Search

The French society of oncological radiotherapy (Société française de radiothérapie oncologique, SFRO) was created in 1990. On the occasion of its thirtieth annual congress, in October 2019, a session was devoted to it, with the objective of exposing its functioning, its actions and its productions during these three decades during which radiotherapy and oncology have undergone unprecedented transformations. We propose in this article to outline the content of this session., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Hypofractionation is not a new idea in radiotherapy. The use of a few high-dose fractions has been proposed by some pioneers of our specialty in the early years of the 20th century. Hypofractionation then reappeared several times in the next decades, based on successive radiobiological concepts, a number of them having been shown to be wrong. The nominal single dose (NSD), for example, so fashionable in the 1970's, dramatically underestimated the late toxicity of the high-dose fractions. Consequently, the NSD was directly responsible for a significant increase of the incidence and of the severity of late complications in large cohorts of patients. The linear-quadratic model (LQ) unequivocally improved our understanding of fractionation sensitivity, but one has to keep in mind its limitations, both in the areas of low and high doses per fraction. For more than a decade, prostate cancer has been the subject of fierce discussions about its sensitivity to fractionation. A number of studies have suggested an unusually low (for a malignant tumor) alpha/beta ratio. However, the available data do not allow a precise evaluation of this ratio; "very low" (1.5 Gy), with an advantage of hypofractionation in terms of local control? Or simply "low" (3-4 Gy), only allowing a reduction of the total number of fractions (with a dose adequately reduced)? While waiting for complementary data, it is advised to remain very careful when modifying the classical schemes towards hypofractionation., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

Many clinical studies have showed the key role of radiotherapy in anticancer treatment strategy. Radiations are delivered alone or in combination with systemic therapies. In recent years, the main goal of all clinical developments has focused on improving clinical benefit, with an increased tumour control and a higher normal tissue protection. This research was designed to reduce local recurrences, to increase recurrence-free or overall survival and to decrease acute and late effects. Technological and biological evolutions (or revolutions) accompanied clinicians to improve clinical benefit, namely with strong progress in radiology and better understanding of radiobiology, particularly at the molecular level. Differences in tumour and normal tissues radiosensitivity are nowadays integrated in daily clinical practice of radiation oncologists. The current report details the last 5-year developments of clinical and translational research in radiation oncology, especially the role of French teams in the development of personalized treatment., (Copyright © 2012 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

For the second year, the French Radiotherapy Database presents information from French radiation oncology centers. Among 179 centers, 159 have participated (90 %). The number of accelerators increased from 371 to 384 between 2006 and 2007, 11 % of these machines are more than 15 years old. On average, centers are open 50 hours per week for treatment and 9.5 % more for maintenance. The lack of dedicated CT remains a difficulty: 158 from 159 centers have an access to a CT, but only 50 % have a dedicated scanner. There is no progress compared to 2006. The proportion of centers having a MU double calculation system has increased from 51 to 58 %. Two thirds of centers do not implement in vivo dosimetry. The activity is stable around 190 000 treatments per year. Three-dimension conformal radiotherapy is used for more than half of treatments in 77.2 % of private centers and 50 % of public hospitals. Intensity modulated radiotherapy remains rarely used. The number of radiation oncologists and technologists remains stable. The number of radiophysicists has increased from 7.6 %. Despite some progress, the difficulties of this speciality persist in France and are equally distributed across all regions, and between private and public centers. In 2009, the French Society for Radiation Oncology and the associated partners will continue this survey, which interest is recognized by both professionals and health administrations.

Within the frame of Plan cancer and events of radioprotection which occurred since 2005, the community of radiation oncologists is aware under the umbrella of SFRO of the technologic, structural and cultural mutation that our discipline is going through, with the support of the tutelages. We report on the actions the SFRO has participated with, or initiated these last 2 years.

The influence of thermoplastic masks used in clinical routine for patient immobilization in head and neck radiotherapy treatment on the absorbed skin dose has been investigated at Gustave-Roussy Institute. The measurements were performed in 60Co gamma-rays, 4 and 6MV X-rays and in 8 and 10MeV electron beams. Initially, the measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF) and a NACP chamber on a polystyrene phantom in order to study the influence of physical parameters (distance, field size, energy...) on first millimeters depth variation dose. The study was completed with in vivo measurements on 14 patients using various dosimeters (thermoluminescent detectors, diodes) in order to assess the increase of dose on first millimeters depth and to verify the delivered dose during treatment sessions (quality control). In treatment conditions, masks lead to an important increase of dose on the first millimeter in 60Co gamma-rays beams (dose value normalized to maximum of dose increase from 57.1% to 77.7% for 0.5 mm-water depth and from 78.5% to 88% for 1 mm-water depth); its contribution is less important in 4 and 6 MV X-rays beams (dose value normalized to maximum of dose increase from 49.5% to 63.2% for 0.5 mm-water depth and from 59% to 70.1% for 1 mm-water depth). Concerning 8 and 10 MeV electron beams, the normalized dose value increase respectively from 78.4% to 81.7% and from 82.2% to 86.1% for 0.5 mm-water depth. In vivo dosimetry enabled the quality control of delivered dose during treatment. Measured dose is in agreement within +/- 5% with the prescribed dose for 92.3% of cases. In routine, in vivo dosimetry allowed to quantify the increase of skin dose induced by thermoplastic masks for various energies of photon and electron beams as well as quality control.

Answering the question from patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate is always difficult; choice of radiation therapy (versus prostatectomy), indications of brachytherapy frequency and severity of acute and late effects as rate of survival, local control, are among the most frequent inquiries. A part of the answers are not evident of due lack, consensus and the physicians need to speak honestly and give the most appropriate responses without improving anxiety and fears of the patient.

Nasopharynx carcinomas (NPC) are a very special head and neck cancer, in term of epidemiology, clinic and pathology. Endemic disease in South East Asia, undifferentiated nasopharynx carcinoma are very frequent CT scan and NMR allow a better knowledge of the modalities of the clinical presentation. Prognostic factors include local and regional extension. NPC is a wellknown radiosensitive disease with a dose-response curve well established. Modern imaging modalities and modification of the ballistic explain the amelioration of the local control and the diminution of therapeutic sequellae. Brachytherapy is an interesting modalities for the boost and the treatment of recurrent disease. The exact place of 3 D CRT and IMRT is not yet known as modifications of fractionation. Local control for T1T2 tumor is excellent but is related to clinical extension (cranial and neurologic involvement) and nodal extension (supra clavicular N3) and show the interest of combined chemo-radiotherapy protocols.

The paper deals with the recent improvements introduced in the most usual method applied in the Institut Gustave Roussy radiotherapy department for obtaining the anatomical data of patients treated for head and neck tumors. For each of these patients, five to seven transverses slices and a lateral radiographic film are taken from a Mecaserto simulator-CT. The anatomical representation of the patient sagittal plane is carried out from the digitalisation of the radiographic film on a Vidar Vxr-12 Plus film scanner and integrated into the Dosigray dose calculation programme in order to be used as a support for the laying out of the dose distribution in reference to the treatment. The sagittal anatomical representation obtained from the radiographic film digitalisation is compared with the one resulting from the interpolation between a limited number of irregularly-spaced transverse slices taken on the simulator-CT. The method using the simulator-scanner transverse slices and the radiographic film digitalisation represents an interesting alternative for obtaining an anatomy simulation representative of the patient in hospitals where a scanner is not available full-time for the needs of the radiotherapy process.

Purpose: Validation of biological dosimetry versus physical dosimetry in malignant haemopathy patients conditioned by total body irradiation (TBI) before bone marrow transplantation (BMT)., Patients and Methods: The scoring of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes irradiated in vivo was used to perform the biological dosimetry. The data were compared to those obtained with healthy volunteers' total blood exposed to in vitro irradiation with linear accelerator doses (0.2, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Gy) for dose-response curves. In experimental animal models, can in vivo and in vitro responses be considered as being the same? All the published human data are based on retrospective dose evaluation with very large uncertainties on the dose precisely delivered to the subject. TBI before BMT was taken as a model where the dose calculation results from the physical method, with homogeneous beam and dose delivered precisely along the entire organism. In vivo response allows us to validate biological dosimetry in 15 adult patients (female + male), before (D = 0 Gy) and after the first fraction of 1.8 Gy, delivered by a linear accelerator (18 MV, dose-rate of 15.8 cGy/min-1). Two methods, conventional cytogenetics (CCG) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH painting) of chromosome 4 were respectively used to analyze the unstable chromosome aberrations and stable chromosome aberrations., Results: Healthy volunteer lymphocytes, before irradiation, yielded 0.1% dicentrics and 0.3% translocations of chromosome 4, with 2.5% for the whole genome. Patients before irradiation had 2% dicentrics and 11.48% chromosome 4 translocations for the whole genome. In the 15 patients, for a physical dose of 1.8 Gy, the evaluated biological dose was 1.93 Gy (95% CI: 1.85-2.05 Gy) with conventional cytogenetics and 2.06 Gy (95% CI: 1.75-2.15 Gy) with FISH., Conclusion: These results, in which the biologically estimated dose is in complete agreement with the dose calculated by physical dosimetry in the homogeneous irradiation model, suggest the validation of biological dosimetry in TBI conditioning.

The objective of this study was to review randomized trials which evaluated the effect of the radio-chemotherapy in head and neck carcinoma, and which compared radiotherapy alone vs the same local treatment plus chemotherapy. Over 40 such randomized trials have been performed, which generally showed no statistical difference between both arms. However few trials showed a benefit which is almost always in favor of the CT arm. Indeed, some trials of concomitant chemoradiotherapy have shown a statistically significant benefit in favor of the combined treatment. On the contrary, neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally leads to no detectable benefit compared to radiotherapy alone. These results have been reinforced by those of four randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the same chemotherapy but given concomitantly with radiotherapy. The global effect of chemotherapy on survival of patients with head & neck squamous cell carcinoma has been recently evaluated by a meta-analysis based on individual patient data which included more than 10,000 patients from 63 randomized trials. The absolute survival rate benefit at 5 years is 4%, but is more pronounced in the concomitant combinations (8% at 5 years). In tumors classified as "T3" of the pharyngo-larynx, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in good responders can avoid a total laryngectomy without significantly compromised survival. In the nasopharynx carcinoma, a few randomized studies have been performed, suggesting a benefit in favor of chemoradiotherapy. Finally, future randomized trials will determine what are the optimal chemoradiotherapy schedules, as well as determining what is the best radiotherapy (accelerated, hyperfractionated) to use in combination with chemotherapy.

The conservation of a functional larynx is an important goal in the various attempts to improve the treatment of locally-advanced pharyngo-laryngeal cancers. Several axes have been followed: conservative surgery (subtotal laryngectomy), exclusive irradiation (with conventional or non-conventional fractionation), initial chemotherapy (followed by surgery or irradiation) or concomitant chemotherapy-radiotherapy. The numerous studies, including some major randomised trials, dealing with the issue of larynx preservation are reviewed in the present article. A critical comparison of their results and its integration in a consistent approach are difficult, especially because the different options are aimed at different patients. Total laryngectomy and its psychological and social consequences can be avoided in a significant number of patients, although the long term functional outcome is poorly known and the choice of the optimal treatment modality is largely dependent on the expertise and experience of the medical team.

Background: Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with an increased risk of second malignant neoplasm (SMN). An association between SMN and familial aggregation has also been shown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of familial factors in the risk of SMN and their potential interaction with the effect of treatment., Methods: We devised a case-control study of 25 children with SMN (cases) and 96 children with no SMN after a cancer treatment (controls), taken from a cohort of 649 children treated at our institution between 1953 and 1985. A complete family history was obtained for patients and controls and a familial index defined to evaluate the degree of familial aggregation. The radiation dose given at 151 sites in the body was estimated for each radiotherapy course for each child., Findings: Among family members of the 25 SMN cases, there were ten with early-onset (< or = 45 years) cancer, compared with eight among relatives of the 96 controls. Compared with patients who had no family history of early-onset cancer, those with one or more affected family members had an odds ratio for SMN of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-17.1; p = 0.02). Adjustment for local radiation dose and exclusion of patients known to be predisposed to SMN (carriers of p53 mutation and those with Recklinghausen's disease) did not affect this risk substantially., Interpretation: Both genetic factors and exposure to ionising radiation have independent effects on the risk of SMN. Follow-up of children treated for cancer should be especially vigilant when there is a family history of early-onset cancer.

The prognosis for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains poor. Besides surgical treatment of operable localised tumours, many questions are raised: what is the role of adjuvant therapies, chemo-radiotherapy, pre-operative or post-operative combinations, and what is the role of radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy during surgery? In the case of inoperable tumours, there is no consensus on the role and the value of various protocols whose toxicity is generally high. Improvements in treatment must come from a better understanding of the role of various prognostic factors (biological markers in particular).

From 1981 to 1985, 428 patients presenting with an epidermoid carcinoma of the hypopharynx and/or larynx were treated with a curative intent by surgical resection and postoperative irradiation. Two-thirds of the tumours were T3 and 60% of patients presented with a clinical node involvement. The rates of local failure were 8%, 18% and 13%, respectively, for cancers of the larynx, of the piriform sinus and of the posterior wall; the rates of regional failure were 8%, 23% and 13%, respectively. There is no head and neck site with either a high or low risk of recurrence after resection, but the capsular rupture remains a factor of poor prognosis. The survival rate at 5 years of the whole series is 38%, for laryngeal localisation it reaches 62%. The risk of metastases is related to the node involvement and the interval between surgery and irradiation.

The aim of this prospective study was to decrease the rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) with a multi-modality approach in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC). Patients presenting with squamous cell carcinoma of the pyriform sinus, epilarynx or postcricoid area with indication of pharyngolaryngectomy, without previous treatment, distant metastasis, multiple primaries or general contraindications for surgery and chemotherapy were included in the study. Patients received three consecutive cycles of chemotherapy (CDDP cisplatinium 100 mg/m2 D1, 5-FU 1 g/m2 D1 to D5) before surgery, then two postoperative courses of the same chemotherapy at day 10 and 31 after surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy was initiated at day 50. Between 1986 and 1989, of 198 patients with HSCC, 60 were included in this study. Tumour response of the induction chemotherapy was: no response (NR): 22; partial response (PR): 25; complete response (CR): 11; non evaluable: 2. Forty-seven patients underwent surgery. Only two patients had no viable tumour in the surgical specimen and two others only keratin debris. Of 39 patients in which protocol treatment was respected, 4 LRR, 4 LRR + DM, 8 DM, three second head and neck primaries, and one acute myeloblastic leukemia were observed. Results were compared with those of historical series, with the same mean delay of follow up. The rate of survival at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 42% in the present series, while it was 77% and 33% in the control group, respectively (NS).

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx (UCNT) is a particular head and neck epidermoïd lineage tumor related to the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). It has geographically selective endemic epidemiologic features, without relation to external carcinogens. Its systemic agressiveness is the source of most disease related demises, since radiotherapy achieves excellent local control and a significant percentage of cure in patients with exclusive locoregional disease. Differences in the staging systems currently in use, the recent changes in imaging and radiotherapy technology, and the lack of distinction between UCNT and SCC of the nasopharynx in Western literature reports make for some difficulty in therapeutic results evaluation when analyzing available literature. Its chemosensitivity is a relatively recent acknowledged fact, and its use in metastatic patients results in a high percentage of objective responses, many of long duration. Neoadjuvant cisplatin based chemotherapy seems to be of benefit, but outstanding controversies in this regard will be soon answered through ongoing phase III trials. After a review of the current literature of all the above mentioned aspects of this fascinating nosologic entity, our own experience in over 250 patients seen during the past 8 years, both in metastatic and locoregional disease patients is analyzed.

A quality control programme has been developed in the radiotherapy department of the Institut Gustave-Roussy for an international clinical trial on the use of Etanidazole as a radiosensitizer in association with radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. Twenty-nine european centers belonging to Germany, United Kingdom, Austria, France and Italy contributed to this trial during 374 patients has been included from 1987 to 1988. This programme concerned the control of the external radiotherapy equipment available in the participating centers and the examination of the patient treatment data. The authors present, in this paper, the methods applied and the main results obtained during the analysis of the individual patient treatment data. This analysis shows that 83% of the evaluable treatments were done in compliance with the protocol recommendations and 17% contained a major deviation and among them only 3% were judged unacceptable.