1. Standardization of definition and management for bleeding disorder of unknown cause: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.
- Author
-
Baker RI, Choi P, Curry N, Gebhart J, Gomez K, Henskens Y, Heubel-Moenen F, James P, Kadir RA, Kouides P, Lavin M, Lordkipanidze M, Lowe G, Mumford A, Mutch N, Nagler M, Othman M, Pabinger I, Sidonio R, Thomas W, and O'Donnell JS
- Subjects
- Humans, Blood Coagulation drug effects, Blood Coagulation Tests standards, Hemorrhage therapy, Hemorrhage blood, Hemorrhage diagnosis, Hemorrhagic Disorders diagnosis, Hemorrhagic Disorders therapy, Hemorrhagic Disorders blood, Phenotype, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Terminology as Topic, Hemostasis
- Abstract
In many patients referred with significant bleeding phenotype, laboratory testing fails to define any hemostatic abnormalities. Clinical practice with respect to diagnosis and management of this patient cohort poses significant clinical challenges. We recommend that bleeding history in these patients should be objectively assessed using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) bleeding assessment tool. Patients with increased bleeding assessment tool scores should progress to hemostasis laboratory testing. To diagnose bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC), normal complete blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor function, coagulation factors VIII, IX, and XI, and platelet light transmission aggregometry should be the minimum laboratory assessment. In some laboratories, additional specialized hemostasis testing may be performed to identify other rare causes of bleeding. We recommend that patients with a significant bleeding phenotype but normal laboratory investigations should be registered with a diagnosis of BDUC in preference to other terminology. Global hemostatic tests and markers of fibrinolysis demonstrate variable abnormalities, and their clinical significance remains uncertain. Targeted genomic sequencing examining candidate hemostatic genes has a low diagnostic yield. Underlying BDUC should be considered in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding since delays in diagnosis often extend to many years and negatively impact quality of life. Treatment options for BDUC patients include tranexamic acid, desmopressin, and platelet transfusions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests No funding was sought for design, data interpretation, or manuscript writing. Individual conflict of interest declaration is listed below. R.I.B.’s institution received grants for research clinical research from Bayer, Takeda, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Sanofi, MorphoSys AG, Acerta Pharma, Jansen-Cileg, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Astra Zeneca. The institution is in receipt of equipment and reagents for research from Werfen and Technoclone. He received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, and Astra Zeneca. He provided expert testimony for Sandoz. He has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Boards for Roche, Janssen-Celeg, CSL Behring, Astra Zeneca, and George Institute. A.M. has received consultancy fees from Pfizer and CSL Behring and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca. W.T.: speakers fees from Bayer, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, CSL Behring, Alexion, Portola, Sanofi, and Sobi. Advisory boards for Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Ablynx, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Grifols, LFB Biopharmaceuticals, and Daiichi Sankyo. Support to attend educational meetings from CSL Behring and Bayer. M.L. has served on advisory boards for CSL Behring, as a consultant for Sobi, CSL Behring, Takeda, and Band Therapeutics, received speaker fees from Sobi and Takeda, and has research funding from Takeda. R.S.: consultancy fees from Band/Guardian Therapeutics, Star/Vega Therapeutics, Roche, BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, LFB, Bayer, Novo Nordisk. Octapharma AG, and Takeda. Her institution received investigator-initiated research grants from Takeda, Octapharma, LFB, and Genentech. P.J. received consultancy fees from Band/Guardian Therapeutics, Star/Vega Therapeutics, Roche, and BioMarin Pharmaceuticals. M.N. received research grants or lecture fees from Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, Werfen, Stago, Technoclone, Pentapharm, Buhlmann laboratories, Sysmex, Euroimmun, Bayer Healthcare, and Viatris. J.G. received honoraria, advisory boards, and scientific support from CSL Behring, Takeda, Novartis, SOBI, and Amgen. G.L. received research funding from BioMarin and teaching honoraria from Sobi, Sanofi, Abbvie, Novo Nordisk, Alexion, Novartis, and Takeda. J.O.D. has served on the speaker’s bureau for Baxter, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Sobi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Leo Pharma, Takeda, and Octapharma; served on the advisory boards of Baxter, Sobi, Bayer, Octapharma CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, and Pfizer; and received research grant funding awards from 3M, Baxter, Bayer, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, and Novo Nordisk. Other authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF