Search

Objective: Postoperative pneumonia is among the most common complications in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery. We implemented a proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol and analyzed the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients (≥70 years of age) receiving this protocol after hip fracture surgery versus those receiving usual care before the protocol's implementation at our institution., Materials and Methods: From November 2018 to October 2019, the proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol was implemented. The treatment included intensified physical therapy, postoperative pulmonary exercises and oral care, in addition to the usual surgical treatment for elderly patients with hip fracture. The intervention cohort data were compared with a historical control cohort treated from July 2017 to June 2018. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in both groups, diagnosed according to the presence of two of three of the following: elevated infection parameters, radiologic examination confirmation of pneumonia of the chest or clinical suspicion., Results: A total of 494 patients (n= 249 in the historical control cohort and n=245 in the intervention cohort) were included. A total of 69 patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly lower (6.7 percentage points) in the group receiving the proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol (17.3% in the historical control cohort vs 10.6% in the intervention cohort; p=0.033)., Discussion and Conclusion: A proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol showed promise in decreasing the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate early predictors for discharge to a geriatric rehabilitation department at a skilled nursing home in older patients after hospitalization for hip fracture surgery., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting and Participants: Data from 21,176 patients with hip fracture aged ≥70 years, who were registered in the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit database between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, were included., Methods: Patients were categorized into 3 discharge groups: home (n=7326), rehabilitation (n=11,738), and nursing home (n=2112). Age, gender, Pre-Fracture Mobility Score (PFMS), premorbid Katz index of independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL), history of dementia, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA score), type of anesthesia, fracture type, surgical treatment, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were gathered. Multinomial regression analysis was used to assess for early predictors., Results: Higher age, poor premorbid mobility, lower premorbid Katz-ADL, no history of dementia, ASA score 3-5, general anesthesia, intramedullary implant, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were independent predictors for discharge to geriatric rehabilitation vs discharge home. Identical predictors were found for discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home. History of dementia and premorbid Katz-ADL were distinguishing factors; a higher premorbid Katz-ADL and a history of dementia were associated with a higher risk of discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home. The multinomial regression model correctly predicted 86%, 38.6%, and 2.4% of the patients in the rehabilitation group, home group, and nursing home group, respectively., Conclusions and Implications: This study showed that age, PFMS, premorbid Katz-ADL, surgical treatment, ASA score, type of anesthesia, history of dementia, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were independent early predictors for discharge to geriatric rehabilitation vs discharge home in older patients after hip fracture surgery. Identical predictors were found as predictors for discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home, except for history of dementia and premorbid Katz-ADL., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Parker Mobility Score has proven to be a valid and reliable measurement of hip fracture patient mobility. For hip fracture registries the Fracture Mobility Score is advised and used, although this score has never been validated. This study aims to validate the Fracture Mobility Score against the Parker Mobility Score., Patients and Methods: The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit uses the Fracture Mobility Score (categorical scale). For the purpose of this study, five hospitals registered both the Fracture Mobility Score and the Parker Mobility Score (0-9 scale) for every admitted hip fracture patient in 2018. The Spearman correlation between the two scores was calculated. To test whether the correlation coefficient remained stable among different patient subgroups, analyses were stratified according to baseline patient characteristics., Results: In total 1,201 hip fracture patients were included. The Spearman correlation between the Fracture Mobility Score and Parker Mobility Score was strong: 0.73 (p = < 0.001). Stratified for gender, age, ASA score, dementia, Index of Activities of Daily Living (KATZ-6 ADL score), living situation and nutritional status, the correlation coefficient varied between 0.40-0.84. For patients aged 90 and over and having an ASA score of III-IV who suffered from dementia, had a KATZ-6 ADL score of 1-6, lived in an institution and/or were malnourished, the correlation was moderate., Conclusion: The Fracture Mobility Score is overall strongly correlated with the Parker Mobility Score and can be considered as a valid score to measure hip fracture patient mobility. This may encourage other hip fracture audits to also use the Fracture Mobility Score, which would increase the uniformity of mobility score results among national hip fracture audits and decrease the overall registration load., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Stijn C Voeten, Wieke S. Nijmeijer, Marloes Vermeer, Inger B. Schipper and J.H (Hegeman) certify that he or she has no commercial associations (eg. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hip fractures are common in the elderly and have a high risk of early mortality. Identification of patients at high risk of early mortality could contribute to enhanced quality of care. A simple scoring system is essential for preoperative identification of patients at high risk of early mortality in clinical practice. Of risk models published, The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) shows the most promising results so far. However, there is still room for improvement., Methods: A cohort study including 850 patients was conducted over a period of 5,5 yr. The NHFS was adjusted for cognitive impairment (NHFS-a) and tested. Patients who died within 30days following hip fracture surgery (early mortality group) were compared to survivors. Independent risk factors for early mortality were assessed. A new hip fracture score for frail elderly was developed: the Almelo Hip Fracture Score (AHFS). The NHFS-a and the AHFS were compared for accuracy and predictive validity., Results: Sixty-four (7.5%) patients died within 30days following hip fracture surgery. The AHFS predicts the risk of early mortality better than the NHFS-a (p<0.05). Using cut-off points of AHFS ≤ 9 and AHFS ≥ 13, patients could be divided into a low, medium or high risk group. The area under the curve improved with the AHFS compared to the NHFS-a (0.82 versus 0.72). The likelihood ratio test reveals a significantly better fit of the AHFS in comparison with the NHFS-a (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The AHFS can identify frail elderly at high risk of early mortality following hip fracture surgery accurately. With the AHFS, the patient can be classified into the low, medium or high risk group, which contributes to enhanced quality of care in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Unlabelled: Unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures in women older than 55 years were treated by closed reduction and external fixation to achieve the best functional outcome. Sixteen women had radiographic and functional assessment. Despite initial good alignment secondary displacement occurred in 11 patients, probably due to the comminution of the fracture and possibly influenced by osteoporosis. Malunion of the distal radius was seen in two patients and intra-articular incongruity with an intra-articular step exceeding 1 mm was observed in two other patients. The functional outcome was excellent or good in 10 and fair in two patients. Four patients had a poor functional outcome. Two of these patients had a significant loss of reduction, one resulting in a malunion. The other two had an intra-articular incongruity of more than 1 mm. Three of the four patients with a poor functional outcome had clinical signs of reflex sympathetic dystrophy., Conclusion: Closed reduction and external fixation of "bad case" severely comminuted unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly may result in an acceptable functional outcome in the majority of the cases, although significant secondary displacement occurred in eleven of the sixteen patients.