Search

Aims: We aim to research the efficacy and safety of single(SAPT), dual(DAPT), and triple(TAPT) antiplatelets approaches across IHD patients undergoing PCI., Methods and Results: A network meta-analysis was conducted until April 1st, 2024, using the netmeta package in R studio 4.3.3. Primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction(MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding(BARC 3-5). From 25 studies, a total of 65115 patients were included. For cardiac death, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.40 to 1.35); p-value = 0.33], [RR = 1.01, 95%CI (0.84 to 1.19); p-value = 0.87] respectively. For MI, TAPT had no different risk than DAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.77; 95%CI (0.51 to 1.16); p-value = 0.2047], [RR = 0.81, 95%CI (0.64 to 1.03); p-value = 0.0850] respectively. For stent thrombosis, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT compared to SAPT [RR = 0.74; 95%CI (0.45 to 1.21); p-value = 0.2284], [RR = 0.84, 95%CI (0.27 to 2.59); p-value = 0.7630] respectively. For stroke, DAPT had no different risk than TAPT in comparison to SAPT [RR = 0.91; 95%CI (0.75 to 1.10); p-value = 0.3209], and [RR = 0.87, 95%CI (0.43 to 1.76); p-value=0.6937], respectively. For Major bleeding(BARC 3-5), DAPT and TAPT increased major bleeding compared to SAPT, with only DAPT showing statistical significance. [RR = 1.43; 95%CI (1.09 to 1.88); p-value = 0.0107], and [RR = 2.78, 95%CI (0.90 to 4.78); p-value = 0.0852], respectively., Conclusion: DAPT and TAPT increased the risk of bleeding events compared to SAPT. However, we found no significant differences between these regimens for the other primary outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Purpose: Arterial stiffness has gained recognition as a stand-alone risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Obesity is intricately linked to elevated arterial stiffness, the development of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and the emergence of diastolic dysfunction, all of which collectively contribute substantially to an unfavorable prognosis. Weight loss has become a standard recommendation for all patients with CVD concurrent with morbid obesity; however, randomized evidence to support this recommendation was limited earlier. The latest scientific studies revealed dynamic changes in aortic stiffness after substantial weight loss by bariatric surgery, also known as metabolic surgery, in patients with obesity. There is also a favorable evolution in LV hypertrophy and a significant impact on arterial hypertension and other promising cardiovascular outcomes in obese people after bariatric surgery., Methods/results: We aimed to examine the cardiovascular effects of various metabolic surgeries in morbidly obese individuals, especially their role in improving arterial health, the potential impact on surrogate markers of atherosclerotic vascular disease, and consequently reducing the likelihood of cardiovascular events., Conclusion: In conclusion, metabolic surgery is associated with a significant decrease in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality among obese individuals, alongside remarkable enhancement of arterial health. These findings underscore the critical importance of implementing strategies to combat obesity and reduce adiposity within the general population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Evidence supporting Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) for the prevention of SCD and mortality has shown conflicting results to date., Objective: We aim to evaluate the impact of ICD therapy with conventional care for the primary prevention of death of various causes in adults with ICM and NICM., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on the electronic database for relevant articles from inception until 30th May 2023. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random effect model, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials involving 7857 patients were included in the study. Pooled analysis showed that ICD therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.69 (95%CI:0.55-0.87), P = 0.001), with a similar trend among ICM and NICM compared with the control group. ICD therapy also reduces the incidence of SCD (OR, 0.32(95%CI: 0.24-0.43), P<0.00001) with a similar trend in ICM and NICM, as well as death due to arrhythmia (OR, 0.35(95%CI: 0.19-0.64), P<0.001). However, the incidence of cardiovascular mortality in the ICD group (OR, 0.77(95%CI: 0.58-1.02), P=0.07) was comparable to the control group., Conclusion: ICD therapy was associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality, sudden cardiac death, and death due to arrhythmia among ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Vikash Jaiswal serves as social media editor in the European Heart Journal Imaging Method and Practice, and Associate Editor in the European Journal of Medical Research (Cardiology Section), (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Renal denervation (RDN) is a minimally invasive intervention performed by denervation of the nervous fibers in the renal plexus, which decreases sympathetic activity. These sympathetic nerves influence various physiological functions that regulate blood pressure (BP), including intravascular volume, electrolyte composition, and vascular tone. Although proven effective in some trials, controversial trials, such as the Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension (SYMPLICITY-HTN3), have demonstrated contradictory results for the effectiveness of RDN in resistant hypertension (HTN). In the treatment of HTN, individuals with primary HTN are expected to experience greater benefits compared to those with secondary HTN due to the diverse underlying causes of secondary HTN. Beyond its application for HTN, RDN has also found utility in addressing cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, and managing cases of heart failure. Non-cardiogenic applications of RDN include reducing the intensity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), overcoming insulin resistance, and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of RDN and its uses in cardiology and beyond, along with providing future directions and perspectives., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Cardiovascular diseases, particularly myocardial infarction (MI), are a significant cause of mortality globally. Traditional MIs are commonly linked to substantial coronary artery blockage. However, a distinct subset of patients experience MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries, known as MINOCA. Imaging techniques, such as invasive coronary angiograms, are employed to diagnose MI or assess predisposition to one. Coronary angiograms help visualize vessel blockages; however, these blockages are absent in MINOCA cases, posing a diagnostic challenge. Precision medicine aims to introduce new diagnostic tools to assist in early diagnosis and further management of MINOCA. As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not benefit MINOCA patients, medical management tailored to the specific pathophysiological mechanism of MINOCA is employed. For example, if MINOCA is attributed to plaque disruption with or without plaque thrombus formation, the fundamental treatments may include statins, agents that modulate the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and antiplatelet therapies. On the other hand, if coronary artery spasm is identified as the primary cause, essential intervention involves the use of calcium channel blockers. This approach has been previously utilized in patients with vasospastic angina and could be utilized in MINOCA, although research specific to MINOCA is ongoing. Therefore, the handling of MINOCA underscores the necessity for a tailored therapeutic strategy that corresponds to the underlying physiological mechanism responsible for the patient's clinical symptoms. Ongoing research initiatives are directed at expanding the availability of these treatments, uncovering new biomarkers, creating advanced diagnostic instruments, and establishing a more individualized approach for managing MINOCA patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)