Search

Purpose: To develop a rigid real-time prospective motion-corrected multiparametric mapping technique and to test the performance of quantitative estimates. Methods: Motion tracking and correction were performed by integrating single-shot spiral navigators into a multiparametric imaging technique, three-dimensional quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with a T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS). The spiral navigator was optimized, and quantitative measurements were validated using a standard system phantom. The effect of motion correction on whole-brain T1 and T2 mapping under different types of head motion during the scan was evaluated in 10 healthy volunteers. Finally, six patients with Parkinson's disease, which is known to be associated with a high prevalence of motion artifacts, were scanned to evaluate the effectiveness of our method in the real world. Results: The phantom study demonstrated that the proposed motion correction method did not introduce quantitative bias. Improved parametric map quality and repeatability were shown in volunteer experiments with both in-plane and through-plane motions, comparable to the no-motion ground truth. In real-life validation in patients, the approach showed improved parametric map quality compared to images obtained without motion correction. Conclusions: Real-time prospective motion-corrected multiparametric relaxometry based on 3D-QALAS provided robust and repeatable whole-brain multiparametric mapping.

Purpose: Uncertainties related to geometric distortion are a major obstacle for effectively utilizing MRI in radiation oncology. We aim to quantify the geometric distortion in patient images by comparing their in-treatment position MRIs with the corresponding planning CTs, using CT as the non-distorted gold standard. Methods: Twenty-one head and neck cancer patients were imaged with MRI as part of a prospective Institutional Review Board approved study. MR images were acquired with a T2 SE sequence (0.5 Ã 0.5 Ã 2.5 mm voxel size) in the same immobilization position as in the CTs. MRI to CT rigid registration was then done and geometric distortion comparison was assessed by measuring the corresponding anatomical landmarks on both the MRI and the CT images. Several landmark measurements were obtained including; skin to skin (STS), bone to bone, and soft tissue to soft tissue at specific levels in horizontal and vertical planes of both scans. Inter-observer variability was assessed and interclass correlation (ICC) was calculated. Results: A total of 430 landmark measurements were obtained. The median distortion for all landmarks in all scans was 1.06 mm (IQR 0.6â1.98). For each patient 48% of the measurements were done in the right-left direction and 52% were done in the anteroposterior direction. The measured geometric distortion was not statistically different in the right-left direction compared to the anteroposterior direction (1.5 ± 1.6 vs. 1.6 ± 1.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.4). The magnitude of distortion was higher in the STS peripheral landmarks compared to the more central landmarks (2.0 ± 1.9 vs. 1.2 ± 1.3 mm, pÂ