22 results on '"H. Pass"'
Search Results
2. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Background Data and Proposals for the Classification of Lung Cancer with Separate Tumor Nodules in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer
- Author
-
Frank C. Detterbeck, Vanessa Bolejack, Douglas A. Arenberg, John Crowley, Jessica S. Donington, Wilbur A. Franklin, Nicolas Girard, Edith M. Marom, Peter J. Mazzone, Andrew G. Nicholson, Valerie W. Rusch, Lynn T. Tanoue, William D. Travis, Hisao Asamura, Ramón Rami-Porta, Peter Goldstraw, David Ball, David G. Beer, Ricardo Beyruti, Kari Chansky, Frank Detterbeck, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt, John Edwards, Françoise Galateau-Sallé, Dorothy Giroux, Fergus Gleeson, Patti Groome, James Huang, Catherine Kennedy, Jhingook Kim, Young Tae Kim, Laura Kingsbury, Haruhiko Kondo, Mark Krasnik, Kaoru Kubota, Antoon Lerut, Gustavo Lyons, Mirella Marino, Jan van Meerbeeck, Alan Mitchell, Takashi Nakano, Anna Nowak, Michael Peake, Thomas Rice, Kenneth Rosenzweig, Enrico Ruffini, Valerie Rusch, Nagahiro Saijo, Paul Van Schil, Jean-Paul Sculier, Lynn Shemanski, Kelly Stratton, Kenji Suzuki, Yuji Tachimori, Charles F. Thomas, William Travis, Ming S. Tsao, Andrew Turrisi, Johan Vansteenkiste, Hirokazu Watanabe, Yi-Long Wu, Paul Baas, Jeremy Erasmus, Seiki Hasegawa, Kouki Inai, Kemp Kernstine, Hedy Kindler, Lee Krug, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Harvey Pass, David Rice, Conrad Falkson, Pier Luigi Filosso, Giuseppe Giaccone, Kazuya Kondo, Marco Lucchi, Meinoshin Okumura, Eugene Blackstone, Douglas Flieder, Myrna Godoy, Jin Mo Goo, Lawrence R. Goodman, Jim Jett, Paul de Leyn, Alberto Marchevsky, Heber MacMahon, David Naidich, Morohito Okada, Marina Perlman, Charles Powell, Paul van Schil, Arne Warth, F. Abad Cavaco, E. Ansótegui Barrera, J. Abal Arca, I. Parente Lamelas, A. Arnau Obrer, R. Guijarro Jorge, D. Ball, G.K. Bascom, A.I. Blanco Orozco, M.A. González Castro, M.G. Blum, D. Chimondeguy, V. Cvijanovic, S. Defranchi, B. de Olaiz Navarro, I. Escobar Campuzano, I. Macía Vidueira, E. Fernández Araujo, F. Andreo García, K.M. Fong, G. Francisco Corral, S. Cerezo González, J. Freixinet Gilart, L. García Arangüena, S. García Barajas, P. Girard, T. Goksel, M.T. González Budiño, G. González Casaurrán, J.A. Gullón Blanco, J. Hernández Hernández, H. Hernández Rodríguez, J. Herrero Collantes, M. Iglesias Heras, J.M. Izquierdo Elena, E. Jakobsen, S. Kostas, P. León Atance, A. Núñez Ares, M. Liao, M. Losanovscky, G. Lyons, R. Magaroles, L. De Esteban Júlvez, M. Mariñán Gorospe, B. McCaughan, C. Kennedy, R. Melchor Íñiguez, L. Miravet Sorribes, S. Naranjo Gozalo, C. Álvarez de Arriba, M. Núñez Delgado, J. Padilla Alarcón, J.C. Peñalver Cuesta, J.S. Park, H. Pass, M.J. Pavón Fernández, M. Rosenberg, E. Ruffini, V. Rusch, J. Sánchez de Cos Escuín, A. Saura Vinuesa, M. Serra Mitjans, T.E. Strand, D. Subotic, S. Swisher, R. Terra, C. Thomas, K. Tournoy, P. Van Schil, M. Velasquez, Y.L. Wu, and K. Yokoi
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,Medizin ,Adenocarcinoma ,1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology ,Lung cancer ,Lung cancer staging ,Multiple tumors ,Non-small cell lung cancer ,TNM classification ,Oncology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Meta-Analysis as Topic ,medicine ,Humans ,Non–small cell lung cancer ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,Survival rate ,Neoplasm Staging ,business.industry ,Background data ,Nodule (medicine) ,Neoplasms, Second Primary ,1103 Clinical Sciences ,Second primary cancer ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,Survival Rate ,030228 respiratory system ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, Multiple Pulmonary Sites Workgroup and Participating Institutions ,IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee Advisory Boards Multiple Pulmonary Sites Workgroup and Participating Institutions ,Neoplasm staging ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
Introduction Separate tumor nodules with the same histologic appearance occur in the lungs in a small proportion of patients with primary lung cancer. This article addresses how such tumors can be classified to inform the eighth edition of the anatomic classification of lung cancer. Separate tumor nodules should be distinguished from second primary lung cancer, multifocal ground glass/lepidic tumors, and pneumonic-type lung cancer, which are addressed in separate analyses. Methods Survival of patients with separate tumor nodules in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database were analyzed. This was compared with a systematic literature review. Results Survival of clinically staged patients decreased according to the location of the separate tumor nodule relative to the index tumor (same lobe > same side > other side) in N0 and N-any cohorts (all M0 except possible other-side nodules). However, there was also a decrease in the proportion of patients resected; among only surgically resected or among nonresected patients no survival differences were noted. There were no survival differences between patients with same-lobe nodules and those with other T3 tumors, between patients with same-side nodules and those with T4 tumors, and patients with other-side nodules and those with other M1a tumors. The data correlated with those identified in a literature review. Conclusions Tumors with same-lobe separate tumor nodules (with the same histologic appearance) are recommended to be classified as T3, same-side nodules as T4, and other-side nodules as M1a. Thus, there is no recommended change between the seventh and eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer.
- Published
- 2015
3. A Perspective on the MARS2 Trial.
- Author
-
Lim E, Opitz I, Woodard G, Bueno R, de Perrot M, Flores R, Gill R, Jablons D, and Pass H
- Abstract
Introduction: The phase 3 randomized controlled trial of extended pleurectomy decortication and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for pleural mesothelioma (PM) (MARS2) reported "extended pleurectomy decortication was associated with worse survival to 2 years, and more serious adverse events for individuals with resectable PM, compared with chemotherapy alone." These results have led to considerable discourse regarding the future role of surgery for PM, and there has not been unanimity in the mesothelioma surgical community regarding the trial interpretation. This "perspective" evaluates MARS2 using internationally renowned PM experts who either agreed with the trial interpretation or who found issues with its conduct which may have influenced the results., Methods: A facilitator (HP) worked with team leaders (GW, IO) to assemble individuals offering opinions regarding the trial and its conclusions. Arguments agreeing or not agreeing with the trial interpretation were written only after publication of the full trial. Once both arguments were received by the facilitator, the individual team manuscripts were combined and sent to each team allowing editing for changes in perceived factual errors., Findings: Insightful arguments include (but were not limited to) the difficulties yet advantages of randomization, quality assurance, selection of histologic subtypes, the timing of randomization, use of preoperative staging, statistical methods, and reasons for surgical mortality., Conclusions: The decision to operate for PM in the future will continue to be defined by consensus guidelines and health payer willingness, and the interpretation of MARS2 may play an important role in modulating the role of surgery in the future., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Lim reports having contracts or grants with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medela, Johnson & Johnson, Covidien, Guardant Health, Takeda, Lily Oncology, and Bayer; receiving consulting fees with BeiGene, Roche, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and receiving funds from the National Institute for Health and Care Research as Chief Investigator of MARS2. Dr. Opitz reports having contracts or grants from Roche, Medtronic, and XVIVO; receiving consulting fees from Intuitive; receiving honoraria from Siemens, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intuitive, and Sanofi. Dr. Woodard reports serving on the advisory board for AstraZeneca. Dr. Bueno reports having contracts with Verastem, Genentech, Roche, Myriad, Novartis, Siemens, Gritstone, Epizyme, MedGenomic, Merck, Bayer, Intuitive Northpond, Zagbio, and Early; receiving consulting fees from Regeneron, Covidien, Helios, DiNAQOR, and multiple law firms; and having stock options from Navigation Sciences and Helios. Dr. de Perrot reports receiving consulting fees with AstraZeneca, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma.
- Author
-
Kindler HL, Rosenthal A, Giroux DJ, Nowak AK, Billè A, Gill RR, Pass H, Rice D, Ripley RT, Wolf A, Blyth KG, Cedres S, and Rusch V
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Mesothelioma, Malignant pathology, Mesothelioma, Malignant classification, Survival Rate, Aged, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Pleural Neoplasms pathology, Pleural Neoplasms classification, Neoplasm Staging standards, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma classification, Mesothelioma mortality, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms classification, Lung Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
Introduction: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a global multicenter database to propose evidence-based revisions for the ninth edition of the TNM classification of pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzes the M category to validate eighth edition M category recommendations., Methods: Cases were submitted electronically or by transfer of existing institutional databases for patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed PM. The presence and number of metastases (single versus multiple) in each of eight organ systems were reported for patients with M1 disease at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in OS were assessed by log-rank test., Results: Of 7338 submitted cases, 3598 were eligible and 3221 had sufficient data for clinical staging; 228 cases (7%) were M1. Median overall estimated survival was inferior for M1 compared with M0 patients: 10.5 months versus 21.5 months, respectively (p < 0.0001); estimated 1-year survival was 46% versus 71%, respectively. OS differences between M categories were preserved within histologic subgroups. Among 158 patients with organ-specific documentation of M1 disease, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between those with intrathoracic versus more distant metastatic disease (14.4 mo versus 10.9 mo, p = 0.64). No significant survival difference was detected between patients with metastatic disease in a single-organ system versus multiple-organ systems (12.6 mo versus 8.8 mo, p = 0.45)., Conclusions: This evidence-based analysis of the M category for PM conforms with the eighth edition M descriptors. No changes are proposed in the ninth edition of the mesothelioma M category., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Kindler’s work is supported in part by the University of Chicago Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014599. Dr. Rusch’s work is supported in part by MSK Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. Dr. Nowak acknowledges support from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, APP2008104 and APP1197652. No tobacco industry support has been received for the conduct of this research. None of the investigators involved have received tobacco industry support. Dr. Kindler has relationships with Amgen (consultant), Opna Bio LLC (consultant), and Enlivex Therapeutics (consultant). Dr. Pass has relationships with Roche (steering committee and speakers bureau) and AstraZeneca (advisory board). Dr. Ripley receives institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca and Merck (speakers bureau). Dr. Rusch receives institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; receives meeting preparation and travel reimbursement from NIH/NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; and serves as unpaid member, DSMC Committee, MARS II trial (Cancer Research UK). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Characteristics of Long-term Survivors With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
- Author
-
Opitz I, Lauk O, Werner R, Matter A, Hebeisen M, Battilana B, Batirel H, Pass H, Flores R, Wolf A, de Perrot M, Hoda MA, Klepetko W, Klikovits T, Hashimoto M, Hasegawa S, Richards WG, and Bueno R
- Abstract
Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a cancer with a usually dismal prognosis. However, long-term survivors do exist. Herein, we analyzed long-term survivors (>5 years after surgery) from high-volume centers around the world., Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective descriptive analysis of long-term survivors (overall survival ≥5 years from surgery) treated within a multimodality therapy approach, including macroscopic complete resection. Overall survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and patients were matched by center and surgery year and compared with a control group of short-term survivors (<2 years) in a conditional logistic regression analysis., Results: There were 276 long-term survivors (166 men [63%]), with a median age of 59 years (range 21-83 years) at the time of diagnosis. The histology was epithelioid for 246 patients and nonepithelioid for 30 patients. The disease was on the right side in 58% of the patients. As of this analysis, 148 patients had died, 104 were alive, and 10 were lost to follow-up. Pathologic tumor stages were: pT1 (n = 50), pT2 (n = 63), pT3 (n = 90), or pT4 (n = 16) and pN0 (n = 150), pN1 (n = 20), and pN2 (n = 39). The matched control data set included 333 patients, 95 cases and 238 controls. Comparing short- with long-term survivors, we found moderate evidence that a low white blood cell count before surgery was more often observed in long-term survivors., Conclusions: The data show that long-term survival in PM is possible in a subgroup of surgically treated patients. Histologic subtype and white blood cell count seem to be prognosticators for longer survival., Competing Interests: Disclosures Isabelle Opitz reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees; with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with Bristol-Myers Squibb Co that includes: consulting or advisory; with MSD that includes: consulting or advisory; with Medtronic that includes: funding grants; and with Intuitive that includes: consulting or advisory. Hasan Batirel reports a relationship with Johnson and Johnson that includes: consulting or advisory, paid expert testimony, and speaking and lecture fees; with Medtronic that includes: speaking and lecture fees; and with AstraZeneca that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Harvey Pass reports a relationship with Jones and Bartlett Publishing that includes book royalties. Andrea Wolf reports a relationship with Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization that includes: board membership. Marc de Perrot reports a relationship with Roche that includes: consulting or advisory, and with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Marc de Perrot reports a relationship with BMS that includes: consulting or advisory; with Merck that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; and with Bayer that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Mir Alireza Hoda reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: speaking and lecture fees; with MSD that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with BMS that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; with AstraZeneca that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees; and with the Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology (ACO-ASSO) that includes: board membership. Seiki Hasegawa reports a relationship with the Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo Medical University that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Raphael Bueno reports a relationship with Verastem that includes: funding grants. Raphael Bueno reports a relationship with Genentech that includes: funding grants and travel reimbursement; with Roche that includes: funding grants and travel reimbursement; with Myriad Genetics that includes: funding grants; with Novartis that includes: funding grants; with Siemens that includes: funding grants; with Gritstone that includes: funding grants; with Epizyme that includes: funding grants; with MedGenome that includes: funding grants; with Merck that includes: funding grants; with Bicycle Therapeutics that includes: funding grants; with Bayer that includes: funding grants; with Intuitive Surgical that includes: funding grants; with Northpond that includes: funding grants; with Regeneron that includes: consulting or advisory; with University of Miami Miller School of Medicine that includes: speaking and lecture fees; with Shanghai International Forum on the Standard Treatments of Thoracic Tumors that includes: speaking and lecture fees; with Thornton Law Firm LLP that includes: paid expert testimony; with Blankingship & Keith that includes: paid expert testimony; with Public Health Advocacy Institute that includes: paid expert testimony; with Dolan, Dobrinsky, Rosenblum, Bluestein that includes: paid expert testimony; with Kelley and Uustal that includes: paid expert testimony; with Foster & Eldridge LLP that includes: paid expert testimony; with Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman, Guekguezian LLP that includes: paid expert testimony; with Navigation Sciences that includes: equity or stocks; and with Covidien and Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory. Raphael Bueno has patent licensed to Raphael Bueno. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Radiographic identification of a positive clipped axillary lymph node in a mastectomy specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Author
-
Seto A, Lin C, Norden S, Stratton J, O'Riordan M, and Pass H
- Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsies are recommended for staging in node-positive breast cancer patients who become clinically node-negative after neoadjuvant therapy. Current guidelines support the omission of an axillary lymph node dissection if 3 negative sentinel nodes are retrieved during surgery. Consequently, the utility of routine clip placement in biopsied nodes prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the necessity of targeted removal of these clipped nodes is in question. There are various methods for retrieving clipped nodes. We describe a case in which an intraoperative radiograph of a mastectomy specimen identified a clipped node that had not been localized with targeted axillary dissection in a patient with breast cancer. Pathology revealed persistent nodal positivity after neoadjuvant therapy, resulting in an escalation in care and a complete axillary dissection. We review the current literature on nodal clipping, and discuss the importance of localizing clipped nodes and the impact it can have on management., (© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee.
- Author
-
Moreira AL, Ocampo PSS, Xia Y, Zhong H, Russell PA, Minami Y, Cooper WA, Yoshida A, Bubendorf L, Papotti M, Pelosi G, Lopez-Rios F, Kunitoki K, Ferrari-Light D, Sholl LM, Beasley MB, Borczuk A, Botling J, Brambilla E, Chen G, Chou TY, Chung JH, Dacic S, Jain D, Hirsch FR, Hwang D, Lantuejoul S, Lin D, Longshore JW, Motoi N, Noguchi M, Poleri C, Rekhtman N, Tsao MS, Thunnissen E, Travis WD, Yatabe Y, Roden AC, Daigneault JB, Wistuba II, Kerr KM, Pass H, Nicholson AG, and Mino-Kenudson M
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Adenocarcinoma pathology, Lung Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Introduction: A grading system for pulmonary adenocarcinoma has not been established. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology panel evaluated a set of histologic criteria associated with prognosis aimed at establishing a grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma., Methods: A multi-institutional study involving multiple cohorts of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas was conducted. A cohort of 284 stage I pulmonary adenocarcinomas was used as a training set to identify histologic features associated with patient outcomes (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to select the best model, which was validated (n = 212) and tested (n = 300, including stage I-III) in independent cohorts. Reproducibility of the model was assessed using kappa statistics., Results: The best model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.749 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) was composed of a combination of predominant plus high-grade histologic pattern with a cutoff of 20% for the latter. The model consists of the following: grade 1, lepidic predominant tumor; grade 2, acinar or papillary predominant tumor, both with no or less than 20% of high-grade patterns; and grade 3, any tumor with 20% or more of high-grade patterns (solid, micropapillary, or complex gland). Similar results were seen in the validation (AUC = 0.732 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) and test cohorts (AUC = 0.690 for RFS and 0.743 for OS), confirming the predictive value of the model. Interobserver reproducibility revealed good agreement (k = 0.617)., Conclusions: A grading system based on the predominant and high-grade patterns is practical and prognostic for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. A proposal for score assignment to characterize biological processes from mass spectral analysis of serum.
- Author
-
Roder J, Net L, Oliveira C, Meyer K, Asmellash S, Kasimir-Bauer S, Pass H, Weber J, Roder H, and Grigorieva J
- Abstract
Introduction: Most diseases involve a complex interplay between multiple biological processes at the cellular, tissue, organ, and systemic levels. Clinical tests and biomarkers based on the measurement of a single or few analytes may not be able to capture the complexity of a patient's disease. Novel approaches for comprehensively assessing biological processes from easily obtained samples could help in the monitoring, treatment, and understanding of many conditions., Objectives: We propose a method of creating scores associated with specific biological processes from mass spectral analysis of serum samples., Methods: A score for a process of interest is created by: (i) identifying mass spectral features associated with the process using set enrichment analysis methods, and (ii) combining these features into a score using a principal component analysis-based approach. We investigate the creation of scores using cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and ovarian cancer. Since the circulating proteome is amenable to the study of immune responses, which play a critical role in cancer development and progression, we focus on functions related to the host response to disease., Results: We demonstrate the feasibility of generating scores, their reproducibility, and their associations with clinical outcomes. Once the scores are constructed, only 3 µL of serum is required for the assessment of multiple biological functions from the circulating proteome., Conclusion: These mass spectrometry-based scores could be useful for future multivariate biomarker or test development studies for informing treatment, disease monitoring and improving understanding of the roles of various biological functions in multiple disease settings., Competing Interests: Joanna Roder, Heinrich Roder, Julia Grigorieva, Lelia Net, Senait Asmellash, Carlos Oliveira, and Krista Meyer are or were employees of Biodesix, Inc. and have or had stock or stock options in Biodesix, Inc. Joanna Roder, Heinrich Roder and Carlos Oliveria are inventors on related patents assigned to Biodesix, Inc. Sabine Kasimir-Bauer, Harvey Pass and Jeffrey Weber declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2020 The Authors.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. EURACAN/IASLC Proposals for Updating the Histologic Classification of Pleural Mesothelioma: Towards a More Multidisciplinary Approach.
- Author
-
Nicholson AG, Sauter JL, Nowak AK, Kindler HL, Gill RR, Remy-Jardin M, Armato SG 3rd, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Bueno R, Alcala N, Foll M, Pass H, Attanoos R, Baas P, Beasley MB, Brcic L, Butnor KJ, Chirieac LR, Churg A, Courtiol P, Dacic S, De Perrot M, Frauenfelder T, Gibbs A, Hirsch FR, Hiroshima K, Husain A, Klebe S, Lantuejoul S, Moreira A, Opitz I, Perol M, Roden A, Roggli V, Scherpereel A, Tirode F, Tazelaar H, Travis WD, Tsao MS, van Schil P, Vignaud JM, Weynand B, Lang-Lazdunski L, Cree I, Rusch VW, Girard N, and Galateau-Salle F
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Pneumonectomy, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, Lung Neoplasms genetics, Mesothelioma surgery, Mesothelioma, Malignant, Pleural Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Introduction: Molecular and immunologic breakthroughs are transforming the management of thoracic cancer, although advances have not been as marked for malignant pleural mesothelioma where pathologic diagnosis has been essentially limited to three histologic subtypes., Methods: A multidisciplinary group (pathologists, molecular biologists, surgeons, radiologists, and oncologists), sponsored by European Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, met in 2018 to critically review the current classification., Results: Recommendations include: (1) classification should be updated to include architectural patterns and stromal and cytologic features that refine prognostication; (2) subject to data accrual, malignant mesothelioma in situ could be an additional category; (3) grading of epithelioid malignant pleural mesotheliomas should be routinely undertaken; (4) favorable/unfavorable histologic characteristics should be routinely reported; (5) clinically relevant molecular data (programmed death ligand 1, BRCA 1 associated protein 1 [BAP1], and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) should be incorporated into reports, if undertaken; (6) other molecular data should be accrued as part of future trials; (7) resection specimens (i.e., extended pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy) should be pathologically staged with smaller specimens being clinically staged; (8) ideally, at least three separate areas should be sampled from the pleural cavity, including areas of interest identified on pre-surgical imaging; (9) image-acquisition protocols/imaging terminology should be standardized to aid research/refine clinical staging; (10) multidisciplinary tumor boards should include pathologists to ensure appropriate treatment options are considered; (11) all histologic subtypes should be considered potential candidates for chemotherapy; (12) patients with sarcomatoid or biphasic mesothelioma should not be excluded from first-line clinical trials unless there is a compelling reason; (13) tumor subtyping should be further assessed in relation to duration of response to immunotherapy; and (14) systematic screening of all patients for germline mutations is not recommended, in the absence of a family history suspicious for BAP1 syndrome., Conclusions: These multidisciplinary recommendations for pathology classification and application will allow more informative pathologic reporting and potential risk stratification, to support clinical practice, research investigation and clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Patient-derived xenografts effectively capture responses to oncology therapy in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with solid tumors.
- Author
-
Izumchenko E, Paz K, Ciznadija D, Sloma I, Katz A, Vasquez-Dunddel D, Ben-Zvi I, Stebbing J, McGuire W, Harris W, Maki R, Gaya A, Bedi A, Zacharoulis S, Ravi R, Wexler LH, Hoque MO, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Pass H, Peled N, Davies A, Morris R, Hidalgo M, and Sidransky D
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Animals, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Transplantation methods, Neoplasms genetics, Exome Sequencing, Neoplasms pathology, Neoplasms therapy, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays methods
- Abstract
Background: While patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) offer a powerful modality for translational cancer research, a precise evaluation of how accurately patient responses correlate with matching PDXs in a large, heterogeneous population is needed for assessing the utility of this platform for preclinical drug-testing and personalized patient cancer treatment., Patients and Methods: Tumors obtained from surgical or biopsy procedures from 237 cancer patients with a variety of solid tumors were implanted into immunodeficient mice and whole-exome sequencing was carried out. For 92 patients, responses to anticancer therapies were compared with that of their corresponding PDX models., Results: We compared whole-exome sequencing of 237 PDX models with equivalent information in The Cancer Genome Atlas database, demonstrating that tumorgrafts faithfully conserve genetic patterns of the primary tumors. We next screened PDXs established for 92 patients with various solid cancers against the same 129 treatments that were administered clinically and correlated patient outcomes with the responses in corresponding models. Our analysis demonstrates that PDXs accurately replicate patients' clinical outcomes, even as patients undergo several additional cycles of therapy over time, indicating the capacity of these models to correctly guide an oncologist to treatments that are most likely to be of clinical benefit., Conclusions: Integration of PDX models as a preclinical platform for assessment of drug efficacy may allow a higher success-rate in critical end points of clinical benefit., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Improving Staging of a Rare Disease Through International Participation.
- Author
-
Pass H, Giroux D, Kennedy C, Ruffini E, Cangir AK, Rice D, Asamura H, Waller D, Edwards J, Weder W, Hoffmann H, van Meerbeeck JP, Nowak A, and Rusch VW
- Subjects
- Humans, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma, Malignant, Pleural Neoplasms pathology, Registries, Lung Neoplasms classification, Mesothelioma classification, Neoplasm Staging, Pleural Neoplasms classification, Rare Diseases classification
- Abstract
For nearly 40 years, there was no generally accepted staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma. In 1994, members of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group, in collaboration with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, proposed a TNM staging system based on analyses of outcomes in retrospective surgical series and small clinical trials. Subsequently accepted by the American Joint Commission on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control for the sixth editions of their staging manuals, this system has since been the international staging standard. However, it has significant limitations, particularly with respect to clinical staging and to the categories for lymph node staging. Here we provide an overview of the development of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer malignant pleural mesothelioma staging database, which was designed to address these limitations through the development of a large international data set. Analyses of this database, described in papers linked to this overview, are being used to inform revisions in the eighth editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control staging systems., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma.
- Author
-
Rice D, Chansky K, Nowak A, Pass H, Kindler H, Shemanski L, Opitz I, Call S, Hasegawa S, Kernstine K, Atinkaya C, Rea F, Nafteux P, and Rusch VW
- Subjects
- Humans, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma, Malignant, Pleural Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms classification, Mesothelioma classification, Neoplasm Staging classification, Pleural Neoplasms classification
- Abstract
Introduction: Nodal categories for malignant pleural mesothelioma are derived from the lung cancer staging system and have not been adequately validated. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a multinational database to generate evidence-based recommendations to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of malignant pleural mesothelioma., Methods: Data from 29 centers were entered prospectively (n = 1566) or by transfer of retrospective data (n = 1953). Survival according to the seventh edition N categories was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis., Results: There were 2432 analyzable cases: 1603 had clinical (c) staging, 1614 had pathologic (p) staging, and 785 had both. For clinically staged tumors there was no separation in Kaplan-Meier curves between cN0, cN1 or cN2 (cN1 versus cN0 hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, p = 0.77 and cN2 versus cN1 HR = 1.04, p = 0.85). For pathologically staged tumors, patients with pN1 or pN2 tumors had worse survival than those with pN0 tumors (HR = 1.51, p < 0.0001) but no survival difference was noted between those with pN1 and pN2 tumors (HR = 0.99, p = 0.99). Patients with both pN1 and pN2 nodal involvement had poorer survival than those with pN2 tumors only (HR = 1.60, p = 0.007) or pN0 tumors (HR = 1.62, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: A recommendation to collapse both clinical and pN1 and pN2 categories into a single N category comprising ipsilateral, intrathoracic nodal metastases (N1) will be made for the eighth edition staging system. Nodes previously categorized as N3 will be reclassified as N2., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Survival after Sublobar Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Methodological Obstacles in Comparing the Efficacy to Lobectomy.
- Author
-
Taioli E, Yip R, Olkin I, Wolf A, Nicastri D, Henschke C, Yankelevitz D, Pass H, and Flores RM
- Subjects
- Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Male, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Lung Neoplasms surgery, Pneumonectomy methods
- Abstract
Introduction: Surgery is the treatment of choice for early-stage lung cancer (LC). Although lobectomy (L) is the historic standard treatment, the issue of whether long-term outcomes of sublobar resection (SL) are comparable is still under debate. The objective of this study was to perform a review of the literature on 5-year survival rates after SL compared to L for patients with early-stage LC., Methods: A priori inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) observational studies, (2) L compared to SL for early-stage LC, (3) radiographic staging by computed tomography scan, and (4) 5-year survival reported. A Medline search through January 2015 resulted in 31 studies representing 23 distinct datasets. The absolute difference in 5-year survival was calculated and plotted for each study., Results: L was performed in 4564 patients and SL in 2287 patients. Of 19 studies reporting the reason for SL, 11 indicated that SL was performed because of comorbidities or impaired cardiopulmonary function. Four studies showed no difference in 5-year survival, 13 favored L, and six favored SL. One propensity score study favored L and the other favored SL. Of 20 studies reporting recurrence rate, 11 favored L and nine favored SL., Conclusions: Studies comparing 5-year survival rates of SL to L are sufficiently heterogeneous to prevent carrying out traditional meta-analysis. SL survival is often similar to L when adjustments are made for age, comorbidities, or impaired cardiopulmonary function. New approaches are needed for the comparison of L to SL., (Copyright © 2015 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Isolated Lung Perfusion for Pulmonary Metastases.
- Author
-
Ward A, Prokrym K, and Pass H
- Subjects
- Animals, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion methods, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms secondary
- Abstract
Isolated lung perfusion (ILP) is a surgical technique developed to treat pulmonary metastases. During ILP, high-dose chemotherapy is delivered into the pulmonary vasculature, minimizing systemic exposure and delivering the chemotherapeutic agent directly to the lung. ILP has been studied extensively in a variety of animal models and in humans in phase I trials. The most frequently studied chemotherapeutic agents used in ILP are doxorubicin, 5-flurodeoxyuridine, tumor necrosis factor-α, paclitaxel, melphalan, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Phase I clinical trials with ILP have shown that ILP can be safely performed in humans but with mixed clinical results and poor long-term survival., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Initial analysis of the international association for the study of lung cancer mesothelioma database.
- Author
-
Rusch VW, Giroux D, Kennedy C, Ruffini E, Cangir AK, Rice D, Pass H, Asamura H, Waller D, Edwards J, Weder W, Hoffmann H, and van Meerbeeck JP
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Databases, Factual, Female, Humans, International Agencies, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms surgery, Male, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma surgery, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pleural Neoplasms pathology, Pleural Neoplasms surgery, Prognosis, Registries, Survival Rate, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Mesothelioma mortality, Pleural Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
Background: The current staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is controversial. To plan revisions of this system, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee developed an international database. Initial analyses focus on patients managed surgically., Methods: Participation was solicited from centers known to have MPM registries. Common data elements were analyzed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee Statistical Center. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, prognostic factors by log rank and Cox regression model. p Value less than 0.05 was significant., Results: Data included 3101 patients (15 centers, 4 continents)., Demographics: median age 63 years, 79% men, 62.3% epithelioid tumor. Best tumor, node, metastasis (bTNM) stages were: I (11%), II, (21%), III (48%), and IV (20%). Curative-intent surgery was performed in 1494 patients (64.5%). Median survivals by clinical TNM and pathological TNM were similar: stage I, 21 months; stage II, 19 months; stage III, 16 months; and stage IV, 12 months. Median survival by histology: epithelioid 19 months, biphasic 13 months, and sarcomatoid 8 months. By multivariable analyses, significant differences in overall survival were seen for: T4 versus T3 and T3 versus T2 but not T2 versus T1; N0 versus N1 and N2 but not N1 versus N2; stages III and IV versus I but not II versus I; epithelioid histology versus other; age of female versus age of male; and palliative versus curative-intent surgery., Conclusions: This is the largest international database examining outcomes in surgically managed MPM patients. Survival differences reported from smaller databases are confirmed but suggest the need to revise tumor and node staging.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Recommendations for uniform definitions of surgical techniques for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a consensus report of the international association for the study of lung cancer international staging committee and the international mesothelioma interest group.
- Author
-
Rice D, Rusch V, Pass H, Asamura H, Nakano T, Edwards J, Giroux DJ, Hasegawa S, Kernstine KH, Waller D, and Rami-Porta R
- Subjects
- Consensus, Humans, International Agencies, Neoplasm Staging, Public Opinion, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms surgery, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma surgery, Pleural Neoplasms pathology, Pleural Neoplasms surgery, Practice Guidelines as Topic standards
- Abstract
Introduction: Extrapleural pneumonectomy has been well defined; however, surgeons vary regarding the surgical extent and goals of "pleurectomy/decortication" (P/D). We explored mesothelioma surgeons' concepts of P/D with the aim of unifying surgical nomenclature., Methods: A web-based survey was administered to surgeons who operated on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) for diagnosis, staging, palliation, or cytoreduction. One hundred thirty surgeons from 59 medical centers were included. Surgeons who did not perform surgery for MPM within the last year were excluded., Results: There were 62 (48%) respondents from 39 medical centers in 14 countries. The mean number of patients with MPM seen annually at each medical center was 46, and the mean annual number of cytoreductive procedures performed per surgeon was 8. Most (88%) agreed that the goal of cytoreductive surgery should be macroscopic complete resection of tumor. P/D was defined as resection of parietal and visceral pleura with the aim of achieving macroscopic complete resection by 72% of respondents. If the diaphragm or pericardium required resection, 64% preferred the term "radical P/D," whereas "P/D" (40%) or "total pleurectomy" (39%) was preferred if these structures were not removed. Most surgeons believed that extrapleural pneumonectomy (90%) or "radical P/D" (68%) could provide adequate cytoreduction, whereas only 23% thought that P/D could., Conclusions: There was significant variation regarding surgical nomenclature for procedures for MPM. The International Staging Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the International Mesothelioma Interest Group recommend that P/D should aim to remove all macroscopic tumor involving the parietal and visceral pleura and should be termed "extended" P/D when the diaphragm or pericardium is resected.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. A histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 downregulates XIAP in mesothelioma cell lines which is likely responsible for increased apoptosis with TRAIL.
- Author
-
Symanowski J, Vogelzang N, Zawel L, Atadja P, Pass H, and Sharma S
- Subjects
- Acetylation, BH3 Interacting Domain Death Agonist Protein metabolism, Caspases metabolism, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors pharmacology, Enzyme Activation drug effects, Enzyme Inhibitors pharmacology, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Histones metabolism, Humans, Immunoblotting, Indoles, Leupeptins pharmacology, Panobinostat, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases metabolism, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Apoptosis drug effects, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Hydroxamic Acids pharmacology, Mesothelioma metabolism, Mesothelioma pathology, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand metabolism, X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein metabolism
- Abstract
Purpose: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of tumor necrosis factor family and it is important for ligand induced apoptosis in tumor cells. TRAIL has been shown to be synergistic with a variety of chemotherapies and targeted agents. In the study, a combination of TRAIL and a histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 was studied in mesothelioma cell lines., Experimental Design: Five mesothelioma cell lines and two normal cell lines were tested for cell growth inhibition and apoptosis using high-throughput assays in the presence of LBH589, TRAIL and a combination of the two. Caspase induction was studied and levels of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) were tested using Western blotting. A combination of a direct inhibitor of XIAP was also tested in combination with TRAIL., Results: In mesothelioma cell lines, a combination of LBH589 and TRAIL markedly increased cell growth inhibition and apoptosis when compared with the effect on normal cell lines. LBH589 and TRAIL appeared to induce higher levels of caspase 3 and 7 and this appeared to be closely related to ability of LBH589 to degrade XIAP. In addition, a direct inhibitor of XIAP was also sensitized cells to TRAIL apoptosis, providing an indirect confirmation for XIAP degradation as a possible mechanism of synergy., Conclusions: In mesothelioma cell lines, LBH589 increases the sensitivity to TRAIL. In addition, at least partly, the mechanism of this induction of TRAIL sensitivity is due to LBH589 related degradation of XIAP. These results provide initial evidence for testing this combination in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Detection and localization of intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma using fluorescence-reflectance bronchoscopy: an international, multicenter clinical trial.
- Author
-
Edell E, Lam S, Pass H, Miller YE, Sutedja T, Kennedy T, Loewen G, Keith RL, and Gazdar A
- Subjects
- Aged, Airway Obstruction, Carcinoma in Situ diagnosis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell diagnosis, Female, Fluorescence, Humans, Hyperplasia diagnosis, International Agencies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Smoking, Bronchial Neoplasms diagnosis, Bronchoscopy, Lung Neoplasms diagnosis, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial diagnosis
- Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit of using a new fluorescence-reflectance imaging system, Onco-LIFE, for the detection and localization of intraepitheal neoplasia and early invasive squamous cell carcinoma. A secondary objective was to evaluate the potential use of quantitative image analysis with this device for objective classification of abnormal sites., Design: This study was a prospective, multicenter, comparative, single arm trial. Subjects for this study were aged 45 to 75 years and either current or past smokers of more than 20 pack-years with airflow obstruction, forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity less than 75%, suspected to have lung cancer based on either sputum atypia, abnormal chest roentgenogram/chest computed tomography, or patients with previous curatively treated lung or head and neck cancer within 2 years., Materials and Methods: The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the relative sensitivity of white light bronchoscopy (WLB) plus autofluorescence-reflectance bronchoscopy compared with WLB alone. Bronchoscopy with Onco-LIFE was carried out in two stages. The first stage was performed under white light and mucosal lesions were visually classified. Mucosal lesions were classified using the same scheme in the second stage when viewed with Onco-LIFE in the fluorescence-reflectance mode. All regions classified as suspicious for moderate dysplasia or worse were biopsied, plus at least one nonsuspicious region for control. Specimens were evaluated by the site pathologist and then sent to a reference pathologist, each blinded to the endoscopic findings. Positive lesions were defined as those with moderate/severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ (CIS), or invasive carcinoma. A positive patient was defined as having at least one lesion of moderate/severe dysplasia, CIS, or invasive carcinoma. Onco-LIFE was also used to quantify the fluorescence-reflectance response (based on the proportion of reflected red light to green fluorescence) for each suspected lesion before biopsy., Results: There were 115 men and 55 women with median age of 62 years. Seven hundred seventy-six biopsy specimens were included. Seventy-six were classified as positive (moderate dysplasia or worse) by pathology. The relative sensitivity on a per-lesion basis of WLB + FLB versus WLB was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.89). The relative sensitivity on a per-patient basis was 1.33 (95% CI, 1.13-1.70). The relative sensitivity to detect intraepithelial neoplasia (moderate/severe dysplasia or CIS) was 4.29 (95% CI, 2.00-16.00) and 3.50 (95% CI, 1.63-12.00) on a per-lesion and per-patient basis, respectively. For a quantified fluorescence reflectance response value of more than or equal to 0.40, a sensitivity and specificity of 51% and 80%, respectively, could be achieved for detection of moderate/severe dsyplasia, CIS, and microinvasive cancer., Conclusions: Using autofluorescence-reflectance bronchoscopy as an adjunct to WLB with the Onco-LIFE system improves the detection and localization of intraepitheal neoplasia and invasive carcinoma compared with WLB alone. The use of quantitative image analysis to minimize interobserver variation in grading of abnormal sites should be explored further in future prospective clinical trial.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Invited commentary.
- Author
-
Pass H
- Subjects
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung immunology, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms immunology, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Male, Pneumonectomy methods, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Analysis, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung surgery, Immunity, Cellular physiology, Lung Neoplasms surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted methods, Thoracotomy methods
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. The mets, the scalpels, and possibly the beams.
- Author
-
Pass H
- Subjects
- Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Radiosurgery instrumentation, Neoplasms surgery, Radiosurgery methods
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Current treatment options and biology of peritoneal mesothelioma: meeting summary of the first NIH peritoneal mesothelioma conference.
- Author
-
Hassan R, Alexander R, Antman K, Boffetta P, Churg A, Coit D, Hausner P, Kennedy R, Kindler H, Metintas M, Mutti L, Onda M, Pass H, Premkumar A, Roggli V, Sterman D, Sugarbaker P, Taub R, and Verschraegen C
- Subjects
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Mesothelioma epidemiology, Mesothelioma genetics, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Peritoneal Neoplasms epidemiology, Peritoneal Neoplasms genetics, United States, Mesothelioma pathology, Mesothelioma therapy, Peritoneal Neoplasms pathology, Peritoneal Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare cancer of the peritoneum with about 250 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States. It is the second most common site for mesothelioma development and accounts for 10-20% of all mesotheliomas diagnosed in the United States. A meeting sponsored by the NIH Office of Rare Diseases was held in Bethesda, Maryland on September 13 and 14, 2004. The objective of this meeting was to review the epidemiology, biology and current surgical and medical management of peritoneal mesothelioma. In addition, the meeting also discussed clinical and pre-clinical evaluation of novel treatments for mesothelioma as well as ongoing laboratory research to better understand this disease. This report summarizes the proceedings of the meeting as well as directions for future clinical and basic research.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Nonsurgical therapy for pulmonary hydatid cyst disease.
- Author
-
Mawhorter S, Temeck B, Chang R, Pass H, and Nash T
- Subjects
- Adult, Animals, Biopsy, Needle, Drainage adverse effects, Echinococcosis, Pulmonary diagnosis, Echinococcosis, Pulmonary parasitology, Echinococcus isolation & purification, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung parasitology, Male, Recurrence, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Albendazole therapeutic use, Anthelmintics therapeutic use, Drainage methods, Echinococcosis, Pulmonary therapy
- Abstract
Therapeutic and diagnostic aspiration of Echinococcus granulosus liver cysts, but not pulmonary cysts, are increasingly being performed. Documented herein is the utility of percutaneous drainage and of albendazole treatment in a patient with a large recurrent, isolated, pulmonary echinococcal cyst for whom traditional therapy would have resulted in severe morbidity. Therapeutic options and possible complications are discussed.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.