Search

Purpose: Ulnar wrist denervation has been a successful treatment for patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain. The purpose of this study was to characterize the articular branches of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) and validate a technique for selective peripheral nerve blockade., Methods: In cadavers, we performed simulated local anesthetic injections using 0.5 mL of 0.5% methylene into the subcutaneous tissue at a point midway between the palpable borders of the pisiform and ulnar styloid. We then dissected the DBUN, characterized its articular branching pattern, and measured staining intensity of the DBUN and the ulnar nerve relative to a standard., Results: The DBUN branched from the ulnar nerve 7.0 ± 1.2 cm proximal to the ulnar styloid. Among 17 specimens, the DBUN provided an average of 1.2 (range, 0-2) ulnocarpal branches and 1.0 (range, 0-2) carpometacarpal articular branches. A simulated local anesthetic injection successfully stained 100% of the DBUN articular branches at or proximal to their takeoff. There was no staining of the proper ulnar nerves. In all specimens, the DBUN supplied at least one articular branch., Conclusions: A point midway between the palpable border of the pisiform and ulnar styloid may be an effective location for selectively blocking the DBUN articular afferents., Clinical Relevance: In this study, we were able to identify a point halfway between the pisiform and ulnar styloid that has the potential to produce a selective peripheral nerve block of the portion of the DBUN that supplies articular fibers to the ulnocarpal joint and the fifth carpometacarpal joint. This technique may prove useful to surgeons treating ulnar-sided wrist pain., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This study aimed to understand the current utilization of surgical approaches for nerve ending management in upper extremity amputation to prevent and treat nerve-related pain. We administered a survey to 190 of 1270 surgeons contacted by email (15% response rate) and analyzed their demographics, practice patterns, and perceptions regarding techniques for nerve ending management in upper extremity amputees. Although many surgical techniques were employed, most surgeons (54%) performed traction neurectomy during amputation and, alternatively, bury nerve into muscle if a neuroma subsequently develops (52%). Surgeons in practice less than 10 years were more likely to perform targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) than surgeons in practice greater than 10 years (p<0.001). TMR and RPNI were performed more frequently for proximal amputations than distal amputations, but there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing to utilize these techniques. Surgeons commonly cited improved prosthetic control, pain, and phantom limb symptoms as reasons for performing TMR and RPNI. Increased physician compensation as a consideration was more commonly cited among TMR non-adopter than adopters (31% vs 14%, p=0.008). There is no consensus regarding techniques for the prevention or treatment of nerve ending pain in upper extremity amputees. TMR and RPNI are being utilized with increasing frequency and both patient and surgeon factors affect implementation in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Understanding the morbidity of sural nerve harvest is important when counselling patients regarding nerve grafts. Existing data consist of small studies with varying degrees of follow-up and a wide range of reported donor site outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and pool the current data for postoperative outcomes after sural nerve graft harvest., Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify studies that examined donor site outcomes of sural nerve graft harvests., Results: Five-hundred and fourteen studies were identified through a literature search, and nine studies met inclusion criteria. There were 240 patients who underwent sural nerve grafts. The most common methods for sensory evaluation were patient survey (44.4%) and Semmes-Weinstein evaluation (33.3%). Five studies reported surface areas of sensory loss, and this generally decreased over time after sural nerve grafting. Overall, 87.2% of patients (n = 190) reported sensory loss, 25.6% (n = 42) of patients reported pain, 22.2% (n = 28) of patients reported cold sensitivity, and 10% (n = 20) of patients reported functional impairment at follow-up. When the proximal sural nerve was spared during harvest, the extent of sensory loss and pain were less than harvest at the popliteal fossa (87.4% vs 95.7%, p = 0.0407 and 9.1% vs 35.5%, p = 0.0004, respectively)., Conclusions: In this study, we present the extent of sensory loss and rates of pain, cold sensitivity, and functional impairment after sural nerve harvest. These data should be discussed prior to surgery in order for patients and surgeons to make an informed decision., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)