Search

Background: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) typically employs traditional edge detection algorithms that often require manual correction. This has important implications for the accuracy of downstream 3D coronary reconstructions and computed haemodynamic indices (e.g. angiography-derived fractional flow reserve). We developed AngioPy, a deep-learning model for coronary segmentation that employs user-defined ground-truth points to boost performance and minimise manual correction. We compared its performance without correction with an established QCA system., Methods: Deep learning models integrating user-defined ground-truth points were developed using 2455 images from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) study. External validation was performed on a dataset of 580 images. Vessel dimensions from 203 images with mild/moderate stenoses segmented by AngioPy (without correction) and an established QCA system (Medis QFR®) were compared (609 diameters)., Results: The top-performing model had an average F1 score of 0.927 (pixel accuracy 0.998, precision 0.925, sensitivity 0.930, specificity 0.999) with 99.2 % of masks exhibiting an F1 score > 0.8. Similar results were seen with external validation (F1 score 0.924, pixel accuracy 0.997, precision 0.921, sensitivity 0.929, specificity 0.999). Vessel dimensions from AngioPy exhibited excellent agreement with QCA (r = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.95-0.96], p < 0.001; mean difference - 0.18 mm [limits of agreement (LOA): -0.84 to 0.49]), including the minimal luminal diameter (r = 0.93 [95 % CI 0.91-0.95], p < 0.001; mean difference - 0.06 mm [LOA: -0.70 to 0.59])., Conclusion: AngioPy, an open-source tool, performs rapid and accurate coronary segmentation without the need for manual correction. It has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of QCA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BDB reports receiving consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, research grants from Coroventis Research, Pie Medical Imaging, CathWorks, Boston Scientific, Siemens, HeartFlow Inc., and Abbott Vascular, and owning equity in Siemens, GE, Philips, HeartFlow Inc., Edwards Life Sciences, Bayer, Sanofi, Celyad. All the other authors have nothing to disclose. The following are the supplementary data related to this article. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132598., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Meier has received an institutional grant from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: The transcaval (TCv) vascular approach is increasingly used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients unsuitable for the gold-standard transfemoral approach. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with TCv-TAVR., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all articles assessing the TCv approach published through December 2023. Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality (ACM), 30-day rehospitalisation, perioperative complications and postoperative complications at 30 days. The meta-analysis was registered on the PROSPERO database with the identifier CRD42024501921., Results: A total of 8 studies with 467 patients were included. TCv-TAVR procedures achieved a success rate of 98.5%. TCv-TAVR was associated with a 30-day ACM rate of 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9%-8.2%), a 1-year ACM rate of 14.9% (95% CI 2.3%-27.6%) and a 30-day rehospitalisation rate of 4.2% (95% CI -2.2% to 10.6%). Postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack, major vascular complications, and major or life-threatening bleeding occurred in 3.3%, 8.7%, and 7.5% of cases, respectively. Cumulative meta-analyses showed a temporal trend of decreasing rates of vascular complications., Conclusions: The TCv approach in TAVR demonstrated a reassuring efficacy and safety profile, with mortality and postoperative complication rates similar to those reported for supra-aortic alternative TAVR access routes. The temporal decrease in vascular complications suggests potential improvements in procedural techniques and device technology. These findings further support the TCv approach as a viable option in patients ineligible for the transfemoral access., Prospero: CRD42024501921., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated., Objectives: This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery., Methods: We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization., Results: Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005)., Conclusions: The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Collet received research grants from Biosensors, HeartFlow Inc, Abbott Vascular, Insight Lifetech, GE Healthcare, Siemens and Shockwave Medical. Dr Johnson has received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST, NCT02184117) and Philips Volcano (DEFINE-FLOW, NCT02328820) for studies using intracoronary pressure and flow sensors; has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart-minimum FFR algorithm commercialized under 510(k) K191008; and has pending patents on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and TAVI physiology and also algorithms to correct pressure tracings from fluid-filled catheters. Dr Mizukami has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical. Dr Fearon receives institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; he has a consulting relationship with CathWorks and Siemens; and he owns minor stock options in HeartFlow. Dr Berry receives research funding from the British Heart Foundation grant (RE/18/6134217); and is employed by the University of Glasgow, which holds consultancy and research agreements for his work with Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Causeway Therapeutics, Coroventis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Menarini, Neovasc, Siemens Healthcare, and Valo Health. Dr Sonck is supported by a grant provided by the CardioPath PhD program. Dr Collison has received honoraria/speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Koo has received an institutional research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. Dr Meneveau has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Bayer Healthcare, BMS-Pfizer, Boehringer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Oldroyd is an employee of Biosensors International. Dr Leipsic is a consultant for and holds stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow; and has a research grant from GE Healthcare. Dr Taylor is an employee of HeartFlow Inc. Dr Ko has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic; and has received research support from Canon Medical. Dr Perera has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular, HeartFlow, and Philips. Dr Leone received consultant fees and honoraria for lectures in sponsored symposia with Abbott Vascular and Bracco Imaging/ACIST Medical. Dr Matsuo has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical; and has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Philips, and Boston Scientific. Dr Amabile reports consulting/proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Shockwave Medical; and has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Piróth has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Opsens, and Boston Scientific. Dr Toth has received consultancy fees and research support from Abbott, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Terumo. Dr Ihdayhid reports receiving consulting honorarium from Abbott Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Artrya Pty Ltd (including equity interest). Dr West is an employee of Abbott Vascular. Dr Munhoz is supported with a PhD grant from CardioPath. Dr Barbato has received speaker fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Engstrøm has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer AS. Dr Escaned is supported by the Intensification of Research Activity project INT22/00088 from Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and served as speaker and advisory board member for Abbott and Philips. Dr Ali has received institutional grant support Abbott, Abiomed, ACIST Medical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Canon, Conavi, Heartflow, Inari, Medtronic Inc, National Institute of Health, Nipro, Opsens Medical, Medis, Philips, Shockwave, Siemens, Spectrawave, Teleflex; and consulting fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Opsens, Philips, Shockwave and equity in Elucid, Lifelink, Spectrawave, Shockwave, VitalConnect. Dr Kern has received speaker fees from Abbott, ACIST Medical, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Philips. Dr Pijls has received research grants from Abbott and Hexacath and consultancy fees from Abbott, GE, Philips, and HeartFlow and have equity in GE, Philips, and Heartflow. Dr De Bruyne has received institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Siemens, and GE; has received institutional grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronic, CathWorks, Pie Medical, and HeartFlow; and holds minor equities in Philips, Siemens, GE, Bayer, HeartFlow, Edwards Lifesciences, and Ceyliad. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) has mainly been used to treat in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention and was virtually abandoned about 20 years ago. However, patients treated with this strategy are still alive and some teams continue to perform this therapy. We aimed to investigate the very long-term clinical outcome of patients treated with ICB., Methods/materials: A total of 173 consecutive patients who had been treated with ICB at a large tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2003 were included. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were as follows: occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization), cardiac death, and presence of angina at the end of follow-up., Results: Patients' mean age at the time of ICB was 64 ± 10 years and 77 % were male. Restenosis (bare metal stent vs. balloon angioplasty) was the only indication for ICB. Unstable angina was present in 34 % of the patients. Follow-up was available for 166 patients. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 1.3 years, 66 % of the patients had died (including 74 patients (67 %) with cardiac death). Cumulative MACE rate at 20 years was 96 %., Conclusions: Very long-term follow-up of patients with in-stent restenosis treated with ICB confirmed a high all-cause mortality rate mainly due to cardiac causes and MACEs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background and Aims: Wall shear stress (WSS) has been associated with atherogenesis and plaque progression. The present study assessed the value of WSS analysis derived from conventional coronary angiography to detect lesions culprit for future myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods and Results: Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3DQCA), was used to calculate WSS and pressure drop in 80 patients. WSS descriptors were compared between 80 lesions culprit of future MI and 108 non-culprit lesions (controls). Endothelium-blood flow interaction was assessed by computational fluid dynamics (10.8 ± 1.41 min per vessel). Median time between baseline angiography and MI was 25.9 (21.9-29.8) months. Mean patient age was 70.3 ± 12.7. Clinical presentation was STEMI in 35% and NSTEMI in 65%. Culprit lesions showed higher percent area stenosis (%AS), translesional vFFR difference (ΔvFFR), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) and topological shear variation index (TSVI) compared to non-culprit lesions (p < 0.05 for all). TSVI was superior to TAWSS in predicting MI (AUC-TSVI = 0.77, 95%CI 0.71-0.84 vs. AUC-TAWSS = 0.61, 95%CI 0.53-0.69, p < 0.001). The addition of TSVI increased predictive and reclassification abilities compared to a model based on %AS and ΔvFFR (NRI = 1.04, p < 0.001, IDI = 0.22, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: A 3DQCA-based WSS analysis was feasible and can identify lesions culprit for future MI. The combination of area stenoses, pressure gradients and WSS predicted the occurrence of MI. TSVI, a novel WSS descriptor, showed strong predictive capacity to detect lesions prone to cause MI., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: CCN family member 1 (CCN1) has recently been proposed as a novel biomarker of myocardial injury, improving prediction of 30-day and one-year mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, we evaluated the utility of CCN1 measured immediately before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) as a predictor of two earlier endpoints: final myocardial infarct size and post-infarction left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of CCN1 on the discriminatory power of the CADILLAC score., Methods: STEMI patients were obtained from the SPUM-ACS cohort. Serum CCN1 was measured prior to PPCI. Linear regression assessed the association between CCN1, peak creatinine kinase (CK), and post-infarction LVEF. Cox models assessed an association between CCN1 and 30-day all-cause mortality., Results: CCN1 was measured in 989 patients with a median value of 706.2 ng/l (IQR 434.3-1319.6). A significant correlation between CCN1, myocardial infarct size (peak CK) and LVEF was observed in univariate and multivariate analysis (both p < 0.001). Even among patients with normal classical cardiac biomarker levels at the time of PPCI, CCN1 correlated significantly with final infarct size. CCN1 significantly improved prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality by the CADILLAC score (C-index 0.864, likelihood-ratio chi-square test statistic 6.331, p = 0.012; IDI 0.026, p= 0.050)., Conclusions: Compared with classical cardiac biomarkers, CCN1 is potentially the earliest predictor of final myocardial infarct size and post-infarction LVEF. CCN1 improved the discriminatory capacity of the CADILLAC score suggesting a potential role in the very-early risk stratification of STEMI patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In chronic coronary syndromes, guidelines mandate invasive functional guidance of revascularization whenever non-invasive proof of ischemia is missing. ISIS-2 survey aimed to evaluate how the adoption of guideline recommendation on ischemia-guided revascularization has evolved over the last 5-7 years., Methods: In ISIS-2 participants assessed five complete angiograms, presenting only intermediate stenoses without information on non-invasive pre-testing. Fractional flow reserve was known for each stenosis, but remained undisclosed. Participants could determine stenosis significance either by angiography or by requesting an adjunctive invasive diagnostic method (intravascular imaging or functional tests). Primary endpoint was the rate of requesting adjunctive functional assessment. Secondary endpoints were the rate of concordance between angiography-based decisions and know functional severity. ISIS-2 utilized the same web-based platform as ISIS-1 in 2013. (NCT04001452)., Results: 334 participants performed 2059 lesion evaluations: 1202 (59%) decisions were based solely on angiography without expressed need for further evaluation. These decisions were discordant with known functional significance in 39%, mainly with potential of overtreatment. Participants requested invasive functional assessment in 643 (31%) and intravascular imaging in 214 (10%) cases. Compared to ISIS-1 the rate of purely angiography-based decisions has decreased (59% vs 66%; p < 0.001), while invasive functional tests were more frequently requested (31% vs 25%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: ISIS-2 suggests an evolving pattern in the intention to integrate invasive coronary physiology into the revascularization decisions. However, the disconnect between recommendations and current thinking is still dominant., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is a highly prevalent condition in both obstructive and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Intracoronary thermodilution is a promising technique to investigate coronary microvascular (dys)function in vivo and to assess its most important metric: microvascular resistance. Here, the authors provide a practical review of bolus and continuous thermodilution for the measurement of coronary flow and microvascular resistance. The authors describe the basic principles of indicator-dilution theory and of coronary thermodilution and detail the practicalities of their application in the catheterization laboratory. Finally, the authors discuss contemporary clinical applications of coronary thermodilution-based microvascular assessment in humans and future perspectives., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs. Kodeboina, Fournier, Di Gioia, and Sonk are supported by a research grant from CardioPaTh. Dr. Di Gioia is supported by the STAR program of Compagnia di San Paolo. Dr. Collet has received institutional consultancy fees from HeartFlow and Philips Volcano. Dr. van ’t Veer has received speaker fees from Abbott. Dr. Pijls has received institutional research grants from Abbott and Hexacath; has received consultancy fees from Abbott, Opsens, and GE; and holds minor equity positions in Philips, ASML, and HeartFlow. Dr. De Bruyne has received institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Siemens; has received institutional grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and holds equity positions in Philips, Siemens, GE, Bayer, HeartFlow, Edwards Lifesciences, and Ceyliad. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The transfemoral (TF) approach is the gold-standard access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Alternative approaches, among which the transcervical (TC) approach, are needed in some patients. We aimed to compare TC-TAVR with TF-TAVR., Methods: All patients who underwent TAVR in our institution between 2016 and 2020, using Edwards SAPIEN family balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves, were retrospectively included. Endpoints included 30-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications (according to the VARC-2 criteria), procedure duration, hospital length of stay (LOS) and echocardiographic outcomes. For 30-day all-cause mortality, we furthermore used a Cox proportional-hazards model to adjust for significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics as well as anesthesia modality., Results: TAVR was performed in 306 patients, using a TF approach (n = 255) or a TC approach (n = 51). TC-TAVR was associated with significantly higher STS scores (4.06 [IQR (interquartile range), 2.05, 5.56] vs. 2.97 [IQR, 2.08, 4.88], p < 0.001) and higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease, history of stroke, previous cardiovascular surgery. 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.87 [0.77, 9.77], p = 0.909) and stroke rates (2.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.840) were similar, as well as procedural duration (74.0 [53.0, 99.5] vs. 77.0 [58.0, 98.0] minutes, p = 0.370), LOS (6.0 [IQR, 3.0, 8.0] vs. 6.0 [IQR, 4.0, 9.0] days, p = 0.175) and postprocedural mean transvalvular gradient (10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 13.00] vs. 10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 12.00] mmHg, p = 0.724)., Conclusion: Despite a higher cardiovascular disease burden in TC patients, TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR yielded similar outcomes. TC-TAVR may be a safe alternative when TF-TAVR is contraindicated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Stephane Fournier reports consulting fees from Bayer and Cathworks, Eric Eeckhout reports grants from Edwards, Olivier Muller reports grants from Abbott and Edwards. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest in relation with this article., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Pulse pressure (PP) is a surrogate of aortic stiffness (AS) easily obtainable. The link between AS and cardio-vascular disease is documented, however, data regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are scarce and contradictory. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of PP measured at admission, with regard to major adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality, recurrence of MI, and stroke), during the first year following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Methods: The SPUM-ACS project is a prospective cohort study of patients with ACS conducted in 4 Swiss University hospitals. Patients with no PP at admission or with severe clinical heart failure or cardiogenic shock were excluded. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine associations between PP and outcomes (all-cause mortality, recurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke). Three multivariate Cox regression models were adjusted for hemodynamic, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular confounders, added successively., Results: Of 5635 eligible patients, 5070 met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 63 years (range: 54-72), 79.6% were male, and mean blood pressure and PP were 93.9 ± 15.6 and 54 ± 17 mmHg, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed the prognostic significance of PP for each 10-mmHg increase for the composite endpoint, hazard ratio (HR) 1.126 [1.051-1.206], p = 0.001; all-cause mortality, HR1.129 [1.013-1.260], p = 0.029; and recurrence of MI, HR1.206 [1.102-1.320], p < 0.001; but not for stroke, HR1.014[0.853-1.205]., Conclusions: PP measured at admission is a strong, independent prognostic marker predicting mortality and recurrence of MI after ACS. PP should be considered for the management of secondary prevention., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)