Search

Background: There is no systematic assessment whether the quality of reporting has been improved since the CONSORT Statement was introduced into China in 1997. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of the CONSORT Statement is associated with improved quality of reporting of RCTs published in Chinese pediatrics journals., Methods: Six core Chinese pediatrics journals that included Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics, Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, and Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery were searched from inception through Dec. 2010. The CONSORT checklists were used to assess the quality of reporting. Data was collected using a standardized form. Analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 software., Results: A total of 619 RCTs were included. The quality of reporting has improved significantly in aspects such as introduction, recruitment, baseline data, and ancillary analyses (p<0.05), but not in several important methodological components, including sample size calculation (0.63% vs.1.08%), randomization sequence generation (3.18% vs. 7.58%), allocation concealment (0% vs. 1.08%), and blinding (0% vs. 0.87%)., Conclusions: The quality of reporting of RCTs has not significantly improved since the CONSORT Statement was introduced into China. The reporting remains poor, and often inadequate for assessment of the rigor of studies. Chinese pediatrics journals should reinforce the use of the CONSORT Statement in the reporting of trials., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the results of palliative surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in terms of quality of life, survival period and cholangitis rate., Methods: The clinical data on 232 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the last 22 years were analyzed retrospectively. Palliative operations included extrahepatic or intrahepatic choledochojejunostomy (123 patients), bridge internal drainage (15), endoscopic biliary drainage (49), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or celiotomy biliary drainage (29), and exploratory celiotomy external drainage (16)., Results: In this series, the operative mortality rate was 9.1%, and no significant difference was observed between groups. The rate of cholangitis after operation was significantly lower in Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy group (16.2%) and bridge internal drainage group (15.4%) than in internal drainage group (35.5%, P<0.01), including percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and celiotomy (or PTBD) external biliary drainage group (39.1%, P<0.01). No significant difference in survival was observed between the Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy group (9.3+/-1.8 months) and PTBD (or ERBD) internal drainage group (8.7+/- 2.2 months), but the survivals of the above groups were significantly longer than those of the bridge internal drainage group (6.5+/-1.7 months, P<0.05) and celiotomy (or PTBD) external biliary drainage group (4.4+/-2.1 months, P<0.01)., Conclusions: In unresectable cholangiocarcinomas, either operative bilioenteric bypass or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage can achieve significant palliation. Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy is the best choice for palliative operation. The use of U-tube is recommended for internal radiation therapy.