Search

Objectives: In the Netherlands, limited variability exists in performance of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) among centers treating colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM), except for the intraperitoneal drug administration. This offers a unique opportunity to investigate any disparities in survival between the two most frequently used HIPEC regimens worldwide: mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin., Methods: This was a comparative, population-based cohort study of all Dutch patients diagnosed with synchronous colorectal PM who underwent CRS-HIPEC between 2014 and 2017. They were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Main outcome was overall survival (OS). The effect of the intraperitoneal drug on OS was investigated using multivariable Cox regression analysis., Results: In total, 297 patients treated between 2014 and 2017 were included. Among them, 177 (59.6%) received MMC and 120 (40.4%) received oxaliplatin. Only primary tumor location was different between the two groups: more left-sided colon in the Oxaliplatin group (47.5% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p=0.048). The 1-, 2- and 3-year OS were 84.6% vs. 85.8%, 61.6% vs. 63.9% and 44.7% vs. 53.5% in patients treated with MMC and oxaliplatin, respectively. Median OS was 30.7 months in the MMC group vs. 46.6 months in the oxaliplatin group (p=0.181). In multivariable analysis, no influence of intraperitoneal drug on survival was observed (adjusted HR 0.77 [0.53-1.13])., Conclusions: Long-term survival between patients treated with either MMC or oxaliplatin during CRS-HIPEC was not significantly different., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: De Hingh: An unrestricted research grand from RanD/QPS and Roche, paid to the institute., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To analyse the results of needle localised biopsy (NLB) for non-palpable breast lesions in our hospital and to compare them with data on stereotactic large-core biopsy (SCB), which has been recently introduced as a new less invasive method for evaluating mammographic abnormalities., Methods: We evaluated the results of all consecutive NLB procedures in our hospital in the period 1998-2000 and compared them with data from literature. Clinical, mammographic and pathological data were reviewed., Results: In the present study 314 patients with 319 non-palpable mammographic abnormalities were included. Seventy percent of patients were referred to us from the national screening program. In all but one patient the NLB procedure was successful. The mean duration of hospital stay was 3 (1-10) days. Histological diagnosis was invasive carcinoma in 31%, invasive carcinoma with DCIS in 32%, DCIS alone in 13% and benign in 24%. The invasive carcinoma group scored tumour-free margins after the first operation in 77% of patients, for both the DCIS with invasive carcinoma group and DCIS alone group the tumour-free margin rate was 47%. Patients with invasive carcinoma and/or DCIS were re-operated in 88%. Of all procedures, 91% was performed without complications., Conclusion: NLB is a safe, relatively simple procedure with a high diagnostic accuracy combined with a lower failure and false-negative rate compared to SCB.