Search

The role of early reperfusion therapy at the acute stage of myocardial infarctus in elderly patients is debated. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic role of reperfusion with i.v. thrombolysis or primary PTCA in the nationwide USIK database, which prospectively included all pts admitted to a CCU for an AMI < 48 hours in France in November 1998. For the purpose of the present study, only patients admitted within 24 hours of AMI and with one-year follow-up available were included. Of the 1838 patients included, 785 were > 70 years-old, of whom 225 (29%) had early reperfusion therapy with thrombolysis (N = 173) or primary PTCA (N = 52). Patients treated with early reperfusion had a baseline profile that differed substantially from that of patients treated conventionally: women (31% vs 50%, p < 0.001), admission within six hours of symptom onset (84% vs 55%, p < 0.001), history of systemic hypertension (48% vs 60%, p < 0.002), stroke (5% vs 11%, p < 0.01), peripheral arterial disease (8% vs 18%, p < 0.001); congestive heart failure (5% vs 20%, p < 0.001) or previous MI (12% vs 25%, p < 0.001), more anterior location of current MI (40% vs 28%, p < 0.002). Overall one-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 78% for patients with versus 64% for those without reperfusion therapy (p < 0.01). In patients with Q wave myocardial infarction, Cox multivariate analysis showed that reperfusion therapy was an independent predictor of survival (RR 0.66; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.45-0.96), along with age, anterior location and history of congestive heart failure. Therefore, data from this large "real life" registry indicate that reperfusion therapy with either thrombolysis or primary PTCA is associated with improved one-year survival in patients over 70 years of age.

The objective of the MACH1 study (MEMS for the Assessment of Compliance of Hypertensives) was to evaluate the real behaviour of patients in relation to antihypertensive treatment administered as a single daily dose. After a 2-week period during which no other antihypertensive was allowed to be administered, 590 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension received 2 mg of trandolapril as a single daily dose in the morning between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. for 4 weeks. Treatment was packaged in electronic pillboxes recording the date and time of each opening. Various profiles were distinguished on the basis of the individual chronograms for the 501 patients able to be analysed in terms of compliance, and as a function of the deviations observed in relation to the treatment regimen prescribed. One hundred and two patients (20%) omitted more than 20% of the prescribed doses, either consecutive doses or scattered throughout the month of treatment; these patients were referred to as "omitters". The other patients were classified according to the scatter of openings in relation to the mean time of the dose: 10 "metronome" patients (2%), 126 "regular" patients (25%), 221 "irregular" patients (44%) and 42 "anarchic" patients (8%). Irregularities of dose times were more frequent on public holidays than on week days and in patients living in Paris or the Paris region. "Metronome" patients were older than the overall patient population. The use of an electronic pillbox could allow the attending physician to more adequately adapt his therapeutic approach and management of specific problems of compliance observed in hypertensive patients.

The efficacy and safety of trandolapril alone and in combination with a calcium channel blocker were evaluated in 13,147 hypertensive patients over 60 years old. Two patient groups were constituted. After a 2-week wash-out period, the patients in group I received monotherapy with trandolapril 2 mg/day for 4 weeks. Trandolapril was continued for another 4 weeks in responding patient, otherwise the dosage of trandolapril was doubled or another antihypertensive was added. Group 2, composed of patients previously treated with a calcium channel blocker with insufficient efficacy, was treated according to the same treatment regimen, but the calcium channel blocker was maintained throughout the study. 13,147 patients (group 1: 11,329 patients, group 2: 1,818 patients) with a mean age of 68 +/- 7 years were followed. After 4 weeks of treatment, the blood pressure measured by mercury sphygmomanometer decreased from 176 + 11/99 +/- 8 mmHg to 164 +/- 12/87 +/- 7 mmHg (p < 0.0001). This blood pressure fall was similar in group 1 (-22 +/- 12/-12 +/- 8 mmHg) and in group 2 (-21 +/- 11/-12 +/- 8 mmHg). In the pure systolic HT subgroup treated by trandolapril monotherapy, the antihypertensive effect predominantly affected the SBP (-23 +/- 12/- 4 +/- 6 mmHg). The antihypertensive effect was correlated with the initial blood pressure. In group 1, in the case of insufficient response to trandolapril monotherapy, the addition of a calcium channel blocker was the strategy which achieved the most marked antihypertensive effect (ANOVA, p < 0.0001). This bitherapy was more effective than the trandolapril+diuretic combination (-18 +/- 11/- 11 +/- 8 mmHg and -15 +/- 10/- 9 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 1,270 adverse events were reported by 996 patients (7.6%), leading to discontinuation of treatment in 372 patients (2.8%). The most frequent adverse effects were cough (2.8%), headache (0.8%), vertigo (0.8%) and nausea (0.5%). Only one minor equivalent of angioneurotic oedema was reported. In conclusion, trandolapril is effective and well tolerated in elderly hypertensive patients. In the case of pure systolic HTA, its action is essentially exerted on SBP. The combination of trandolapril+calcium channel blocker appears to be the most effective strategy in the case of incomplete blood pressure control by trandolapril alone.