Search

Your search keyword '"Hyde, Z"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Hyde, Z" Publisher elsevier
6 results on '"Hyde, Z"'

1. The World Health Network: a global citizens' initiative.

Author

Bar-Yam Y, Gurdasani D, Baker MG, Scally G, George S, Kvalsvig A, Fhaoláin SN, Chiou ST, Drury J, Duckett S, Ding EL, Gershenson C, Gibson C, Greenhalgh T, Hamdy A, Hyde Z, James T, Jimenez JL, McKee M, Michie S, Pagel C, Philippe C, Prather K, Raina SK, Ricciardi W, Rubin M, Ryan T, Schneider MF, Staines A, West R, and Ziauddeen H

Subjects
COVID-19 epidemiology, Humans, COVID-19 prevention & control, Disease Eradication organization & administration, Global Health, International Cooperation
Abstract

Competing Interests: MM, GS, CPa, and SM are members of the Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, and RW and JD are members of its behavioural subgroups. ZH is a member of OzSAGE. TR advises on the Independent Scientific Advocacy Group, Ireland. All other authors declare no competing interests. YB-Y, DG, and MGB contributed equally. Signatories of this Correspondence are listed in the appendix.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Mass infection is not an option: we must do more to protect our young.

Author

Gurdasani D, Drury J, Greenhalgh T, Griffin S, Haque Z, Hyde Z, Katzourakis A, McKee M, Michie S, Pagel C, Reicher S, Roberts A, West R, Yates C, and Ziauddeen H

Subjects
Child, Humans, Pandemics prevention & control, SARS-CoV-2, United Kingdom epidemiology, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 Vaccines administration & dosage, Disease Transmission, Infectious prevention & control, Health Policy, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Public Health
Abstract

Competing Interests: JD, ZHa, MM, SM, CP, AR, and SR are members of Independent SAGE. SR is a member of the advisory group to the Scottish Chief Medical Officer. RW, SM, SR, and JD are participants in the Independent Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours, the behavioural science subgroup of SAGE. JD declares funding for research on public behaviour in the pandemic, paid to the University of Sussex, from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and fees from the BBC and The Guardian for media appearances and articles. SG declares research grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the AMMF and fees from Hallmark Care Homes for webinars about vaccine hesitancy. SG is also a member of the UK Government's COVID-19 Expert Panel on Home Testing and the COVID-19 International Best Practice Advisory Group, and he is a consultant on shielding for the International Comparators Joint Unit (IBPAG-ICJU). SG is Chair of the Virus Division of the Microbiology Society and a member of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy grants review panel. SM declares research grants from the MRC, the ESRC, the Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK, and the National Institutes of Health Research and fees from the BBC and ITN for media appearances. All other authors declare no competing interests. A summit to discuss the concerns outlined in this Correspondence will take place on July 8, 2021. Signatories of this Correspondence are listed in the appendix.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. The UK needs a sustainable strategy for COVID-19.

Author

Gurdasani D, Bear L, Bogaert D, Burgess RA, Busse R, Cacciola R, Charpak Y, Colbourn T, Drury J, Friston K, Gallo V, Goldman LR, Greenhalgh T, Hyde Z, Kuppalli K, Majumder MS, Martin-Moreno JM, McKee M, Michie S, Mossialos E, Nouri A, Pagel C, Pimenta D, Popescu S, Priesemann V, Rasmussen AL, Reicher S, Ricciardi W, Rice K, Silver J, Smith TC, Wenham C, West R, Yamey G, Yates C, and Ziauddeen H

Subjects
COVID-19 economics, COVID-19 mortality, Communicable Disease Control methods, Delivery of Health Care methods, Financial Support, Humans, International Cooperation, Schools, United Kingdom epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Pandemics prevention & control
Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now.

Author

Alwan NA, Burgess RA, Ashworth S, Beale R, Bhadelia N, Bogaert D, Dowd J, Eckerle I, Goldman LR, Greenhalgh T, Gurdasani D, Hamdy A, Hanage WP, Hodcroft EB, Hyde Z, Kellam P, Kelly-Irving M, Krammer F, Lipsitch M, McNally A, McKee M, Nouri A, Pimenta D, Priesemann V, Rutter H, Silver J, Sridhar D, Swanton C, Walensky RP, Yamey G, and Ziauddeen H

Subjects
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, Communicable Disease Control standards, Consensus, Europe, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Immunity, Herd, SARS-CoV-2, Communicable Disease Control methods, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Coronavirus Infections transmission, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral transmission
Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Falls risk assessment outcomes and factors associated with falls for older Indigenous Australians.

Author

Hill KD, Flicker L, LoGiudice D, Smith K, Atkinson D, Hyde Z, Fenner S, Skeaf L, Malay R, and Boyle E

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, Accidental Falls prevention & control
Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of falls and associated risk factors in older Indigenous Australians, and compare the accuracy of validated falls risk screening and assessment tools in this population in classifying fall status., Method: Cross-sectional study of 289 Indigenous Australians aged ≥45 years from the Kimberley region of Western Australia who had a detailed assessment including self-reported falls in the past year (n=289), the adapted Elderly Falls Screening Tool (EFST; n=255), and the Falls Risk for Older People-Community (FROP-Com) screening tool (3 items, n=74) and FROP-Com falls assessment tool (n=74)., Results: 32% of participants had ≥1 fall in the preceding year, and 37.3% were classified high falls risk using the EFST (cut-off ≥2). In contrast, for the 74 participants assessed with the FROP-Com, only 14.9% were rated high risk, 35.8% moderate risk, and 49.3% low risk. The FROP-Com screen and assessment tools had the highest classification accuracy for identifying fallers in the preceding year (area under curve >0.85), with sensitivity/specificity highest for the FROP-Com assessment (cut-off ≥12), sensitivity=0.84 and specificity=0.73., Conclusions: Falls are common in older Indigenous Australians. The FROP-Com falls risk assessment tool appears useful in this population, and this research suggests changes that may improve its utility further., (© 2016 Public Health Association of Australia.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results