Search

Background: The cost of cancer care is high and rising. Evidence of increased patient cost burden is prevalent in the medical literature and has been defined as "financial toxicity," the financial hardship and financial concerns experienced by patients because of a disease and its related treatments. With targeted therapies and growing out-of-pocket costs, patient financial toxicity is a growing concern among patients with gynecologic cancer., Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of financial toxicity and identify its risk factors in patients with gynecologic cancer treated at a large cancer center using objective data., Study Design: Using institutional databases, we identified patients with gynecologic cancer treated from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients with a preinvasive disease were excluded. Financial toxicity was defined according to institutionally derived metrics as the presence of ≥1 of the following: ≥2 bills sent to collections, application or granting of a payment plan, settlement, bankruptcy, financial assistance program enrollment, or a finance-related social work visit. Clinical characteristics were gathered using a 2-year look-back from the time of the first financial toxicity event or a randomly selected treatment date for those not experiencing toxicity. Risk factors were assessed using chi-squared tests. All significant variables on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model., Results: Of the 4655 patients included in the analysis, 1155 (25%) experienced financial toxicity. In the univariate analysis, cervical cancer (35%), stage 3 or 4 disease (24% and 30%, respectively), younger age (35% for age <30 years), nonpartnered marital status (31%), Black (45%) or Hispanic (37%) race and ethnicity, self-pay (48%) or commercial insurance (30%), clinical trial participation (31%), more imaging studies (39% for ≥9), ≥1 emergency department visit (36%), longer inpatient stays (36% for ≥20 days), and more outpatient clinician visits (41% for ≥20 visits) were significantly associated with financial toxicity (P<.01). In multivariate analysis, younger age, nonpartnered marital status, Black and Hispanic race and ethnicity, commercial insurance, more imaging studies, and more outpatient physician visits were significantly associated with financial toxicity., Conclusion: Financial toxicity is an increasing problem for patients with gynecologic cancer. Our analysis, using objective measures of financial toxicity, has suggested that demographic factors and healthcare utilization metrics may be used to proactively identify at-risk patients for financial toxicity., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Since the approval of pembrolizumab for advanced or recurrent PD-L1 positive (CPS > 1%) cervical cancer, the clinical characteristics associated with response have remained undefined. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic features of patients with advanced cervical cancer at our institution who derived durable clinical benefit from treatment with pembrolizumab., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14 patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who received pembrolizumab monotherapy from August 2017 to November 2019 and were followed until November 1, 2020. Reviewed clinical data included age, histology, tumor molecular profiling results, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, baseline pattern of metastatic disease at initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy, and outcomes. Treatment response was evaluated by computed tomography using RECIST v1.1 criteria., Results: The objective response rate was 21% (n = 3), including two partial responses and one complete response. Two patients (14%) had stable disease of six months or greater, for an observed durable clinical benefit rate of 36%. When stratified by those who derived clinical benefit, metastatic spread to lung and/or lymph node only at baseline was associated with improved response to pembrolizumab (n = 7, p = 0.02) and associated with significantly improved PFS and OS. Tumor mutational burden was higher in those with durable clinical benefit compared to non-responders (median 12.7 vs. 3.5 mutations/megabase, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Our findings highlight clinical features that may select for a population most likely to benefit from pembrolizumab monotherapy and underscores the need for identification of additional biomarkers of response., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: To determine utility scores for health states relevant to the treatment of early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer., Methods: Seven descriptive health states incorporating the physical and emotional aspects of medical treatment, recovery, and prognosis were developed. Forty-five female volunteers valuated each health state using the visual analogue score (VAS) and time trade off (TTO) methods. Treatment options were ranked by mean and median TTO scores. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of ranking preferences. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare central tendencies related to age, race, parity, and subject history of abnormal cervical cytology., Results: VAS and TTO scores were highly correlated. Volunteers ranked minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with low-risk features as most preferred (mean TTO = 0.96; median TTO = 1.00) and aborted radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiation as least preferred (mean TTO = 0.69; median TTO = 0.83). Health states that included radical surgery were ranked higher than those that included chemoradiation, either in the adjuvant or primary setting. When survival was comparable, volunteers rated radical hysterectomy with high-risk pathology followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (mean TTO = 0.78; median TTO = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87) similarly to chemoradiation alone (mean TTO = 0.76; median TTO 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66-0.86; p = NS). Utility scores for the majority of health states were not significantly associated with age, race, parity, or subject history of abnormal cervical cytology., Conclusion: Subjects consistently preferred surgical excision to treat early-stage, high-risk cervical cancer and chose a minimally invasive approach. Such utility scores can be used to incorporate quality-of-life effects into comparative-effectiveness models for cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)