Search

Background & Aims: Oxysterols have been implicated in biliary tract cancer (BTC), and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) has been associated with oxysterol uptake in biliary and intestinal cells. Thus, our study aims to investigate the potential causal link between genetically proxied NPC1L1 inhibitors and the risk of BTC., Methods: In this study, we employed two genetic instruments as proxies for NPC1L1 inhibitors, which included LDL cholesterol-associated genetic variants located within or in close proximity to the NPC1L1 gene, as well as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) of the NPC1L1 gene. Effect estimates were calculated using the Inverse-variance-weighted MR (IVW-MR) and summary-data-based MR (SMR) methods., Results: In MR analysis using the IVW method, both proxy instruments from the UK Biobank and the GLGC demonstrated a positive association between NPC1L1-mediated LDL cholesterol and BTC risk, with odds ratios (OR) of 10.30 (95% CI = 1.51-70.09; P = 0.017) and 5.61 (95% CI = 1.43-21.91; P = 0.013), respectively. Moreover, SMR analysis revealed a significant association between elevated NPC1L1 expression and increased BTC risk (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.04-1.37; P = 0.014)., Conclusions: This MR study suggests a causal link between NPC1L1 inhibition and reduced BTC risk. NPC1L1 inhibitors, like ezetimibe, show potential for chemoprevention in precancerous BTC patients, requiring further clinical investigation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Statin-intolerance (SI) has prevalence between 8.0 % and 10 %, and muscular complaints are the most common reason for discontinuation. Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, decreases hepatic generation of cholesterol, upregulates low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression in the liver, and eventually clears circulating LDL-cholesterol from the blood. Multiple randomized clinical trials studying BA demonstrate a reduction in LDL levels by 17-28 % in SI. The CLEAR OUTCOME trial established significant cardiovascular benefits with BA. A dose of 180 mg/day of BA showed promising results. BA alone or in combination with ezetimibe is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and/or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. BA reduced HbA1c by 0.12 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with diabetes. Adverse events of BA include myalgia (4.7 %), anemia (3.4 %), and increased aminotransferases (0.3 %). BA can cause up to four times higher risk of gout in those with a previous gout diagnosis or high serum uric acid levels. Reports of increased blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were noted. Current evidence does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths from cardiovascular causes. More studies that include a diverse population and patients with both high and low LDL levels should be conducted. We recommend that providers consider BA as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with a maximally tolerated dosage to specifically target LDL levels., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is accelerated in people with diabetes. Dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation play a role via a variety of mechanisms operative in the artery wall. In addition, some unique features predispose people with type 1 diabetes to accelerated atherosclerosis. Various organizations have created guidelines that provide advice regarding screening, risk assessment, and roadmaps for treatment to prevent ASCVD in diabetes. Management of dyslipidemia, especially with statins, has proven to be of immense benefit in the prevention of clinical CVD. However, since many patients fail to attain the low levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) recommended in these guidelines, supplemental therapy, such as the addition of ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors, is often required to reach LDL goals. As a result, the upfront use of combination therapies, particularly a statin plus ezetimibe, is a rational initial approach. The addition to statins of drugs that specifically lower triglyceride levels has not proven beneficial, although the addition of icosapent-ethyl has been shown to be of value, likely by mechanisms independent of triglyceride lowering. Newer treatments in development, including apoC-III and ANGPTL3 inhibitors, seem promising in further reducing apoB-containing lipoproteins., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Proper prescription and high adherence to intensive lipid lowering drugs (LLD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are crucial and strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to investigate long-term treatment patterns and adherence to LLD following hospitalization for a CHD event., Methods: Patients admitted to two Norwegian hospitals with a CHD event from 2011 to 2014 (N = 1094) attended clinical examination and completed a questionnaire, median 16 months later. Clinical data were linked to pharmacy dispensing data from 2010 to 2020. The proportions using high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 40/80 mg or rosuvastatin 20/40 mg) and non-statin LLD after the CHD event were assessed. Adherence was evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and gaps in treatment., Results: Median age at hospitalization was 63 (IQR 12) years, 21 % were female. Altogether, 1054 patients (96 %) were discharged with a statin prescription, while treatment was dispensed in 85 % within the following 90 days. During median 8 (SD 2.5) years follow-up, the proportion using high-intensity statin therapy ranged 62-68 %, whereas the use of ezetimibe increased from 4 to 26 %. PDC <0.8 was found in 22 % of statin users and 26 % of ezetimibe users. The proportions with a treatment gap exceeding 180 days were 22 % for statins and 28 % for ezetimibe. Smoking at hospitalization and negative affectivity were significantly associated with reduced statin adherence, regardless of adherence measure., Conclusions: In this long-term follow-up of patients with CHD, less than 70 % used high-intensity statin therapy with only small changes over time, and only 25 % used additional treatment with ezetimibe. We identified factors associated with reduced statin adherence that may be target for interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:IE and CB are affiliated with Oslo Economics and have completed consultancy assignments outside the submitted work for several public and private institutions in recent years. HS is affiliated with Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus and has received consultancy fees from Novartis, Arla Foods AMBA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Neumirna outside the submitted work. EH, ES and TD reports no conflicts of interest. SH has received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. JM received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We aimed to describe clinical and genetic characteristics, lipid-lowering treatment and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes over a long-term follow-up in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)., Methods: SAFEHEART (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cohort Study) is a long-term study in molecularly diagnosed FH. Data analyzed in HoFH were prospectively obtained from 2004 until 2022. ASCVD events, lipid profile and lipid-lowering treatment were determined., Results: Thirty-nine HoFH patients were analyzed. The mean age was 42 ± 20 years and nineteen (49%) were women. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 6,18). Median age at genetic diagnosis was 24 years (IQR 8,42). At enrolment, 33% had ASCVD and 18% had aortic valve disease. Patients with new ASCVD events and aortic valve disease at follow-up were six (15%), and one (3%), respectively. Median untreated LDL-C levels were 555 mg/dL (IQ 413,800), and median LDL-C levels at last follow-up was 122 mg/dL (IQR 91,172). Most patients (92%) were on high intensity statins and ezetimibe, 28% with PCSK9i, 26% with lomitapide, and 23% with lipoprotein-apheresis. Fourteen patients (36%) attained an LDL-C level below 100 mg/dL, and 10% attained an LDL-C below 70 mg/dL in secondary prevention. Patients with null/null variants were youngers, had higher untreated LDL-C and had the first ASCVD event earlier. Free-event survival is longer in patients with defective variant compared with those patients with at least one null variant (p=0.02)., Conclusions: HoFH is a severe life threating disease with a high genetic and phenotypic variability. The improvement in lipid-lowering treatment and LDL-C levels have contributed to reduce ASCVD events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RA reports personal fees and non-financial support from Tecnofarma Chile, NovoNordisk Chile, and personal fees from Novartis Chile, Amgen Spain, and Teva Chile, outside the submitted work. JLDD received honoraria for research activities from Merck Sharp and Dhome Spain, Amgen Spain, and Sanofi Spain. PM, received research grants from Amgen USA and Sanofi Spain., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) predisposes to premature cardiovascular diseases. Since 2015, the European Atherosclerosis Society has advocated initiation of statins at 8-10 years of age and a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <135 mg/dL. Longitudinal data from large databases on pharmacological management of pediatric HeFH are lacking., Objective: Here, we describe treatment patterns and LDL-C goal attainment in pediatric HeFH using longitudinal real-world data., Methods: This was a retrospective and prospective multicenter cohort study (2015-2021) of children with HeFH, diagnosed genetically or clinically, aged <18 years, and followed up in the National French Registry of FH (REFERCHOL). Data on the study population as well as treatment patterns and outcomes are summarized as mean±SD., Results: We analyzed the data of 674 HeFH children (age at last visit: 13.1 ± 3.6 years; 82.0 % ≥10 years; 52.5 % females) who were followed up for a mean of 2.8 ± 3.5 years. Initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was on average at 11.8 ± 3.0 years of age for a duration of 2.5 ± 2.8 years. At the last visit, among patients eligible for treatment (573), 36 % were not treated, 57.1 % received statins alone, 6.4 % statins with ezetimibe, and 0.2 % ezetimibe alone. LDL-C was 266±51 mg/dL before treatment and 147±54 mg/dL at the last visit (-44.7 %) in treated patients. Regarding statins, 3.3 %, 65.1 %, and 31.6 % of patients received high-, moderate-, and low-intensity statins, respectively. Overall, 59 % of children on statin therapy alone and 35.1 % on bitherapy did not achieve the LDL-C goal; fewer patients in the older age group did not reach the treatment goal., Conclusion: Pediatric patients with FH followed up in specialist lipid clinics in France receive late treatment, undertreatment, or suboptimal treatment and half of them do not reach the therapeutic LDL-C goal. Finding a more efficient framework for linking scientific evidence to clinical practice is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest • NP has received honoraria from ADEN-ALLP, Alexion AMGEN, Amryt, Biocodex, Elsevier, Kowa, Lactalis, Nestlé NHS, NHC, Nutricia-Danone, Orphan Europ, Sanofi, Shire, Ultragenyx • PT has participated in one scientific committee at Ultragenyx laboratories • YP has received honoraria from Servier, Viatris, AMGEN, Sanofi, Bouchara-Recordati • JPR has received remuneration from Sanofi, Ultragenyx • EB has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, AMGEN, MSD, Sanofi and Regeneron, Aegerion/Amryt, Lilly, Ionis-pharmaceuticals, Akcea, Alexion pharma, Servier, Novartis, Mylan/Viatris, Organon and Genfit • AG reports grants and personal fees from AMGEN, Sanofi, Regeneron, Mylan Viatris, MSD, Akcea Therapeutics, Amryt and Ultragenyx. • SB has received honoraria for board, conferences, clinical trial or congress from Aegerion, Akcea, Elivie, Novartis, Sanofi or AMGEN • PP, LR, AV, RR have no conflict of interest related to this article., (Copyright © 2024 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Patients with CKD are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Clinical studies suggest statins reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Lipid lowering therapy with statin with or without ezetemibe is recommended for most of the patients in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min and also in those who have an increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (≥3 mg/mmol) for at least 3 months. Evidence suggests that it should not be started for hemodialysis patients without evidence of ASCVD. Patients who were already taking statins or statin/ezetimibe combination at the time of dialysis should consider continuing these medications, especially if they have ASCVD. Fibrates should not be used in conjunction with statins in patients with CKD, and ezetimibe monotherapy is also not recommended. The role of PCSK9 inhibitors is evolving suggests that it is effective in lowering LDL cholesterol without affecting the renal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite numerous improvements in the management of acute coronary syndrome(ACS), it is a major cause of mortality in India. Lipids play a critical role in pathogenesis of ACS and reduction of lipid parameters plays a pivotal role in secondary prevention. High total cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein(LDL) are the major lipid abnormalities globally as well as in Indians. Among all the lipid parameters, LDL is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies across the globe. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid are recommended therapies for LDL reduction in ACS patients. Statins have pleiotropic effects on the modulation of thrombogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial protection. Multiple randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that the use of high-dose statin has significant benefits in ACS. LDL reduction goal is < 55 mg/dl or at least 50 % reduction from the baseline regardless of age or gender. Non-fasting LDL should be measured soon after the ACS as it varies minimally with food intake. The first line of therapy after ACS is to advise lifestyle modifications, combination therapy including high-dose statin with ezetimibe, and evaluation after 4-6 weeks of the index event. If the goal is not achieved then PCSK 9 inhibitors or Bempedoic acid should be used in combination with statins and ezetimibe to reduce recurrent ischaemic events. Despite the proven effect of these lipid-lowering therapies, undertreatment is still a big hurdle across the globe. Prohibitive costs, adverse effects, medication non-adherence, variation in health practice in different countries, and clinical inertia to prescribe this medication by physicians are the main reasons for the undertreatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Whether the effect of a combination strategy rather than increasing doses of one drug to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is consistent across baseline LDL-C levels remains uncertain., Methods: In the RACING trial, which showed a non-inferiority of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg) to high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) for the primary outcome (3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular event, or stroke), the heterogeneity in treatment effect according to baseline LDL-C levels was assessed for the primary and secondary outcomes (clinical efficacy and safety)., Results: Of 3780 participants, 2817 participants (74.5%) had LDL-C <100 mg/dL, and 963 participants (25.5%) had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. The treatment effect of combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar among the lower LDL-C subset (8.8% vs. 10.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.08, p = 0.19) and the higher LDL-C subset (10.8% vs. 9.6 %; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.7, p = 0.53) without a significant interaction (interaction p = 0.22). Of the secondary outcomes, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL was greater in the combination therapy group regardless of baseline LDL-C levels., Conclusions: Among ASCVD patients, there was no heterogeneity in the effect of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy in the higher and lower baseline LDL-C levels for the 3-year composite of cardiovascular outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Byeong-Keuk Kim has received speaker's fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular, Myeong-Ki Hong has received speaker's fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Pfizer, Yangsoo Jang has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi, and Jung-Sun Kim has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Despite lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reaching LDL-C targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains challenging. Our aim was to determine attainment of LDL-C target levels and reasons for not reaching these in female and male FH patients., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of heterozygous FH patients in five hospitals in the Netherlands and Norway. Clinical characteristics and information about LLT, lipid levels and reasons for not being on LDL-C treatment target were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records., Results: We studied 3178 FH patients (53.9% women), median age 48.0 (IQR 34.0-59.9) years. Median LDL-C before treatment and on-treatment was higher in women compared to men (6.2 (IQR 5.1-7.3) and 6.0 (IQR 4.9-7.2) mmol/l (p=0.005) and 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.8) and 2.8 (IQR 2.3-3.5) mmol/L (p<0.001)), respectively. A minority of women (26.9%) and men (28.9%) reached LDL-C target. In patients with CVD, 17.2% of women and 25.8% of men reached LDL-C target. Women received less often high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Most common reported reasons for not achieving the LDL-C target were insufficient effect of maximum LLT (women 17.3%, men 24.3%) and side effects (women 15.2%, men 8.6%)., Conclusions: In routine practice, only a minority of women and men with FH achieved their LDL-C treatment target. Extra efforts have to be made to provide FH patients with reliable information on the safety of statins and their long-term effects on CVD risk reduction. If statin treatment is insufficient, alternative lipid lowering therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9-inhibitors should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinically diagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) may require a genetic test (GT) to confirm diagnosis. GT availability/accessibility is resource-dependent and usually restricted to specialized clinics. While GT has a diagnostic value, it has not yet defined its impact on long-term management and prognosis of FH., Objective: The aim was to identify the clinical characteristics associated with the request for a GT in suspected heterozygous FH., Methods: Retrospective study including adult patients with clinically suspected to be FH. Positive GT (GT+) was defined as having a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. Patients were stratified based on whether they had a genetic study conducted, and among those with a genetic study, according to those who did or did not have a GT+., Results: From 4854 patients included, 3090 were performed a GT (GT+: 2113). Median follow-up: 6.2 years. A younger age, FH-related physical signs, premature coronary disease, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) and lower body mass index and triglycerides, associated higher odds of being conducted a genetic study. These patients had higher baseline LDLc (252 mg/dL vs. 211 mg/dL among clinically diagnosed patients) and experienced larger reductions over the follow-up (157.7 mg/dL vs. 113.5 mg/dL, respectively). A similar pattern was observed among patients with GT+ (vs. negative GT). LDLc target attainment was low but increased to 66-95% when a triple combination with statin/ezetimibe/proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9-inhibitor was used. Cardiovascular events occurred in 3.2% and 3.1% of patients who conducted/not conducted a genetic study. Patients conducted a genetic analysis and those with GT+ tended to present the events earlier., Conclusions: Genetic study, vs. having a clinical-only diagnosis, impacts the management of FH. Cardiovascular prognosis was similar in both groups, perhaps as a result of the more intensive management of patients with a genetic study., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: In 2020, the Spanish Society of Cardiology published a consensus to improve lipid control in secondary prevention patients. This study was aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of this consensus in clinical practice., Methods: Non-interventional, national and multicenter study, with a prospective and retrospective design in two cohorts. Implementation of the consensus was performed on the prospective cohort. Prospective cohort included patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from December 2020 to March 2022 and were followed-up for 3 months. Retrospective cohort included patients with ACS in the same hospital, matched for main baseline clinical characteristics, between August 2019 to February 2020, with a follow-up of 3 months. Additionally, patients were included if they had previously received lipid-lowering therapy and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was >55 mg/dL., Results: A total of 516 patients were included (245 in the prospective cohort and 271 in the retrospective cohort). Overall, mean age was 67.9 ± 11.4 years, 73.8 % were men, and 35.8 % had diabetes. At discharge, 98.4 % and 98.9 %, respectively (P = 0.71) were taking statins (90.6% vs 88.9 %; P = 0.564 high intensity statins), 58.4% vs 33.2 %; P<0.001 ezetimibe, 1.2% vs 0.4 %; P = 0.35 PCSK9 inhibitors. During the follow-up, the dose of statins was increased in 11.4% vs 3.3 % (P<0.001), and ezetimibe was added in 25.7% vs 25.8 % (P = 0.976). At study end, significantly more patients achieved LDL-C <55 mg/dL in the prospective cohort (45.6% vs 33.5 %; P = 0.013)., Conclusions: The implementation of the Spanish lipid consensus was associated with a significant improvement of LDL-C control after only 3 months., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Although studies of nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits; whether these benefits provide good value has not been evaluated in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. A systematic review was performed to include studies on the cost-effectiveness of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with/without cardiovascular disease. Thirteen studies were included; ezetimibe (n = 8), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (n = 4), fenofibrate (n = 2), nicotinic acid (n = 1), extended-release niacin/laropiprant (n = 1), and icosapent ethyl (n = 1). Six studies considered ezetimibe + statin to be a cost-effective compared to statins monotherapy, three studies suggested that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9inhibitors + statins were not cost-effective compared to statin + ezetimibe. Fenofibrate was a cost-effective either as monotherapy or combined with a statin compared to statin or fenofibrate monotherapy. Nicotinic acid and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 compared to statin monotherapy were also cost-effective. Icosapent ethyl was cost-effective compared to standard care but not using the wholesale acquisition cost., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is insufficient despite clear guideline recommendations. Lipid clinics have specialized in patients with dyslipidemia, but the magnitude and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in lipid clinics has not yet been studied in depth., Objective: To assess LDL-C reduction in very high-risk CVD patients achieved in a lipid clinic through different forms of LLT in comparison to standard care without the initiation of PSCK9 inhibitors., Methods: Data from 96 lipid clinic patients were analyzed retrospectively and compared to 84 standard care patients. Very high-risk patients were defined according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Different combinations of LLT focusing on statins and ezetimibe were investigated. Achievement of LDL-C treatment goals according to ESC guidelines as well as LDL-C reduction were assessed., Results: Baseline and follow-up data of 180 very high-risk CVD patients (mean age 67.7 (±9.8) y; 60.6% male) were used. Achievement of the LDL-C goal in lipid clinic patients increased significantly from 14.6% at baseline to 41.7% at the latest visit (p<0.001) while standard care patients improved from 21.4% to 33.3% (p=0.08). The largest relative LDL-C reduction via an adjustment in LLT was achieved by initiation of high-intensity statins (50.8 ± 4.9%, n = 5, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Treatment in a lipid clinic leads to a superior LDL-C goal achievement in very high-risk CVD patients as compared to standard care with the highest reduction under LLT with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Referral algorithms have to be established for high-risk patients., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Obicetrapib, a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein particles, and apolipoproteins, when added to high-intensity statin in patients with dyslipidemia., Objective: To evaluate the safety and lipid-altering efficacy of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe combination therapy as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy., Methods: This double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial administered 10 mg obicetrapib plus 10 mg ezetimibe (n = 40), 10 mg obicetrapib (n = 39), or placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks to patients with LDL-C >70 mg/dL and triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL, on stable high-intensity statin. Endpoints included concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9), safety, and tolerability., Results: Ninety-seven patients were included in the primary analysis (mean age 62.6 years, 63.9% male, 84.5% white, average body mass index of 30.9 kg/m 2 ). LDL-C decreased from baseline to week 12 by 63.4%, 43.5%, and 6.35% in combination, monotherapy, and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.0001 vs. placebo). LDL-C levels of <100, <70, and <55 mg/dL were achieved by 100%, 93.5%, and 87.1%, respectively, of patients taking the combination. Both active treatments also significantly reduced concentrations of non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and total and small LDL particles. Obicetrapib was well tolerated and no safety issues were identified., Conclusion: The combination of obicetrapib plus ezetimibe significantly lowered atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and was safe and well tolerated when administered on top of high-intensity statin to patients with elevated LDL-C., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to understand the impact of physicians' perception about LDL-cholesterol (LDLc) control on the management of patients with dyslipidemia in Spain., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional and multicenter study, in which 435 healthcare professionals participated in face-to-face meetings, collecting qualitative and quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia management. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 patients with hypercholesterolemia attended by each physician were collected., Results: A total of 4,010 patients (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular [CV] risk) were included. Physicians' perception was that 62% of their patients attained LDLc goals (66%, 63%, 61% and 56%, for low, moderate, high and very high CV risk, respectively). However, when looking into the data only 31% (vs 62% p<0.01) of patients attained the LDLc goals (47%, 36%, 22% and 25%, respectively). Overall, 33% of patients were taking high intensity statins, 32% statin/ezetimibe, 21% low/moderate intensity statins and 4% PCSK9 inhibitors. These numbers were 38%, 45%, 8% and 6% for very high risk patients and 44%, 21%, 21% and 4% for high CV risk patients. In 32% of patients, a change in lipid lowering therapy was performed after the visit, mainly combining statins/ezetimibe (55%)., Conclusions: In Spain, most patients with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals because of an insufficient intensification of lipid lowering therapy. On the one hand, this is in part due to physicians misperception on preventive LDLc control and the need for repeated advice to patient, and, on the other, to the lack of patient adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Juan Cosin-Sales: has received conference fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi and Sanofi; has participated in advisory services for Almirall, Amgen, MSD and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Amgen, Ferrer, MSD and Sanofi. Raquel Campuzano: has received conference fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. José Luis Díaz: has received fees for presentations, advisory services or scientific collaborations from Amgen, Bayer, Boëringher, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Rovi, Rubió, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier. Carlos Escobar: has received fees for conferences/advisory services from: Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi, Sanofi, Servier and Viatris. María Rosa Fernández: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and Rovi; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin. Juan José Gómez-Doblas: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and MSD; has participated in advisory services for Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer and Daiichi-Sankyo. José María Mostaza: has participated in advisory services and/or conferences, or has carried out projects for Pfizer, Amarin, Ferrer, Sanofi, Amgen, Alter, Servier, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo. Juan Pedro-Botet: has received fees for conferences from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi and Viatris; and has participated in advisory services for Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, Sanofi and Viatris. Núria Plana: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo Mylan and Alexion. Pedro Valdivielso: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Amarin, Akcea, Sobi, MSD, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo; has participated in advisory services for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Sanofi, Akcea and Amarin; and has received research grants from Ferrer and Akcea., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nearly two-thirds of individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not reach target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite statin therapy. Three novel lipid-lowering therapies have proven to further reduce ASCVD beyond statins, including: ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), and icosapent ethyl. This study evaluated the use of these three agents in 728,423 individuals with ASCVD from 89 US health systems from 01/2018 through 03/2021 using the electronic health record. As of 2021, only 6.0% of ASCVD patients were on ezetimibe, 1.6% were on a PCSK9i, and 1.3% on icosapent ethyl, with utilization only marginally increasing over the study period. Addressing the underutilization of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention is a critical step in improving the treatment gap of patients with residual risk of ASCVD., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in statin-treated patients remains suboptimal. We quantified the health economic impact of delayed lipid-lowering intensification from an Australian healthcare and societal perspective., Methods: A lifetime Markov cohort model (n = 1000) estimating the impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) of intensifying lipid-lowering treatment in statin-treated patients with uncontrolled LDL-C, at moderate to high risk of CHD with no delay or after a 5-year delay, compared with standard of care (no intensification), starting at age 40 years. Intensification was tested with high-intensity statins or statins + ezetimibe. LDL-C levels were extracted from a primary care cohort. CHD risk was estimated using the pooled cohort equation. The effect of cumulative exposure to LDL-C on CHD risk was derived from Mendelian randomization data. Outcomes included CHD events, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), healthcare and productivity costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All outcomes were discounted annually by 5%., Results: Over the lifetime horizon, compared with standard of care, achieving LDL-C control with no delay with high-intensity statins prevented 29 CHD events and yielded 30 extra QALYs (ICERs AU$13 205/QALY) versus 22 CHD events and 16 QALYs (ICER AU$20 270/QALY) with a 5-year delay. For statins + ezetimibe, no delay prevented 53 CHD events and gave 45 extra QALYs (ICER AU$37 271/QALY) versus 40 CHD events and 29 QALYs (ICER of AU$44 218/QALY) after a 5-year delay., Conclusions: Delaying attainment of LDL-C goals translates into lost therapeutic benefit and a waste of resources. Urgent policies are needed to improve LDL-C goal attainment in statin-treated patients., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Dyslipidemia, specifically elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and increases the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Statins, a class of drugs that exert their effects by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol, have been the mainstay of therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and lipids reduction. Statins are associated with side effects, most commonly myopathy and myalgias, despite their proven efficacy. This review explores non-statin lipid-lowering therapies and examines recent advances and emerging research. Over the previous decades, several lipid-lowering therapies, both as monotherapy and adjuncts to statin therapy and lipid-targeting gene therapy, have emerged, thus redefining how we treat dyslipidemia. These drugs include Bile acids sequestrants, Fibrates, Nicotinic acid, Ezetimibe, Bempedoic acid, Volanesoren, Evinacumab, and the PCSK 9 Inhibitors Evolocumab and Alirocumab. Emerging gene-based therapy includes Small interfering RNAs, Antisense oligonucleotides, Adeno-associated virus vectors, CRISPR/Cas9 based therapeutics, and Non-coding RNA therapy. Of all these therapies, Bempedoic acid works most like statins by working through a similar pathway to decrease cholesterol levels. However, it is not associated with myopathy. Overall, although statins continue to be the gold standard, non-statin therapies are set to play an increasingly important role in managing dyslipidemia., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Blood cholesterol levels are regulated by competing mechanisms of cholesterol synthesis, absorption and excretion. Plant sterols are natural constituents of plants, are not synthesized in humans, and serve as markers for cholesterol absorption. Ezetimibe lowers the intestinal absorption of cholesterol and plant sterols. We analyzed the associations of differences in cholesterol metabolism, in particular increased cholesterol absorption, and the occurrence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with stable coronary artery disease., Methods: Elective stent implantation of de novo stenosis was conducted in 59 patients (74.6 % males, 67.2 ± 9.6 years). Cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols were quantified in serum samples by gas chromatography or mass spectrometry. ISR was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and quantitative angiography (QCA) after six months., Results: Markers for cholesterol absorption (e.g. campesterol-to-cholesterol) were positively associated with ISR measured by QCA (%diameter stenosis, late lumen loss) and OCT (proliferation volume, %area stenosis), whereas markers for cholesterol synthesis (e.g. lathosterol-to-cholesterol) were negatively associated with ISR (%area stenosis: r = -0.271, p = 0.043). There was no association between ISR and total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides. Markers for cholesterol absorption (e.g. campesterol-to-cholesterol) were significantly lower in ezetimibe-treated patients compared to patients on a statin only (1.29 ± 0.69 vs. 2.22 ± 1.23; p = 0.007). Combined lipid-lowering with ezetimibe plus statin reduced ISR compared to statin only (13.7 ± 10.4 vs. 22.5 ± 12.1 %diameter stenosis, p = 0.015)., Conclusions: Differences in cholesterol metabolism, more specifically increased cholesterol absorption, are associated with ISR., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We aim to estimate the number and proportion of very-high risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who would be able to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL with various lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), including statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and evinacumab, using a Monte Carlo simulation model described previously. With current treatment options for LDL-C lowering, including statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 inhibitors, it was estimated that most very-high risk patients with ASCVD (99.1%) were able to achieve the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL. Nevertheless, approximately 88,715 patients in the USA were estimated to not be able to achieve the LDL-C goal after current available LLTs, thus remaining at elevated risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. Evinacumab may be useful to address such unmet needs effectively, as the majority of those not at goal after PCSK9 inhibitors could achieve the goal of <70 mg/dL after taking evinacumab., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest J.G., R.J.S., and S.F. are employees of and stockholders in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A.C. is an employee of Axtria. R.S.R. reports grants and/or personal fees for scientific advisory board participation from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen, Arrowhead, CRISPER Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, and Precision BioSciences; honoraria for non-promotional speaking from Amgen and Kowa; royalties from UpToDate; and stock holdings in MediMergent, LLC., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Lipid-lowering medications comprise standard of care in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. This study examined the trends in the utilization of statin and non-statin medications in the Australian general population between 2013 and 2019. Pharmacoepidemiological analyses were performed using pharmacy dispensing data from Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. One-year prevalence and incidence of statin and non-statin prescribing patterns were reported, and relative variations in prescribing examined via Poisson regression modelling. The one-year prevalence of statins' prescriptions decreased between 2013-2019 by 5.5% (from 25.0%-19.5%). Females were less likely than males to be prescribed statins (rate ratio [RR]=0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.91). The one-year prevalence of ezetimibe alone, and in combination with statins, increased consistently from 2013-2019 from 1.5%-3.6% (P<0.01) and 0.1%-1.1% (P<0.01), respectively. The prevalence was higher among those aged 61-80 years (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.10-1.21) and those aged older than 80 years (RR=1.34, 95%CI 1.22-1.47), when compared to people aged <60 years. The incidence of ezetimibe prescriptions was highest in people aged 61-80 years (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.31-1.41) compared to those aged <60 years. The one-year prevalence of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor prescriptions was highest among those aged 46-60 years (RR=1.24, 95%CI 0.97-4.97) compared to people aged <46 and >60 years. Females were less likely than males to be prescribed a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.75-0.98). Statins remain the most prevalent lipid-lowering medication prescribed in Australia. The prescribing of non-statin medications remains low, but is increasing., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9(PCSK9) monoclonal antibody (Mab; Evolocumab) has been reported to inhibit low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)] in coronary heart diseases (CHD) patients in America, Europe and Japan. However, little is known about the effect of Evolocumab in Chinese population. This retrospective study in Chinese CHD patients compared the efficacy without or with Evolocumab therapy added to the conventional treatment with a statin (Rosuvastatin) and a gut cholesterol absorption inhibitor (Ezetimibe)., Methods: CHD patients from our hospital were divided into three therapeutic groups, A) the statin monotherapy group (10 mg Rosuvastatin every night); B) the statin/cholesterol absorption inhibitor group (10 mg Rosuvastatin and 10 mg Ezetimibe daily); and C) the triple therapy with PCSK9 Mab group (10 mg Rosuvastatin daily, 10 mg Ezetimibe daily, and 140 mg Evolocumab once 2 weeks). The plasma lipid data were collected at 0, 4, 12, and 24 Week(s). The Graphpad Prism 7 program was used to perform all the statistical analysis., Results: Out of 103 patients 91 were eligible for further evaluation with 31 in group A, 31 in group B, and 29 in group C. The plasma LDL-C levels were reduced only by 33.82% in the Rosuvastatin monotherapy group, 52.13% in the Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe group, and 73.59% in the Evolocumab/Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe group (P < 0.0001) at 24 weeks compared to the prior therapy levels. Neither the statin therapy alone (5.95%; P = 0.6), nor the double therapy (5.27%; P = 0.7) affected LP(a) levels. In contrast, addition of Evolocumab to the double therapy significantly decreased LP(a) level by 37.2% (P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Addition of Evolocumab to the standard double therapy in Chinese CHD patients improved the efficacy in LDL-C reduction when compared to Rosuvastatin alone or in Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe double therapy. Furthermore, the addition of Evolocumab lowered LP(a) level in Chinese CHD patients., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Aims: The achievement of a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in clinical settings is often insufficient. A hospital lipid-lowering protocol (HLP) could be effective for providing the optimal lipid-lowering therapy. Herein we determined the effectiveness of a HLP for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,497 patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS at our hospital (November 2011 to May 2020). In December 2018, we introduced a HLP that included the prescription of the maximum tolerated dose of statin, ezetimibe, and eicosapentaenoic acid. We compared the lipid profile and clinical outcomes at 12 months between before (Control group: 1,219 patients) and after the HLP's introduction (HLP group: 278 patients). The primary outcome was the achievement rate of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). The key secondary outcomes were the change value and ratio of LDL-C plus the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis., Results: The achievement rate of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L was significantly higher in the HLP group than in the Control group (58% vs. 27%, p < 0.01). The HLP group's change ratio and LDL-C values were significantly lower than those of the Control group (-39.5 [-55.1, -13.2]% vs. -20.4 [-38.4, 0]%, p < 0.001; -41 [-69, -11] mg/dL vs. -21 [-38, 0] mg/dL, p < 0.001). MACE was similar between the groups (16.9 vs. 15.5%, p = 0.66)., Conclusion: Implementing a HLP for ACS patients improved the achievement of target LDL-C at 12 months., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest O. Iida received remuneration from Boston Scientific Japan, W. L. Gore & Associates G.K., BD and TERUMO. T. Mano received a research grant from Abbott Vascular Japan. The other authors have no disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Sitosterolemia is a rare form of dyslipidemia that has diverse clinical manifestations, and insufficient knowledge of the disease frequently leads to a delay in diagnosis. We report a case of sitosterolemia in a 26-year-old Chinese woman, characterized by anemia, thrombocytopenia, persistent hypercholesterolemia, premature atherosclerosis, extensive xanthoma, and arthralgia-tenosynovitis. Successive misdiagnoses of Evans syndrome and familial hypercholesterolemia had been made, and the patient had responded minimally to steroid therapy, splenectomy, and statin treatment; therefore, she was referred to our hospital. On admission, a peripheral blood smear revealed the presence of abnormally shaped erythrocytes and giant platelets. Multiple atherosclerotic lesions, sites of tenosynovitis, and carotid sheath xanthomas were identified on ultrasonography. Compound heterozygous mutations of the ABCG5 gene, including a hot variant (c.1,336, exon10 C>T, p.(R446*)) and a novel variant (c.1,325-3(IVS9)&#95;c.1325-2(IVS9)delCA) were separately identified in her parents by pedigree analysis. Plant sterols analysis by high performance liquid chromatography method revealed remarkably elevated plasma plant sterol concentrations after drug withdrawal but reduced rapidly after restarting ezetimibe during follow-up period. After 21 months of treatment with ezetimibe and a low-plant sterol diet, her hematologic abnormalities, tenosynovitis, and hypercholesterolemia had significantly improved; and ultrasonography showed that her skin and carotid sheath xanthomas had resolved or shrunk. This case demonstrates that morphological changes in blood cells on a peripheral blood smear, ultrasonographic findings and ABCG5/ABCG8 gene screening are valuable, and plant sterol analysis in serum is crucial to confirm diagnosis and assess treatment adequacy for sitosterolemia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sitosterolemia is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by phytosterol accumulation in the blood and tissues. However, the detailed clinical and genetic spectra are lacking., Objective: To describe and compare the clinical, biochemical, genetic, therapeutic, and follow-up characteristics of 55 pediatric and five adult sitosterolemia patients., Methods: Clinical, genetic and therapeutic data from 60 patients at Xinhua Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021 were retrospectively collected., Results: Pediatric patients' manifestations included xanthomas(93%), hematological disorders(30%), arthralgia(24%), splenomegaly(11%), atherosclerosis(10%). Adult patients had symptoms such as atherosclerosis(5/5), xanthomas(4/5), hematological disorders(3/5), arthralgia(3/5), splenomegaly(3/5). Elevated total cholesterol(TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) were observed in 96% patients (pediatric 98%, adult 3/4), and phytosterol levels in 100% patients. The age of onset was also negatively correlated with blood TC (P < 0.0001, r = -0.5548) and LDL-C (P = 0.0001, r = -0.4859) levels. Targeted treatments resulted in symptomatic remission(pediatric 96%, adult 4/5), and significantly decreased lipid and phytosterol levels(all P<0.05). In the dietary-therapy cohort(n=34), blood lipid levels decreased(all P<0.05). In the 13 pediatric patients from the dietary-therapy cohort who switched from dietary to combination therapy with ezetimibe, dietary therapy decreased TC and LDL-C levels by 54% and 52%, and ezetimibe further decreased them by 18% and 20%, respectively. Further, we identified 15 novel ABCG5/ABCG8 variants., Conclusions: This study expands the clinical and genetic spectra of sitosterolemia. The low-phytosterol diet is the cornerstone of sitosterolemia treatment. Ezetimibe can further decrease blood lipid levels and increase daily dietary phytosterol tolerance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The 2019 European guidelines (ESC/EAS) for the treatment of dyslipidaemias recommend more aggressive targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Current lipid-lowering treatment is often inadequate to achieve these targets., Methods: Data from the HELLAS-FH registry were analysed to assess achievement of LDL-C targets in adults with FH based on the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. In patients who had not achieved LDL-C target, the maximally reduced LDL-C value was calculated after theoretical switch to rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 40/10 mg/day. The percentage of patients who remained candidates for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) was then calculated., Results: Patients (n = 1694, mean age 50.8 ± 14.7 years) had LDL-C levels 242 ± 71 mg/dL (6.3 ± 1.8 mmol/L) at diagnosis. Most treated patients were receiving statins (97.5%) and about half were on additional ezetimibe (47.5%). Based on the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines the percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals was only 2.7%. Following theoretical up titration to rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 40/10 mg, LDL-C target achievement rate would increase to 5.9%. In this scenario, most patients (55.9%) would be eligible for PCSK9i treatment. Following theoretical administration of a PCSK9i, LDL-C target achievement rate would rise to 57.6%. However, 42.4% of patients would still be eligible for further LDL-C lowering treatment., Conclusions: Most FH patients do not reach new LDL-C targets even if on maximum intensity statin/ezetimibe treatment. In this case, more than half of FH patients are candidates for PCSK9i therapy and a considerable proportion may still require additional LDL-C lowering., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Ezetimibe and pemafibrate are lipid-lowering drugs and promote reverse cholesterol transport. However, it is unknown whether cholesterol is mainly excreted by hepatobiliary excretion or by non-biliary transintestinal cholesterol efflux (TICE). We evaluated the effects of ezetimibe and pemafibrate on hepatic and intestinal cholesterol transporter regulation in Sham-operated rats, and examined the effects of these drugs on TICE in bile duct-ligated rats. Seven-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated as follows for two weeks: 1) Sham, Sham operation; 2) BDL, bile duct ligation; 3) E-Sham, Sham + ezetimibe; 4) E-BDL, BDL + ezetimibe; 5) P-Sham, Sham + pemafibrate; and 6) P-BDL, BDL + pemafibrate. Blood, liver, jejunum, and feces were collected 72 h post-surgery. Hepatic cholesterol levels were decreased in P-Sham and E-Sham, and were lower in E-BDL and P-BDL than in BDL. Fecal cholesterol levels increased in E-Sham and P-Sham compared with Sham, and were higher in E-BDL and P-BDL than in BDL. In liver, Abcg5 mRNA showed induction in E-Sham, Abcg5 and Abca1 mRNA were induced in P-Sham, Abcg5 mRNA was reduced in E-BDL, and Abca1 mRNA was increased in P-BDL. In jejunum, Abcg5 mRNA was induced in E-Sham. Abcg8 mRNA was induced in E-Sham and P-Sham. NPC1L1 mRNA showed reduced expression in P-Sham and P-BDL. SR-B1 mRNA was reduced in P-Sham, and the expression decreased in P-BDL. LDL receptor mRNA was induced in BDL and P-BDL. Ezetimibe and pemafibrate may promote TICE by increasing Abcg5/g8, while pemafibrate may inhibit intestinal cholesterol absorption by decreasing SR-B1 and NPC1L1., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The 2021 guidelines primary panel selected clinically relevant questions and produced updated recommendations, on the basis of important new findings that have emerged since the 2016 guidelines. In patients with clinical atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, most patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and those with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 5 mmol/L, statin therapy continues to be recommended. We have introduced the concept of lipid/lipoprotein treatment thresholds for intensifying lipid-lowering therapy with nonstatin agents, and have identified the secondary prevention patients who have been shown to derive the largest benefit from intensification of therapy with these agents. For all other patients, we emphasize risk assessment linked to lipid/lipoprotein evaluation to optimize clinical decision-making. Lipoprotein(a) measurement is now recommended once in a patient's lifetime, as part of initial lipid screening to assess cardiovascular risk. For any patient with triglycerides ˃ 1.5 mmol/L, either non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or apolipoprotein B are the preferred lipid parameter for screening, rather than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We provide updated recommendations regarding the role of coronary artery calcium scoring as a clinical decision tool to aid the decision to initiate statin therapy. There are new recommendations on the preventative care of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Health behaviour modification, including regular exercise and a heart-healthy diet, remain the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention. These guidelines are intended to provide a platform for meaningful conversation and shared-decision making between patient and care provider, so that individual decisions can be made for risk screening, assessment, and treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Cardiovascular risk in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) is driven by LDL cholesterol levels. Since lipid response to statin therapy presents individual variation, this study aimed to compare mean LDL and non-HDL cholesterol reductions and their variability achieved with different types and doses of the most frequently prescribed statins., Methods and Results: Among primary hypercholesterolaemia cases on the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society registry, 2894 with probable/definite HeFH and complete information on drug therapy and lipid profile were included. LDL cholesterol reduction ranged from 30.2 ± 17.0% with simvastatin 10 mg to 48.2 ± 14.7% with rosuvastatin 40 mg. After the addition of ezetimibe, an additional 26, 24, 21 and 24% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels was obtained for rosuvastatin, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg, respectively. Subjects with definite HeFH and a confirmed genetic mutation had a more discrete LDL cholesterol reduction compared to definite HeFH subjects with no genetic mutation. A suboptimal response (<15% or <30% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels, respectively with low-/moderate-intensity and high-intensity statin therapy) was observed in 13.5% and, respectively, 20.3% of the subjects., Conclusion: According to the LDL cholesterol reduction in HeFH patients, the ranking for more to less potent statins was rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin; however, at maximum dosage, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were nearly equivalent. HeFH subjects with positive genetic diagnosis had a lower lipid-lowering response. Approximately 1 in 5 patients on high-intensity statin therapy presented a suboptimal response., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Climent has nothing to disclose. Dr. Marco-Benedí has nothing to disclose. Dr. Benaiges has nothing to disclose. Dr. Pintó reports personal consulting fees from Amgen and Sanofy, and payment for lectures from Astra-Zeneca, Esteve, Ferrer and Mylan. Dr. Manuel Suárez Tembra payment for lectures from Mylan and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr. Plana has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lafuente reports payment for lectures from Amgen, Ferrer, Mylan and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ortega-Martínez de Victoria reports personal fees from Amgen, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi, NovoNordisk, Lilly-Boehringer, non-financial support from Amgen, MSD, Sanofi, NovoNordisk, grants from Amgen, outside the submitted work. Dr. Brea–Hernando payment for lectures from Mylan and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr. Vila has nothing to disclose. Dr. Civeira reports personal fees from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD Spain and Sanofy, outside the submitted work. Dr. Pedro-Botet reports consulting fees from Amgen, Mylan and Sanofi, and payment for lectures from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Mylan and Sanofi, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) is a rare form of genetic hypercholesterolemia caused by mutations in low density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1 (LDLRAP1). The proband first presented with linear eruptive xanthomas over her ankles, knees and elbows, with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 16.0 mmol/L (618.7 mg/dL), at 2.5 years old. Next generation sequencing revealed a novel homozygous mutation in LDLRAP1 exon 5 (c.466delG). In the first year, drug regimens of either cholestyramine or simvastatin, reduced her LDL-C to 10.5 mmol/L (406 mg/dL) and 11.7 mmol/L (452.4 mg/dL), respectively. Combination simvastatin and ezetimibe was the mainstay of therapy from age 5 - 10 years. Her lowest achieved LDL-C was 6.3 mmol/L (243.6 mg/dL). Switching to atorvastatin did not lead to further reduction. Carotid intima-media thickness was 0.47 mm (> 97 th percentile) and 0.32 mm (75 - 95 th percentile) at ages 8 years and 11 years, respectively. Addition of monthly injections of evolocumab for 3 months, led to an increase in LDL-C, from 7.0 mmol/L (270.7 mg/dL) to a range of [(8.4 - 9.1) mmol/L or (324.8 - 351.9) mg/dL]. In this report, a decade-long lipid management is described in a patient with ARH. Residual activity of LDLRAP1 is a likely determinant of her response. Clinical management remains sub-optimal and options for the paediatric population are limited. Novel classes of cholesterol-lowering medications are needed for this ultra-rare and severe hypercholesterolemia., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Much of these diseases burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that with respect to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and the recent data have strongly emphasized the need of also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, the availability of ezetimibe and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) are additional very effective approach to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. LLT is initiated as a response to an individual's calculated risk of future ASCVD and is intensified over time in order to meet treatment goals. However, in real-life clinical practice goals are not met in a substantial proportion of patients. This Position Paper complements existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS. Bearing in mind the very high risk of further events in ACS, we propose practical solutions focusing on immediate combination therapy in strict clinical scenarios, to improve access and adherence to LLT in these patients. We also define an 'Extremely High Risk' group of individuals following ACS, completing the attempt made in the recent European guidelines, and suggest mechanisms to urgently address lipid-medicated cardiovascular risk in these patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may be crucial in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9-i) on steatosis biomarkers such as triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) and hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and analyse the role of TG/HDL in this population before and after adding-on PCSK9-i., Methods and Results: In this observational study, we evaluated 26 genetically confirmed FH patients with NAFLD and an LDL-C off-target despite high-intensity statins plus ezetimibe. All patients added PCSK9-i treatment and obtained biochemical analysis and TyG and HSI evaluation at baseline and after six months of PCSK9-i. No difference of steatosis biomarkers was found after adding-on PCSK9-i therapy. In a secondary analysis, we divided the study population in two groups according to TG/HDL median value: high TG/HDL group (H-TG/HDL) and low TG/HDL group (L-TG/HDL). TyG and HSI were significantly lower in the L-TG/HDL than H-TG/HDL group (for TyG 9.05 ± 0.34 vs 9.51 ± 0.32; for HSI 38.43 ± 1.35 vs 41.35 ± 1.83, p value for both < 0.05). After six months of PCSK9-i therapy, TyG and HSI were significantly reduced in the L-TG/HDL group after PCSK9-i therapy (-7.5% and -8.4% respectively, p value for both < 0.05) and these biomarkers were lower compared to H-TG/HDL group (for TyG 8.37 ± 0.14 vs 9.19 ± 0.12; for HSI 35.19 ± 1.32 vs 39.48 ± 1.33, p value for both < 0.05)., Conclusion: In conclusion, PCSK9-i therapy significantly ameliorate steatosis biomarkers in FH patients with low TG/HDL; our results appear to be consistent with a beneficial role of PCSK9-i on steatosis biomarkers in FH subjects with NAFLD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinical benefit of LDL cholesterol lowering treatment in older patients remains debated. We aimed to summarise the evidence of LDL cholesterol lowering therapies in older patients., Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published between March 1, 2015, and Aug 14, 2020, without any language restrictions. We included randomised controlled trials of cardiovascular outcomes of an LDL cholesterol-lowering drug recommended by the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines, with a median follow-up of at least 2 years and data on older patients (aged ≥75 years). We excluded trials that exclusively enrolled participants with heart failure or on dialysis because guidelines do not recommend lipid-lowering therapy in such patients who do not have another indication. We extracted data for older patients using a standardised data form for aggregated study-level data. We meta-analysed the risk ratio (RR) for major vascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or other acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or coronary revascularisation) per 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol., Findings: Data from six articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, which included 24 trials from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis plus five individual trials. Among 244 090 patients from 29 trials, 21 492 (8·8%) were aged at least 75 years, of whom 11 750 (54·7%) were from statin trials, 6209 (28·9%) from ezetimibe trials, and 3533 (16·4%) from PCSK9 inhibitor trials. Median follow-up ranged from 2·2 years to 6·0 years. LDL cholesterol lowering significantly reduced the risk of major vascular events (n=3519) in older patients by 26% per 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol (RR 0·74 [95% CI 0·61-0·89]; p=0·0019), with no statistically significant difference with the risk reduction in patients younger than 75 years (0·85 [0·78-0·92]; p interaction =0·37). Among older patients, RRs were not statistically different for statin (0·82 [0·73-0·91]) and non-statin treatment (0·67 [0·47-0·95]; p interaction =0·64). The benefit of LDL cholesterol lowering in older patients was observed for each component of the composite, including cardiovascular death (0·85 [0·74-0·98]), myocardial infarction (0·80 [0·71-0·90]), stroke (0·73 [0·61-0·87]), and coronary revascularisation (0·80 [0·66-0·96])., Interpretation: In patients aged 75 years and older, lipid lowering was as effective in reducing cardiovascular events as it was in patients younger than 75 years. These results should strengthen guideline recommendations for the use of lipid-lowering therapies, including non-statin treatment, in older patients., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Changes in serum levels of angiopoietin-like protein-8 (ANGPTL8) and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high-density lipoprotein binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1) in patients with dyslipidemia after ezetimibe therapy remain to be elucidated. Thirty-eight patients who initially received ezetimibe and were followed for 16 weeks were enrolled. Various parameters were investigated before and after 16 weeks of ezetimibe treatment in all patients. In addition, the patients were also divided into metabolic syndrome (MetS) (n = 22) and Non-MetS (n = 16) groups, and various parameters were compared between these groups. ANGPTL8 was significantly positively correlated with triglyceride (TG) and negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) before treatment in all patients and in the MetS group. After treatment, TC and LDL-C were significantly decreased in all patients, and in both the MetS and Non-MetS groups, whereas there were no changes in TG or HDL-C. Serum levels of remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) significantly decreased in all patients and in the MetS group. The ANGPTL8 level before treatment was significantly positively associated with TG and negatively correlated with HDL-C in all patients and in the MetS group. ANGPTL8 and GPIHBP1were significantly decreased after treatment in all patients. GPIHBP1 was also significantly decreased after treatment in both groups. In conclusion, this is the first report to support the possibility of a new effect of ezetimibe therapy. Ezetimibe significantly decreased the serum level of LDL-C, but not TG or HDL-C, while reducing ANGPTL8 and GPIHBP1 in all patients with dyslipidemia. In addition, ezetimibe significantly decreased RLP-C levels in the MetS group., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S.M. has received lecture honoraria and grant from MSD, Co. Ltd. and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. and belong to Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Therapeutics supported by MSD, Co. Ltd. S.M.’s spouse is an employee of Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: This study aimed to elucidate whether high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) at 3-month follow-up for patients receiving contemporary lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could predict cardiac events., Methods: The HIJ-PROPER study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial comparing intensive lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin + ezetimibe) and conventional lipid-lowering therapy (pitavastatin monotherapy) after ACS. The entire cohort was divided into three groups according to tertiles of HDL-C levels at 3-month follow-up (Group 1, HDL-C ≤43 mg/dL; Group 2, HDL-C >43, <53.6 mg/dL; Group 3; HDL-C ≥53.6 mg/dL). Baseline characteristics and incidence of the primary endpoint (a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina pectoris, or ischemia-driven revascularization) were compared among the three groups., Results: The primary endpoint event occurred in 34.8%, 30.1%, and 24.6% of patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and its incidence was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.9; p = 0.001). Irrespective of the treatment regimen, Group 1 had significantly higher rates of the primary endpoint than Group 3 (pitavastatin + ezetimibe therapy: HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.12-2.22; p = 0.01 and pitavastatin monotherapy: HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.98; p = 0.02). These trends remained even after adjustment for baseline characteristics and lipid profiles. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower body mass index, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, higher levels of high-sensitivity C reactive protein at baseline, and lower levels of HDL-C at 3-month follow-up were independent predictors of the incidence of primary endpoint., Conclusions: Lower levels of HDL-C at 3-month follow-up are independently associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events in ACS patients receiving contemporary lipid-lowering therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have the following disclosures: all members of the HIJ-PROPER study group have received research support to perform clinical trials from the Japan Research Promotion Society for Cardiovascular Diseases, which is sponsored by Abbott Vascular Japan Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Boston Scientific Corporation, Bristol-Myers K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi K.K., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. NH reports honoraria from Bristol-Myers K.K. and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., and grants from Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. JY belongs to the Clinical Research Division for Cardiovascular Catheter Intervention, which is financially maintained by donations from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Terumo. The HIJ-PROPER Steering Committee had full access to all data of the present study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effects of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels on clinical outcomes in chronic-phase acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing aggressive lipid-lowering therapy remain unclear. We examined the effects of hs-CRP levels on the prognosis of ACS patients who underwent aggressive lipid-lowering therapy and determined treatment targets for hs-CRP value., Methods: This post-hoc sub-analysis of a prospective randomized control trial (HIJ-PROPER) included 1734 ACS patients with dyslipidemia, who were divided into hs-CRP quartiles after 3 months of treatment. Primary endpoints were combined all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina, and ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. Secondary endpoint was all-cause death., Results: The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Overall, 1415 patients were evaluated retrospectively. No significant among-group differences were noted in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels over time (p = 0.44). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the incidence of the primary and secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the highest hs-CRP group than in the other groups [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.00, p < 0.01; HR = 5.30, 95% CI = 2.47-11.32, p < 0.01, respectively]. The cut-off hs-CRP level to predict all-cause death was 0.74 mg/L (receiver operating characteristic curve: sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 62%). Multivariate analyses revealed that hs-CRP ≥0.74 mg/L　at 3 months was correlated with an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR = 3.68, 95% CI = 2.22-6.10, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Elevated hs-CRP levels independently predicted a worse prognosis, regardless of LDL-C levels, suggesting that interventions against elevated inflammatory responses plus intensive lipid-lowering therapy and coronary revascularization are encouraging options for secondary prevention in ACS patients., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000002742. Trial name: Proper level of lipid lowering with pitavastatin and ezetimibe in acute coronary syndrome (HIJ-PROPER) URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr-view.cgi?recptno=R000003334., (Copyright © 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The relevance of the IMPROVE-IT trial on real-life practice has not been explored in patients with ACS., Methods: A prospective Swiss cohort of 6266 patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 with a one-year follow-up. The primary endpoints were the ezetimibe use overall or in combination with high-intensity statin at discharge and at one year after ACS. Secondary endpoint was LDL-C target achievement at one year in a subsample of 2984 patients. Relative Ratios (RR) were used to assess changes in primary endpoints before and after the publication of IMPROVE-IT, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, LDL-C and attendance to cardiac rehabilitation., Results: The period following the publication of the IMPROVE-IT trial was associated with a steady increase in the use of ezetimibe at discharge (from 1.8% to 3.8%, P < 0.001, adjusted RR 2.85, 95% CI 1.90-4.25) and at one year (from 5.0% to 13.8%, P < 0.001, adjusted RR 3.00, 95% CI 2.40-3.75). The combination of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe rose from 0.9% to 2.1% at discharge (P < 0.001, adjusted RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.90-5.89) and from 2.1% to 7.8% at one year (P < 0.001, adjusted RR 3.98, 95% CI 2.90-5.47). The period following the publication of the IMPROVE-IT trial was associated with an improvement of LDL-C target <1.8 mmol/L (adjusted RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68)., Conclusions: After the publication of the IMPROVE-IT trial, the use of ezetimibe was increased by three-fold in a large contemporary cohort of ACS patients, concomitant with an improved LDL-C target achievement., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Prof. Lüscher reports receiving research grants to the institution from Abbott, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Daichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Medtronic, and consultant payments from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Merck, and Pfizer, MSD, Roche and Servier. Prof. Matter received grants from MSD, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche and Bayer; expert testimony from MSD; payment for lectures from MSD, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and patents from Mabimmune, CH. Prof. Windecker reports research contracts to the institution from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, Cordis, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical. Prof Mach reports receiving research grants to the institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Sanofi, and Pfizer. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Drugs reducing plasma concentrations of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in both primary and secondary prevention. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of statins and ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration and long-term CVD risk, a large number of patients do not achieve their therapeutic goals. The introduction of monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein was a milestone in the treatment of lipid disorders, as their administration leads to unprecedentedly low LDL cholesterol concentrations. Inclisiran represents an entirely new mechanism of PSCK9 protein inhibition in hepatocytes, targeting the messenger RNA for PCSK9. Its administration is necessary only every 3 to 6 months, which is an essential advantage over statin and monoclonal antibody therapy. The infrequent administration regimen can increase the number of patients who maintain their therapeutic goals, especially in patients struggling to comply with daily or biweekly pharmacotherapy. Preclinical studies and Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of inclisiran have demonstrated its tolerability and efficacy in promoting long-term reduction of both PCSK9 protein and LDL cholesterol. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran will continue to be assessed in ongoing and forthcoming trials on larger patient groups. If the results of these trials reflect previously published data, they will add further evidence that inclisiran might be a revolutionary new tool in the pharmacologic management of plasma lipids. This review summarizes the currently available literature data on inclisiran with respect to its mechanism of action, effectiveness, and safety as a lipid-lowering drug for CVD prevention., (Copyright © 2020 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic impact of increased left atrial (LA) volume in mild-to-moderate aortic valve stenosis (AS) is unclear. We investigated the association of estimated LA volume with prognosis in a large prospective study of patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS., Methods: The association of estimated LA volume with major cardiovascular events (MACE, combined cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization and non-hemorrhagic stroke) was assessed in 1534 patients with initially mild-to moderate asymptomatic AS, participating in the Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study for a median of 4.3 years. LA volume was estimated from LA diameter applying a validated nonlinear equation and indexed to body height in meters squared (eLAVI). An enlarged eLAVI was identified by using sex-specific cut-offs (>19 ml/height 2 in men and >17 ml/height 2 in women)., Results: Patients with enlarged eLAVI were older, more obese, and had higher systolic blood pressure and left ventricular (LV) mass index (all p < 0.001). During follow-up, incident MACE occurred in 137 patients, more often in patients with enlarged eLAVI (20% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001). Using aortic valve replacement as a competing risk event, enlarged eLAVI at baseline predicted increased hazard rate (HR) of MACE (HR 2.21 [95% confidence interval 1.37-3.55], p = 0.001) independent of significant associations with presence of LV hypertrophy, older age, higher peak aortic jet velocity, serum creatinine and lower LV ejection fraction and stroke volume., Conclusions: Presence of enlarged eLAVI was independently associated with increased risk of MACE in patients with mild-to moderate asymptomatic AS., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elevated remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C) levels increase cardiovascular disease risk. However, RLP-C measurement methods are not standardized, leading to variations across studies., Objective: To evaluate the effect of ezetimibe (Eze) + statins vs statin monotherapy on RLP-C using immunoseparation (IM), vertical auto profile (VAP) ultracentrifugation, and calculated RLP-C measurement methods., Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated data pooled from 3 first-line (all-statin [simvastatin 10/20/40/80 mg] vs Eze + statin [Eze 10 mg + simvastatin]) and 2 second-line (statin [atorvastatin uptitrated to 40/80 mg] vs statin + Eze [atorvastatin 20/40 mg + Eze 10 mg]) studies. Similarity of RLP-C methods was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. RLP-C changes and percent changes from baseline were measured by all 3 methods in first-line and VAP and calculated methods in second-line studies., Results: Correlations between methods were generally moderate to strong for RLP-C levels, changes, and percent changes across treatment groups (r = 0.29-0.79) but with little evidence of agreement by Bland-Altman plots. Baseline RLP-C levels for Eze + statin vs all-statin groups were lower by IM (14.0 vs 14.0) compared with VAP (36.9 vs 35.9) and calculated (32.8 vs 33.3) methods. RLP-C changes (mg/dL) and percent changes from baseline were significantly greater (P < .01) with Eze + statins vs statins by VAP, calculated, and IM methods (between-treatment differences: -5.0 and -12.0, -2.0 and -5.4, and -1.5 and -12.1, respectively) in first-line, and VAP and calculated methods (between-treatment differences: -5.0 and -19.9 and -2.0 and -7.3) in second-line studies., Conclusion: Although the 3 methods showed little agreement, each supported Eze + statins for achieving greater RLP-C reductions vs statin monotherapy; variability of results reinforces urgent need to standardize RLP-C measurements., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Maximal doses of potent statins are the basement of treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Little is known about the use of different statin regimens in FH., Objectives: The objectives of the study were to describe the treatment changes and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement with atorvastatin (ATV) and rosuvastatin (RV) in the SAFEHEART cohort, as well as to analyze the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (ACVEs) and changes in the cardiovascular risk., Methods: SAFEHEART is a prospective follow-up nationwide cohort study in a molecularly defined FH population. The patients were contacted on a yearly basis to obtain relevant changes in life habits, medication, and ACVEs., Results: A total of 1939 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 6.6 years (5-10). The estimated 10-year risk according the SAFEHEART risk equation was 1.61 (0.67-3.39) and 1.22 (0.54-2.93) at enrollment for ATV and RV, respectively (P < .001). There were no significant differences at the follow-up: 1.29 (0.54-2.82) and 1.22 (0.54-2.76) in the ATV and RV groups, respectively (P = .51). Sixteen percent of patients in primary prevention with ATV and 18% with RV achieved an LDL-C <100 mg/dL and 4% in secondary prevention with ATV and 5% with RV achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. The use of ezetimibe was marginally greater in the RV group. One hundred sixty ACVEs occurred during follow-up, being its incidence rate 1.1 events/100 patient-years in the ATV group and 1.2 in the RV group (P = .58)., Conclusion: ATV and RV are 2 high-potency statins widely used in FH. Although the reduction in LDL-C levels was greater with RV than with ATV, the superiority of RV for reducing ACVEs was not demonstrated., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Statin-based treatments reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD), but it is unclear which regimen is the most cost-effective. We used the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) CKD-CVD policy model to evaluate the effect of statins and ezetimibe on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care costs in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). Net costs below $100,000/QALY (US) or £20,000/QALY (UK) were considered cost-effective. We investigated statin regimens with or without ezetimibe 10 mg. Treatment effects on cardiovascular risk were estimated per 1-mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as reported in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis, and reductions in LDL cholesterol were estimated for each statin/ezetimibe regimen. In the US, atorvastatin 40 mg ($0.103/day as of January 2019) increased life expectancy by 0.23 to 0.31 QALYs in non-dialysis patients with stages 3B to 5 CKD, at a net cost of $20,300 to $78,200/QALY. Adding ezetimibe 10 mg ($0.203/day) increased life expectancy by an additional 0.05 to 0.07 QALYs, at a net cost of $43,600 to $91,500/QALY. The cost-effectiveness findings and policy implications in the UK were similar. In summary, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, the evidence suggests that statin/ezetimibe combination therapy is a cost-effective treatment to reduce the risk of CVD., (Copyright © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Differences in lipid and cardiovascular risk profiles have been observed in African-American/black (AA/B), white (W), and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) individuals. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, may vary by race and ethnicity and has not been analyzed., Objective: This post hoc analysis evaluated alirocumab efficacy and safety vs control in 3 pooled ODYSSEY phase 3 trials (COMBO I, COMBO II, and LONG TERM) by race (AA/B [n = 154] vs W [n = 1982]) and ethnicity (H/L [n = 174] vs non-H/L [n = 3149])., Methods: Patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite maximally tolerated statin received alirocumab (75 mg up to 150 mg every 2 weeks [COMBO I & II] or 150 mg every 2 weeks [LONG TERM]) or control (placebo [COMBO I and LONG TERM] or ezetimibe [COMBO II])., Results: At baseline, LDL-C levels were similar across treatment groups; median lipoprotein(a) levels were higher in AA/B (33.0-120.0 mg/dL) vs W (7.1-66.3 mg/dL) and lower in H/L (5.0-38.3 mg/dL) vs non-H/L (7.7-69.0 mg/dL). At week 24, alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C vs control. Alirocumab also reduced lipoprotein(a) compared with control across the subgroups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between alirocumab (68.9-85.0%) and control (70.6-82.4%) regardless of race and ethnicity., Conclusion: Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and Lp(a) levels compared with control, regardless of race and ethnicity, with overall safety comparable to control across most of the racial and ethnic groups analyzed., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The cross-sectional observational International ChoLesterol management Practice Study study assessed achievement of European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients outside Western Europe., Objective: The aim of the study was to assess LDL-C goal achievement in International ChoLesterol management Practice Study participants with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)., Methods: A total of 334 patients (aged ≥18 years) with definite or probable FH (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6; 43.1% genetically confirmed) who had been receiving stable lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for ≥3 months were enrolled., Results: The mean ± standard deviation age of the patients was 58.5 ± 13.1 years, 49.1% were male, and 48.2% had coronary artery disease. Most were receiving statin (∼99%). Of these, 57.6% were on high-intensity statin therapy, 49.1% on the highest dose available, and 13.0% used a statin together with a cholesterol absorption inhibitor (CAI). Mean ± standard deviation LDL-C level was 5.6 ± 3.0 mmol/L before LMT and 3.3 ± 2.0 mmol/L at enrollment. Overall, 32.0% of patients achieved their LDL-C target. Target achievement rates were 36.6% for patients with coronary artery disease, and 27.5% for those without, and 27.9%, 28.0%, and 37.5% for patients treated with a statin plus CAI, highest-dose statin (no CAI), and lower-dose statin (no CAI), respectively., Conclusions: LDL-C target achievement rates were low in patients with FH, even in those receiving intensive LMT. Factors that are likely to have contributed to the low LDL-C target achievement rates include high baseline LDL-C, inadequate statin dosages, and low use of CAI. Many patients would have been eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor therapy., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at high risk of early myocardial infarction (MI). However, coronary artery disease (CAD) burden of FH remains not well described, especially for French patients., Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of FH and severity of CAD from a large database of a French regional registry of acute MI., Methods: All consecutive patients hospitalized for an acute MI in a multicenter database from 2001 to 2017 were considered. FH was diagnosed using an algorithm adapted from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria. The prevalence and clinical features of FH and the severity of CAD were assessed., Results: Among the 11,624 patients included in the study, the proportion of "probable/definite", "possible", and "unlikely" FH in patients with MI was 2.1% (n = 249), 20.7% (n = 2405), and 77.2% (n = 8970), respectively. When compared with patients with "unlikely" FH, patients with "probable/definite" FH were 20 years younger (51 vs 71, P < .001), with a lower rate of diabetes (17% vs 25%, P = .007) and a higher prevalence of personal and familial history of CAD. Chronic statin treatment was only used in 48% of FH patients and ezetimibe in 8%. After adjustment for age, sex, and diabetes, patients with FH were characterized by increased extent of CAD (SYNTAX score 11 vs 7, P < .001) and multivessel disease (55% vs 40%, P < .001)., Conclusions: In this large cohort of French individuals, FH was common in patients with MI, associated with markedly early age of MI and severity of CAD burden and limited use of preventive lipid-lowering therapy., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present a 37-year-old man diagnosed with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia who presented with the severe hyperlipidemic phenotype. None of the usual metabolic triggers were found to explain his severe lipid abnormalities. Genetic analysis revealed the expected APOE E2/E2 genotype, but no other mutations were found to explain any monogenic dyslipidemia or syndrome. Polygenic risk scores for quantitative lipid traits did reveal scores placing the patient in the >99th percentile for the general population concerning polygenic susceptibility for both high cholesterol and triglycerides. Owing to his gastrointestinal intolerance to two high-intensity statins, he was treated with both ezetimibe 10 mg a day and evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks. All measures of potentially atherogenic lipids were markedly improved and remained so for more than 10 months of follow-up. This case report shows an unusual trigger for severe hyperlipidemia with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia and a favorable therapeutic response to the combination of ezetimibe and evolocumab., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)