Search

Background: Aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients younger than 60 years because of missing data on long-term outcomes in this age group., Methods: From 1984 to 2008, 383 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 373 patients 60 years or younger (mean age, 51.0 ± 9.2 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded from our cohort. Baseline clinical, perioperative, and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. The mean follow-up was 8.6 ± 5.9 years, for a total of 3,299 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 95.3% of patients included., Results: Operative mortality rate was 1.3%. Eighty-five late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 2.6%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 78.1% ± 2.6%, 65.6% ± 3.5%, and 46.8% ± 6.0% after 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2.3%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates attributable to structural valve deterioration at 10, 15, and 20 years were, respectively, 88.3% ± 2.4%, 70.8% ± 4.1%, and 38.1% ± 5.6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to structural valve deterioration at 20 years of 41.6% ± 4.1%. Expected valve durability was 17.6 years for this age group., Conclusions: In selected patients 60 years or younger undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 17.6 years. Reoperation for structural valve deterioration was associated with a low risk of mortality., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) has demonstrated good long-term outcomes, but its durability remains unclear depending on age at implantation. We report our 20-year experience with the Perimount valve implanted in the aortic position, with particular attention to the probability and time to reoperation required due to bioprosthesis deterioration., Methods: From 1984 to 2008 at our center, 2,659 patients (mean age, 70.7 ± 10.4 years) underwent aortic valve replacement using the Perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Patients were prospectively followed on an annual basis (mean 6.7 ± 4.8 years, range 0 to 24.6 years) with an echocardiogram at the time of follow-up. Cumulative follow-up was 18,404 valve-years. Bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment., Results: Overall operative mortality was 2.8%. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths averaged 52.4% ± 1.2%, 31.1% ± 1.4%, and 14.4% ± 1.7% after 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Age-stratified freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration at 15 and 20 years was 70.8% ± 4.1% and 38.1% ± 5.6%, respectively, for the group aged 60 years or less, 82.7% ± 2.9% and 59.6% ± 7.6% for those 60 to 70 years, and 98.1% ± 0.8% at 15 years and above for the oldest group. Expected valve durability is 19.7 years for the entire cohort., Conclusions: With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years, and particularly a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a tissue valve in the aortic position, especially in patients over 60 years of age., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) represents a common degenerative disease, often requiring surgery. If untreated, MVP with considerable valve incompetence can lead to cardiovascular and systemic complications causing substantial morbidity and mortality. In contrast with the wide knowledge concerning clinical and physiological features, currently available data regarding its molecular bases are very limited. We review current knowledge concerning MVP biological mechanisms, focusing on specific aspects of haemostasis, platelet function, oxidative stress, extracellular matrix remodeling and genomics. In particular, available evidence supports the role played by tissue remodeling processes in determining MVP onset and progression. Moreover, even if a consistent although controversial perturbation of haemostatic system and alterations of the oxidative stress equilibrium have been proposed to influence disease development, it is unknown whether these changes precede or follow MVP occurrence. Consequently, the complete knowledge of all the biochemical pathways involved are far from complete. In addition, changes in the regulation pattern of adrenergic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems have been described in MVP syndrome, a condition characterized by the association of MVP with other peculiar neurological and general symptoms, but it is unknown whether these abnormalities are shared by "traditional" MVP. In conclusion, MVP is probably a multi-factorial process, and many aspects still need to be clarified. As surgery can only correct the damaged valve but not the underlying mechanisms, a more complete knowledge of the involved molecular pathways is necessary, as it may allow the discovery of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at modifying or slackening MVP natural course in the early phases., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) was developed to predict immediate outcomes after adult cardiac operations, but less than 30% of the cases used to develop this score were valve procedures. We studied EuroSCORE performance in valve procedures., Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published studies reporting the assessment of discriminatory power of the EuroSCORE by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis in adult valve operations. A comparison of observed and predicted mortality rates was also performed., Results: A literature search identified 37 potentially eligible studies, and 12 were selected for meta-analysis comprising 26,621 patients with 1250 events (mortality rate, 4.7%). Meta-analysis of these studies provided an average area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.730 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717 to 0.743). The same results were obtained when meta-analyses were performed separately in studies categorized on reliability of uncertainty estimation: in the seven studies reporting reliable uncertainty estimation (8175 patients with 358 events; mortality rate, 4.4%), the ROC curve provided an average AUC value of 0.724 (95% CI, 0.699 to 0.749). The five studies not reporting reliable uncertainty estimation (18,446 patients with 892 events; mortality rate, 4.8%) had an average AUC of 0.732 (95% CI, 0.717 to 0.747). We documented a constant trend to overpredict mortality by EuroSCORE, both in the additive and especially in the logistic form., Conclusions: The EuroSCORE has low discrimination ability for valve surgery, and it sensibly overpredicts risk. Alternative risk scoring algorithms should be seriously considered., (2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether, in recent years, sex differences in the type of care during coronary artery bypass graft surgery procedures occurred., Methods: Between 1995 and 2004, 5,935 consecutive patients (4,867 men and 1,068 women) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery; propensity score matching was used to investigate whether sex adversely impacts standard care and early outcomes of coronary revascularization., Results: Of the 1,068 women undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, only 280 (26.2%) were matched on propensity scores with men. Distribution of preoperative variables among matched pairs was, on average, equal. Propensity-matched women received similar number of distal anastomoses as men (2.70 +/- 0.89 versus 2.82 +/- 0.97; p = 0.13), had similar rates of complete revascularization (82.5% versus 81.6%; p = 0.78), and of off-pump procedures (24.3% versus 27.5%; p = 0.39); also, the rate of utilization of arterial grafts (left internal mammary artery 98.5% versus 98.2%; p = 0.73; right internal mammary artery 3.2% versus 3.2%; p > 0.99; radial artery 8.2% versus 9.6%; p = 0.55), as well as the number of distal anastomoses performed with arterial grafts (1.11 +/- 0.36 versus 1.13 +/- 0.39; p = 0.47), were similar in women and men. No differences were detected in major complications (in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and stroke) in propensity-matched pairs, whereas women had lower reexploration for bleeding and blood transfusion rates., Conclusions: The preoperative profiles of women and men were markedly different, as only one fourth of women could be matched. In the current era, after adjustment for preoperative variables, female patients received the same standard of care as men, with improved results in some minor early outcomes.

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of linear and geometric left ventricular aneurysm reconstruction on early postoperative outcomes., Methods: A search of computerized databases supplemented with manual bibliographic review was performed for all peer-reviewed English language publications concerning randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting the results of left ventricular reconstruction after both linear and geometric reconstruction techniques. Meta-analyses of several short-term outcomes were performed., Results: No randomized trial was identified. Eighteen nonrandomized trials were found with a total of 1,814 and 803 patients who underwent linear and geometric reconstruction, respectively. Meta-analysis of all studies (n = 18) revealed an increased risk of in-hospital death for patients undergoing linear reconstruction (relative risk = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.26, p = 0.01). The subanalysis of studies in which linear reconstruction was adopted mainly in the first period of time, and geometric reconstruction was adopted in a later phase, still showed a significant advantage in terms of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing geometric reconstruction (n = 11 studies, relative risk = 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.93, p = 0.004). By contrast, when the two surgical approaches were carried out in the same time lag, there was no difference between linear and geometric reconstruction techniques (n = 7 studies, relative risk = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.92, p = 0.89). No differences in the other outcomes of interest were observed., Conclusions: The advantage for geometric reconstruction techniques in terms of in-hospital mortality shown in some studies can be an effect of learning curve or of improvement over time in management of these difficult patients. Further studies are required to clarify this issue.