Search

Objectives: To describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis (EE), determine factors associated with outcome and propose a management plan for EE., Methods: Retrospective case series in two tertiary referral centers from 2010 to 2022., Results: Sixty-four eyes of 53 patients were included. Bilateral involvement occurred for 11/53 patients (21%). Ocular symptoms were the only first manifestation of the disease in 36/53 (68%) of cases; signs of sepsis were evident in 17/53 (32%). Imaging tests detected at least one extraocular focus of infection in 34/53 patients (64%), with contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography showing relevant findings in 28/50 (56%) of cases. EE was microbiologically confirmed in 43/53 patients (81%); the organisms involved were: Gram-positive bacteria (19/53, 36%), Gram-negative bacteria (13/53, 25%) and Candida sp. (11/53, 21%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacteria (10/32, 31%). Blood cultures were positive in 28/53 patients (53%) and eye samples in 11/41 eyes (27%). All patients were treated with systemic antimicrobial therapy, 39/64 eyes (61%) received anti-infective intravitreal injection(s) and 17/64 eyes (27%) underwent vitrectomy. Four patients (8%) died due to uncontrolled systemic infection. Final visual acuity (VA) was < 20/400 in 28/57 eyes (49%) and ocular structural loss (bulbar phthisis or enucleation/evisceration) was reported in 18/64 eyes (28%). In multivariate analysis, initial VA was the only parameter associated with visual and/or structural loss of the eye (OR = 24.44 (4.33-228.09) and 5.44 (1.33-26.18) respectively)., Conclusions: EE remains a severe infection with a poor ocular outcome. We propose a standard protocol to improve diagnosis and medical management., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The authors declare they have no financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate performances of the rapid multiplex PCR assay BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FA-PP) for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in sputum, endotracheal aspirate (ETA) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens., Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in 11 French university hospitals (July to December 2018) and assessed performance of FA-PP by comparison with routine conventional methods., Results: A total of 515 respiratory specimens were studied, including 58 sputa, 217 ETA and 240 BAL. The FA-PP detected at least one pathogen in 384 specimens, yielding an overall positivity rate of 74.6% (384/515). Of them, 353 (68.5%) specimens were positive for typical bacteria while eight atypical bacteria and 42 resistance genes were found. While identifying most bacterial pathogens isolated by culture (374/396, 94.4%), the FA-PP detected 294 additional species in 37.7% (194/515) of specimens. The FA-PP demonstrated positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement values of 94.4% (95% CI 91.7%-96.5%) and 96.0% (95% CI 95.5%-96.4%), respectively, when compared with culture. Of FA-PP false-negative results, 67.6% (46/68) corresponded to bacterial species not included in the panel. At the same semi-quantification level (in DNA copies/mL for FA-PP versus in CFU/mL for culture), the concordance rate was 43.4% (142/327) for culture-positive specimens with FA-PP reporting higher semi-quantification of ≥1 log 10 in 48.6% (159/327) of cases. Interestingly, 90.1% of detected bacteria with ≥10 6 DNA copies/mL grew significantly in culture., Conclusions: FA-PP is a simple and rapid molecular test that could complement routine conventional methods for improvement of diagnosis accuracy of pneumonia., (Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)