Search

Orthognathic surgery has always been a classical focus of maxillofacial surgery. Since more than 100 years, various surgical techniques for mandibular repositioning have been developed and clinically tested. Since the establishment of plate and screw osteosynthesis, orthognathic surgery became more stable and safe. Nowadays, different surgical methods for mobilising the mandible are existing. This international multicenter analysis (n = 51 hospitals) is providing first evidence based data for the current use of different surgical methods. The dominating techniques were Obwegeser/dal Pont (61%) followed by Hunsuck/Epker (37%) and Perthes/Schlössmann (29%). The main osteosynthesis materials were plates (82%), bicortical screws (23.5%), or a combination of both (5.9%). 47% of all centers reported to use several surgical methods at the same time, depending on the anatomical problem and the surgeon's preference. This shows that different surgical methods seem to work as comparable, safe, and reliable procedures in everydays clinical practise. On this basis, further prospective studies could evaluate possible advantages for our patients., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aetiology of anti-resorptive agent-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) is still under debate. Clinical and genetic risk factors are currently being investigated to help understand its pathogenesis. This case-control study analysed a large number of cancer patients (n = 230) under therapy with intravenous bisphosphonates, half of which were diagnosed with ARONJ. Multiple myeloma, greater patient age and the use of more than one bisphosphonate were identified as clinical risk factors on logistic regression analysis. In addition, 204 patients were genotyped for HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 and the allele frequencies were compared between ARONJ (n = 94) and unaffected cancer patients (n = 110). For the HLA class II alleles, a strong increase in the frequency of DRB1*15, DQB1*06:02, DRB1*01 and DQB1*05:01 was observed in the ARONJ group. These results were reinforced on analysis of the respective haplotypes, with DRB1*15-DQB1*06:02 being significantly associated with the development of ARONJ (odds ratio [OR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-5.0). The presence of at least one of the haplotypes DRB1*15-DQB1*06:02 and DRB1*01-DQB1*05:01 was highly associated with the development of ARONJ (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7-5.5). The data in this study of a large number of cancer patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates suggest that MHC class II polymorphisms represent genetic risk factors for the development of ARONJ. This result supports recent findings that inflammation and infection might play an important role in the pathogenesis of ARONJ., (Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bisphosphonates (BPs) are powerful drugs that inhibit bone metabolism. Adverse side effects are rare but potentially severe such as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). To date, research has primarily focused on the development and progression of BRONJ in cancer patients with bone metastasis, who have received high dosages of BPs intravenously. However, a potential dilemma may arise from a far larger cohort, namely the millions of osteoporosis patients on long-term oral BP therapy., Patients and Methods: This current study assessed 470 cases of BRONJ diagnosed between 2004 and 2008 at eleven different European clinical centres and has resulted in the identification of a considerable cohort of osteoporosis patients suffering from BRONJ. Each patient was clinically examined and a detailed medical history was raised., Results: In total, 37/470 cases (7.8%) were associated with oral BP therapy due to osteoporosis. The majority (57%) of affected individuals did not have any risk factors for BRONJ as defined by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The average duration of BP intake of patients without risk factors was longer and the respective patients were older compared to patients with risk factors, but no statistical significant difference was found. In 78% of patients the duration of oral BP therapy exceeded 3 years prior to BRONJ diagnosis., Discussion: The results from this study suggest that the relative frequency of osteoporosis patients on oral BPs suffering from BRONJ is higher than previously reported. There is an urgent need to substantiate epidemiological characteristics of BRONJ in large cohorts of individuals., (Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bisphosphonates (BPs) have transformed our ability to treat certain malignancies, osteoporosis and hypercalcaemia. This class of drug is assumed to be well tolerated by most. There are some important caveats to this assumption, however, one of the significances being the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)., Material and Methods: This multi-centre retrospective study examined the role of different BPs on the development of ONJ, its clinical presentation and the efficacy of various treatment modalities, comparing these findings with the available literature., Results: A total of 78 patients from 17 centres were identified with ONJ. A majority of patients identified with ONJ had used Pamidronate or Zoledronate (93.6%) intravenously. 94.9% of patients had received BP in the course of treatment for malignancies and a majority had also received prior chemotherapy or exogenous steroids. 82.1% of patients had received BP for more than 1 year. The mean time from the introduction of BP to the development of ONJ in 24 patients from our department was 31.8 months., Conclusions: The most common intraoral manifestation was exposed necrotic jawbone. Tooth extractions and oral surgical intervention appear to place patients on BP therapy at risk of ONJ, especially after intravenous BP treatments. ONJ proved in this study to be remarkably refractory to treatment, with radical resection being the only curative approach. We recommend that all patients receive necessary dental treatment prior to commencing BP therapy.

Introduction: Airbags are intended to minimize facial injuries, alone and when used in combination with seatbelts in high-velocity motor-vehicle accidents. They may occasionally perforate, resulting in the release of sodium azide or sodium hydroxide, which result in chemical burns when in contact with skin. The force of deployment may itself result in significant blunt trauma, and there is a temperature rise during the inflation causing thermal burns, possibly as a separate and unnecessary consequence of a relatively minor accident., Method: A case report is presented. The literature on such injuries was reviewed and the mechanism of airbag deployment commented., Conclusion: Alternative designs and mechanisms of linking the activation of the device to the velocity of travel or to add a switch which is activated when accessing a motorway are recommended.