Search

Background: Thoracic spinal deformities may reduce chest wall compliance, leading to respiratory complications. The first SARS-CoV-2 (L-variant) strain caused critical respiratory illness, especially in vulnerable patients. This study investigates the association between scoliosis and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) disease course severity., Methods: Clinical data of 129 patients treated between March 2020 to June 2021 who received a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction result from Mount Sinai and had a scoliosis ICD-10 code (M41.0-M41.9) was retrospectively analyzed. Degree of coronal plane scoliosis on imaging was confirmed by 2 independent measurers and grouped into no scoliosis (Cobb angle <10°), mild (10°-24°), moderate (25°-39°), and severe (>40°) cohorts. Baseline characteristics were compared, and a multivariable logistic regression controlling for clinically significant comorbidities examined the significance of scoliosis as an independent risk factor for hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mechanical ventilation, and mortality., Results: The no (n = 42), mild (n = 14), moderate (n = 44), and severe scoliosis (n = 29) cohorts differed significantly only in age (P = 0.026). The percentage of patients hospitalized (P = 0.59), admitted to the ICU (P = 0.33), developing ARDS (P = 0.77), requiring mechanical ventilation (P = 1.0), or who expired (P = 0.77) did not significantly differ between cohorts. The scoliosis cohorts did not have a significantly higher likelihood of hospital admission (mild P = 0.19, moderate P = 0.67, severe P = 0.98), ICU admission (P = 0.97, P = 0.94, P = 0.22), ARDS (P = 0.87, P = 0.74, P = 0.94), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.73, P = 0.69, P = 0.70), or mortality (P = 0.74, P = 0.87, P = 0.66) than the no scoliosis cohort., Conclusions: Scoliosis was not an independent risk factor for critical COVID-19 illness. No trends indicated any consistent effect of degree of scoliosis on increased adverse outcome likelihood., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on "by hand" and on "gold standard" flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion., Methods: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined., Results: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements., Conclusions: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center., Clinical Relevance: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.

There is a high incidence of cervical involvement in patients with rheumatoid disease. Early evaluation of the neck, close follow-up with dynamic radiographs of the cervical spine, and careful neurological assessment are important in the care of these patients. Surgical stabilization should be considered early even in the absence of neurological findings when significant instability is noted since outcome is related to preoperative neurological function. The type of fusion performed is determined by a careful assessment of the location of instability, patient factors, and the experience of the surgeon with various techniques. The type of postoperative immobilization should be decided on an individual basis depending on the quality of fixation achieved at surgery. Patients must be observed closely in the postoperative period for development of early complications and followed-up for the appearance of pseudarthrosis or late instabilities.