Search

Purpose: Routine protocols for the study of mental retardation include karyotype, analysis for fragile X syndrome, and subtelomeric rearrangements. Nevertheless, detection of cryptic rearrangements requires more sensitive techniques. Mutation screening in all known genes responsible for X-linked mental retardation is not feasible, and linkage analysis is sometimes limited. Multiplex ligation probe amplification is a recently developed technique based on the amplification of specific probes that allows relative quantification of 40 to 46 different target DNA sequences in a single reaction., Methods: In the present study, we assessed multiplex ligation probe amplification for the detection of microduplications/microdeletions in 80 male patients with suspicion of X-linked mental retardation., Results: We detected four copy number aberrations (5%): three duplications (GDI1, RPS6KA3, and ARHGEF6) and one deletion (OPHN1). All these changes were confirmed by other molecular techniques, and patients were clinically re-evaluated., Conclusions: We strongly recommend the use of multiplex ligation probe amplification as a first screening method for the detection of copy number aberrations in patients with mental retardation because of its cost-effectiveness.

Adult dominant polycystic kidney disease is an hereditary condition responsible for 6% of end-stage renal failure in Spain. Two genes were located in chromosomes 16 and 4 as related to this age-dependent disease in the 90s (PKD1 and PKD2). The diagnosis can be easily achieved by sonographic study, but molecular analysis by means of linkage analysis has the advantage of an early diagnosis in asymptomatic genetic carriers, with a view to the preventive follow-up of these subjects and genetic counselling. In this paper we present the results of molecular analysis of 30 families with Adult Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (from the province of Las Palmas Spain), carried out linkage analysis with two series of microsatellite markers located within or in the vicinity ofPKD1 (D16S521, KG8, AC2.5, CW2, SM7) and PKD2 (D4S1538, D4S1534, D4S423,D4S414) genes. The objectives of the study were: first, to verify the informativeness, and therefore, the usefulness of these markers for family studies in our population; and second,to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the genetic analysis in our population. Most of the markers showed a high heterozygosity, comparable to data in other studies. Considering the alleles of the different markers together in a chromosome as an haplotype increased the informativeness of the markers, and allowed the unequivocal identification of genetic data in 97.7% of patients and 88.7% of healthy subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the genetic analysis were 90.7% (CI 95%: 85.7-95.7) and 86.8% (CI 95%: 80.6-93.0), respectively.