Search

Background: Family or friend carers of people with cancer report high levels of depression, anxiety, caregiving strain, and unmet needs. Limited strategies for identification and management of distress have been established among cancer carers. This paper describes the protocol of two linked studies: Study 1a, a distress screening and stepped care pathway feasibility study and Study 1b, a hybrid implementation-effectiveness Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) to assess the benefit of a comprehensive, carer-centred online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) program for carers with anxiety and depression., Methods: For Study 1a, 300 cancer carers will be screened for distress. Carers with low distress will be referred to publicly available carer resources. Carers scoring 4 and higher on the distress thermometer will complete depression and anxiety measures. Carers with high anxiety/depression will be recommended psychological therapy. Carers with mild/moderate anxiety and/or depression will be allocated to the Carers iCBT Program, evaluated via a RCT with waitlist control group (Study 1b). For Study 1b, intervention group carers will receive access to a 6-lesson self-directed online iCBT program. Waitlist-controls will access the intervention at 14 weeks. Intervention and control groups will complete baseline, 6 week, and 14 week self-report measures; controls will complete additional measures at 20 and 28 weeks. A sample size of n = 166 carers in the iCBT RCT is needed., Conclusions: If acceptable, feasible and effective, this pathway and iCBT intervention could offer a sustainable, scalable and low-cost approach to identifying and managing distress in carers, and potentially improving patient and carer outcomes., Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry number: ACTRN12623001341617p., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Many oncology health professionals (HPs) report communicating with carers as complex; and receive limited carer-relevant training. We developed an online HP education program for supporting and managing carer involvement (eTRIO). We aimed to assess whether HPs' self-efficacy in carer communication, knowledge, and decision-making preferences improve following eTRIO. Satisfaction and implementation potential were assessed., Methods: This type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study used a pre-post single arm intervention design. HPs completed baseline measures, the eTRIO online module, and measures at 1- and 12-weeks post-intervention. Measures included: self-efficacy in carer communication (13-items), applied knowledge (7-items), preference for carer involvement in decisions (1-item). Fifteen of participants completed feedback interviews which underwent thematic analysis. User analytics were collected and analysed., Results: Fifty-six HPs completed baseline measures, 42 completed post- and follow-up measures. At baseline mean self-efficacy score was 88. HPs showed a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy post-intervention (mean = 105.8, CI [12.99, 20.47]), maintained at 12-weeks (mean = 101.1, CI [8.00, 15.72]). There were no changes in knowledge or decision-making preferences. Program engagement and satisfaction were high, 86.7% participants rated eTRIO as very/extremely helpful., Conclusions and Practice Implications: eTRIO provided HPs with confidence to effectively engage with carers and manage complex situations such as family dominance. These gains are noteworthy, as conflict with families/carers contributes to HP burnout., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To identify patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making (SDM) about treatment., Methods: We conducted a scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched for literature across seven databases until March 2022, and included qualitative studies that focused on associations between patient-related characteristics and SDM about treatment in adults. We analyzed studies using an inductive thematic approach., Results: The search yielded 5948 articles, of which 70 were included. We identified many different patient-related characteristics, which we grouped into four categories related to: (1) the individual who is facing the decision, (2) the decision, (3) the relationship between the patient and the clinician and others involved in the decision, and (4) the healthcare context., Conclusions: Studies report a variety of patient-related characteristics that may affect patient involvement in SDM. Amongst others, patients may need to feel informed, to understand their role in SDM, and be able to communicate. Involvement may be challenging with characteristics such as perceived time pressure, poor patient-clinician relationships, emotional distress, and severe illness., Practice Implications: In order to truly involve patients in SDM, we might need to focus on characteristics such as patient emotions and relationship building, besides information provision and values clarification., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: People living with multimorbidity often rely on the support of informal family carers, yet challenges frequently arise when carers of people with multimorbidity (PwM) interact with health professionals (HPs) and healthcare systems. This study aimed to provide insights into the experiences and challenges involved in working with carers of PwM, from HPs' perspectives., Methods: Twenty-one HPs (11 doctors, 5 nurses and 5 allied health professionals) from varying specialities participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analysed using thematic analysis., Results: Five themes were identified: carer involvement makes multimorbidity easier to manage, differing views on HP's responsibilities to carers, multimorbidity makes management harder for HPs, strategies to support carers of PwM, and multimorbidity is one aspect of complexity., Conclusions: HPs recognise unique needs of carers of PwM, yet perceive challenges addressing these needs and supporting this commonly overlooked group., Practice Implications: The unmet needs of carers of PwM that HPs identified in this study suggest pathways for future improvements and interventions, including HP education and training, and appropriate referral pathways for carers of PwM to access supportive services. Underpinning these findings is the need for greater recognition and respect for the critical work of family carers in healthcare., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology (CLEO) questionnaire was developed to measure concerns cancer survivors may have about late effects. The current study sought to assess the Concerns about Late Effects in Oncology's (CLEO) psychometric properties - factor structure, construct validity, discriminatory power, and internal consistency., Methods: 147 breast cancer survivors completed a survey. Factor structure was determined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Construct validity was assessed against fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and neuroticism. Discriminatory power was assessed against participants' age and clinical characteristics., Results: The EFA confirmed a 4-factor structure; health professionals' support, psychological impacts, adapting, and daily functional impacts. There was only partial support for construct validity and discriminatory power. The CLEO demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's α = 0.87 (health professionals' support: α = 0.89, psychological impacts: α = 0.93, adapting: α = 0.82, and daily functional impacts: α = 0.89)., Conclusion: The findings suggest further development of the CLEO should focus on the psychological and functional impacts of late effects., Practice Implications: Use of the CLEO may enhance communication about the impact of late effects, ensuring earlier identification and management of late effects in this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Competing interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Given the stressful and emotional nature of cancer, challenging interactions between nurses, patients, and family frequently occur. Nurses are rarely equipped with strategies to avoid or de-escalate stressful situations with carers, which can include displays of conflict, anger, or dominance. A brief online education module (TRIO-Conflict) was developed to provide nurses with management strategies to use in situations of conflict. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of TRIO-Conflict., Methods: Nurses were recruited through an Australian breast cancer organisation (McGrath Foundation). Participants completed pre/post module measures of attitudes towards carers, confidence in their skills to effectively navigate challenging interactions with carers, and applied knowledge of management strategies. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative feedback was analysed using content analysis., Results: 52 nurses completed pre-/post- measures, with 4 semi-structured interviews conducted. Significant improvements in attitudes towards carers (p = .010) and confidence in one's own ability to manage challenging interactions with carers (p < .001) were found, but not knowledge of strategies. Most nurses found TRIO-Conflict very/extremely helpful (87%) and were satisfied with content (94%) and usability (93%)., Conclusion: TRIO-Conflict utilised evidence-based learning techniques (provision of example phrases, video vignettes, reflective exercises) to improve nurses attitudes and confidence., Practice Implications: TRIO-Conflict is a brief, targeted, clinically relevant, and easily accessible online training programme which could be widely disseminated to oncology nurses., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Most patients want their family involved in consultations and decisions, however some family caregivers report feeling overwhelmed and unsure of their role. As caregivers are increasingly looking to medical websites for guidance, this study aimed to review reputable web-resources available to inform family caregivers on how to be involved in medical consultations and decisions., Methods: Google searches were performed using lay search strings, to imitate how a cancer caregiver may locate information. Relevant webpages were included if they were directed at caregivers and from a reputable health organisation. Qualitative content analyses were performed on the included webpages., Results: 22 webpages were included and 8 were directed at caregivers of cancer patients. Six key categories of information were identified: preparing for consultations, helping during consultations, advocating for the patient, decision-making, communicating in hospital settings, and communicating with family and friends., Conclusion: A range of online resources were found to guide family caregivers, particularly cancer caregivers, on involvement in consultations. However, few provided information to caregivers on complex situations such as treatment decision-making, advocating for patient's needs, and communicating in a hospital setting., Practice Implications: Clinicians can actively refer family caregivers to online resources that support caregiver communication in medical settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Family caregivers regularly attend medical consultations and are often involved in decision-making; however, there are few practical strategies to guide effective communication for the clinician-patient-family trio. We aimed to develop and evaluate the first comprehensive guidelines for oncology physicians and nurses, on how to positively and effectively involve family caregivers of adult patients in consultations and patient care (TRIO Guidelines-1) and how to manage challenging interactions with family caregivers (TRIO Guidelines-2)., Methods: The TRIO Guidelines were based on a comprehensive literature review and input from an expert advisory group (n = 10). They underwent two rounds of formal evaluation via an online Delphi consensus process involving international experts (n = 35), and a subset were piloted with 24 breast cancer clinicians in a workshop format., Results: TRIO Guidelines-1 incorporate strategies and sub-strategies on facilitating collaborative and effective family involvement (6 topics). Example wording, behaviours, and level of evidence are provided throughout. All 24 clinicians rated the guidelines as helpful after the pilot workshop., Conclusion: These guidelines will be a useful educational tool for clinicians and medical/nursing students., Practice Implications: By equipping clinicians with strategies to facilitate effective and collaborative family engagement, the TRIO Guidelines have the potential to transform communication in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Family caregivers can, at times, add complexity to clinical encounters. Difficult family caregivers and dynamics may: derail consultation communication, reduce patient autonomy, and compromise effective clinical care. A paucity of practical strategies guiding effective clinician-family communication exists. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the first comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines (the TRIO guidelines) for oncology physicians and nurses to better manage several complex/challenging situations involving family members., Methods: TRIO Guidelines were based on a comprehensive review of literature, relevant guidelines, and feedback from an expert advisory group (n = 10). Draft guidelines underwent two rounds of evaluation via an online Delphi consensus process involving international experts (n = 35)., Results: Guidelines incorporate topic areas, strategies, and sub-strategies on managing challenging family involvement (7 topics). Example wording, behaviours and level of evidence are provided., Conclusion: Challenging triadic interactions require skillful navigation, and the TRIO Guidelines provide clear, specific, and evidence-based strategies for clinicians to utilise in these potentially stressful encounters. Training based on these guidelines may improve both patient care and clinician confidence., Practice Implications: Implementation of these guidelines into medical/nursing curricula and as a component of continuing professional development programs will likely be highly beneficial., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Family caregivers are regularly involved in cancer consultations and treatment decision-making (DM). Yet there is limited conceptual description of caregiver influence/involvement in DM. To address this, an empirically-grounded conceptual framework of triadic DM (TRIO Framework) and corresponding graphical aid (TRIO Triangle) were developed., Methods: Jabareen's model for conceptual framework development informed multiple phases of development/validation, incorporation of empirical research and theory, and iterative revisions by an expert advisory group., Results: Findings coalesced into six empirically-grounded conceptual insights: i) Caregiver influence over a decision is variable amongst different groups; ii) Caregiver influence is variable within the one triad over time; iii) Caregivers are involved in various ways in the wider DM process; iv) DM is not only amongst three, but can occur among wider social networks; v) Many factors may affect the form and extent of caregiver involvement in DM; vi) Caregiver influence over, and involvement in, DM is linked to their everyday involvement in illness care/management., Conclusion: The TRIO Framework/Triangle may serve as a useful guide for future empirical, ethical and/or theoretical work., Practice Implications: This Framework can deepen clinicians's and researcher's understanding of the diverse and varying scope of caregiver involvement and influence in DM., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Given increasing rates of risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM), and the potentially significant psychological sequelae of this irreversible procedure, health professionals (HPs) regularly refer patients to psychologists for pre-operative assessment and support. This is the first study to provide qualitative insights from HPs into the role of psychologists who are working with women considering RRM or CPM., Materials and Methods: 24 HPs (psychologists, surgeons, breast care nurses and genetic counsellors) experienced in treating patients before or after RRM/CPM completed semi-structured interviews (n = 15) or participated in a focus group (n = 10). Interviews were qualitatively analysed using Framework methods., Results: Qualitative analysis revealed four interconnected themes: (1) perceived patient motivation to undergo RRM/CPM; (2) HP reasons for psychologist referral; (3) role of the psychologist; and (4) value of psychologist involvement. The reported psychologist role included: mental health assessment, checking understanding of information, ensuring informed decision-making, preparation for the procedure, and management of post-surgical challenges., Conclusion: Psychologists are perceived by HPs to have a key role in the multi-disciplinary care of patients considering RRM or CPM., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Little is known about how family are involved in cancer treatment decision-making. This study aimed to qualitatively explore Australian oncology clinicians', patients', and family members' attitudes towards, and experiences of, family involvement in decision-making., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 cancer patients, 33 family members, 10 oncology nurses and 11 oncologists. Framework analysis methods were used., Results: Three main themes were uncovered: (i) how family are involved in the decision-making process: specific behaviours of family across 5 (extended) decision-making stages; (ii) attitudes towards family involvement in the decision-making process: balancing patient authority with the rights of the family; and (iii) factors influencing family involvement: patient, family, cultural, relationship, and decision., Conclusion: This study highlighted many specific behaviours of family throughout the decision-making process, the complex participant attitudes toward retaining patient authority whilst including the family, and insight into influencing factors. These findings will inform a conceptual framework describing family involvement in decision-making., Practice Implications: Clinicians could ascertain participant preferences and remain open to the varying forms of family involvement in decision-making. Given the important role of family in the decision-making process, family inclusive consultation strategies are needed., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)