Search

Objectives: To investigate guideline adherence 3 years after the introduction of a national guideline on urinary tract infections (UTIs) in frail older adults. Appropriate use of urine dipstick tests, treatment decisions, and antibiotic drug choices in residents with (suspected) UTIs without a catheter were examined., Design: Observational prospective study., Setting and Participants: Nineteen nursing homes participating in a Dutch Sentinel Nursing Home Surveillance Network., Methods: As of September 2021, for a 3-month period, medical practitioners recorded additional clinical information in the electronic health record in case of a (suspected) UTI. Based on this information, adherence to guideline recommendations was assessed. Nonadherence was classified into 2 categories: (1) "intentional nonadherence" as reported by practitioners and (2) "nonadherence otherwise" applied to all other cases where the recorded information was discordant with the guideline recommendations., Results: A total of 532 cases of (suspected) UTIs from 469 residents were analyzed. In 455 cases (86%), dipsticks were used. For the 231 cases where clinical signs and symptoms already indicated no UTI treatment according to the guideline, a dipstick was still inappropriately ordered in 196 cases (85%). The decision to prescribe or withhold antibiotics was in 69% of the cases adherent, in 6% intentionally nonadherent, and in 25% nonadherent otherwise. The type of prescribed antibiotic was adherent to the recommended antibiotics for cystitis in 88% and for UTIs with signs of tissue invasion in 48%. Overall, for 40% of suspected UTIs, adherence to all relevant recommendations could be established, and in 9% practitioners reported intentional nonadherence to the guideline., Conclusions and Implications: There is considerable room for improvement in all clinical stages of managing a suspected UTI in Dutch nursing homes, particularly with regard to the importance of patient's clinical signs and symptoms for appropriate dipstick use and antibiotic UTI treatments., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Caring for people with Korsakoff syndrome (KS) residing in specialized long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can be distressing because of challenging neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). However, good-quality studies on NPS in this under-researched population are lacking. This study examined the prevalence and severity of NPS in people with KS living in specialized LTCFs and the associated caregiver distress., Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Data were obtained using structured interviews with care staff, elderly care physicians, and residents., Setting: Nine specialized LTCFs in the Netherlands., Participants: KS residents admitted for at least 3 months., Measurements: The prevalence and severity of NPS were measured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q). The associated caregiver distress was assessed with the NPI Distress Scale (NPI-D) according to the nurse or nurse assistant., Results: Almost all of the 281 residents (96.4%) showed at least 1 NPS and 45.8% showed 5 or more symptoms. Irritability/lability (68.3%), agitation/aggression (58.7%), and disinhibition (52.7%) were most prevalent. Although the mean level of severity for all NPS was relatively low, half of the residents (49.1%) had at least 1 severe NPS. Care staff experienced low levels of distress associated with NPS., Conclusion: NPS are highly prevalent in KS residents. Unexpectedly, these did not have any severe impact on residents and care staff. Acquiring more insight into the persistence and course of NPS, and its associations, among KS residents is important to better understand and reduce these symptoms and, ultimately, improve the quality of care for these residents., (Copyright © 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)