Search

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) account for 20% of all healthcare-associated infections, are the most common nosocomial infection among surgical patients, and are a focus of quality improvement initiatives. Despite implementation of many quality care measures (e.g. prophylactic antibiotics), SSIs remain a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden, particularly in the field of neurosurgery. Topical vancomycin is increasingly utilized in instrumented spinal and cardiothoracic procedures, where it has been shown to reduce the risk of SSIs. However, a randomized controlled trial assessing its efficacy in the general neurosurgical population has yet to be done. The principle aim of "Topical Vancomycin for Neurosurgery Wound Prophylaxis" (NCT02284126) is to determine whether prophylactic, topical vancomycin reduces the risk of SSIs in the adult neurosurgical population. This prospective, multicenter, patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial will enroll patients to receive the standard of care plus topical vancomycin, or the standard of care alone. The primary endpoint of this study is a SSI by postoperative day (POD) 30. Patients must be over 18years of age. Patients are excluded for renal insufficiency, vancomycin allergy, and some ineligible procedures. Univariate analysis and logistic regression will determine the effect of topical vancomycin on SSIs at 30days. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the efficacy of this treatment. Results of this trial are expected to directly influence the standard of care and prevention of SSIs in neurosurgical patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Extranasal colonization is increasingly recognized as an important reservoir for Staphylococcus aureus among high-risk populations. We conducted a cross-sectional study of multiple body site colonization among 173 randomly selected STD clinic patients in Baltimore, Maryland. Staphylococcal carriage at extranasal sites, including the oropharynx, groin, rectum, and genitals, was common among study subjects. The USA300 clone was particularly associated with multiple sites of colonization compared with non-USA300 strains (p = .01). Given their high burden of multi-site colonization and confluence of established staphylococcal risk factors, STD clinic patients may represent a community-based reservoir for S. aureus and be well suited for innovative infection control initiatives., (Copyright © 2012 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this study, we sought to confirm which types of device-related infections impact bridge-to-transplant rates. We also aimed to determine the effect of device-related infections on post-transplant survival and post-transplant infection., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paper and electronic medical records for 149 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to transplantation at the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center between 2000 and 2006. The primary outcome measures were survival to transplantation, post-transplant infection and post-transplant survival., Results: Patients with sepsis were less likely to be successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation (7 of 22 vs 103 of 127, 31.8% vs 81.1%, p = 0.01). However, if transplanted, their survival rates at 1 year were not decreased (6 of 7 vs 85 of 103, 85.7% vs 82.5%, p = 1.00). No other pre-transplant device-related infection affected post-transplant survival at 1 year (22 of 27 vs 69 of 83, 81.5% vs 83.1%, p = 1.00). Pre-transplant drive-line infections predicted post-transplant infection in former drive-line or pocket sites (11 of 16 vs 14 of 94, 68.8% vs 14.9%, p = 0.01) and increased overall post-transplant hospital length of stay (16 vs 19 days, p = 0.04). They did not, however, affect post-transplant survival at 1 year (22 of 25 vs 69 of 85, 88% vs 81.2%, p = 0.56)., Conclusions: Although survival to transplantation was diminished in LVAD patients with sepsis, if successfully transplanted, post-transplant survival was unaffected. Patients with local device infections and signs of early sepsis may warrant evaluation for urgent transplantation. A pre-transplant drive-line infection was associated with post-transplant infection in either the former pocket or drive-line site, and increased overall length of stay, but it did not decrease post-transplant survival.

Background: Increasing concern about inappropriate antibiotic use prompted us to examine whether our patients were receiving frequent and perhaps unwarranted changes of antibiotic therapy., Methods: We evaluated antibiotic prescribing by the physicians in the Emergency Department and by those on the inpatient medical service during the first 72 hours of hospitalization in 119 patients admitted with suspected serious infections to an acute care, university-affiliated, municipal teaching hospital. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed independently and retrospectively by 2 infectious disease specialists (each based at a different hospital) using a 4-grade scale (from 1 = wrong choice to 4 = appropriate). Of their evaluations of the 427 antibiotic regimens given to the 119 patients during 4 defined intervals during their first 72 hours of hospitalization, 90% agreed with each other within 1 grade. Their evaluations were then compared with the selections that had been made at each interval by the prescribing physicians., Results: Successive prescribing physicians changed the antibiotic regimens in 77% of cases during the first 24 hours and in 56% during the next 48, often without apparent clinical or microbiologic indications. By 72 hours, the 119 patients had received a mean of 3.1 +/- 1.3 (+/-SD) different antibiotics, and 40 received between 4 and 7. Only 7% of the patients had no change in the regimen prescribed originally., Conclusions: Many patients had multiple changes of antibiotics, often unnecessarily, resulting in exposure to too many agents.

Introduction: The causes and management of prosthetic graft infections have been extensively studied for conventional bypass grafts; however, the infectivity and therapy for endovascular graft infections are completely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the biologic properties of infected aortic grafts when inserted by endoluminal or standard transabdominal techniques., Methods: Eighteen dogs underwent placement of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in their infrarenal aortas either by an endovascular technique (8) or a standard interposition technique (10). Endovascular grafts were constructed from polytetrafluoroethylene (3 cm) and two balloon-expandable stents coaxially mounted onto a balloon catheter delivery system. The grafts were inserted through a left carotid arteriotomy under fluoroscopic control. Initially, seven grafts were infected with decreasing inocula of Staphylococcus aureus, starting at 10(7) organisms per ml for 30 minutes and then rinsed briefly (10 seconds) in normal saline solution, until a 50% infective dose for the standard grafts was determined to be 10(2) organisms per ml. After this initial experiment, a second group of 11 dogs were compared at a concentration of 10(2) S. aureus per ml. Five dogs underwent endovascular repair, and six dogs had standard graft interpositions after an identical period of bacterial exposure. All grafts were removed at 2 weeks under sterile conditions and were submitted for quantitative culture analysis., Results: Three of the six dogs (50%) with standard grafts appeared to clear their infections, whereas only one of the five dogs (20%) with an endovascular graft was free of organisms at 14 days. This results was further manifested by statistically significant lower postmortem colony counts in the standard grafts (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: The endoluminal position of the graft and its proximity to the arterial wall do not appear to provide protection against infection. These data suggest that if endovascular grafts become infected, they may be in a disadvantaged position for host defense mechanisms to be effective.

A cluster of ten nosocomial eye infections occurred in three intensive-care units during an 18-month period. Nine of the ten patients were intubated, all were obtunded, and all had copious sputum production. The bacteria isolated from the patients' sputum samples and from the eyes were identical in nine cases. Pseudomonas aeruginosa caused six of the infections, including all those with complications (three corneal ulcers, two hypopyon, one opaque cornea, two corneal rupture). Three patients lost their sight. Only the left eye was infected in nine cases. In a prospective study of bacterial dispersion during tracheal suctioning of twenty intubated patients, patients with copious secretions had significantly higher bacterial colony counts on settle plates than those without. Colony counts were higher on the side opposite to the hand the nurse used to withdraw the catheter than on the same side. Nurses tended to withdraw the catheter diagonally across the patient's face, which may explain the selective involvement of the left eye.

Endophthalmitis remains a dreaded complication of intraocular surgery and penetrating eye trauma. Subconjunctival, topical, and systemic antibiotics have been largely ineffective in the treatment of endophthalmitis, whereas intravitreal antibiotics have proved efficacious. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis has become an important pathogen in many infections, including endophthalmitis. Toxicity, clearance, and efficacy of intravitreal vancomycin were evaluated in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis endophthalmitis. No evidence of retinal toxicity was found and therapeutic levels were demonstrated six days after injection. The treated rabbit eyes showed a marked beneficial effect when compared to the untreated eyes. If experience confirms the safety of intravitreal vancomycin in human eyes, vancomycin should be considered the drug of choice for methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis endophthalmitis.

Antibiotic therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis was investigated with the rabbit endocarditis model. Time-kill studies in vitro demonstrated that gentamicin and rifampin had the most rapid early bactericidal rates. With rifampin alone, rifampin-resistant subpopulations emerged. Combinations of antibiotics with gentamicin or rifampin in vitro did not significantly alter the killing rate but prevented emergence of subpopulations resistant to the latter. In the rabbit endocarditis model, gentamicin and vancomycin were the most effective single antibiotic regimens in terms of ability to reduce the bacterial densities on cardiac valve vegetations. Five treatment regimens were equally effective, including vancomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin plus rifampin or gentamicin, and rifampin plus gentamicin. The three-drug combination of vancomycin, rifampin, and gentamicin did not significantly improve the results. Cephalothin therapy was significantly less effective than any of the regimens noted above. It was no more effective than no treatment at 2 days and was only slightly more effective at 4 days. This result with cephalothin treatment was not predicted by routine types of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing. Treatment of rabbits with methicillin or cephalothin was associated with an increase in the subpopulation of bacteria resistant to the respective drugs. A number of regimens show potential for therapy of these infections, including vancomycin plus rifampin or gentamicin, rifampin plus gentamicin, and vancomycin alone.