1. The association of umbilical coiling and angiogenesis markers: Impact assessment of gestational diabetes.
- Author
-
Najafi L, Honardoost M, Khajavi A, Cheraghi S, Kadivar M, and Khamseh ME
- Subjects
- Pregnancy, Female, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Adult, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Umbilical Cord metabolism, Maternal Age, Diabetes, Gestational metabolism
- Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the postnatal umbilical coiling index (pUCI) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and its receptor (VEGFR2) in parturients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)., Methods: Within 24 h following birth, the umbilical cord and pUCI of 29 newborns with GDM and 28 neonates with non-GDM parturients were prospectively examined. Real-time PCR tests were used to determine the expression levels of the VEGFA and VEGFR2 genes, measured from the umbilical cord. The Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests were used to compare continuous and discrete variables with and without GDM., Results: The median (IQR) of maternal age was 30 (26-34) years. There were no differences in demographic features between GDM and non-GDM parturients. While there was a marginal difference in VEGFA expression levels between the GDM and non-GDM groups (P-values = 0.07), no difference was detected for VEGFR2 (P-values = 0.75). Comparing hyper- and hypocoiling cords revealed a small difference in VEGFA levels (P-values = 0.05), but no change in VEGFR2 (P-values = 0.50). Furthermore, in both GDM and non-GDM parturients, down-regulated VEGFA was the general rule among abnormal pUCIs., Discussion: The GDM and coiling state both are associated with the amount of VEGFA expression, but neither is related to VEGFR2. Furthermore, regardless of whether the patient has GDM or not, the abnormal coiling pattern appears to be related to the VEGFA down-regulation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no financial and non-financial conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF