Search

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if phosphor plates used in predoctoral clinics are microbiologically contaminated and to identify the source of contamination., Study Design: Forty-five of 300 phosphor plates (15%) were randomly selected for examination. The plates were pressed into individual blood agar plates, were incubated using standard techniques at 37 degrees C, and were monitored for 72 hours. The number, size, distribution, and variety of resulting colonies were noted. A representative of each type of colony was selected to be Gram stained using the standard technique., Results: Of the plates, 42.2% were uncontaminated, 57.8% yielded bacterial colonies, and 15.6% of those colonies demonstrated hemolytic growth. The hemolytic growth included combined alpha and beta hemolysis and beta only hemolysis. Six colonies were gram-positive rods and 7 were gram-positive cocci., Conclusion: Meticulous infection-control techniques are inevitable and continuous reinforcement and training for staff and students are mandatory. Periodic gas sterilization of phosphor plates may be necessary.

Objectives: To compare the accuracy of local computed tomography (LCT) and conventional radiography for proximal caries detection and depth assessment., Study Design: An in vitro model was used consisting of 20 extracted posterior teeth with 18 caries lesions. Local computed tomography slices were reconstructed in axial and parasagittal planes from 100 basis projections. Conventional radiographs were also acquired. Eight observers determined the presence and depth of caries lesions. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and weighted kappa statistics were used., Results: Local computed tomography had a mean A(z) score of 0.82 (SD = 0.07) and conventional radiography of 0.79 (SD = 0.08; analysis of variance: P > .05). Interobserver agreement was moderate. The mean kappa for depth assessment was 0.68 (SD = 0.06) for LCT and 0.47 (SD = 0.08) for conventional radiography (analysis of variance: P < .05). Local computed tomography resulted in substantial and conventional radiography in moderate interobserver agreement., Conclusions: There is no difference between LCT and conventional radiography for proximal caries detection. Local computed tomography was more accurate for assessing caries lesion depth.