Search

Unlabelled: The net benefit (i.e., benefits minus costs) of sustained-release (SR) bupropion for smoking cessation from an employer's perspective has previously been evaluated in clinical trials including frequent, in-person behavioral counseling and manufacturer recommended dosing but not in actual practice settings and lower dosing., Objectives: The objective of this research was to determine the return on investment (ROI) and internal rate of return (IRR) from an employer's perspective of two dosing schedules of bupropion SR in combination with behavioral interventions of minimal intensity (tailored mailings, TM) or moderate intensity (proactive telephone calls, PTC) in an actual practice setting., Methods: An open-label, randomized trial with 1-year follow-up was conducted in a large health system (Group Health Cooperative) based in Seattle, WA. Participants included 1524 adult smokers interested in quitting smoking. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of bupropion SR daily and PTC (n=382), 150 mg of bupropion SR daily and TM (n=381), 300 mg of bupropion SR daily and PTC (n=383) or 300 mg of bupropion SR daily and TM (n=378). Sufficient medications for 8 weeks of dosing were provided to patients. The primary outcome measure of the field trial was self-reported point-prevalence 7-day nonsmoking status at 12 months, and the primary outcome measures of the economic analysis were employer net benefit, employer ROI, and the ROI-associated IRR using 2002 dollars., Results: Using net benefit, the 300-mg/PTC and the 150-mg/PTC treatments were approximately equally preferred. Using ROI or IRR, both the 150-mg/TM and 150-mg/PTC treatments were about equally preferred, with IRR values of 31.7% and 31.4%, respectively. Under a pessimistic scenario regarding effectiveness and costs, 150 mg/PTC became more cost-effective than 150 mg/TM, and employer IRR for 150 mg/PTC was 13%. Under an optimistic scenario IRR exceeded 45% for all treatments., Conclusions: These results suggest that employers can receive competitive returns on investment from sponsoring smoking cessation programs, that 150 mg of bupropion doses yield better returns than 300-mg doses, and that PTC treatments should be preferred to TM if smoking cessation rates in the targeted employee population are lower than those in the study population.

Subjects for this study were 265 participants of stop-smoking clinics (mean age = 42.6 years; average number of cigarettes smoked daily = 26.0) who were examined before and immediately after cessation and then followed for 1 year. The objective of this study was to identify subgroups of smokers with different rates of relapse using tree-structured survival analysis, a multivariate approach to classification. Five distinct subgroups that differed with respect to the rate of relapse were identified: (I) subjects (n = 15) with very low precessation cotinine levels (< or = 129 ng/ml), who had an exceptionally low rate of relapse (mean abstinence time = 270 days); (II) women 32 years old and younger (n = 24), who had a very high rate of relapse (mean abstinence time = 30.5 days); (III) women over 32 years old (n = 121), with the next highest rate of relapse (mean abstinence time = 98.9 days); (IV) men 36 years old and younger (n = 31), who had a mean abstinence time of 196.7 days; and (V) men over 36 years old (n = 74), who abstained an average of 130.2 days before relapsing. Relapse curves for all groups (except III vs V) differed significantly from each other, p < 0.05. Results indicate that this approach can identify interactions among individual differences that are variably associated with relapse rates. Identification of relapse subgroups may have important implications for both theories and treatment of smoking relapse.