Search

The arrival of CAR-T cell treatments in Europe in 2018 has considerably changed the clinical and logistical management of lymphoma patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate pathways of patients eligible for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), particularly previously and afterwards of its administration, stages that are currently poorly documented in the literature. Ninety-eight patients from eleven French qualified centers eligible for axi-cel treatment between June 2020 and February 2021 were retrospectively included. Of all the stages in the care pathway evaluated, the median time observed between relapse after the previous line and prescription of axi-cel was 27days, and the median time between the multidisciplinary consultation meeting and axi-cel administration was 63days. The two main methods of discharge from hospital were a return home (65% of cases) or hospitalisation in a rehabilitation unit (20% of cases). Among all the geographical and organizational characteristics assessed, no factor was found to have a significant impact on the time length of the patient's journey, apart from the patient capacity of the qualified center, and the origin of the patient's referral (coming from a qualified or a referral center). Since the study was carried out, the number of qualified centers has continued to rise, improving territorial coverage and access to treatment., (Copyright © 2024 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring plays a pivotal role in the management of hematologic malignancies. Well-established molecular targets, such as PML::RARA, CBFB::MYH11, or RUNX1::RUNX1T1, are conventionally tracked by quantitative RT-PCR. Recently, a broader landscape of fusion transcripts has been unveiled through transcriptomic analysis. These newly discovered fusion transcripts may emerge as novel molecular markers for MRD quantification. In this study, we compared a targeted RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) approach (FusionPlex) with a whole-transcriptomic strategy (Advanta RNA-Seq XT) for fusion detection in a training set of 21 samples. We evidenced a concordance of 100% for the detection of known fusions, and showed a good correlation for gene expression quantification between the two techniques (Spearman r = 0.77). Additionally, we prospectively evaluated the identification of fusions by targeted RNA-seq in a real-life series of 126 patients with hematological malignancy. At least one fusion transcript was detected for 60 patients (48%). We designed tailored digital PCR assays for 11 rare fusions, and validated this technique for MRD quantification with a limit of detection of <0.01%. The combination of RNA-seq and tailored digital PCR may become a new standard for MRD evaluation in patients lacking conventional molecular targets., Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In response to the French hospital system crisis and the challenges faced by the heads of departments, we have undertaken an initiative to create a community of heads of haematology departments willing to assist each other. Our inaugural seminar, held in January 2023, established the foundational "core" group of heads of department. Throughout 2023, this emerging community has prospered, offering sustained support to peers. In January 2024, we broadened our community to include other heads of departments, following a second seminar gathering 36 participants. During this event, we took the time to exchange thoughts and reflect on our missions. Building on the experience of guest speakers and employing methods of co-development and co-construction in plenary sessions, small-group workshops, and social gathering, we were able to discover and experience the collective intelligence, creativity, strength, and support stemming from such a group. This peer community of heads of departments stands as a powerful tool for management support, whereby personal experiences nourish and enrich the experience of others. We hope that our initiative will inspire heads of departments from other specialties so that, together, we can better work towards our missions as heads of departments and collaborate on rebuilding the hospital "from the bottom up"., (Copyright © 2024 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: In this retrospective study, chimeric antigen receptor T cells remained effective in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Obinutuzumab (O) and rituximab (R) are 2 CD antibodies that have never been compared in a prospective randomized trial of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Herein, we report the long-term outcome of the LyMa-101 trial, in which newly diagnosed patients with MCL were treated with chemotherapy plus O before transplantation, followed by O maintenance (O group). We then compared these patients with those treated with the same treatment design with R instead of O (R group). A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the 2 populations (O vs R groups) in terms of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction (EOI), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In LyMa-101, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS after inclusion (n = 85) were 83.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5-89.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 77.6-92.5), respectively. At EOI, patients treated in the O group had more frequent bone marrow MRD negativity than those treated in the R group (83.1% vs 63.4%; χ2, P = .007). PSM resulted in 2 sets of 82 patients with comparable characteristics at inclusion. From treatment initiation, the O group had a longer estimated 5-year PFS (P = .029; 82.8% vs 66.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-3.76) and OS (P = .039; 86.4% vs 71.4%; HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01-4.16) compared with the R group. Causes of death were comparable in the 2 groups, the most common cause being lymphoma. O before transplantation and in maintenance provides better disease control and enhances PFS and OS compared with R in transplant-eligible patients with MCL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00921414 and NCT02896582., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Histologic transformation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (HT-WM) carries a poor prognosis with standard treatments. Here, we report the first series of HT-WM treated with chimeric antigen receptor T cells showing a high efficacy and no unexpected toxicity., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Hematological toxicity is the most common adverse event after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Cytopenias can be profound and long-lasting and can predispose for severe infectious complications. In a recent worldwide survey, we demonstrated that there remains considerable heterogeneity in regard to current practice patterns. Here, we sought to build consensus on the grading and management of immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) after CAR T-cell therapy. For this purpose, a joint effort between the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) involved an international panel of 36 CAR T-cell experts who met in a series of virtual conferences, culminating in a 2-day meeting in Lille, France. On the basis of these deliberations, best practice recommendations were developed. For the grading of ICAHT, a classification system based on depth and duration of neutropenia was developed for early (day 0-30) and late (after day +30) cytopenia. Detailed recommendations on risk factors, available preinfusion scoring systems (eg, CAR-HEMATOTOX score), and diagnostic workup are provided. A further section focuses on identifying hemophagocytosis in the context of severe hematotoxicity. Finally, we review current evidence and provide consensus recommendations for the management of ICAHT, including growth factor support, anti-infectious prophylaxis, transfusions, autologous hematopoietic stem cell boost, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In conclusion, we propose ICAHT as a novel toxicity category after immune effector cell therapy, provide a framework for its grading, review literature on risk factors, and outline expert recommendations for the diagnostic workup and short- and long-term management., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The French hospital system crises are constantly forcing the heads of departments to adapt and find solutions for maintaining optimal patient care in a context of staff shortage. Facing these challenges, we had the desire to create a community of department heads capable of helping each other, sharing their experiences, relying on collective intelligence and, ultimately, contributing to rebuilding their hospitals from the bottom up. In this respect, we arranged a two-day seminar, which brought together fourteen heads of hematology departments who share the same desire to challenge their organizations with a collaborative approach and make them evolve. The seminar was animated by an external speaker and included many fruitful sessions, both formal and informal. Following this seminar, participants are now interested in sharing this experience with other department heads throughout the organization of "collaborative seminars of heads of department." Such seminars would serve to create a real community of department heads capable of supporting each other to improve our organizations and to generate new ideas to participate in the reconstruction of our health system from the bottom. This approach is in line with the current strategy of public services to restore a prominent role to hospital departments. We hope that our initiative will also inspire heads of departments in other specialties., (Copyright © 2023 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare, usually refractory, and fatal diseases. Case series have suggested that allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) might improve the prognosis of advanced-stage CTCLs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of allogeneic HSCT compared with non-HSCT therapy on the outcome of individuals with advanced-stage CTCLs., Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, matched controlled trial, conducted at 30 hospitals, participants with advanced CTCLs were allocated treatment: if they had an available compatible related donor they were assigned to allogeneic HSCT, or if not they were allocated to non-allogeneic HSCT therapy. Key inclusion criteria were participants aged 18-70 years, with advanced stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome, and at least one poor prognostic criteria. Participants were excluded if they were not in complete or partial remission of the disease. Propensity score 1:1 matching with replacement (ie, that each participant treated with HSCT was matched to the participant with the closest propensity score treated with non-HSCT therapy, even if they had already been matched) was used to handle confounding factors, with the balance of covariate distribution between HSCT and non-HSCT groups assessed using standardised mean differences. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the matched intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02520908), and is currently active but not recruiting., Findings: From June 1, 2016, to March 3, 2022, total of 99 participants were enrolled at 17 centres in France. Participants with a sibling or matched unrelated donor were assigned to allogeneic HSCT (HSCT group, n=55 [56%]) and participants without a donor were assigned to non-allogeneic HSCT treatment (non-HSCT group, n=44 [44%]). The median follow-up among survivors was 12·6 months (IQR 11·0-35·2). In the HSCT group, 51 participants (93%) were 1:1 matched to participants from the non-HSCT group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the HSCT group (9·0 months [95% CI 6·6-30·5]) than in the non-HSCT group (3·0 months [2·0-6·3]), with a hazard ratio of 0·38 (95% CI 0·21-0·69; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol population, 40 participants (78%) in the HSCT group had 101 serious events and 29 participants (67%) in the non-HSCT group had 70 serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse event other than graft-versus-host disease in both groups was infections, occurring in 30 participants (59%) in the HSCT group and in 19 participants (44%) in the non-HSCT group., Interpretation: Allogeneic HSCT was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival in participants with advanced-stage CTCLs. These results indicate that allogeneic HSCT treatment should be made available to individuals with high-risk, advanced-stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome who achieve pre-transplant disease remission., Funding: French Ministry of Health, National Cancer Institute, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique en Cancérologie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AdM reports research funding from Innate, Almirall, and Kyowa Kirin; travel expenses from Kyowa Kirin, Recordati Rare Diseases and Orphan Europe, and Janssen-Cilag; and fees from Takeda. MB-B reports consultancy at Kyowa Kirin and Recordati; and research funding from Celgene and Roche. SD reports institutional grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme. SI-H-O reports consultancy for Takeda and Recordati. CO reports honoraria from Novartis. JA reports honoraria from Roche and Janssen. OD reports consultancy from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; registration to meetings from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; grants from Pierre Fabre; research funding from Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; and travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi. SBa reports consultancy at Amgen and Blueprint Medicines; and honoraria from Novartis, Leo Laboratories, and AbbVie. EW-H reports consultancy at Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, BluePrint, Sun Pharma, AbbVie, and Sanofi; research funding from AbbVie; and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, AbbVie, Sanofi, and Pierre Fabre. FA reports consultancy at AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge; honoraria from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge; and research funding from Galderma, Janssen, and Pfizer. RH reports honoraria from Kite and Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, and Roche; and consultancy at Kite and Gilead, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte, and Miltenyi. AP-L reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and travel accommodation and meeting participation from Kyowa Kirin, Recordati, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. DM reports honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, CSL Behring, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. J-DB reports being on a speaker or advisory board member for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Union Chimique Belge, Leo, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Almirall. FG reports consultancy at Recordati Rare Disease, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. HM-T reports consultancy at Innate; and research funding from Kyowa Kirin. SMo reports honoraria from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Biocartis; and research funding from Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb. MBat reports consultancy at Bristol Myers Squibb and Quantum Genomics; honoraria from Innate, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Meccellis Biotech, Cerba Research, and Sanofi; research funding from Kyowa Kirin; and grants from Takeda. ED reports grants from Pfizer and Mallinckrodt; and consultancy at Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. ML reports honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Novartis, Sanofi, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Gilead, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AP reports consultancy and honoraria from Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sun Pharma. AH reports consultancy at Novartis, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer; and honoraria from Novartis, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer. YLC reports consultancy at Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pierre Fabre Oncologie; and honoraria from Novartis, Leo, AbbVie, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre Oncologie. EF reports participation in advisory board at Gilead, GSK, and Sanofi; speakers bureau from Novartis and Alexion; honoraria from Novartis; and travel grants from Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. GS reports consultancy at Novartis and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; and research funding from Alexion Pharmaceuticals. RPdL reports consultancy at Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum; honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum; research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; and grants from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells represent a major advance in the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, a significant number of patients experience failure. Among 550 patients registered in the French registry DESCAR-T, 238 (43.3%) experienced progression/relapse, with a median follow-up of 7.9 months. At registration, 57.0% of patients presented an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 2 to 3, 18.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 57.1% received >3 lines of treatment prior to receiving CAR T-cells, and 87.8% received bridging therapy. At infusion, 66% of patients presented progressive disease, and 38.9% had high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Failure after CAR T-cell treatment occurred after a median of 2.7 months (range: 0.2-21.5). Fifty-four patients (22.7%) presented very early failure (day [D] 0-D30); 102 (42.9%) had early failure (D31-D90), and 82 (34.5%) had late (>D90) failure. After failure, 154 patients (64%) received salvage treatment: 38.3% received lenalidomide, 7.1% bispecific antibodies, 21.4% targeted treatment, 11% radiotherapy, and 20% immunochemotherapy with various regimens. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months. Median OS for patients failing during D0-D30 vs after D30 was 1.7 vs 3.0 months, respectively (P = .0001). Overall, 47.9% of patients were alive at 6 months, but only 18.9% were alive after very early failure. In multivariate analysis, predictors of OS were high LDH at infusion, time to CAR-T failure

Obinutuzumab and lenalidomide (referred to as the GALEN combination) is an active immunomodulatory combination with a manageable safety profile in multiple types of lymphoma. We report efficacy and safety results for the phase 2 GALEN study in previously untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). Eligible patients aged ≥18 years had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and high-tumor burden, grade 1 to 3a FL. Induction treatment was obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV, days 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1; day 1, cycles 2-6) plus lenalidomide (20 mg/d, days 1-21, cycle 1; days 2-22, cycles 2-6) for six 28-day cycles. Maintenance included obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 2 cycles) plus lenalidomide (10 mg, days 2-22) for ≤12 cycles (year 1) followed by obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 56 days) for 6 cycles (year 2). The primary end point was complete response rate (CRR) after induction per the 1999 International Working Group criteria. From October 2015 to February 2017, a total of 100 patients were enrolled. CRR after induction was 47%, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 92%. Post hoc analyses per the 2014 Lugano classification, including patients with missing bone marrow assessments, identified an additional 13 patients fulfilling CRR criteria, resulting in a complete metabolic response of 80% and an ORR of 94%. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 82% and 94%, respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (48% any grade; 47% grade ≥3). Only 2% of patients presented with febrile neutropenia; others were mainly grade ≤2. No other specific grade ≥3 toxicity occurred at a frequency >3%. Overall, these results showed promising clinical efficacy for the chemotherapy-free GALEN backbone in previously untreated patients with high tumor burden FL. Except for neutropenia, the safety profile of the combination is remarkable. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01582776., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

CAR-T Cells have opened new doors for cellular immunotherapies and provides new therapeutic options for patients with refractory B-cell malignancies, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cel lymphoma. CAR-T Cells have benefited from an accelerated approval procedure in many countries. Indeed, The French health authorities have approved the specialties Tisacel ® and Axicel ®, but additional data including the use of CAR-T Cells in real life were also mandatory. In regard to the scientific interest of the project, LYSA-LYSARC committed itself to prospectively and retrospectively collect information on patients eligible for CAR-T Cells as required by French health authorities. Other academic cooperating groups (GRAALL, IFM, SFCE, FILO and the scientific society SFGM-TC) were associated to this initiative which aims to build a nationwide CAR-T Cells devoted registry, so-called DESCART (Dispositif d'Enregistrement et Suivi des patients traités par CAR-T cells). DESCAR-T is a real-life multicentric registry set up in French sites qualified for CAR-T Cells treatment. DESCAR-T objective is to describe the use of CAR-T Cells in real life. All paediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancy fulfilling CAR-T Cells approval criteria and for whom a CAR-T Cells therapy has been discussed are included from 1 July 2018. Clinical data are directly collected from medical records and patients are treated according to the centers' routine practices. One of the distinctive features of DESCAR-T is its link with HTA for CAR-T Cells s reimbursement by the French public health system. DESCAR-T is the first national registry promoted by an academic group allowing centralized data collection for both academic and HTA/health authorities' purposes., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Three CD19 CAR-T cells (Yescarta®, Kymriah® and Breyanzi®), have been approved in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) after at least two previous lines of therapy. These immunotherapies have transformed the prognosis of these lymphomas, which can't be cured by conventional treatments. Long-term updates of registration studies as well as the first real-life data allow a better knowledge of the efficacy of these emerging therapies, their toxicity and their resistance mechanisms. These advances have also led to consider the earlier use of CAR-T cells in the therapeutic strategy and to extend it to other B lymphomas such as mantle cell and indolent lymphomas. Indeed, Yescarta® and Tecartus® have been recently approved in those malignancies, Furthermore, other strategies are being investigated to develop new CAR-T cells to target Hodgkin's lymphomas and T-cell lymphomas, although data in these settings still have to be completed. In this article, we review the latest data on the use of CAR-T cells in lymphomas., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite treatment with novel therapies and allogeneic stem-cell transplant (allo-SCT) consolidation, outcomes in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia remain poor, underlining the need for more effective therapies., Methods: We report the pivotal phase 2 results of ZUMA-3, an international, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy KTE-X19 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Patients were enrolled at 25 sites in the USA, Canada, and Europe. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and morphological disease in the bone marrow (>5% blasts). After leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy, patients received a single KTE-X19 infusion (1 × 10 6 CAR T cells per kg bodyweight). The primary endpoint was the rate of overall complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery by central assessment. Duration of remission and relapse-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, and allo-SCT rate were assessed as secondary endpoints. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the treated population (all patients who received a dose of KTE-X19). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02614066., Findings: Between Oct 1, 2018, and Oct 9, 2019, 71 patients were enrolled and underwent leukapheresis. KTE-X19 was successfully manufactured for 65 (92%) patients and administered to 55 (77%). The median age of treated patients was 40 years (IQR 28-52). At the median follow-up of 16·4 months (13·8-19·6), 39 patients (71%; 95% CI 57-82, p<0·0001) had complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery, with 31 (56%) patients reaching complete remission. Median duration of remission was 12·8 months (95% CI 8·7-not estimable), median relapse-free survival was 11·6 months (2·7-15·5), and median overall survival was 18·2 months (15·9-not estimable). Among responders, the median overall survival was not reached, and 38 (97%) patients had MRD negativity. Ten (18%) patients received allo-SCT consolidation after KTE-X19 infusion. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anaemia (27 [49%] patients) and pyrexia (20 [36%] patients). 14 (25%) patients had infections of grade 3 or higher. Two grade 5 KTE-X19-related events occurred (brain herniation and septic shock). Cytokine release syndrome of grade 3 or higher occurred in 13 (24%) patients and neurological events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 14 (25%) patients., Interpretation: KTE-X19 showed a high rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, with the median overall survival not reached in responding patients, and a manageable safety profile. These findings indicate that KTE-X19 has the potential to confer long-term clinical benefit to these patients., Funding: Kite, a Gilead Company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests BDS reports honoraria from Kite, a Gilead Company, and BeiGene; a consultancy or advisory role for BeiGene, Pepromene Bio, Kite, a Gilead Company, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Juno, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Precision Biosciences, Adaptive Biotechnologies, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Chotiner Pediatric Research Foundation, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health; travel support from Kite, a Gilead Company; a leadership or fiduciary role for the National Cancer Center Network, the International Working Group for Acute Leukemia and CAR T, and the Society of Hematologic Oncology; and payment for expert testimony from Bayer. AG reports consultancy or advisory role for Amgen, Kite, a Gilead Company, Atara, Wugen, and Celgene; and research funding from Amgen and Kite, a Gilead Company. OOO reports a consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company, Pfizer, and Janssen; and research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company. ACL reports honoraria from Amgen; a consultancy or advisory role for Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, and Incyte; and research funding from Autolus, Amphivena, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kadmon, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Pharmacyclics. NB reports honoraria from Servier and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; a consultancy or advisory role for Amgen, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Servier; and travel support from Amgen. RDC reports employment with Seagen; stock or other ownership in Seagen; honoraria from Pfizer; a consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company, Pfizer, Amgen, and Pepromene Bio; research funding from Pfizer, Merck, Amgen, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Vanda; and travel support from Pfizer. MRBi reports honoraria from Kite, a Gilead Company; a consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company; and speakers' bureau participation for Kite, a Gilead Company. MST reports consultancy or advisory role for Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Regeneron; and research funding from Amgen, Kite, a Gilead Company, Roche, MacroGenics, and Regeneron. DT reports a consultancy or advisory role for Takeda and Kite, a Gilead Company; speakers' bureau participation for Takeda and Kite, a Gilead Company; and research funding from BMS. KMO reports a consultancy or advisory role for Beam Therapeutics. MLA reports a consultancy or advisory role for Gilead Sciences, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Syndax Pharmaceuticals. YL reports a consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company, Celgene, Juno, Bluebird Bio, Janssen, Legend, Gamida Cell, Novartis, Iovance, Takeda, Fosun Kite, and Sorrento; and research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company, Celgene, Bluebird Bio, Janssen, Legend, Merck, Takeda, and Boston Scientific. GJS reports honoraria from Kite, a Gilead Company. JHP reports honoraria from Clinical Care Options and Aptitude Health; a consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Autolus, Allogene, Artiva, Baxalta, Curocell, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Intellia, Kura Oncology, Minerva, Pfizer, Takeda, Umoja, Affyimmune, and Bright Pharmaceutical Services. MA reports consultancy or advisory role for Celgene; speakers' bureau participation for BMS and Kite, a Gilead Company; and research funding from the National Institutes of Health and California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. MCM reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Roche, and Celgene; a consultancy or advisory role for Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, and Alnylam; travel support from Celgene; and a leadership or fiduciary role for diagnostic guidelines for plasma cell dyscrasias and treatment guidelines for amyloid light-chain amyloidosis in the Netherlands. DJD reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Agios, Autolus, Blueprint Medicines, Forty Seven, GlycoMimetics, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda; a consultancy or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankya, FibroGen, and Mount Sinai Hospital; research funding from AbbVie, GlycoMimetics, Novartis, and Blueprint Medicines; and travel support from GlycoMimetics. PS reports research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company. DJ reports research funding from Pfizer and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. CF and JMR report employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; and stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences. JD reports employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; and stock or other ownership in Kite, a Gilead Company. TS reports employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; stock or other ownership in Kite, a Gilead Company; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company; and travel support from Kite, a Gilead Company. FM reports employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences; and travel support from Kite, a Gilead Company. RV reports employment with Kite, a Gilead Company. BKM reports employment with Kite, a Gilead Company; and stock or other ownership in Kite, a Gilead Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Immatics, Novartis, BMS, and Roche. RH reports consultancy or advisory role for Kite, a Gilead Company; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company; and travel support from Kite, a Gilead Company. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders with renal involvement are relatively frequent, but remain poorly described. A kidney biopsy is usually required to detect the renal lesions that are often missed using other diagnostic tools., Methods: We retrospectively identified 34 patients with renal lymphoma diagnosed by percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB) at Rennes University Hospital and its affiliated hospital centers between January 1, 2004, and May 1, 2016. Clinical, biological, radiological, and histological characteristics were collected at biopsy time., Results: The included patients had Waldenström macroglobulinemia ( n  = 12; 35.3%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphocytic lymphoma ( n  = 10; 29.5%), high-grade B-cell lymphoma ( n  = 6; 17.6%), and low-grade B-cell lymphoma ( n  = 6; 17.6%). The median follow-up was 29 months. Renal involvement led to renal function impairment in 29 patients (85.3%), among whom 20 had acute kidney injury (70%), and to nephrotic syndrome in 4 patients (11.8%). Only 13 patients (38.2%) presented morphological kidney anomalies among whom 5 showed bilateral infiltration. Histologically, interstitial infiltrate (97.1%) was the most common kidney lesion, and 9 patients (26.5%) had specific lymphomatous intraglomerular lesions. After hematological treatment ( n  = 29), a renal response was observed only in 8 patients (27.6%)., Conclusion: Renal involvement in the context of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders is not uncommon. PKB is the best method to confirm this diagnosis. It should be performed early to rapidly initiate the hematological treatment to preserve kidney function.

Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity better than rituximab. Given promising results with lenalidomide and rituximab, this phase 1b study assessed the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide combined with obinutuzumab (GALEN). Patients age ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after rituximab-containing therapy received escalating doses (10 [n = 7], 15 [n = 3], 20 [n = 6], and 25 mg [n = 3]) of daily oral lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 of cycle 1 and on days 2 to 22 of cycles 2 to 6 (28-day cycles). Obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV was administered on days 8, 15, and 22 (cycle 1) and on day 1 (cycles 2-6). Dose was escalated in a 3 + 3 design based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1 to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). We observed 164 adverse events (AEs), of which 139 were grade 1/2. The most common AEs were constipation (52.6%), neutropenia (47.4%), and asthenia (36.8%); 64.3% (9 of 14) of the grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia/neutrophil decrease, but without any febrile neutropenia. Four DLTs occurred in 2 patients, all deemed unrelated to treatment. MTD was not reached. Twelve patients (63.2%) responded: 8 complete, 3 unconfirmed complete, and 1 partial response. Oral lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab is well tolerated and effective in R/R FL. The recommended dose of lenalidomide was established at 20 mg based on the risk of grade 3/4 neutropenia from cycle 2. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01582776., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

PD-1 blockade is an effective therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) who have relapsed after or are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although single-agent anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb's) are associated with high response rates and durable remissions, available results to date suggest that a large majority of patients will eventually progress on therapy. Many of these patients are potential candidates for allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) after receiving anti-PD-1 mAb's, and allo-HCT remains for now the only treatment with demonstrated curative potential in this setting. However, initial reports suggested that allo-HCT in this setting may be associated with increased risk of early transplant-related toxicity, likely driven by lingering effects of PD-1 blockade. Furthermore, many patients with R/R cHL who undergo allo-HCT will relapse after transplantation, most often with limited treatment options. Here again, PD-1 blockade appears to yield high response rates, but with an increased risk of attendant immune toxicity. Many questions remain regarding the use of PD-1 blockade before or after allo-HCT, especially in relation to the feasibility, outcome, optimal timing, and method of allo-HCT after PD-1 blockade. Despite the scarcity of prospective data, these questions are unavoidable and must be tackled by clinicians in the routine care of patients with advanced cHL. We provide consensus recommendations of a working group based on available data and experience, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions until more definitive data are obtained., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Improved understanding of the interactions between cancer cells and the immune system combined with technological advances has led to the development of novel types of immunotherapies. These include checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engager antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells which have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in B-cell malignancies, including anti-PD1 antibodies in Hodgkin lymphoma, and T-cell engager antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, leading to their approval in these indications. Recent clinical data suggest that these immunotherapies may also benefit patients with other types of hematologic malignancies, particularly patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Here, we review the most recent clinical data regarding these different immunotherapies in patients with lymphoma. Ongoing and future studies should further define which immunotherapy may best apply to a given patient in order to provide a 'personalized immunotherapy'.

The benefit of radiotherapy (RT) after chemotherapy in limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. We conducted a randomized trial in patients with nonbulky limited-stage DLBCL to evaluate the benefit of RT after rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Patients were stratified according to the modified International Prognostic Index, including lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and disease stage. The patients received 4 or 6 consecutive cycles of R-CHOP delivered once every 2 weeks, followed or not by RT at 40 Gy delivered 4 weeks after the last R-CHOP cycle. All patients were evaluated by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans performed at baseline, after 4 cycles of R-CHOP, and at the end of treatment. The primary objective of the trial was event-free survival (EFS) from randomization. The trial randomly assigned 165 patients in the R-CHOP arm and 169 in the R-CHOP plus RT arm. In an intent-to-treat analysis with a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year EFS was not statistically significantly different between the 2 arms, with 89% ± 2.9% in the R-CHOP arm vs 92% ± 2.4% in the R-CHOP plus RT arm (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.2; P = .18). Overall survival was also not different at 92% (95% CI, 89.5%-94.5%) for patients assigned to R-CHOP alone and 96% (95% CI, 94.3%-97.7%) for those assigned to R-CHOP plus RT ( P = not significant). R-CHOP alone is not inferior to R-CHOP followed by RT in patients with nonbulky limited-stage DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00841945., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Immune checkpoint-targeted monoclonal antibodies directed at Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1), Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) are currently revolutionizing the prognosis of many cancers. By blocking co-inhibitory receptors expressed by antitumor T cells, these antibodies can break the immune tolerance against tumor cells and allow the generation of durable cancer immunity. Benefits in overall survival over conventional therapies have been demonstrated for patients treated with these immunotherapies, leading to multiple approvals of such therapies by regulatory authorities. However, only a minority of patients develop an objective tumor response with long-term survival benefits. Moreover, the systemic delivery of immunotherapies can be responsible for severe auto-immune toxicities. This risk increases dramatically with anti-PD(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 combinations and currently hampers the development of triple combination immunotherapies. In addition, the price of these novel treatments is probably too high to be reimbursed by health insurances for all the potential indications where immunotherapy has shown activity (i.e. in more than 30 different cancer types). Intratumoral immunotherapy is a therapeutic strategy which aims to use the tumor as its own vaccine. Upon direct injections into the tumor, a high concentration of immunostimulatory products can be achieved in situ, while using small amounts of drugs. Local delivery of immunotherapies allows multiple combination therapies, while preventing significant systemic exposure and off-target toxicities. Despite being uncertain of the dominant epitopes of a given cancer, one can therefore trigger an immune response against the relevant neo-antigens or tumor-associated antigens without the need for their characterization. Such immune stimulation can induce a strong priming of the cancer immunity locally while generating systemic (abscopal) tumor responses, thanks to the circulation of properly activated antitumor immune cells. While addressing many of the current limitations of cancer immunotherapy development, intratumoral immunotherapy also offers a unique opportunity to better understand the dynamics of cancer immunity by allowing sequential and multifocal biopsies at every tumor injection., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is indicated for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Although long-term disease control can be achieved, relapse is still frequent. The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway-blocking antibody nivolumab has shown substantial therapeutic activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory HL who did not receive allo-HCT. However, PD-1 blocking strategy can increase the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in murine models. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab as a single agent in 20 HL patients relapsing after allo-HCT. GVHD occurred in 6 patients (30%) after nivolumab initiation. All 6 patients had prior history of acute GVHD. The patients with nivolumab-induced GVHD were managed by standard treatment for acute GVHD. Two patients died as a result of GVHD, 1 of progressive disease and 1 of complications related to a second allo-HCT. Overall response rate was 95%. At a median follow-up of 370 days, the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 58.2% (95% CI, 33.1%-76.7%) and the overall survival rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 52.4%-91.5%). Among 13 patients still in response, 6 received a single dose of nivolumab and 7 remain on nivolumab. Compared with standard options for this indication, our results show that nivolumab is effective with an acceptable safety profile., (© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies are being increasingly tested in patients with advanced lymphoma. Following treatment, many of those patients are likely to be candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, the safety and efficacy of HSCT may be affected by prior PD-1 blockade. We conducted an international retrospective analysis of 39 patients with lymphoma who received prior treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor, at a median time of 62 days (7-260) before HSCT. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the 1-year cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 44% and 23%, respectively, whereas the 1-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 41%. There were 4 treatment-related deaths (1 from hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, 3 from early acute GVHD). In addition, 7 patients developed a noninfectious febrile syndrome shortly after transplant requiring prolonged courses of steroids. One-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74-96) and 76% (95% CI, 56-87), respectively. One-year cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 14% (95% CI, 4-29) and 11% (95% CI, 3-23), respectively. Circulating lymphocyte subsets were analyzed in 17 patients. Compared with controls, patients previously treated with PD-1 blockade had significantly decreased PD-1 + T cells and decreased ratios of T-regulatory cells to conventional CD4 and CD8 T cells. In conclusion, HSCT after PD-1 blockade appears feasible with a low rate of relapse. However, there may be an increased risk of early immune toxicity, which could reflect long-lasting immune alterations triggered by prior PD-1 blockade., (© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Kinases downstream of B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) represent attractive targets for therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). As clinical responses vary, improved knowledge regarding activation and regulation of BCR signaling in individual patients is needed. Here, using phosphospecific flow cytometry to obtain malignant B-cell signaling profiles from 95 patients representing 4 types of NHL revealed a striking contrast between chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) tumors. Lymphoma cells from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients had high basal phosphorylation levels of most measured signaling nodes, whereas follicular lymphoma cells represented the opposite pattern with no or very low basal levels. MCL showed large interpatient variability in basal levels, and elevated levels for the phosphorylated forms of AKT, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, p38, STAT1, and STAT5 were associated with poor outcome. CLL tumors had elevated basal levels for the phosphorylated forms of BCR-signaling nodes (Src family tyrosine kinase, spleen tyrosine kinase [SYK], phospholipase Cγ), but had low α-BCR-induced signaling. This contrasted MCL tumors, where α-BCR-induced signaling was variable, but significantly potentiated as compared with the other types. Overexpression of CD79B, combined with a gating strategy whereby signaling output was directly quantified per cell as a function of CD79B levels, confirmed a direct relationship between surface CD79B, immunoglobulin M (IgM), and IgM-induced signaling levels. Furthermore, α-BCR-induced signaling strength was variable across patient samples and correlated with BCR subunit CD79B expression, but was inversely correlated with susceptibility to Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and SYK inhibitors in MCL. These individual differences in BCR levels and signaling might relate to differences in therapy responses to BCR-pathway inhibitors., (© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.)

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the number of circulating monocytes and neutrophils represents an independent prognostic factor. These cell subsets include monocytic and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M- and G-MDSCs) defined by their ability to suppress T-cell responses. MDSCs are a heterogeneous population described in inflammatory and infectious diseases and in numerous tumors including multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and DLBCL. However, their mechanisms of action remain unclear. We broadly assessed the presence and mechanisms of suppression of MDSC subsets in DLBCL. First, a myeloid suppressive signature was identified by gene expression profiling in DLBCL peripheral blood. Accordingly, we identified, in a cohort of 66 DLBCL patients, an increase in circulating G-MDSC (Lin(neg)HLA-DR(neg)CD33(pos)CD11b(pos)) and M-MDSC (CD14(pos)HLA-DR(low)) counts. Interestingly, only M-MDSC number was correlated with the International Prognostic Index, event-free survival, and number of circulating Tregs. Furthermore, T-cell proliferation was restored after monocyte depletion. Myeloid-dependent T-cell suppression was attributed to a release of interleukin-10 and S100A12 and increased PD-L1 expression. In summary, we identified expanded MDSC subsets in DLBCL, as well as new mechanisms of immunosuppression in DLBCL., (© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), namely anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies, demonstrated efficacy across multiple types of cancer. However, only subgroups of patients respond to these therapies. Additionally, CPI can induce severe immune-related adverse events (irAE). Biomarkers that predict efficacy and toxicity may help define the patients who may benefit the most from these costly and potentially toxic therapies. In this study, we review the main biomarkers that have been associated with the efficacy (pharmacodynamics and clinical benefit) and the toxicity (irAE) of CPIs in patients., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving field that offers a novel paradigm for cancer treatment: therapies focus on enhancing the immune system's innate and adaptive anti-tumor response. Early immunotherapeutics have achieved impressive clinical outcomes and monoclonal antibodies are now integral to therapeutic strategies in a variety of cancers. However, only recently have antibodies targeting innate immune cells entered clinical development. Innate immune effector cells play important roles in generating and maintaining antitumor immunity. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) are important innate immune mechanisms for tumor eradication. These cytolytic processes are initiated by the detection of a tumor-targeting antibody and can be augmented by activating co-stimulatory pathways or blocking inhibitory signals on innate immune cells. The combination of FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies with innate effector-targeting antibodies has demonstrated potent preclinical therapeutic synergy and early-phase combinatorial clinical trials are ongoing., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification distinguishes three entities among the large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGL leukemia): T-cell LGL leukemia (T-LGL leukemia), aggressive natural killer (NK) cell leukemia, and chronic NK lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), the later considered as a provisional entity. Only a few and small cohorts of chronic NK LPD have been published., Patients and Methods: We report here clinicobiological features collected retrospectively from 70 cases of chronic NK LPD, and compared with those of T-LGL leukemia., Results: There were no statistical differences between chronic NK LPD and T-LGL leukemia concerning median age [61 years (range 23-82 years)], organomegaly (26%), associated autoimmune diseases (24%), and associated hematological malignancies (11%). Patients with chronic NK LPD were significantly less symptomatic (49% versus 18%, P < 0.001) and the association with rheumatoid arthritis was more rarely observed (7% versus 17%, P = 0.03). The neutropenia (<0.5 × 10(9)/l) was less severe in chronic NK LPD (33% versus 61%, P < 0.001) without difference in the rate of recurrent infections. STAT3 mutation was detected in 12% of the cohort, which is lower than the frequency observed in T-LGL leukemia. Thirty-seven percent of the patients required specific therapy. Good results were obtained with cyclophosphamide. Overall and complete response rates were, respectively, 69% and 56%. Overall survival was 94% at 5 years., Conclusion: This study suggests very high similarities between chronic NK LPD and T-LGL leukemias. Since chronic NK LPD is still a provisional entity, our findings should be helpful when considering further revisions of the WHO classification., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Lymphoma occurring in patients aged 90 or older is not uncommon, and its incidence is expected to increase over time. Management of these patients is difficult given their underlying fragility and the lack of information regarding this population., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 234 patients diagnosed with lymphoma at the age of 90 years or older (90+) between 1990 and 2012 to describe their characteristics, management, outcomes and prognostic factors., Results: The median age was 92 years; 88% were B-cell lymphomas consisting mainly in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 months (range, 0-92 months) for the 227 patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), with a significant difference between aggressive and indolent NHL (5.2 months versus 19.4 months, respectively). We further analyzed 166 NHL patients for whom detailed characteristics were available. Among these patients, 63.5% received a treatment, either local (7.5%) or systemic (56%). Lymphoma was reported as the main cause of death (40%). Treatment administration was associated with improved OS in patients with aggressive (P < 0.001) but not indolent NHL (P = 0.96). In patients with aggressive NHL, hypoalbuminemia appeared as a strong and independent negative prognostic factor., Conclusions: The median OS is short in 90+ patients diagnosed with lymphoma but some patients experience prolonged survival. Lymphoma represents the main cause of death in these patients. Treatment may improve survival of selected patients with aggressive but not indolent NHL. Management of these patients may be guided by prognostic factors identified in this study, notably serum albumin.

Defects in T-cell function in patients with cancer might influence their capacity to mount efficient antitumor immune responses. Here, we identified highly reduced IL-4-, IL-10-, and IL-21-induced phosphorylation of STAT6 and STAT3 in tumor-infiltrating T cells (TILs) in follicular lymphoma (FL) tumors, contrasting other non-Hodgkin lymphoma TILs. By combining phospho-protein-specific flow cytometry with several T-cell markers, we identified that CD4(+)CD45RO(+)CD62L(-) FL TILs were largely nonresponsive to cytokines, in contrast to the corresponding autologous peripheral blood subset. We observed differential expression of the inhibitory receptor PD-1 in FL TILs and peripheral blood T cells. Furthermore, CD4(+)PD-1(hi) FL TILs, containing T(FH) and non-T(FH) cells, had lost their cytokine responsiveness, whereas PD-1 TILs had normal cytokine signaling. However, this phenomenon was not tumor specific, because tonsil T cells were similar to FL TILs. FL tumor cells were negative for PD-1 ligands, but PD-L1(+) histiocytes were found within the T cell-rich zone of the neoplastic follicles. Disruption of the microenvironment and in vitro culture of FL TILs could restore cytokine signaling in the PD-1(hi) subset. Because FL TILs in vivo probably receive suppressive signals through PD-1, this provides a rationale for testing PD-1 Ab in combination with immunotherapy in patients with FL.

CD137 (also known as 4-1BB and TNFRSF9) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. Originally identified as a costimulatory molecule expressed by activated T cells and NK cells, CD137 is also expressed by follicular dendritic cells, monocytes, mast cells, granulocytes, and endothelial cells. Anti-CD137 immunotherapy has recently shown promise as a treatment for solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies in preclinical models. We defined the expression of CD137 protein in both normal and neoplastic hematolymphoid tissue. CD137 protein is expressed by follicular dendritic cells in the germinal center and scattered paracortical T cells, but not by normal germinal-center B cells, bone marrow progenitor cells, or maturing thymocytes. CD137 protein is expressed by a select group of hematolymphoid tumors, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma, T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas, and follicular dendritic cells neoplasms. CD137 is a novel diagnostic marker of these tumors and suggests a possible target for tumor-directed antibody therapy., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no consensual first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The GOELAMS (Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucémies Aiguës et Maladies du Sang) group previously developed the (R)VAD+C regimen (rituximab, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and chlorambucil), which appeared as efficient as R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, prednisone) while less toxic. Based on this protocol, we now added bortezomib (RiPAD+C: rituximab, bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone and chlorambucil) given its efficacy in relapsed/refractory MCL patients. The goal of the current phase II trial was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the RiPAD+C regimen as frontline therapy for elderly patients with MCL., Patients and Methods: Patients between 65 and 80 years of age with newly diagnosed MCL received up to six cycles of RiPAD+C., Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Median age was 72 years (65-80). After four cycles of RiPAD+C, the overall response rate was 79%, including 51% complete responses (CRs). After six cycles, CR rate increased up to 59%. After a 27-month follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS) is 26 months and median overall survival has not been reached. Four patients (10%) discontinued the treatment because of a severe toxicity and seven patients (18%) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity., Conclusion: The bortezomib-containing RiPAD+C regimen results in high CR rates and prolonged PFS with predictable and manageable toxic effects in elderly patients with MCL.

Several gene-expression signatures predict survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but the lack of practical methods for genome-scale analysis has limited translation to clinical practice. We built and validated a simple model using one gene expressed by tumor cells and another expressed by host immune cells, assessing added prognostic value to the clinical International Prognostic Index (IPI). LIM domain only 2 (LMO2) was validated as an independent predictor of survival and the "germinal center B cell-like" subtype. Expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9 (TNFRSF9) from the DLBCL microenvironment was the best gene in bivariate combination with LMO2. Study of TNFRSF9 tissue expression in 95 patients with DLBCL showed expression limited to infiltrating T cells. A model integrating these 2 genes was independent of "cell-of-origin" classification, "stromal signatures," IPI, and added to the predictive power of the IPI. A composite score integrating these genes with IPI performed well in 3 independent cohorts of 545 DLBCL patients, as well as in a simple assay of routine formalin-fixed specimens from a new validation cohort of 147 patients with DLBCL. We conclude that the measurement of a single gene expressed by tumor cells (LMO2) and a single gene expressed by the immune microenvironment (TNFRSF9) powerfully predicts overall survival in patients with DLBCL.

Background: In non-cutaneous T-cell/natural killer (T/NK) lymphomas, the prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) during or after therapy is unknown., Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, 54 T/NK lymphoma patients were assessed using FDG-PET before (n = 40), during (n = 44) and/or after therapy (n = 31)., Results: FDG-PET showed an abnormal FDG uptake in all cases. Interim FDG-PET was negative in 25 of 44 cases. After completion of therapy, 19 of 31 patients reached complete remission with negative FDG-PET. In ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphomas, the 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 80% and the negative predictive value of post-therapy FDG-PET was 83% (n = 9). In ALK- T/NK lymphomas, the 4-year PFS was 59% for patients with a negative interim FDG-PET versus 46% for patients with a positive interim FDG-PET (P = 0.28, n = 35). Similarly, there was no statistical difference in 4-year PFS between negative and positive post-therapy FDG-PET in these lymphomas (51% and 67%, respectively, P = 0.96). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse from a negative post-therapy FDG-PET was 53% in ALK- T/NK lymphomas., Conclusions: Although T/NK lymphomas are FDG-avid at diagnosis, a negative interim or post-therapy FDG-PET does not translate into an improved PFS in ALK- T/NK lymphomas.

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is largely mediated by natural killer (NK) cells, is thought to play an important role in the efficacy of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) used to treat patients with B-cell lymphomas. CD137 is a costimulatory molecule expressed on a variety of immune cells after activation, including NK cells. In the present study, we show that an anti-CD137 agonistic mAb enhances the antilymphoma activity of rituximab by enhancing ADCC. Human NK cells up-regulate CD137 after encountering rituximab-coated tumor B cells, and subsequent stimulation of these NK cells with anti-CD137 mAb enhances rituximab-dependent cytotoxicity against the lymphoma cells. In a syngeneic murine lymphoma model and in a xenotransplanted human lymphoma model, sequential administration of anti-CD20 mAb followed by anti-CD137 mAb had potent antilymphoma activity in vivo. These results support a novel, sequential antibody approach against B-cell malignancies by targeting first the tumor and then the host immune system.

Despite the success of passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), many lymphoma patients eventually relapse. Induction of an adaptive immune response may elicit active and long-lasting antitumor immunity, thereby preventing or delaying recurrence. Immunomodulating mAbs directed against immune cell targets can be used to enhance the immune response to achieve efficient antitumor immunity. Anti-CD137 agonistic mAb has demonstrated antitumor efficacy in various tumor models and has now entered clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors. Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of anti-CD137 mAb in lymphoma. We found that human primary lymphoma tumors are infiltrated with CD137+ T cells. We therefore hypothesized that lymphoma would be susceptible to treatment with anti-CD137 agonistic mAb. Using a mouse model, we demonstrate that anti-CD137 therapy has potent antilymphoma activity in vivo. The antitumor effect of anti-CD137 therapy was mediated by both natural killer (NK) and CD8 T cells and induced long-lasting immunity. Moreover, the antitumor activity of anti-CD137 mAb could be further enhanced by depletion of regulatory T cell (T(regs)). These results support the evaluation of anti-CD137 therapy in clinical trials for patients with lymphoma.

Therapeutic vaccines for lymphomas have been developed to induce active and long-lasting immune responses against lymphoma capable of eradicating the tumor. Most of these vaccines use the tumor B cell idiotype (the unique variable region of the surface immunoglobulin) as a tumor-specific antigen. The first human clinical trial for lymphoma vaccine was initiated 20 years ago. Along with several other phase I/II trials, it showed encouraging results which supported the initiation of three phase III trials. The results of these trials have recently been released (although not published yet) which failed to demonstrate a prolongation in progression-free survival following chemotherapy. Despite this disappointing result, a number of observations have accumulated over the years that suggest some clinical efficacy of lymphoma vaccines. Several strategies are being developed to improve these results that include optimization of antigen delivery and presentation as well as enhancement of anti-tumor T cell function. This review describes the clinical development of lymphoma vaccines and delineates advances, problems and prospects towards integration of this strategy in the therapeutic armamentarium for lymphoma.

We have previously shown that intratumoral injection of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide plus systemic chemotherapy can induce a T-cell immune response against lymphoma and serve as a therapeutic vaccine to cure tumors in a murine model. Here, we demonstrate that antibody-mediated modulation of T cells increases the efficacy of CpG vaccination, thereby eliminating the need for chemotherapy. T-cell modulation was accomplished by targeting both effector and regulatory T-cell populations using systemic administration of monoclonal antibodies against OX40, CTLA4, GITR, and folate receptor 4 (FR4). Each of these antibodies enhanced the effect of intratumoral CpG. Some pairwise combinations of these antibodies potentiated T-cell modulation and further enhanced the efficacy of CpG vaccination. Specifically, the combination of anti-OX40 and anti-CTLA4 which enhance activation and block cell-intrinsic negative regulatory circuits in T cells, respectively, was especially potent. When combined with intratumoral CpG, it induced antitumor CD4 and CD8 T-cell immunity, cured large and systemic lymphoma tumors without chemotherapy, and provided long-lasting immunity against tumor rechallenge. Our results show that the combination of intratumoral CpG and immunomodulatory T-cell antibodies has promise for therapeutic vaccination against lymphoma. These reagents are becoming available for human clinical trials.

Background: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in patients older than 80 years is not a rare disease and treatment strategies are often difficult because of associated comorbidities., Patients and Methods: We entered 205 NHL patients older than 80 years treated in a single institution in a retrospective analysis to describe clinical presentation and outcome and to identify specific prognostic factors., Results: The median age was 83 years, and 91% of the cases were B-cell lymphomas consisting mainly of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma. Among patients presenting comorbidities (87%), Charlson index was low in almost half of the patients (43%). Patients did not receive any treatment or received corticosteroids alone in 15%, surgery, radiotherapy, or monochemotherapy in 35%, polychemotherapy without anthracycline in 18%, and anthracycline based in 32%. Median overall survival was of 2.2 years. Main reason for death was disease progression (57%). Independent prognostic factors of survival were poor performance status (P < 10(-4)) and high lactate dehydrogenase level (P < 10(-5)). Comorbidities were not found to influence survival., Conclusions: Very elderly NHL patients showed similar features and prognostic factors than younger patients. Death was related mainly to the disease, meaning that these patients should be more frequently treated with standard treatments.