Search

Secondary active transporters are fundamental to a myriad of biological processes. They use the electrochemical gradient of one solute to drive transport of another solute against its concentration gradient. Central to this mechanism is that the transport of one does not occur in the absence of the other. However, like in most of biology, imperfections in the coupling mechanism exist and we argue that these are innocuous and may even be beneficial for the cell. We discuss the energetics and kinetics of alternating-access in secondary transport and focus on the mechanistic aspects of imperfect coupling that give rise to leak pathways. Additionally, inspection of available transporter structures gives valuable insight into coupling mechanics, and we review literature where proteins have been altered to change their coupling efficiency.

Planar lipid bilayers, e.g., black lipid membranes (BLM) and solid supported membranes (SSM), have been employed to investigate charge movements during the reaction cycle of P-type ATPases. The BLM/SSM method allows a direct measurement of the electrical currents generated by the cation transporter following chemical activation by a substrate concentration jump. The electrical current transients provides information about the reaction mechanism of the enzyme. In particular, the BLM/SSM technique allows identification of electrogenic steps which in turn may be used to localize ion translocation during the reaction cycle of the pump. In addition, using the high time resolution of the technique, especially when rapid activation via caged ATP is employed, rate constants of electrogenic and electroneutral steps can be determined. In the present review, we will discuss the main results obtained by the BLM and SSM methods and how they have contributed to unravel the transport mechanism of P-type ATPases.

Charge translocation associated with the activity of the Na(+)/proline cotransporter PutP of Escherichia coli was analyzed for the first time. Using a rapid solution exchange technique combined with a solid-supported membrane (SSM), it was demonstrated that Na(+)and/or proline individually or together induce a displacement of charge. This was assigned to an electrogenic Na(+)and/or proline binding process at the cytoplasmic face of the enzyme with a rate constant of k>50s(-1) which preceeds the rate-limiting step. Based on the kinetic analysis of our electrical signals, the following characteristics are proposed for substrate binding in PutP. (1) Substrate binding is electrogenic not only for Na(+), but also for the uncharged cosubstrate proline. The charge displacement associated with the binding of both substrates is of comparable size and independent of the presence of the respective cosubstrate. (2) Both substrates can bind individually to the transporter. Under physiological conditions, an ordered binding mechanism prevails, while at sufficiently high concentrations, each substrate can bind in the absence of the other. (3) Both substrate binding sites interact cooperatively with each other by increasing the affinity and/or the speed of binding of the respective cosubstrate. (4) Proline binding proceeds in a two-step process: low affinity (approximately 1mM) electroneutral substrate binding followed by a nearly irreversible electrogenic conformational transition.