Search

Objectives: Critically ill patients with tuberculosis (TB) face a high mortality risk and require effective treatment. There is a paucity of data on rifampicin pharmacokinetics, the impact of continuous enteral feeding on drug absorption, and the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize drug exposure in these patients., Methods: We performed a sequential pharmacokinetic study to determine the impact of feeding and TDM with rifampicin dose escalation in critically ill patients with TB. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed., Results: Among 20 critically ill patients (40% were HIV-infected), median rifampicin C max (maximum serum concentration) in the fasted and fed states were 5.1 µg/ml versus 3.3 µg/ml, respectively (P <0.0001; geometric mean ratio 1.95; 90% confidence interval 1.46-2.60). The proportion of patients with low rifampicin concentrations in the fasted and fed states was 80% vs 100% (P-value = 0.1336). Optimized dosing led to a per-patient median rifampicin dosing of 24.6 mg/kg and a median C max increase from 2.4 µg/ml to 17.8 µg/ml (P-value = 0.0005; geometric mean ratio 8.29; 90% confidence interval 3.88-17.74). TDM-guided dose escalation increased the proportion of patients achieving the suggested target rifampicin concentration compared with standard dosing (83% vs 0%, P-value = 0.004)., Conclusion: We found low rifampicin concentrations in all patients receiving continuous enteral feeding. TDM-guided dose escalation provided an effective strategy to achieve target drug exposure in these critically ill patients with TB., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are few prospective data about the incidence and mortality associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in intensive care units (ICUs), and none on the accuracy and clinical effect of the Xpert-MTB/RIF assay in this setting. We aimed to measure the frequency of culture-positive tuberculosis in ICUs in Cape Town, South Africa and to assess the performance and effect on patient outcomes of Xpert MTB/RIF versus smear microscopy for diagnosis of tuberculosis., Methods: We did a prospective burden of disease study with a randomised controlled substudy at the ICUs of four hospitals in Cape Town. Mechanically ventilated adults (≥18 years) with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis admitted between Aug 1, 2010, and July 31, 2013 (irrespective of the reason for admission), were prospectively investigated by culture, and by Xpert-MTB/RIF testing or smear microscopy, of tracheal aspirate samples. In the substudy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated allocation list, to smear microscopy or Xpert MTB/RIF. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were not masked to group assignment. Only the laboratory staff were blinded to the clinical details of the participants. In November, 2012, Xpert MTB/RIF was adopted as the initial diagnostic test for respiratory samples in Western Cape province. Thereafter, patients received Xpert MTB/MIF and culture as standard of care. For the whole study cohort, the primary outcome was the frequency of bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis. The primary endpoint of the randomised substudy was the proportion of culture-positive patients on treatment at 48 h after enrolment. The randomised substudy is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01530568., Findings: We investigated 341 patients for suspected pulmonary tuberculosis out of a total of 2309 ICU admissions. 46 (15%) of 317 patients included in the final analysis had a positive test for tuberculosis (Xpert MTB/RIF or culture). Culture-positive patients who failed to initiate treatment (adjusted HR 4·49, 95% CI 1·45-13·89) or who received inotropes (4·33, 1·49-12·60) were more likely to die. However, tuberculosis status was not associated with 28-day or 90-day mortality. In the substudy, we randomly assigned 115 patients to smear microscopy and 111 to Xpert MTB/RIF. Smear microscopy detected six (43%) of 14 culture-positive patients, and Xpert MTB/RIF detected 11 (100%) of 11 culture-positive patients (p=0·002). The proportion of culture-positive patients on treatment at 48 h was higher in the Xpert MTB/RIF group than in the smear microscopy group (11 [92%] of 12 vs nine [53%] of 17; p=0·043), although use of Xpert MTB/RIF had no effect on mortality or other patient outcomes., Interpretation: Tuberculosis is fairly common in ICUs in high-burden settings, and clinicians should screen and test patients for tuberculosis with Xpert MTB/RIF where available. This test improves diagnostic yield and rates of treatment initiation, and reduces unnecessary treatment, but might not increase the total number of patients on treatment when empirical treatment is widely used. A suspected diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis should not exclude patients from ICU care in resource-limited settings because mortality is unaffected by the presence of this disease., Funding: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, South African Medical Research Council, and the Discovery Foundation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of fluids in trauma resuscitation is controversial. We compared resuscitation with 0.9% saline vs hydroxyethyl starch, HES 130/0.4, in severe trauma with respect to resuscitation, fluid volume, gastrointestinal recovery, renal function, and blood product requirements., Methods: Randomized, controlled, double-blind study of severely injured patients requiring >3 litres of fluid resuscitation. Blunt and penetrating trauma were randomized separately. Patients were followed up for 30 days., Results: A total of 115 patients were randomized; of which, 109 were studied. For patients with penetrating trauma (n=67), the mean (sd) fluid requirements were 5.1 (2.7) litres in the HES group and 7.4 (4.3) litres in the saline group (P<0.001). In blunt trauma (n=42), there was no difference in study fluid requirements, but the HES group required significantly more blood products [packed red blood cell volumes 2943 (1628) vs 1473 (1071) ml, P=0.005] and was more severely injured than the saline group (median injury severity score 29.5 vs 18; P=0.01). Haemodynamic data were similar, but, in the penetrating group, plasma lactate concentrations were lower over the first 4 h (P=0.029) and on day 1 with HES than with saline [2.1 (1.4) vs 3.2 (2.2) mmol litre⁻¹; P=0.017]. There was no difference between any groups in time to recovery of bowel function or mortality. In penetrating trauma, renal injury occurred more frequently in the saline group than the HES group (16% vs 0%; P=0.018). In penetrating trauma, maximum sequential organ function scores were lower with HES than with saline (median 2.4 vs 4.5, P=0.012). No differences were seen in safety measures in the blunt trauma patients., Conclusions: In penetrating trauma, HES provided significantly better lactate clearance and less renal injury than saline. No firm conclusions could be drawn for blunt trauma., Study Registration: ISRCTN 42061860.

Background: Chloroquine plus proguanil is widely used for malaria chemoprophylaxis despite low effectiveness in areas where multidrug-resistant malaria occurs. Studies have shown that atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride is safe and effective for prevention of falciparum malaria in lifelong residents of malaria-endemic countries, but little is known about non-immune travellers., Methods: In a double-blind equivalence trial, 1083 participants travelling to a malaria-endemic area were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: atovaquone-proguanil plus placebos for chloroquine and proguanil, or chloroquine, proguanil, and placebo for atovaquone-proguanil. Follow-up was by telephone 7 and 60 days after travel and at a clinic at 28 days. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to a malaria circumsporozoite protein. Blood and serum samples of participants with a potential malaria diagnosis were tested in a reference laboratory., Findings: 7 days after travel, at least one adverse event was reported by 311 (61%) of 511 participants who received atovaquone-proguanil and 329 (64%) of 511 who received chloroquine-proguanil. People receiving atovaquone-proguanil had a lower frequency of treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events (59 [12%] vs 100 [20%], p=0.001), and of treatment-related adverse events of moderate or severe intensity (37 [7%] vs 56 [11%], p=0.05). There were fewer treatment-related adverse events that caused prophylaxis to be discontinued in the atovaquone-proguanil group than in the chloroquine-proguanil group (one [0.2%] vs ten [2%], p=0.015)., Interpretation: Overall the two preparations were similarly tolerated. However, significantly fewer adverse gastrointestinal events were observed in the atovaquone-proguanil group in than in the chloroquine-proguanil group.