Search

Background: Knowing the prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) in risk groups is essential for elimination. The aim of the study was to assess HCV prevalence among people with different risk profiles and the feasibility of linking people with HCV to care., Methods: In Southern Denmark we tested people who were using shelters, cafés, and facilities for marginalized populations and the general population. We established a mobile clinic for HCV testing offering point-of-care HCV-antibody (HCV-Ab), point-of-care HCV RNA testing, and dried blood spot (DBS) testing. People with HCV infection were linked to care., Results: Among 802 tested persons, we found an HCV-Ab /HCV RNA prevalence of 13% (n = 101) /3% (n = 24). We found a prevalence of 20% (n = 97)/5% (n = 24) among 475 persons tested at locations attended by people who inject drugs but 0%/0% when testing the general population. Of 24 people who were HCV RNA positive, 83% (n = 20) initiated treatment, 13% (n = 3) spontaneously cleared their infection, and one was lost to follow-up., Conclusion: General population testing has limited utility while focus on settings attended by people with increased HCV risk is more feasible. Linkage of people with a current HCV infection to care is feasible., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S.D. has received travel support and speaker fees from Gilead, Abbott, and AbbVie, and research grants from Gilead, all unrelated to the current study. P.B.C. has received research grants from Gilead, AbbVie, and MSD unrelated to the current study. ALHØ has received research grants from Gilead and speaker fees and travel support from Gilead, AbbVie, and MSD unrelated to the current study. D.H. and B.R. have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate long-term sensitivity for detection of total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 METHODS: From week 41, 2020, through week 26, 2021, all Danish blood donations were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with the Wantai assay. The results were linked with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results from the Danish Microbiological Database (MiBa)., Results: During the study period, 105,646 non-vaccinated Danish blood donors were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and 3,806 (3.6%) had a positive PCR test before the blood donation. Among the donors with a positive PCR test, 94.2% subsequently also had a positive antibody test. The time between the positive PCR test and the antibody test was up to 15 months and there was no evidence of a decline in proportion with detectable antibodies over time. A negative serological result test was associated with a higher incidence of re-infection (Incidence Rate Ratio = 0.102 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.039-0.262))., Conclusion: Among healthy blood donors, 94.2% developed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after infection, and a lack of detectable antibodies was associated with re-infection., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Evaluate six commercial serological assays for detection of IgA, IgM or IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in different disease severities., Methods: Three lateral flow tests (LFTs) (Acro IgM/IgG, CTK IgM/IgG, Livzon IgM/IgG) and three ELISA assays (Euroimmun IgA and IgG, Wantai IgM) were included. Application was evaluated using samples from 57 patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, stratified according to disease severity. Specificity was assessed using historical samples from 200 blood donors., Results: While IgM LFTs failed to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 37-84% of non-hospitalised patients, the Wantai IgM ELISA detected antibodies in 79%. The Euroimmun IgG ELISA detected antibodies in 95% of non-hospitalised patients. IgA, IgM and IgG ELISA levels were initially low, increased over time, and correlated with disease severity. LFT sensitivity declined in samples taken >28 days after symptom onset/resolution. The Livzon IgG LFT had the highest specificity (98.5%), followed by the Euroimmun IgG ELISA (96.2%). The specificity for Euroimmun IgA ELISA improved (≥97.5%) using a custom cut-off value (4.0)., Conclusions: The sensitive and semi-quantitative ELISA assays are most appropriate for serologic detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mild cases. Livzon LFT and Euroimmun ELISA had the highest specificity among the IgG assays, making them most suitable for seroprevalence studies., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)