Search

The challenge in classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) management is the 30-40% of refractory/relapsed cases., Aims: The aim of this work was to determine whether NIK and BCL-2 could be useful as prognosis biomarkers in cHL. In addition, we evaluated BCL-2 as a directed-therapy in cHL cell lines using venetoclax., Main Methods: We evaluated NIK and BCL-2 expression in 112 untreated cHL patients' lymph-node biopsies by immunohistochemistry. cHL cell lines were treated with venetoclax alone or combined with vincristine or doxorubicin. Cell viability, metabolic activity and cell death were analyzed by trypan-blue exclusion method, MTS assay and FDA/IP staining respectively., Key Findings: No correlation between NIK or BCL-2 expression and the majority of the clinical parameters was found. Patients with ≥60% BCL-2+ HRS-cells had a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.002, p = 0.02 respectively). A decision tree analysis, in a 30 patients subgroup, showed that patients with <60% NIK+ HRS-cells but with ≥60% BCL-2+ HRS-cells had a worse outcome in terms of DFS and OS. These parameters performed better as prognosis indicators as compared to the diagnosis bone marrow status. Human cHL cell lines U-H01, KM-H2, L1236, SUPHD1, L540 showed sensitivity to venetoclax. The co-treatment effect of venetoclax and vincristine or doxorubicin on cell viability was diverse depending on the cell line evaluated., Significance: BCL-2 should be considered as a prognosis biomarker as well as a potential new therapeutic target in cHL. We report for the first time the cytotoxic effect of venetoclax in human cHL cell lines., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Latin American countries (LATAMC) represent a large fraction of patients treated for multiple myeloma (MM) worldwide. In order to understand the difficulty of access to anti-myeloma therapy in LATAMC, we designed this study that explores areas involved in the availability of drugs, such as health care systems, approval times, coverage of new agents, old drugs, use of generics, and the first-line treatments., Material and Methods: We collected data from 16 countries in 2015., Results: The majority of LATAMC (88%; n = 14) had mixed public and private coverage, with patients with MM cared for in public institutions. Although bortezomib and lenalidomide were approved in 100% and 73% in LATAMC, these figures did not translate to real-world practice as one-half of the nations reported unequal access to the new agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide) in both public and private systems. Conversely, cheaper old drugs, represented by melphalan, were not available commercially in 44% (n = 7) of nations. Thus, first-line MM treatments for old and young patients in public practice were triplets with thalidomide-alkylating agent-steroid, whereas in private practice, treatments involved bortezomib-alkylating agent-steroid. An alarming rate of 30% of the nations reported suboptimal regimens (eg, VAD [vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone]) or the impossibility of transplantation., Conclusion: Our data indicates that bortezomib and transplant are still an unmet medical necessity in public systems. In the complex puzzle of myeloma drug access in LATAMC, important issues, such as the adjustment of disparities between health systems, the incorporation of new drugs with an economic cost-effectiveness view, and the re-establishment of essential old drugs, can be a platform to the future., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)