Search

Background: APG-1387 is a novel second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases mimetic, small-molecule inhibitor targeting inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. We report results from two phase I trials evaluating the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activity of APG-1387 monotherapy and APG-1387 plus toripalimab [a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor] for advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Participants aged ≥18 years who had histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with no appropriate standard of care (or refractory to standard care) were eligible. Patients received escalating intravenous doses of APG-1387 alone or combined with fixed-dose toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks) in a '3 + 3' design. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the monotherapy trial, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the combination therapy trial. Secondary endpoints included the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and preliminary efficacy in both trials., Results: In the monotherapy trial, 28 subjects were enrolled and received ≥1 treatment cycle. No DLT was reported among the 28 subjects, and the MTD was not reached. One participant (3.6%) had a grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of alanine aminotransferase elevation. In efficacy analysis of 23 participants, none achieved an objective response, and the disease control rate was 21.7%. In the combination trial, 22 subjects were enrolled and included in all analyses. There was one DLT of grade 3 lipase elevation. The MTD was not reached. Four grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in three participants (13.6%), with the most common being lipase elevation (n = 2). The RP2D was 45 mg weekly. The objective response rate was 13.6%, with complete response achieved in one subject, and the disease control rate was 54.5%., Conclusions: APG-1387 45 mg weekly plus toripalimab was well tolerated and is recommended for further study, with preliminary clinical activity observed in study participants with advanced solid tumors., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: CTONG0806 assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as second-line treatment in advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)., Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, detected by direct sequencing, and previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive gefitinib (250 mg/day) orally or pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) i.v. on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The Independent Review Committee (IRC) evaluated all pictorial data., Results: From February 2009 to August 2012, 161 patients were enrolled, and 157 were assessable (81 in the gefitinib arm, 76 in the pemetrexed arm). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The median PFSs were 4.8 versus 1.6 months in the pemetrexed and gefitinib arms, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.75, P < 0.001] as confirmed by IRC evaluation (5.6versus 1.7 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) showed a trend of superiority in the pemetrexed arm (12.4 versus 9.6 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.04, P = 0.077). Quality-of-life assessment showed no marked difference between the arms. No unexpected adverse events were found. Of 108 patients with sufficient DNA samples, EGFR mutation status was re-tested by Scorpion amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS); 32 (29.6%) tested positive (19 in the pemetrexed arm, 13 in the gefitinib arm; median PFS: 8.1 versus 7.0 months, HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.43-2.08, P = 0.877)., Conclusions: CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvement in PFS and an improved OS trend with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib as second-line setting treatment of EGFR wild-type advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. ARMS is superior to direct sequencing in excluding false-negative patients., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT00891579., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)