Search

Background: Accumulating evidence supports an increasing role of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in clinical lung transplantation. However, EVLP has adverse effects on the quality of lung grafts, which have rarely been discussed. Careful optimization of current EVLP protocols might improve outcomes. This study examined effects of different levels of oxygenation of the perfusate circulated through the lungs during EVLP and the impact on post-transplant functional outcomes., Methods: We compared results of 4 different oxygenation levels in the perfusate during EVLP: 6% oxygen (O 2 ), 40% O 2 , 60% O 2 , and 100% O 2 . We evaluated lung function, compliance, and vascular resistance and levels of glucose and other markers in the perfusate. After EVLP, lung grafts were transplanted, and post-transplant outcomes were compared., Results: Lungs perfused with 40% O 2 on EVLP had the lowest glucose consumption compared with the other perfusates. Lungs treated with 40% O 2 or 60% O 2 exhibited significantly less inflammation, as indicated by reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine messenger RNA levels compared with lungs perfused with 6% O 2 or 100% O 2 . Significantly more oxidative damage was noted after 4 hours of EVLP perfused with 100% O 2 . After transplantation, lungs perfused with 40% O 2 during EVLP had the best post-transplant functional outcomes., Conclusions: Optimization of O 2 levels in the perfusate during EVLP improved outcomes in this rat model. Deoxygenated perfusate, the current standard during EVLP, exhibited significantly more inflammation with compromised cellular metabolic activity and compromised post-transplant outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With an increasing number of potential recipients and a comparatively static number of donors, lung transplantation (LT) in the elderly has come under significant scrutiny. Previous studies have been limited by single-center experiences with small population sizes and often mixed results. Using a national registry, we sought to evaluate the following: (1) differences in survival outcomes in septuagenarians compared with sexagenarians; and (2) the effect of temporal trends on the development of other comorbidities in this population., Methods: We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data files from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to identify recipients who underwent LT between the years 2000 and 2013. The study period was divided into two equal eras. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, we compared the 30-day, 3-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year patient survival between septuagenarians and sexagenarians in both eras. Separate multivariate analyses were performed to estimate the risk of renal failure, risk of rejection and length of hospital stay (LOS) post-LT in each of these time periods., Results: A total of 6,596 patients were identified comprising 1,726 (26.2%) during 2000 to 2005 and 4,870 (73.8%) during 2006 to 2012. In the "early era," 32 (1.9%) septuagenarians and 1,694 (98.1%) sexagenarians underwent LT, whereas 543 (11.1%) septuagenarians and 4,327 (88.9%) sexagenarians underwent transplantation in the "latter era." A comparison of patient survival between the two groups in the early era revealed no difference at 30 days (95.7% vs 93.8%, p = 0.65). However, 3-month (91.2% vs 75%, p = 0.04) and 1-year patient survival (79.5% vs 62.5%, p = 0.048) were both lower in the septuagenarian group. In the later era, however, there were no differences in 30-day (96.2% vs 96.8, p = 0.5), 3-month (92.7% vs 91.9%, p = 0.56) or 1-year (81.7% vs 78.6%, p = 0.12) patient survival between the two age groups. Survival rates at 3 years (63.7% vs 49.3%, p < 0.001) and 5 years (47.5% vs 28.2%, p < 0.001) were each significantly lower in the septuagenarian group., Conclusion: Overall, LT outcomes for the elderly have improved significantly over time and early outcomes in the modern era rival those found in younger recipients., (Copyright © 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung cancer mortality rates may vary with access to specialty providers and local resources. We sought to examine the effect of access to care, using density of lung cancer care providers, on lung cancer mortality among blacks and whites in the United States., Methods: We examined U.S. county-level data for age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates from 2003 to 2007. Our primary independent variable was per capita number of thoracic oncologic providers, adjusting for county-level smoking rates, socioeconomic status, and other geographic factors. Data were obtained from 2009 Area Resource File, National Center for Health Statistics, and the County Health Rankings Project., Results: Providers of lung cancer care were unevenly distributed among the U.S. counties. For example, 41.4% of the U.S. population reside in counties with less than four thoracic surgeons per 100,000 people, 23.4% in counties with 4 to 15 surgeons per 100,000 people, and 35.3% in counties with more than 15 surgeons per 100,000 people. Geographically, 4.3% of whites compared with 11.2% of blacks lived in high lung cancer mortality zones. Lung cancer mortality did not vary by density of thoracic surgeons or oncology services; however, higher primary care provider density was associated with lung cancer mortality reduction of 4.1 per 100,000 for whites., Conclusion: Variation in provider density for thoracic oncology in the United States was not associated with a difference in lung cancer mortality. Lower mortality associated with higher primary care provider density suggests that equitable access to primary care may lead to reduced cancer disparities.

Background: Obesity is disproportionately prevalent among minority patients, yet very little has been written about its effect on surgical outcome in this group., Objective: We investigated the association of body mass index (BMI) category with perioperative complications and resource utilization., Methods: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality improvement Program Participant Use Data File was used to calculate the BMI (kg/m2) of all minority patients undergoing inpatient surgery from 2005 to 2008. Patients were stratified into 4 BMI classes, ranging from normal weight to severely obese. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) was used as the main proxy for resource utilization. Stepwise logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for prolonged LOS after controlling for clinically relevant cofactors., Results: Among 73978 patients, 28% were in the normal BMI category, 28.9% were overweight, 28.2% were obese, and 14.9% were severely obese. Morbidity and mortality distribution varied significantly by BMI category, with the highest proportion of cases occurring in the normal-BMI group and the lowest in the severely obese patients. Postoperative LOS was longer for patients in the normal-BMI group than for severely obese patients. Other markers of resource utilization also followed the same pattern with progressive decrease from normal-BMI patients to the severely obese group., Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity and mortality and markers of hospital resource consumption were highest in the normal-BMI patients and decreased progressively to the severely obese group. This group appears to enjoy a paradoxical protection from perioperative complications and so utilize fewer hospital resources.

Background: Effective communication and teamwork are critical in many health care settings, particularly the operating room (OR). Several studies have implicated failures of communication and teamwork as the root cause in a high proportion of sentinel events in the OR., Methods: In a prospective cohort study at a high-volume teaching, research, and tertiary care referral hospital, a standardized one-page briefing and debriefing tool was developed and implemented in October 2006 to improve interdisciplinary communication and teamwork in the OR. The briefing portion of the tool was completed by the surgical team after the patient's final positioning and before incision; the debriefing portion was initiated and completed by the circulating nurse after the first counts were conducted. Compliance was calculated as the number of cases where the briefing and debriefing tool was completed divided by the total number of eligible cases. Surveys (n=40) were conducted to elicit caregiver perceptions of interdisciplinary communication and teamwork in the OR and the burden and average time taken to complete the briefing and debriefing tool., Results: Between October 2006 and March 2008, 37,133 briefings and debriefings were conducted. Average compliance varied over time since implementation, with overall compliance ranging from 76% to 95%. The majority of caregivers perceived that the briefing and debriefing tool improved interdisciplinary communication and teamwork. On average, it took 2.9 minutes (range, 1-5 minutes) to complete the briefing portion of the tool and 2.5 minutes (range, 1-5 minutes) to complete the debriefing portion., Discussion: Implementation of a standardized briefing and debriefing tool in a large regional medical center was a, practical and feasible strategy to improve perceptions of interdisciplinary communication and teamwork in the OR.

The most significant advances in the management of small-bowel obstruction are developments in imaging modalities available to assist in the diagnosis itself, as well as to possibly assist in the early identification of those cases requiring urgent operative decompression. The most marked of these have been in the use and interpretation of contrast-enhanced CT. This has decreased the use of barium studies and has largely supplanted ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of these patients. Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopic techniques are also growing in both capability and popularity. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and the adjuvant of bioresorbable membranes each hold promise but have yet to become established as standard treatment. Further progress is needed in the detection of early, reversible strangulation. As a consequence, the fundamentals of the surgical management of small-bowel obstruction have evolved little over the past 15 years. With our persistent inability to detect reversible ischemia, a substantial risk of progression to irreversible ischemia remains when surgery is delayed, particularly in the setting of suspected complete obstruction.