Search

Summary: Background: With increasing recognition of the value of incorporating prognostic markers into amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trial design and analysis plans, there is a pressing need to understand which among the prevailing clinical and biochemical markers have real value, and how they can be optimally used. Methods: A subset of patients with ALS recruited through the multi-center Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02327845) was identified as “trial-like” based on meeting common trial eligibility criteria. Clinical phenotyping was performed by evaluators trained in relevant assessments. Serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH), urinary p75ECD, plasma microRNA-181, and an array of biochemical and clinical measures were evaluated for their prognostic value. Associations with functional progression were estimated by random-slopes mixed models of ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) score. Associations with survival were estimated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. Potential sample size savings from adjusting for given biomarkers in a hypothetical trial were estimated. Findings: Baseline serum NfL is a powerful prognostic biomarker, predicting survival and ALSFRS-R rate of decline. Serum NfL 100 pg/mL correspond to future ALSFRS-R slopes of ∼0.5 and ∼1.5 points/month, respectively. Serum NfL also adds value to the best available clinical predictors, encapsulated by the European Network to Cure ALS (ENCALS) predictor score. In models of functional decline, the addition of NfL yields ∼25% sample size saving above those achieved by inclusion of either clinical predictors or ENCALS score alone. The prognostic value of serum pNfH, urinary p75ECD, and plasma miR-181ab is more limited. Interpretation: Among the multitude of biomarkers considered, only blood NfL adds value to the ENCALS prediction model and should be incorporated into analysis plans for all ongoing and future ALS trials. Defined thresholds of NfL might also be used in trial design, for enrichment or stratified randomisation, to improve trial efficiency. Funding: NIH (U01-NS107027, U54-NS092091). ALSA (16-TACL-242).

Summary: Background: As novel therapeutic interventions are being developed and tested in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) population, there is a need to better understand the symptoms and issues that have the greatest impact on the lives of individuals with ALS. We aimed to determine the frequency and relative importance of symptoms experienced by adults in a national ALS sample and to identify factors that are associated with the greatest disease burden in this population. Methods: We conducted 15 qualitative interviews of individuals with varied ALS phenotypes and analyzed 732 quotes regarding the symptomatic disease burden of ALS between August 2018 and March 2019. We subsequently conducted a national, cross-sectional study of 497 participants with ALS and ALS variants through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National ALS Registry between July 2019 and December 2019. Participants reported on the prevalence and relative importance of 189 symptomatic questions representing 17 symptomatic themes that were previously identified through qualitative interviews. Analysis was performed to determine how age, sex, education, employment, time since onset of symptoms, location of symptom onset, feeding tube status, breathing status and speech status relate to symptom and symptomatic theme prevalence. Findings: Symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence in our sample were an inability to do activities (93.8%), fatigue (92.6%), problems with hands or fingers (87.7%), limitations with mobility or walking (86.7%), and a decreased performance in social situations (85.7%). Participants identified inability to do activities and limitations with mobility or walking as having the greatest overall effect on their lives. Interpretation: Individuals with ALS experience a variety of symptoms that affect their lives. The prevalence and importance of these symptoms differ among the ALS population. The most prevalent and important symptoms offer potential targets for improvements in future therapeutic interventions. Funding: Research funding was provided by ALS Association.