Search

Background: The head and neck region has rich regional lymphatic network, with a theoretical risk on contralateral metastasis from oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). There is a long-standing convention to irradiate the great majority of these tumors electively to both sides of the neck to reduce the risk of contralateral regional failure (cRF), but this can induce significant toxicity. We aimed to identify patient groups where elective contralateral irradiation may safely be omitted., Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for original full-text articles in English with a combination of search terms related to the end points: cRF in OPC primarily treated by radiotherapy only to the ipsilateral neck and identifying predictive factors for increased incidence of cRF. The data from the identified studies were pooled, the incidence of cRF was calculated and the correlation with different predictive factors was investigated., Results: Eleven full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, 1116 patients were treated to the ipsilateral neck alone. The mean incidence of cRF was 2.42% (range 0-5.9%, 95% CI 1.6-3.5%). The incidence of cRF correlated only with T-stage (p=0.008), and involvement of midline (p=0.001). However, the significant correlation with T-stage can be explained by the very low incidence of cRF among T1 (0.77%), and disappeared when the incidence of cRF was compared between T2, T3,and T4 (p=0.344)., Conclusion: The incidence of cRF in patients with OPC is very low, with involvement of midline providing the most significant prognosticator. These results call for trials on unilateral elective irradiation in selected groups., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Assessment of the impact of a sentinel node biopsy (SNB)-based strategy in cT1/T2 N0 oral cancer on the course of health related quality of life, psychological distress, and shoulder disability, and evaluation of the patients' perspective on neck management strategies., Study Design: Fifty-two patients (39 SNB negative; 13 SNB positive) completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35, and the HADS, IES, and SDQ questionnaires at baseline, after SNB diagnosis and at 6 months of follow-up. Objective shoulder measurements were performed after 2 years and interviews were conducted after 4.5 months of follow-up., Results: All the scores of the questionnaires were not significantly different between SNB negative and SNB positive patients. Objective shoulder functioning was similar. Most patients preferred a SNB-based strategy to an elective neck dissection strategy., Conclusions: The impact of a SNB-based strategy in patients with cT1/T2 N0 oral cancer is comparable for SNB-negative and SNB-positive patients in terms of health-related quality of life, psychological distress and shoulder functioning. Most patients preferred the SNB-based strategy over the elective neck dissection strategy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Results of the Dutch multi-institutional trial on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in oral cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients were consecutively enrolled from 4 institutions, with T1/T2 oral cancer and cN0 neck based on palpation and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Lymphatic mapping consisted of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. For intraoperative SLN detection a gamma-probe was used and in some patients additional blue dye. SLN negative patients were carefully observed, SLN positive patients were treated by neck dissection, radiotherapy or a combination of both. Endpoints of the study were risk of occult lymp node metastases, neck control, accuracy, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS)., Results: Twenty of 62 patients (32%) had positive SLNs. Macrometastases were found in 9 patients, micrometastases in 8, and isolated tumour cells in 3 patients. Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Of the 42 SLN negative patients, 5 developed a regional recurrence of whom 4 patients could be successfully salvaged. DFS, OS and DSS of SLN negative patients were 72.0%, 92.7% and 97.4%, and for SLN positive patients these numbers were 73.7%, 79.7%, 85.0%, respectively (DFS: p=0.916, OS: p=0.134, DSS: p=0.059, respectively). Neck control rate was 97% in SLN negative and 95% in SLN positive patients. Sensitivity was 80% and negative predictive value 88%., Conclusion: SLN biopsy is able to reduce the risk of occult lymph node metastases in T1/T2 oral cancer patients from 40% to 8%, and enables excellent control of the neck., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)