Search

Your search keyword '"Loriga, P"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Loriga, P" Publisher elsevier
3 results on '"Loriga, P"'

2. Italian consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis.

Author

Frulloni L, Falconi M, Gabbrielli A, Gaia E, Graziani R, Pezzilli R, Uomo G, Andriulli A, Balzano G, Benini L, Calculli L, Campra D, Capurso G, Cavestro GM, De Angelis C, Ghezzo L, Manfredi R, Malesci A, Mariani A, Mutignani M, Ventrucci M, Zamboni G, Amodio A, Vantini I, Bassi C, Delle Fave G, Frulloni L, Vantini I, Falconi M, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Graziani R, Pezzilli R, Capurso IV, Cavestro GM, De Angelis C, Falconi M, Gaia E, Ghezzo L, Gabbrielli A, Graziani R, Manfredi R, Malesci A, Mariani A, Mutignani M, Pezzilli R, Uomo G, Ventrucci M, Zamboni G, Vantini I, Magarini F, Albarello L, Alfieri S, Amodio A, Andriulli A, Anti M, Arcidiacono P, Baiocchi L, Balzano G, Benini L, Berretti D, Boraschi P, Buscarini E, Calculli L, Carroccio A, Campra D, Celebrano MR, Capurso G, Casadei R, Cavestro GM, Chilovi F, Conigliaro R, Dall'Oglio L, De Angelis C, De Boni M, De Pretis G, Di Priolo S, Di Sebastiano PL, Doglietto GB, Falconi M, Filauro M, Frieri G, Frulloni L, Fuini A, Gaia E, Ghezzo L, Gabbrielli A, Graziani R, Loriga P, Macarri G, Manes G, Manfredi R, Malesci A, Mariani A, Massucco P, Milani S, Mutignani M, Pasquali C, Pederzoli P, Pezzilli R, Pietrangeli M, Rocca R, Russello D, Siquini W, Traina M, Uomo G, Veneroni L, Ventrucci M, Zilli M, and Zamboni G

Subjects
Humans, Italy, Pancreatitis, Chronic diagnosis, Pancreatitis, Chronic therapy
Abstract

This paper gives practical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Statements have been elaborated by working teams of experts, by searching for and analysing the literature, and submitted to a consensus process by using a Delphi modified procedure. The statements report recommendations on clinical and nutritional approach, assessment of pancreatic function, treatment of exocrine pancreatic failure and of secondary diabetes, treatment of pain and prevention of painful relapses. Moreover, the role of endoscopy in approaching pancreatic pain, pancreatic stones, duct narrowing and dilation, and complications was considered. Recommendations for most appropriate use of various imaging techniques and of ultrasound endoscopy are reported. Finally, a group of recommendations are addressed to the surgical treatment, with definition of right indications, timing, most appropriate procedures and techniques in different clinical conditions and targets, and clinical and functional outcomes following surgery., (Copyright © 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. How to predict a high rate of inappropriateness for upper endoscopy in an endoscopic centre?

Author

Buri L, Bersani G, Hassan C, Anti M, Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Di Giulio E, Di Matteo G, Familiari L, Ficano L, Loriga P, Morini S, Pietropaolo V, Zambelli A, Grossi E, Intraligi M, Tessari F, and Buscema M

Subjects
Adult, Age Distribution, Humans, Italy, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, ROC Curve, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Endoscopy, Digestive System statistics & numerical data, Patient Selection, Referral and Consultation, Upper Gastrointestinal Tract diagnostic imaging
Abstract

Background: Inappropriateness of upper endoscopy (EGD) indication causes decreased diagnostic yield. Our aim of was to identify predictors of appropriateness rate for EGD among endoscopic centres., Methods: A post-hoc analysis of two multicentre cross-sectional studies, including 6270 and 8252 patients consecutively referred to EGD in 44 (group A) and 55 (group B) endoscopic Italian centres in 2003 and 2007, respectively, was performed. A multiple forward stepwise regression was applied to group A, and independently validated in group B. A <70% threshold was adopted to define inadequate appropriateness rate clustered by centre., Results: discrete variability of clustered appropriateness rates among the 44 group A centres was observed (median: 77%; range: 41-97%), and a <70% appropriateness rate was detected in 11 (25%). Independent predictors of centre appropriateness rate were: percentage of patients referred by general practitioners (GP), rate of urgent examinations, prevalence of relevant diseases, and academic status. For group B, sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of the model in detecting centres with a <70% appropriateness rate were 54%, 93% and 0.72, respectively., Conclusions: A simple predictive rule, based on rate of patients referred by GPs, rate of urgent examinations, prevalence of relevant diseases and academic status, identified a small subset of centres characterised by a high rate of inappropriateness. These centres may be presumed to obtain the largest benefit from targeted educational programs., (Copyright (c) 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results