Search

Background: Many patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction have no overt volume overload and normal resting left atrial (LA) pressure., Objectives: This study sought to characterize patients with normal resting LA pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <15 mm Hg) but exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (EILAH)., Methods: The REDUCE LAP-HF II (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) trial randomized 626 patients with ejection fraction ≥40% and exercise PCWP ≥25 mm Hg to atrial shunt or sham procedure. The primary trial outcome, a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, intensification of diuretics, and change in health status was compared between patients with EILAH and those with heart failure and resting left atrial hypertension (RELAH)., Results: Patients with EILAH (29%) had similar symptom severity, but lower natriuretic peptide levels, higher 6-minute walk distance, less atrial fibrillation, lower left ventricular mass, smaller LA volumes, lower E/e', and better LA strain. PCWP was lower at rest, but had a larger increase with exercise in EILAH. Neither group as a whole had a significant effect from shunt therapy vs sham. Patients with EILAH were more likely to have characteristics associated with atrial shunt responsiveness (peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU) and no pacemaker (63% vs 46%; P < 0.001). The win ratio for the primary outcome was 1.56 (P = 0.08) in patients with EILAH and 1.51 (P = 0.04) in those with RELAH when responder characteristics were present., Conclusions: Patients with EILAH had similar symptom severity but less advanced myocardial and pulmonary vascular disease. This important subgroup may be difficult to diagnose without invasive exercise hemodynamics, but it has characteristics associated with favorable response to atrial shunt therapy. (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure [REDUCE LAP-HF TRIAL II]; NCT03088033)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was sponsored by Corvia Medical Inc. Dr Litwin has received research funding from the department of Veterans Affairs, Corvia, AstraZeneca, V-Wave, Axon Therapeutics, and Eli Lilly all paid to the institution; has received consulting fees from CVRx, Axon Therapeutics, Occlutech, Eli Lilly, and Rivus Pharmaceuticals; and has received travel grants, speaker fees, and advisory board honoraria from NovoNordisk and Roche. Dr Komtebedde is employed by Corvia. Dr Burkhoff has consulted for Corvia. Dr Hasenfuß has consulted for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Servier, Vifor; has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and Vifor; and is a co-principal investigator to Impulse Dynamics. Dr Borlaug has received research grants from Corvia, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Mesoblast, Novartis, and Tenax Therapeutics; and has received consulting fees from Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and VADovations. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Eidos, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, DiNAQOR, Tremeau, CellProthera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, AnaCardio, and Akros. Dr Mohan has received research support from Corvia and V-Wave paid to the institution. Dr Kahwash has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Impulse Dynamics, and Cardionomic. Dr Sverdlov has received research grants from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (Future Leader Fellowships 101918 and 106025), Department of Health and Aged Care (Australia): Medical Research Future Fund (MRF2017053), New South Wales Health (Australia), Novartis Australia, Biotronik, RACE Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor Pharma; and has received personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Fail has received research support paid to the institution from Corvia and Alleviant. Dr Chung has served as a consultant to Intershunt. Dr Kaye has received research support from Corvia. Dr Hummel has received research grant funding from National Institutes of Health, Veterans Affairs, American Heart Association, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Axon Therapies. Dr Zirlik has received personal consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Abbott, Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiorentis, Corvia, Daichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Neucomed, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Rigel, and Stealth Peptides. Dr Hayward has received research support from Corvia, Medtronic, Abbott, Roche, and Procyrion. Dr Lewis has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL 151841, R01-HL131029, R01-HL159514), American Heart Association (15GPSGC-24800006), Amgen, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and SoniVie; has received honoraria for advisory boards outside of the current study from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, NXT, American Regent, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, and Amgen; and has received royalties from UpToDate for scientific content authorship related to exercise physiology. Dr Gupta has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Imara, Corvia, and Astellas Pharma. Dr Cikes has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Novartis, and Pfizer; has received travel grants, speaker fees, and advisory board honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Amicus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Krka Pharma, LivaNova, Medtronic, Novartis, Orion Corporation, Pfizer, Sanofi, Swixx BioPharma, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, all outside of the present study; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Gustafsson has received honoraria outside the present study as a consultant for Abbott, Pfizer, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Alnylam; has received speaker fees from Novartis and Orion Pharma; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Silvestry has received research support from Corvia. Dr Rowin has received research support from Corvia; and has served as a consultant for Cardiovascular Clinical Sciences. Dr Cutlip has received research support from Corvia paid to the institution. Dr Kitzman has received honoraria outside the present study as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Rivus, Keyto, and Novartis; has received grant funding outside the present study from Novartis, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca; owns stock in Gilead Sciences; and has received research support from Corvia. Dr Shah has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (U54 HL160273, R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, R01 HL149423), Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Novartis, and Pfizer; and has received personal fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiora, Coridea, CVRx, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Eisai, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia Therapeutics, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Rivus, Sanofi, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and United Therapeutics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although drug-eluting stents are still the default interventional treatment of coronary artery disease, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represent a novel alternative therapeutic strategy in certain anatomic conditions. The effect of DCBs is based on the fast and homogenous transfer of antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall during single balloon inflation by means of a lipophilic matrix without the use of permanent implants. Although their use is established for in-stent restenosis of both bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, recent randomized clinical data demonstrate a good efficacy and safety profile in de novo small-vessel disease and high bleeding risk. In addition, there are other emerging indications (e.g., bifurcation lesions, large-vessel disease, diabetes mellitus, acute coronary syndromes). Because the interaction among the different delivery balloon designs, doses, formulations, and release kinetics of the drugs used is important, there seems to be no "class effect" of DCBs. On the basis of the amount of recently published data, the International DCB Consensus Group provides this update of previous recommendations summarizing the historical background, technical considerations such as choice of device and implantation technique, possible indications, and future perspectives., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic total occlusions remain one of the biggest challenges for interventional cardiologists and the high risk of restenosis and stent thrombosis is still a major problem. Drug-coated balloons showed favorable results for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and other lesion types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of a drug-coated balloon only approach for chronic total occlusion., Methods: We included 34 patients with a native chronic total occlusion treated only by drug-coated balloons. A visual residual stenosis of 30% or less without major dissection was considered a satisfactory percutaneous intervention result according to the German Consensus Group recommendations for drug-coated balloon use. We collected clinical and procedural data. Angiograms were conducted during the procedure and at follow-up. Quantitative coronary analysis was performed and mean and minimal lumen diameter and late luminal changes were assessed., Results: The recanalization was considered satisfactory in 79.4% (n=27). Restenosis occurred in 11.8% (n=4) and reocclusion in 5.9% (n=2). Out of the 27 patients with a satisfactory initial result, 3.7% (n=1) had reocclusion and 3.7% (n=1) had restenosis. In the subgroup without satisfactory result (n=7), restenosis occurred in 3 patients (42.9%) and reocclusion in 1 patient (14.3%). A luminal increase was found in 67.6% (n=23) and mean late luminal gain was 0.11±0.49mm. Angina class improved significantly (p<0.001). There was no death or myocardial infarction., Conclusions: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty without stenting is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment method for chronic total occlusions if the predilatation result is good., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The 2009 European Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) have been adopted for Germany. While the guidelines contain detailed recommendations regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), they contain only a relatively short paragraph on other, much more frequent forms of PH including PH owing to left heart disease. The guidelines point out that the drugs currently used to treat patients with PAH (prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) have not been sufficiently investigated in other forms of PH. However, despite the lack of respective efficacy data an uncritical use of targeted PAH drugs in patients with PH associated with left heart disease is currently observed at an increasing rate. This development is a matter of concern. On the other hand, PH is a frequent problem that is highly relevant for morbidity and mortality in patients with left heart disease. It that sense, the practical implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany requires the consideration of several specific issues and already existing novel data. This requires a detailed commentary to the guidelines, and in some aspects an update already appears necessary. In June 2010, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany. This conference aimed to solve practical and controversial issues surrounding the implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to PH due to left heart disease. This commentary describes in detail the results and recommendations of the working group which were last updated in October 2011., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)