Di Filippo Y, Dalle S, Mortier L, Dereure O, Dalac S, Dutriaux C, Leccia MT, Legoupil D, Saiag P, Brunet-Possenti F, Arnnault JP, Maubec E, Granel-Brocard F, De Quatrebarbes J, Aubin F, Lesimple T, Beylot-Barry M, Stoebner PE, Dupuy A, Stephan A, Grob JJ, Lefevre W, Oriano B, Allayous C, Lebbé C, and Montaudié H
Background: The 'obesity paradox' suggests that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with better survival values in metastatic melanoma patients, especially those receiving targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Higher BMI is also associated with higher incidences of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). This study assesses whether BMI is associated with survival outcomes and adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients with systemic therapy., Patients and Methods: This multicentric retrospective study, conducted from 1 March 2013 to 29 April 2019, enrolled adults with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma from the French multicentric prospective cohort-MelBase (NCT02828202). Patients with first-line chemotherapy and targeted and immune therapy were included. Underweight people and those with metastatic mucosal or ocular melanoma were excluded. BMI was categorized using the World Health Organization criteria. Co-primary outcomes included the association between BMI and progression-free survival and overall survival, stratified by treatment type, sex, and age. Secondary endpoints were the association of BMI with overall response and TRAEs. Multivariate analyses were carried out., Results: A total of 1214 patients were analyzed. Their median age was 66.0 years (range, 53-75). Male predominance was observed [n = 738 (61%)]. Most patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (63%), followed by targeted therapy (32%), and had stage M1c disease (60.5%). Obese patients represented 22% of the cohort. The median follow-up duration was 13.5 months (range, 6.0-27.5). In the pooled analysis, no positive or negative association between BMI and progression-free survival (P = 0.88)/overall survival (P = 0.25) was observed, regardless of treatment type, sex, and age. These results were nonsignificant in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The objective response rate, according to BMI category, did not differ significantly regardless of age. TRAEs were not associated with BMI., Conclusion: The observed lack of an association between BMI and survival demonstrates that BMI is not a valuable marker of systemic treatment-related outcomes in metastatic melanoma. Future approaches might focus on the whole-body distribution., Competing Interests: Disclosure StD reports institutional research funding from Roche; institutional research funding and nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); and an immediate family member who is employed by Sanofi and owns stock or other ownership interest in the company. LM reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche, Novartis, BMS, and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) outside the submitted work. OD reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Genevrier, Kyowa Kirin, Recordati Rare Diseases outside the submitted work. SoD received research funding and travel costs covered by BMS and MSD. Travel costs covered by Pierre Fabre. CD reports personal fees from Roche, BMS, Novartis, MSD, and Pierre Fabre Laboratories outside the submitted work. PS reports research funding and personal fees from Roche; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre Laboratories; and personal fees from Array, Sanofi, and Merck, all outside the submitted work. J-PA reports personal fees from BMS, grants from BMS, Novartis, and MSD, during the conduct of the study. EM reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from MSD; personal fees from Sanofi and Novartis; personal fees and nonfinancial support from BMS; and nonfinancial support from Pierre Fabre Laboratories, all outside the submitted work. JDQ reports nonfinancial support from BMS, MSD, and Janssen outside the submitted work. FA reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Novartis, MSD, and Roche outside the submitted work. TL reports research funding and personal fees from Roche and personal fees from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre Laboratories, and Incyte, all outside the submitted work. P-ES reports travel accomodations -meetings by BMS, Novartis, MSD, and Sanofi. J-JG reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from BMS, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Merck, Amgen, Pierre Fabre Laboratories, Sanofi, and Pfizer and nonfinancial support from Amgen, all outside the submitted work. CA reports travel accommodations-meetings by Roche, BMS, and Amgen. CL reports grants and personal fees from BMS, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Avantis Medical Systems, personal fees from Pierre Fabre, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Incyte, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. HM reports institutional research funding from LeoPharma; institutional research funding, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from BMS; personal fees from Pierre Fabre Laboratories and MSD; and nonfinancial support from Novartis, all outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)