabial flap has frequently been used in many ways to repair the nostril. It has also been the subject of numerous criticisms, essentially related to the poor quality of the results obtained. However, the authors consider that it has an important place in the treatment of partial transfixing defects of the nostril. The nasolabial flap must be performed according to certain precise rules: strictly nasal superior pedicle, defatting of the entire flap, rotation of the flap around the external extremity of the pedicle, plication of the flap and modelling to recreate the alar margin and to reconstitute the lining. Several clinical examples illustrate this use of the flap and allow the indications to be defined.