Search

Background: Right atrial (RA) imaging has emerged as a promising tool for the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), albeit without systematic validation., Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched for studies investigating the prognostic value of RA imaging assessment in patients with PH from 2000 to June 2021 (PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020212850). An inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of univariable hazard ratios (HRs) was performed using a random effects model., Results: Thirty-five studies were included (3,476 patients with PH; 74% female, 86% pulmonary arterial hypertension). Risk of bias was low/moderate (Quality of Prognosis Studies checklist). RA area (HR 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.08), RA indexed area (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), RA peak longitudinal strain (PLS; HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.91-0.97) and RA total emptying fraction (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98) were significantly associated with combined end-points including death, clinical worsening and/or lung transplantation; RA volume and volume index showed marginal significant associations. RA area (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07), RA indexed area (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.07-1.17) and RA PLS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99) showed significant associations with mortality; RA total emptying fraction showed a marginal association., Conclusions: Imaging-based RA assessment qualifies as a relevant prognostic marker in PH. RA area reliably predicts composite end-points and mortality, which underscores its clinical utility. RA PLS emerged as a promising imaging measure, but is currently limited by the number of studies and different acquisition methods., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is frequently made in elderly patients who present with comorbidities, especially hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. It is unknown to what extent the presence of these comorbidities affects the response to PAH therapies and whether risk stratification predicts outcome in patients with comorbidities., Methods: We assessed the database of COMPERA, a European pulmonary hypertension registry, to determine changes after initiation of PAH therapy in WHO functional class (FC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and mortality risk assessed by a 4-strata model in patients with IPAH and no comorbidities, 1-2 comorbidities and 3-4 comorbidities., Results: The analysis was based on 1,120 IPAH patients (n = 208 [19%] without comorbidities, n = 641 [57%] with 1-2 comorbidities, and n = 271 [24%] with 3-4 comorbidities). Improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk from baseline to first follow-up were significantly larger in patients with no comorbidities than in patients with comorbidities, while they were not significantly different in patients with 1-2 and 3-4 comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted survival in patients without comorbidities as well as in patients with 1-2 or 3-4 comorbidities., Conclusions: Our data suggest that patients with IPAH and comorbidities benefit from PAH medication with improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk, albeit to a lesser extent than patients without comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted outcome in patients with IPAH irrespective of the presence of comorbidities., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among patients meeting diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), there is an emerging lung phenotype characterised by a low diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and a smoking history. The present study aimed at a detailed characterisation of these patients., Methods: We analysed data from two European pulmonary hypertension registries, COMPERA (launched in 2007) and ASPIRE (from 2001 onwards), to identify patients diagnosed with IPAH and a lung phenotype defined by a DLCO of less than 45% predicted and a smoking history. We compared patient characteristics, response to therapy, and survival of these patients to patients with classical IPAH (defined by the absence of cardiopulmonary comorbidities and a DLCO of 45% or more predicted) and patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease (group 3 pulmonary hypertension)., Findings: The analysis included 128 (COMPERA) and 185 (ASPIRE) patients with classical IPAH, 268 (COMPERA) and 139 (ASPIRE) patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype, and 910 (COMPERA) and 375 (ASPIRE) patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease. Most patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype had normal or near normal spirometry, a severe reduction in DLCO, with the majority having no or a mild degree of parenchymal lung involvement on chest computed tomography. Patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (median age, 72 years [IQR 65-78] in COMPERA and 71 years [65-76] in ASPIRE) and patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (median age 71 years [65-77] in COMPERA and 69 years [63-74] in ASPIRE) were older than those with classical IPAH (median age, 45 years [32-60] in COMPERA and 52 years [38-64] in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries). While 99 (77%) patients in COMPERA and 133 (72%) patients in ASPIRE with classical IPAH were female, there was a lower proportion of female patients in the IPAH and a lung phenotype cohort (95 [35%] COMPERA; 75 [54%] ASPIRE), which was similar to group 3 pulmonary hypertension (336 [37%] COMPERA; 148 [39%] ASPIRE]). Response to pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies at first follow-up was available from COMPERA. Improvements in WHO functional class were observed in 54% of patients with classical IPAH, 26% of patients with IPAH with a lung phenotype, and 22% of patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (p<0·0001 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·194 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension); median improvements in 6 min walking distance were 63 m, 25 m, and 23 m for these cohorts respectively (p=0·0015 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·64 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension), and median reductions in N-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic-peptide were 58%, 27%, and 16% respectively (p=0·0043 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·14 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension). In both registries, survival of patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (1 year, 89% in COMPERA and 79% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 31% in COMPERA and 21% in ASPIRE) and group 3 pulmonary hypertension (1 year, 78% in COMPERA and 64% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 26% in COMPERA and 18% in ASPIRE) was worse than survival of patients with classical IPAH (1 year, 95% in COMPERA and 98% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 84% in COMPERA and 80% in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries)., Interpretation: A cohort of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for IPAH with a distinct, presumably smoking-related form of pulmonary hypertension accompanied by a low DLCO, resemble patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease rather than classical IPAH. These observations have pathogenetic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications, which require further exploration., Funding: COMPERA is funded by unrestricted grants from Acceleron, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and OMT. The ASPIRE Registry is supported by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MMH received fees for lectures or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, and Pfizer. KD has received research funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), UK and The Wellcome Trust, UK. RAL has received honoraria and research grants from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. KMO has received fees for lectures or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. DH has received travel compensation from Shire. DP has received fees for consultations from Actelion, Amgen, Aspen, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda and Viatris. EG has received fees for lectures or consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. GS has received honoraria for lectures or consultancy for Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer. CDV has received fees for lectures or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. HG reports personal fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squib, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. OD has or has had a consultancy relationship or has received research funding from 4 D Science, Actelion, Active Biotec, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Bristol Myers Squib, ChemoAb, EpiPharm, Ergonex, espeRare foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech/Roche, Inventiva, Janssen, Lilly, medac, MedImmune, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Serodapharm, and Sinoxa in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications including PAH; and reports a patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143). JSRG has received fees for lectures or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Aerovate, Bayer, Complexia, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. MD reports research grants from Actelion/J&J; speaker and consultant fees from Bayer, MSD, Acceleron, AOP, Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work; and being a holder of the Janssen Chair for Pulmonary Hypertension at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. D-HP has received lecture fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. HAG has received honorariums for consultations or speaking at conferences from Bayer HealthCare, Actelion, Pfizer, Janssen, Merck/MSD, and Gossamer; is member of advisory boards for Acceleron, Bayer HealthCare AG, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Actelion, Merck/MSD, Janssen, and Gossamer; and has received public grants from the German Research Foundation, Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary Institute, State Government of Hessen, and the German Ministry for Education and Research. RE has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. HKa has received honoraria for lectures or consultancy from Actelion, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen. H-JK has received fees from Actelion, Anamed, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie/Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dräger, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Heinen + Löwenstein, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Weinmann, Philips Healthcare, Pulmonx, ResMed, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sapio Life, Weinmann. DS received fees for lectures, consulting, or research support to institution from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD and Pfizer. JB received grants from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi/Genzyme. KM has received fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis. TJL has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultation from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. HW received fees for lectures or consultations from Actelion, Bayer, Biotest, Boehringer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer and Roche. H-JS has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and MSD. MHe has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Nycomed, Roche and Servier. DD declares honoraria for lectures or consultancy from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier and Vifor. IT has received fees from Actelion, Bayer, ELPEN, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. AV-N reports receiving fees for lectures or consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD and Pfizer. SU reports personal fees from Actelion, Janssen, MSD, and Orpha-Swiss outside of the submitted work. HKl has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. MC reports honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma and Roche Pharma, and for serving on advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim. SE has received honoraria for lectures or consultations from Actelion, MSD, Bayer, Acceleron, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Pulmox, Boston Scientific, and Boehringer Ingelheim. K-HS has received fees for lectures and educational events from Abbott, Janssen, and MSD. AJS has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Wellcome Trust, and NIHR; has undertaken consultancy work and received honoraria for lectures from Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has undertaken consultancy work for General Electric. AART is supported by a British Heart Foundation Intermediate Clinical Fellowship (FS/18/13/33281) and has received research grants to their institution from Janssen Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline. CAE has received honoraria for lectures or consultations from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and MSD. SR has received fees for lectures or consultations from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squib, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Vifor; and research grants to institution from AstraZeneca, Actelion, Bayer Janssen and Novartis. RC has received honoraria for lectures or consultations from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and MSD. DGK has received honoraria for lectures or consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and MSD; and research grants to institution from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. MHa has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerlinChemie, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic value of improvement endpoints that have been used in clinical trials of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) needs to be further investigated., Methods: Using the COMPERA database, we evaluated the prognostic value of improvements in functional class (FC) and absolute or relative improvements in 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). In addition, we investigated multicomponent endpoints based on prespecified improvements in FC, 6MWD and NT-proBNP that have been used in recent PAH trials. Finally, we assessed the predictive value of improvements determined by risk stratification tools. The effects of changes from baseline to first follow-up (3-12 months after initiation of PAH therapy) on consecutive survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank testing and Cox proportional hazard analyses., Results: All analyses were based on 596 patients with newly diagnosed PAH for whom complete data were available at baseline and first follow-up. Improvements in FC were associated with improved survival, whereas absolute or relative improvements in 6MWD had no predictive value. For NT-proBNP, absolute declines conferred no prognostic information while relative declines by ≥35% were associated with better survival. Improvements in multicomponent endpoints were associated with improved survival and the same was found for risk stratification tools., Conclusion: While sole improvements in 6MWD and NT-proBNP had minor prognostic relevance, improvements in multicomponent endpoints and risk stratification tools based on FC, 6MWD, and NT-proBNP were associated with improved survival. These tools should be further explored as outcome measures in PAH trials., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) often complicates chronic left-sided heart failure, with a remarkable impact on quality of life, exercise capacity, and survival. PH in chronic left-sided heart failure (PH-LHD) is not only caused by backward transmission of pressures but also involves impairment of atrial function, inflammation, and vasoconstriction. Once the left atrium loses its reservoir capacity, usually pulmonary vascular resistances increase. Right atrial dilation commonly represents the first sign of PH-LHD, before right ventricle dilatation and systolic dysfunction develop, leading to right heart insufficiency, and ultimately, right heart failure., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the Phase III PATENT-1 (NCT00810693) and CHEST-1 (NCT00855465) studies, riociguat demonstrated efficacy vs placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Clinical effects were maintained at 2 years in the long-term extension studies PATENT-2 (NCT00863681) and CHEST-2 (NCT00910429)., Methods: This post hoc analysis of hemodynamic data from PATENT-1 and CHEST-1 assessed whether riociguat improved right ventricular (RV) function parameters including stroke volume index (SVI), stroke volume, RV work index, and cardiac efficiency. REVEAL Risk Score (RRS) was calculated for patients stratified by SVI and right atrial pressure (RAP) at baseline and follow-up. The association between RV function parameters and SVI and RAP stratification with long-term outcomes was assessed., Results: In PATENT-1 (n = 341) and CHEST-1 (n = 238), riociguat improved RV function parameters vs placebo (p < 0.05). At follow-up, there were significant differences in RRS between patients with favorable and unfavorable SVI and RAP, irrespective of treatment arm (p < 0.0001). Multiple RV function parameters at baseline and follow-up were associated with survival and clinical worsening-free survival (CWFS) in PATENT-2 (n = 396; p < 0.05) and CHEST-2 (n = 237). In PATENT-2, favorable SVI and RAP at follow-up only was associated with survival and CWFS (p < 0.05), while in CHEST-2, favorable SVI and RAP at baseline and follow-up were associated with survival and CWFS (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: This post hoc analysis of PATENT and CHEST suggests that riociguat improves RV function in patients with PAH and CTEPH., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD is a poorly investigated clinical condition., Research Question: Which factors determine the outcome of PH in COPD?, Study Design and Methods: We analyzed the characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) with moderate or severe PH in COPD as defined during the 6th PH World Symposium who received medical therapy for PH and compared them with patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH)., Results: The population included incident patients with moderate PH in COPD (n = 68), with severe PH in COPD (n = 307), and with IPAH (n = 489). Patients with PH in COPD were older, predominantly male, and treated mainly with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Despite similar hemodynamic impairment, patients with PH in COPD achieved a worse 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and showed a more advanced World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC). Transplant-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were higher in the IPAH group than in the PH in COPD group (IPAH: 94%, 75%, and 55% vs PH in COPD: 86%, 55%, and 38%; P = .004). Risk factors for poor outcomes in PH in COPD were male sex, low 6MWD, and high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). In patients with severe PH in COPD, improvements in 6MWD by ≥ 30 m or improvements in WHO FC after initiation of medical therapy were associated with better outcomes., Interpretation: Patients with PH in COPD were functionally more impaired and had a poorer outcome than patients with IPAH. Predictors of death in the PH in COPD group were sex, 6MWD, and PVR. Our data raise the hypothesis that some patients with severe PH in COPD may benefit from PH treatment. Randomized controlled studies are necessary to explore this hypothesis further., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01347216; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Riociguat and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i), approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), act on the same pathway via different mechanisms. Riociguat might be an alternative option for patients with PAH who do not respond sufficiently to treatment with PDE5i, but comparisons of the potential benefits of riociguat and PDE5i in these patients are needed. The aim of this trial was to assess the effects of switching to riociguat from PDE5i therapy versus continued PDE5i therapy in patients with PAH at intermediate risk of 1-year mortality., Methods: Riociguat rEplacing PDE5i therapy evaLuated Against Continued PDE5i thErapy (REPLACE) was an open-label, randomised controlled trial in 81 hospital-based pulmonary hypertension centres in 22 countries. The study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with symptomatic PAH at intermediate risk of 1-year mortality (based on the European Society for Cardiology-European Respiratory Society guideline thresholds for WHO functional class and 6-min walk distance [6MWD]) who were receiving treatment with a PDE5i with or without an endothelin receptor antagonist for at least 6 weeks before randomisation. Patients were excluded if they had been previously treated with riociguat, had used prostacyclin analogues or prostacyclin receptor agonists within 30 days before randomisation, had clinically significant restrictive or obstructive parenchymal lung disease, or had left heart disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to remain on PDE5i treatment (oral sildenafil [≥60 mg per day] or oral tadalafil [20-40 mg per day]; the PDE5i group) or to switch to oral riociguat (up to 2·5 mg three times per day; the riociguat group), using an interactive voice and web response system, stratified by cause of PAH. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement by week 24, defined as an absence of clinical worsening and prespecified improvements in at least two of three variables (6MWD, WHO functional class, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide), analysed using last observation carried forward in all randomly assigned patients with observed values at baseline and week 24 who received at least one dose of study medication (the full analysis set). Secondary endpoints included clinical worsening events. The trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02891850., Findings: Between Jan 11, 2017, and July 31, 2019, 293 patients were screened, of which 226 patients were randomly assigned to the riociguat group (n=111) or to the PDE5i group (n=115). 211 patients completed the study and 14 patients discontinued (seven in each group). One patient assigned to the PDE5i group did not receive treatment, so 225 patients were included in the safety analysis, and one further patient in the PDE5i group had missing components of the composite primary endpoint at baseline, so 224 patients were included in the full analysis set. The primary endpoint was met by 45 (41%) of 111 patients in the riociguat group and 23 (20%) of 113 patients in the PDE5i group; odds ratio [OR] 2·78 (95% CI 1·53-5·06; p=0·0007). Clinical worsening events occurred in one (1%) of 111 patients in the riociguat group (hospitalisation due to worsening PAH) and 10 (9%) of 114 patients in the PDE5i group (hospitalisation due to worsening PAH [n=9]; disease progression [n=1]; OR 0·10 [0·01-0·73]; p=0·0047). The most frequently occurring adverse events were hypotension (15 [14%]), headache (14 [13%]), and dyspepsia (10 [9%]) in the riociguat group, and headache (eight [7%]), cough (seven [6%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (seven [6%]) in the PDE5i group. Serious adverse events were reported in eight (7%) of 111 patients in the riociguat group and 19 (17%) of 114 patients in the PDE5i group. During the study, four patients died in the PDE5i group, one of them during the safety follow-up period., Interpretation: Switching to riociguat from PDE5i treatment, both of which act via the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway, could be a strategic option for treatment escalation in patients with PAH at intermediate risk of 1-year mortality., Funding: Bayer AG, Merck Sharp & Dohme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MMH has received fees for consultations and lectures from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD), and Pfizer. HA-H is an investigator of clinical studies with Actelion, Bayer AG, and Pfizer. RLB reports grants from Bellerophon, Bayer AG, Actelion, and EIGER. PAC reports grants and personal fees from Bayer AG, Actelion, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). JSRG reports grants and personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, United Therapeutics, and MSD, personal fees from Arena, Bellopheron, Acceleron, Complexa, and Pfizer, and grants from GSK and Amco. EG reports fees for lectures and consultations from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, MSD, United Therapeutics, and Pfizer. PJ reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Reata Pharmaceuticals, AOP Orphan, and MSD, and is an investigator for Actelion, Bayer AG, and Reata Pharmaceuticals. JRK reports that his institution has received grant support for clinical trials and basic science research in pulmonary hypertension from Actelion, Bayer, Lung Biotechnology, and United Therapeutics. DL reports honoraria, consultation fees, research support, and travel expenses from Actelion, Arena, Bayer AG, Northern Therapeutics, PhaseBio, and United Therapeutics. VVM has received research support or grants from Acceleron Pharma, Actelion, Bayer AG, Reata Pharmaceuticals, SoniVie, and United Therapeutics, and has served as a consultant and on advisory committees for Acceleron, Actelion, Altavant, Bayer, Caremark, CiVi BioPharma, Gossamer, Liquidia, and United Therapeutics. GMBM reports lecture and consultation fees from Bayer AG, Eli Lilly, and GSK. ASP reports fees for research grants, support for travel to meetings, and honoraria from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. TP reports grants and personal fees from Actelion–Janssen, grants from United Therapeutics, Reata Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer, and personal fees from Bayer and Pfizer. SR reports remunerations for lectures and consultancy from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Arena, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ferrer, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics, and research support to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. AV-N is supported by the Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative (CVON-2012-08 PHAEDRA, CVON-2017-10 DOLPHIN-GENESIS) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-VICI: 918.16.610, funding outside of the current study), has received speakers fees from Johnson & Johnson and Ferrer in the past 3 years, and served as a member of the scientific advisory board of Morphogen-XI. RJW reports grants and personal fees from Bayer AG and personal fees from MSD. MC, FK, CM, and KP are employees of Bayer AG. HAG reports personal fees and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer, consultancy fees from Bellerophon Pulse Technologies and MSD, and grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. GS reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, Bayer, and MSD. S-AC, CDV, and JO-A declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few data are available on the long-term course and predictors of quality of life (QoL) following acute pulmonary embolism (PE)., Research Question: What are the kinetics and determinants of disease-specific and generic health-related QoL 3 and 12 months following an acute PE?, Study Design and Methods: The Follow-up after Acute Pulmonary Embolism (FOCUS) study prospectively followed up consecutive adult patients with objectively diagnosed PE. Patients were considered for study who completed the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire at predefined visits 3 and 12 months following PE. The course of disease-specific QoL as assessed using the PEmb-QoL and the impact of baseline characteristics using multivariable mixed effects linear regression were studied; also assessed was the course of generic QoL as evaluated by using the EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level utility index and the EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale., Results: In 620 patients (44% women; median age, 62 years), overall disease-specific QoL improved from 3 to 12 months, with a decrease in the median PEmb-QoL score from 19.4% to 13.0% and a mean individual change of -4.3% (95% CI, -3.2 to -5.5). Female sex, cardiopulmonary disease, and higher BMI were associated with worse QoL at both 3 and 12 months. Over time, the association with BMI became weaker, whereas older age and previous VTE were associated with worsening QoL. Generic QoL also improved: the mean ± SD EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension 5-Level utility index increased from 0.85 ± 0.22 to 0.87 ± 0.20 and the visual analog scale from 72.9 ± 18.8 to 74.4 ± 19.1., Interpretation: In a large cohort of survivors of acute PE, the change of QoL was quantified between months 3 and 12 following diagnosis, and factors independently associated with lower QoL and slower recovery of QoL were identified. This information may facilitate the planning and interpretation of clinical trials assessing QoL and help guide patient management., Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien: www.drks.de); No.: DRKS00005939., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is approved for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following Phase 3 randomized trials. The EXPosurE Registry RiociguaT in patients with pulmonary hypertension (EXPERT) study was designed to monitor the long-term safety of riociguat in clinical practice., Methods: EXPERT was an international, multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, non-interventional cohort study of patients treated with riociguat. Patients were followed for at least 1 year and up to 4 years from enrollment or until 30 days after stopping riociguat treatment. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms and System Organ Classes version 21.0, collected during routine clinic visits and collated via case report forms., Results: In total, 956 patients with CTEPH were included in the analysis. The most common AEs in these patients were peripheral edema/edema (11.7%), dizziness (7.5%), right ventricular (RV)/cardiac failure (7.7%), and pneumonia (5.0%). The most common SAEs were RV/cardiac failure (7.4%), pneumonia (4.1%), dyspnea (3.6%), and syncope (2.5%). Exposure-adjusted rates of hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage and hypotension were low and comparable to those in the long-term extension study of riociguat (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-Stimulator Trial [CHEST-2])., Conclusion: Data from EXPERT show that in patients with CTEPH, the safety of riociguat in routine practice was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug, and no new safety concerns were identified., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is approved for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension following Phase 3 randomized trials. The EXPosurE Registry RiociguaT in patients with pulmonary hypertension (EXPERT) study was designed to monitor the long-term safety of riociguat in clinical practice., Methods: EXPERT was an international, multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, non-interventional cohort study of patients treated with riociguat. Patients were followed for at least 1 year and up to 4 years from enrollment or until 30 days after stopping riociguat treatment. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms and System Organ Classes version 21.0, collected during routine clinic visits (usually every 3-6 months) and collated via case report forms., Results: In total, 326 patients with PAH were included in the analysis. The most common AEs in these patients were dizziness (11.7%), right ventricular (RV)/cardiac failure (10.7%), edema/peripheral edema (10.7%), diarrhea (8.6%), dyspnea (8.0%), and cough (7.7%). The most common SAEs were RV/cardiac failure (10.1%), pneumonia (6.1%), dyspnea (4.0%), and syncope (3.4%). The exposure-adjusted rate of hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage was 2.5 events per 100 patient-years., Conclusion: Final data from EXPERT show that in patients with PAH, the safety of riociguat in clinical practice was consistent with clinical trials, with no new safety concerns identified and a lower exposure-adjusted rate of hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage than in the long-term extension of the Phase 3 trial in PAH., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The term idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is used to categorize patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension of unknown origin. There is considerable variability in the clinical presentation of these patients. Using data from the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension, we performed a cluster analysis of 841 patients with IPAH based on age, sex, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO; <45% vs ≥45% predicted), smoking status, and presence of comorbidities (obesity, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and diabetes mellitus). A hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithm was performed using Ward's minimum variance method. The clusters were analyzed in terms of baseline characteristics; survival; and response to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy, expressed as changes from baseline to follow-up in functional class, 6-minute walking distance, cardiac biomarkers, and risk. Three clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 106; 12.6%): median age 45 years, 76% females, no comorbidities, mostly never smokers, DLCO ≥45%; Cluster 2 (n = 301; 35.8%): median age 75 years, 98% females, frequent comorbidities, no smoking history, DLCO mostly ≥45%; and Cluster 3 (n = 434; 51.6%): median age 72 years, 72% males, frequent comorbidities, history of smoking, and low DLCO. Patients in Cluster 1 had a better response to PAH treatment than patients in the 2 other clusters. Survival over 5 years was 84.6% in Cluster 1, 59.2% in Cluster 2, and 42.2% in Cluster 3 (unadjusted p < 0.001 for comparison between all groups). The population of patients diagnosed with IPAH is heterogenous. This cluster analysis identified distinct phenotypes, which differed in clinical presentation, response to therapy, and survival., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the summer of 2016, delegates from the German Respiratory Society, the German Society of Cardiology and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology met in Cologne, Germany, to define consensus-based practice recommendations for the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These recommendations were built on the 2015 European Pulmonary Hypertension guidelines aiming at their practical implementation, considering country-specific issues, and including new evidence, where available. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to general measures (i.e. physical activity/supervised rehabilitation, pregnancy/contraception, elective surgery, infection prevention, psychological support, travel) and supportive therapy (i.e. anticoagulants, diuretics, oxygen, cardiovascular medications, anaemia/iron deficiency, arrhythmias) for PAH. While the European guidelines provide detailed recommendations for the use of targeted PAH therapies as well as supportive care, detailed treatment decisions in routine clinical care may be challenging, and the relevance of supportive care is often not sufficiently considered. In addition, new evidence became available, thus requiring a thorough reevaluation of specific recommendations. The detailed results and recommendations of the working group on general measures and supportive therapy for PAH, which were last updated in the spring of 2018, are summarized in this article., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In the summer of 2016, delegates from the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) met in Cologne, Germany, to define consensus-based practice recommendations for the management of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). These recommendations were built on the 2015 European Pulmonary Hypertension guidelines, aiming at their practical implementation, considering country-specific issues, and including new evidence, where available. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to the definition, clinical classification and initial diagnosis of PH. While the European guidelines provide a detailed clinical classification and a structured approach for diagnostic testing, their application in routine care may be challenging, particularly given the changing phenotype of PH patients who are nowadays often elderly and may present with multiple potential causes of PH, as well as comorbid conditions. Specifically, the working group addresses the thoroughness of diagnostic testing, and the roles of echocardiography, exercise testing, and genetic testing in diagnosing PH. Furthermore, challenges in the diagnostic work-up of patients with various causes of PH including "PAH with comorbidities", CTEPH and coexisting conditions are highlighted, and a modified diagnostic algorithm is provided. The detailed results and recommendations of the working group on definition, clinical classification and initial diagnosis of PH, which were last updated in the spring of 2018, are summarized in this article., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The European guidelines, which focus on clinical aspects of pulmonary hypertension (PH), provide only minimal information about the pathophysiological concepts of PH. Here, we review this topic in greater detail, focusing on specific aspects in the pathobiology, pathology and genetics, which include mechanisms of vascular inflammation, the role of transcription factors, ion channels/ion channel diseases, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, genetics/epigenetics, metabolic dysfunction, and the potential future role of histopathology of PH in the modern era of PH therapy. In addition to new insights in the pathobiology of this disease, this working group of the Cologne Consensus Conference also highlights novel concepts and potential new therapeutic targets to further improve the treatment options in PAH., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

In the summer of 2016, delegates from the German Respiratory Society, the German Society of Cardiology and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology met in Cologne, Germany, to define consensus-based practice recommendations for the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These recommendations were built on the 2015 European Pulmonary Hypertension guidelines and included new evidence, where available. The treatment algorithm for PAH was modified based on the observation that there are now many patients diagnosed with IPAH who are at an advanced age and have significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities. For patients newly diagnosed with classic forms of PAH, i.e. younger patients without significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, the consensus-based recommendation was to use initial combination therapy as the standard approach. The use of monotherapies was no longer considered appropriate in such patients. The choice of treatment strategies should be based on the risk assessment as proposed in the European guidelines. In patients presenting with a low or intermediate risk, oral combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, respectively, should be used. In high-risk patients, triple combination therapy including a subcutaneous or intravenous prostacyclin analogue should be considered. For patients who suffer from PAH and significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, initial monotherapy is recommended and the use of combination therapies should be considered on an individual basis. The latter recommendations are based on the scarcity of evidence supporting the use of combination therapy and the higher risk of drug-related adverse events in such patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined safety and long-term outcomes of intravenous treprostinil administered via the implantable LENUS Pro pump in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (PH)., Methods: Patients with PH undergoing pump implantation between December 2009 and October 2016 in German referral centers were retrospectively analyzed (end of follow-up: May 2017). The primary objective was to determine long-term safety of the implantable pump. Secondary end points were 3-year survival and prognostic relevance of pre-implantation hemodynamics., Results: We monitored 129 patients (120 with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 1 with PH due to lung diseases, and 8 with inoperable chronic thromboembolic PH) for 260 patient-years (median follow-up, 19 months; interquartile range, 11-34 months). There were 82 complications/peri-procedural events in 60 patients; of these, 57 were serious adverse events (0.60 per 1,000 treatment-days), including 2 periprocedural deaths due to right heart failure. The incidence of complications related to the pump, catheter, infection, and pump pocket per 1,000 treatment-days was 0.074, 0.264, 0.032 (3 local infections; no bloodstream infections), and 0.380, respectively. Three-year overall and transplant-free survival were 66.5% and 55.7%, respectively (39 patients died; 16 underwent lung transplantation). Baseline cardiac index independently predicted transplant-free survival (multivariate hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.28; p = 0.019; n = 95)., Conclusions: Our data suggest that intravenous treprostinil via the LENUS Pro pump in advanced PH is associated with a very low risk of bloodstream infections, but other serious adverse events may occur. Therefore, this therapy needs standardization and should be offered in specialized PH centers only. Further technical advances of the pump system and prospective studies are needed., (Copyright © 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Exercise stress testing of the pulmonary circulation for the diagnosis of latent or early-stage pulmonary hypertension (PH) is gaining acceptance. There is emerging consensus to define exercise-induced PH by a mean pulmonary artery pressure > 30 mm Hg at a cardiac output < 10 L/min and a total pulmonary vascular resistance> 3 Wood units at maximum exercise, in the absence of PH at rest. Exercise-induced PH has been reported in association with a bone morphogenetic receptor-2 gene mutation, in systemic sclerosis, in left heart conditions, in chronic lung diseases, and in chronic pulmonary thromboembolism. Exercise-induced PH is a cause of decreased exercise capacity, may precede the development of manifest PH in a proportion of patients, and is associated with a decreased life expectancy. Exercise stress testing of the pulmonary circulation has to be dynamic and rely on measurements of the components of the pulmonary vascular equation during, not after exercise. Noninvasive imaging measurements may be sufficiently accurate in experienced hands, but suffer from lack of precision, so that invasive measurements are required for individual decision-making. Exercise-induced PH is caused either by pulmonary vasoconstriction, pulmonary vascular remodeling, or by increased upstream transmission of pulmonary venous pressure. This differential diagnosis is clinical. Left heart disease as a cause of exercise-induced PH can be further ascertained by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure above or below 20 mm Hg at a cardiac output < 10 L/min or a pulmonary artery wedge pressure-flow relationship above or below 2 mm Hg/L/min during exercise., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The REVEAL risk score (RRS) was developed to predict survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based on multiple patient characteristics. Herein we calculated RRS for patients in the randomized CHEST-1 study and open-label CHEST-2 extension study of riociguat in inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We investigated the effect of riociguat vs placebo on RRS in the CHEST-1 study, and the relationship between RRS and long-term outcomes in the CHEST-2 study., Methods: RRS was calculated post hoc for baseline and Week 16 of CHEST-1 and Week 12 of CHEST-2, based on 9 evaluable elements. Patients were grouped into risk strata by RRS. Relationships between RRS and both survival and clinical worsening-free survival were examined by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses., Results: Overall, 237 patients completed CHEST-1 and entered CHEST-2. In CHEST-1, riociguat significantly improved RRS (p < 0.0001) and risk stratum (p < 0.001) vs placebo from baseline to Week 16. RRS at baseline, and at Week 16, and change in RRS during CHEST-1 were significantly associated with survival (hazard ratios for a 1-point reduction in RRS: 0.702, 0.692, and 0.682, respectively) and clinical worsening-free survival (hazard ratios: 0.697, 0.719, and 0.754, respectively) over 2 years in CHEST-2., Conclusions: Riociguat improved RRS in patients with inoperable and persistent/recurrent CTEPH. RRS at baseline and Week 16, and change in RRS from baseline, predicted survival and clinical worsening-free survival. This analysis of RRS in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH suggests utility for the RRS in indications beyond PAH., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Detailed hemodynamic data from the phase III PATENT-1 study of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) were investigated., Methods: Patients with PAH who were treatment naïve or pre-treated with endothelin receptor antagonists or non-intravenous prostanoids were randomly assigned to riociguat up to 2.5 mg 3 times a day or placebo. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at baseline and week 12., Results: Riociguat significantly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance in treatment-naïve (n = 221; least squares [LS] mean difference -266 dyne∙sec∙cm -5 [95% confidence interval (CI) -357 to -175; p < 0.0001]) and pre-treated (n = 222; LS mean difference -186 dyne∙sec ∙cm -5 [95% CI -252 to -120; p < 0.0001]) patients and significantly increased cardiac index (LS mean difference +0.7 [95% CI 0.5 to 0.8] and +0.5 [95% CI 0.3 to 0.7], respectively [both p < 0.0001]). Mean pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.0056 and p = 0.0019 for treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients, respectively), mean arterial pressure (both p < 0.0001), and systemic vascular resistance (both p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and there was an increase in mixed venous oxygen saturation (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0004, respectively). Results were similar in patients pre-treated with endothelin receptor antagonists and patients pre-treated with non-intravenous prostanoids. Improvements in 6-minute walking distance correlated very weakly with improvements in pulmonary vascular resistance (r = -0.21 [95% CI -0.30 to -0.11; p < 0.0001]) and cardiac index (r = 0.16 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.25; p < 0.0016])., Conclusions: Riociguat significantly improved hemodynamic parameters in pre-treated and treatment-naïve patients with PAH., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

During the last 15 years, a real "paradigm-shift" occurred, due to the development of PAH-targeted drugs, leading to crucial improvements in symptoms, exercise capacity, hemodynamics and outcome of PAH patients. In order to describe differences regarding epidemiology and therapy in PAH according to gender, we performed a review of the available literature in "PubMed" and "Web of Science" databases. In order to find relevant articles, we combined each of the following the keywords "pulmonary arterial hypertension", "gender", "sex", "men", "woman", "male", "female", "phosphodiesterase inhibitors", "endothelin receptor antagonists", "prostanoids". While there is a substantial agreement among epidemiological studies in reporting an increased prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) among women, male PAH patients are affected by a higher impairment of the right ventricular function and consequently experience poorer outcomes. With regards to PAH-targeted drug administration, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin analogues (PC) show better treatment results in female PAH patients, while phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PD5-I) seem to exert a more beneficial effect on male patients. However, to date no clear consensus could be formed by the available literature, which is constituted mainly by retrospective studies. Females with PAH are more prone to develop PAH, while males experience poorer outcomes. Females PAH might benefit more from ERAs and PC, while males seem to have more beneficial effects from PD5-I administration. However, more research is warranted in order to assess the most effective treatment for PAH patients according to gender., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a chronic disease associated with poor long-term outcomes. Identifying predictors of long-term outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension is important to assess disease severity and guide treatment. We investigate associations between efficacy parameters and long-term outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension receiving riociguat in the PATENT-2 study. We also present safety and efficacy data from the final data cutoff of PATENT-2, where most patients had received at least 2 years of riociguat treatment., Methods: Eligible patients from the PATENT-1 study entered the PATENT-2 open-label extension, which will continue until all patients transition to the commercial drug. All patients received riociguat individually adjusted to a maximum dose of 2·5 mg three times a day. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, assessed with recording adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and deaths; exploratory assessments included 6-min walking distance (6MWD), WHO functional class, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)concentrations, Borg dyspnoea score, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D score), survival, and clinical worsening-free survival. Association between efficacy parameters and long-term outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. PATENT-2 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00863681., Findings: 396 patients entered PATENT-2, of whom 197 patients were receiving riociguat monotherapy and 199 were receiving riociguat in combination with endothelin receptor antagonists or prostanoids, or both. A significant association was noted between 6MWD, NT-proBNP concentration, and WHO functional class and overall survival at baseline (p=0·0006, 0·0225, and 0·0191, respectively), and at follow-up (p=0·021, 0·0056, and 0·0048, respectively). Riociguat was well tolerated in PATENT-2. Serious adverse events were recorded in 238 (60%) of the total population, and 45 (11%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Improvements in 6MWD, WHO functional class, and NT-proBNP concentrations were maintained after 2 years of treatment., Interpretation: These results support the long-term use of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, and emphasise the prognostic value of 6MWD, WHO functional class, and NT-proBNP concentrations., Funding: Bayer Pharma AG., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mutations in the gene encoding the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II (BMPR2) are the commonest genetic cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, the effect of BMPR2 mutations on clinical phenotype and outcomes remains uncertain., Methods: We analysed individual participant data of 1550 patients with idiopathic, heritable, and anorexigen-associated PAH from eight cohorts that had been systematically tested for BMPR2 mutations. The primary outcome was the composite of death or lung transplantation. All-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death or transplantation and all-cause mortality associated with the presence of BMPR2 mutation were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by cohort., Findings: Overall, 448 (29%) of 1550 patients had a BMPR2 mutation. Mutation carriers were younger at diagnosis (mean age 35·4 [SD 14·8] vs 42·0 [17·8] years), had a higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (60·5 [13·8] vs 56·4 [15·3] mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (16·6 [8·3] vs 12·9 [8·3] Wood units), and lower cardiac index (2·11 [0·69] vs 2·51 [0·92] L/min per m(2); all p<0·0001). Patients with BMPR2 mutations were less likely to respond to acute vasodilator testing (3% [10 of 380] vs 16% [147 of 907]; p<0·0001). Among the 1164 individuals with available survival data, age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HRs comparing BMPR2 mutation carriers with non-carriers were 1·42 (95% CI 1·15-1·75; p=0·0011) for the composite of death or lung transplantation and 1·27 (1·00-1·60; p=0·046) for all-cause mortality. These HRs were attenuated after adjustment for potential mediators including pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, and vasoreactivity. HRs for death or transplantation and all-cause mortality associated with BMPR2 mutation were similar in men and women, but higher in patients with a younger age at diagnosis (p=0·0030 for death or transplantation, p=0·011 for all-cause mortality)., Interpretation: Patients with PAH and BMPR2 mutations present at a younger age with more severe disease, and are at increased risk of death, and death or transplantation, compared with those without BMPR2 mutations., Funding: Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation, Vanderbilt University, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Natural Science Foundation., (Copyright © 2016 Evans et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC-BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Riociguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The objective of this study was to evaluate the change of right heart size and function assessed by echocardiography during long-term treatment with riociguat., Methods: We assessed patients who started riociguat treatment (1.0-2.5mg tid) within the trials PATENT, PATENTplus, EAS and CHEST and continued for 3-12 months. Echocardiography, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and further clinical parameters were analyzed at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months. Right heart catheterization was performed at baseline and after 3 months. For missing data we performed the last and baseline observation carried forward (LOCF, BOCF) method as sensitivity analyses., Results: Thirty-nine patients (21 PAH, 18 CTEPH, mean pulmonary arterial pressure 43 ± 2 mmHg, PVR 600 ± 43 dyn ∗ s ∗ cm(-5), 56.4% treatment-naïve) were included. Mean right ventricular (RV) area significantly decreased after 3 (-2.1 ± 3.9 cm(2), equals -7.4 ± 15.3%, p = 0.002), 6 (-4.2 ± 3.2 cm(2), equals -16.1 ± 11.5%, p < 0.001) and 12 months (-5.9 ± 4.6 cm(2), equals -22.1 ± 14.2%, p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Right atrial area significantly decreased after 12 months (-3.5 ± 4.1cm(2), equals -16.8 ± 19.2%, p < 0.001) and TAPSE significantly improved after 6 (+ 2 ± 4.7, equals 12 ± 25.8%, p = 0.025) and 12 months (+ 3.6 ± 5.4, equals 21.0 ± 29.6%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, RV wall thickness and 6MWD significantly improved after 3, 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). Invasive hemodynamics significantly improved after 3 months. Both LOCF and BOCF showed similar significance and lower effect sizes., Conclusion: Long-term treatment with riociguat significantly reduced right heart size and improved RV function in PAH and CTEPH. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)

Background: Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an excellent noninvasive screening test for pulmonary hypertension, the physiologic range of Doppler echocardiography-derived pulmonary pressures remains not completely investigated. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to explore the full spectrum of pulmonary pressures and right ventricular (RV) functional indexes by TTE in healthy subjects and to investigate clinical and echocardiographic correlates., Methods: A random sample of 1,480 healthy individuals (mean age, 36.1 ± 15.5 years; range, 20-80 years; 905 men) underwent a comprehensive TTE. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), mean pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance were estimated by standard Doppler echocardiography formulas. In addition, RV diastolic (Doppler transtricuspid inflow measurements) and systolic indexes (RV fractional area change, RV tissue Doppler peak systolic velocity, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) were calculated., Results: PASP and mean pulmonary artery pressure values were significantly higher in subjects aged &gt; 50 years and in those with a BMI &gt; 30 kg/m2. In particular, a PASP &gt; 40 mm Hg was found in 118 subjects (8%) of those aged &gt; 50 years and in 103 (7%) of those with a BMI &gt; 30 kg/m2. No differences by age were registered in RV systolic indexes and in pulmonary vascular resistances. On multivariate analysis, in the overall study population, age, BMI, mitral E/e' ratio, and left ventricular stroke volume were the only independent predictors of PASP., Conclusions: This study delineates an estimate of pulmonary hemodynamics in a wide age range cohort of healthy subjects. Pulmonary pressures increased with age and BMI, as expected.

Background: The objective of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of exercise training as add-on to medical therapy in patients with congenital heart disease associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-APAH)., Methods: Patients with invasively confirmed CHD-APAH received in-hospital exercise training for 3 weeks and continued at home. Efficacy parameters were evaluated at baseline, after 3 and 15 weeks. Medical treatment remained unchanged. Worsening events and survival rate were assessed in a follow-up period of 21 ± 14 months., Results: Twenty consecutive CHD-APAH patients (16 female, 4 male, mean pulmonary arterial pressure 60 ± 23 mm Hg) were included. Patients significantly improved the mean distance walked in 6 min compared to baseline by 63 ± 47 m after 3 weeks (p<0.001) and by 67 ± 59 m after 15 weeks (p=0.001). Quality of life-score (p=0.05), peak oxygen consumption (p=0.002) and maximal workload (p=0.003) improved significantly by exercise training after 15 weeks. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 100%, the transplantation-free survival rate was 100% after 1 year and 93% after 2 years., Conclusion: Exercise training as add-on to medical therapy may be effective in patients with CHD-APAH and improved work capacity, quality of life and further prognostic relevant parameters. It was associated with an excellent long-term survival. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The 2009 European Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) have been adopted for Germany. While the guidelines contain detailed recommendations regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), they contain only a relatively short paragraph on other, much more frequent forms of PH including PH owing to left heart disease. The guidelines point out that the drugs currently used to treat patients with PAH (prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) have not been sufficiently investigated in other forms of PH. However, despite the lack of respective efficacy data an uncritical use of targeted PAH drugs in patients with PH associated with left heart disease is currently observed at an increasing rate. This development is a matter of concern. On the other hand, PH is a frequent problem that is highly relevant for morbidity and mortality in patients with left heart disease. It that sense, the practical implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany requires the consideration of several specific issues and already existing novel data. This requires a detailed commentary to the guidelines, and in some aspects an update already appears necessary. In June 2010, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany. This conference aimed to solve practical and controversial issues surrounding the implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to PH due to left heart disease. This commentary describes in detail the results and recommendations of the working group which were last updated in October 2011., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The 2009 European Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension have been adopted for Germany. The guidelines contain detailed recommendations on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the practical implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany requires the consideration of several country-specific issues and already existing novel data. This requires a detailed commentary to the guidelines, and in some aspects an update already appears necessary. In June 2010, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany. This conference aimed to solve practical and controversial issues surrounding the implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This commentary describes in detail the results and recommendations of the working group on treatment of PAH which were last updated in October 2011., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The 2009 European Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension have been adopted for Germany. The guidelines contain detailed recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. However, the practical implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany requires the consideration of several country-specific issues and already existing novel data. This requires a detailed commentary to the guidelines, and in some aspects an update already appears necessary. In June 2010, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany. This conference aimed to solve practical and controversial issues surrounding the implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to the non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. This manuscript describes in detail the results and recommendations of the working group which were last updated in October 2011., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Even after successful single-lung transplantation (SLTx) or bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx), patients continue to have peripheral muscle weakness and exercise impairment. After SLTx, exercise limitation is also attributed to persistent or recurrent pulmonary vascular abnormalities with elevated pulmonary arterial pressures at rest or during exercise. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate systolic pulmonary artery pressures (PASPs) at rest and during supine bicycle exercise, exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary function in post-BLTx patients., Methods: Nine patients underwent BLTx due to end-stage pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and 37 age- and gender-matched control subjects underwent a physical examination, electrocardiographic (ECG) test, a 6-minute walk test, a lung function test, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and echocardiographic assessment at rest and during exercise., Results: Exercise capacity was significantly reduced in the BLTx group, with an impaired 6-minute walk test and maximal oxygen uptake and workload. Ventilatory factors did not appear to limit exercise capacity. Right and left ventricular size and pump function and PASP values at rest were normal in both groups, but exceeded 40 mm Hg in 3 of 9 BLTx recipients and in 1 of 37 controls during exercise at low workloads. Mean PASP during exercise was only slightly higher in the BLTx group (40 +/- 5 vs 36 +/- 4 mm Hg, p = not statistically significant)., Conclusions: Reduced exercise capacity of patients after BLTx due to end-stage pulmonary hypertension is not attributed to persistent or recurrent manifest pulmonary hypertension or cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Nevertheless, latent pulmonary hypertension with exaggerated pulmonary artery pressures during exercise may occur in some patients.

Background: Due to its higher diagnostic accuracy stress echocardiography (SE) has been advocated as a substitute for stress ECG to detect coronary heart disease (CAD). However, its contribution to clinical decision-making in unselected patients presenting to the ambulatory care centre for known or suspected coronary artery disease is unclear., Methods: To evaluate the clinical value of SE in unselected patients, we prospectively obtained SE and stress ECG in 221 consecutive patients (142 males; mean age 58+/-12 years) presenting to the ambulatory care centre with known or suspected CAD. Patients with acute coronary syndrome were not included., Results: Results of stress ECG and SE were concordant in 181 (82%) and discordant in 40 patients (18%). The clinical decision to recommend or to currently withhold coronary angiography was possible solely on the basis of clinical criteria and stress ECG findings in 191 (86.4%) patients but was guided by the results of SE in 30 patients (13.6%). Left heart catheterization and coronary angiography were conducted in 61 patients. In this population SE was more accurate (82.6%) than stress ECG (65.6%) in indicating significant coronary artery stenosis., Conclusion: Despite its higher accuracy, SE adds little to the information derived from dynamic stress ECG and symptom evaluation in unselected outpatients with known or suspected CAD. Thus, SE should not in general replace stress ECG as a screening method for detecting significant coronary artery disease, for both clinical and economic reasons.