Search

Study Objective: To examine the outcomes of surgery performed for bowel endometriosis including shaving, discoid resections with hand-sewn closure, and segmental resection., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Large academic hospital., Patients: All patients with bowel wall endometriosis who underwent surgical excision with the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery between 2009 and 2022., Interventions: No interventions administered., Measurements and Main Results: From 2009 to 2022, a total of 112 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of endometriosis involving the rectum. From this cohort, 82 underwent shaving, 23 underwent discoid excision, and 7 had segmental bowel resection. The discoid excisions were closed in multiple layers with hand sewing and were not closed with a staple device. Average lesion size on preoperative imaging was 20.9 mm in the shave group, 22.5 mm in the discoid group, and 38.5 mm in the segmental group. Complication requiring reoperation for anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases (3.66%) of the shave group and 1 case (4.35%) of the discoid excision group, but did not occur in any of the segmental resections. The number of layers of closure and type of suture used did not appear to have an effect on complication rate, however, this study was not powered to detect a meaningful difference., Conclusion: Our data shows a similar rate of anastomotic leak complication for each closure type as that reported in the literature (2.2%, 9.7%, and 9.9% reported for shave, discoid and segmental resection, respectively). While our study is underpowered, these findings support that hand sewing for discoid excision is a safe and reasonable alternative to circular stapler closures and can be considered with an experienced surgeon. Further study is warranted to confirm safety and explore potential cost savings associated with this technique as well as applications in areas with less resources available., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest J.I.E. is a consultant for Arthrex. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endometriosis surgery involving the ureter poses significant challenges requiring meticulous surgical techniques and vigilant postoperative care. This chapter addresses key aspects of ureterolysis techniques, intraoperative management of ureteral injuries, and postoperative care in the context of endometriosis surgery. Ureterolysis methods aim to isolate and mobilize the ureter while preserving its vascularity. Cold instruments and careful dissection are recommended to prevent thermal injury during surgery. Intraoperative tools such as indocyanine green (ICG) show promise in assessing for vascular compromise. Over half of ureteral injuries are detected postoperatively, necessitating a high index of suspicion. Optimal postoperative care in the case of ureteral injury involves Foley catheterization for decompression, ureteral stenting, and meticulous follow-ups to monitor healing and renal function. While advances have been made in surgical techniques and diagnostic tools, gaps persist in preoperative imaging optimization and predictive models for identifying at-risk patients. This chapter aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps, optimize surgical practices, and enhance the overall care and outcomes of patients undergoing endometriosis surgery involving the ureter., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest L.R.C reports no conflict of interest., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Study Objective: The objective of this case series is to evaluate the rates of ureteral injury at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy among high-volume fellowship-trained surgeons., Design: A retrospective chart review was performed, evaluating laparoscopic hysterectomy cases between 2009 and 2019 performed exclusively by fellowship-trained surgeons., Setting: Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, a Harvard Medical School teaching hospital in Boston., Patients: All patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by one of 5 surgeons with fellowship training in MIGS., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 5160 cases were handled by MIGS surgeons between 2009 and 2019 at our institution. Of these cases, 2345 were laparoscopic hysterectomy cases with available intraoperative and postoperative documentation. Most patients had undergone previous surgeries, and the most common indications for hysterectomy included uterine myomas, pelvic pain/endometriosis, and abnormal uterine bleeding. At the time of hysterectomy, 1 ureteral injury (0.04%) was noted. No additional delayed ureteral injuries were observed. Most patients were discharged home the same day (64.9%) and did not have any postoperative complications (63.9%) as designated by the Clavien-Dindo classification., Conclusion: Ureteral injury, although rare, is more prevalent in gynecologic surgery than in other surgical disciplines that have some focus on the pelvis. No study to date has evaluated the effect of surgical training and volume on rates of ureteral injuries. This study retrospectively examined ureteral injury rates for one group of high-volume fellowship-trained surgeons and found their rates to be lower than the national average. Proposals are presented for optimizing training and delivery of gynecologic surgical care to minimize complications., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed, but do clinicians routinely use these classification systems, which system do they use and what are the clinicians' motivations?, Data Sources: A cross-sectional study was performed to gather data on the current use of endometriosis classification systems, problems encountered and interest in a new simple surgical descriptive system for endometriosis. Of particular focus were three systems most commonly used: the Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) classification, the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI), and the ENZIAN classification. Data were analysed by SPSS. A survey was designed using the online SurveyMonkey tool consisting of 11 questions concerning three domains-participants background, existing classification systems and intentions with regards to a new classification system for endometriosis. Replies were collected between 15 May and 1 July 2020., Methods of Study Selection: na TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: The final dataset included the replies of 1178 clinicians, including surgeons, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, fertility specialists and sonographers, all managing women with endometriosis in their clinical practice. Overall, 75.5% of the professionals indicate that they currently use a classification system for endometriosis. The rASRM classification system was the best known and used system, the EFI system and ENZIAN system were known by a majority of the professionals but used by only a minority. The lack of clinical relevance was most often selected as a problem with using any system. The findings of the survey suggest that clinicians worldwide are open to using a new classification system for endometriosis that can achieve standardized reporting, and is clinically relevant and simple. The findings therefore support future initiatives for the development of a new descriptive system for endometriosis and provide information on user expectations and conditions for universal uptake of such a system., Conclusion: Even with a high uptake of the existing endometriosis classification systems (rASRM, ENZIAN and EFI), most clinicians managing endometriosis would like a new simple surgical descriptive system for endometriosis., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Study Objective: Video presentation showing retroperitoneal dissection and deep pelvic side wall anatomy [1-3]., Design: Case presentation with showing anatomic structures in detail., Setting: Tertiary academic teaching hospital., Interventions: A 74-year-old female with history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and a vaginal hysterectomy with left sacrospinous ligament suspension 9 years ago presented with fever and was found to have bacteremia. Abdomen and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a presacral and precoccygeal loculated collections, sacral osteomyelitis, and fistula from the left superior vaginal vault to one of the presacral collections. Transgluteal drain placed with cultures growing Streptococcus constellatus and Gemella morbillorum. Blood cultures grew same bacteria. She was started on vancomycin, cefepime, and metronidazole and was transitioned to ceftriaxone with a plan for 6-week antibiotic course. Her blood sugar levels were well controlled during hospitalization with baseline insulin and moderate sliding scale. Physical therapy started preoperative and continued postoperative. She was managed with an interdisciplinary team of gynecologists, urogynecologists, orthopedic doctors, neurosurgeons, nutritionists, infectious disease doctors, endocrinologists, hematologists, rehabilitation specialists, and physical therapists. This video showcases laparoscopic resection of sacrospinous fistula tract. Postoperative pathology result showed squamous mucosa, submucosa, and deep soft tissue with a submucosal abscess surrounded by fibrosis, consistent with a fistula tract., Conclusion: Preoperative planning is of paramount importance in cases with multiple comorbidities. Gentle dissection with maintained hemostasis, creating windows, and starting from less distorted anatomy are key points in retroperitoneal dissection. Knowing the precise anatomy of critical structures close to the area of interest is crucial., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the field of endometriosis, several classification, staging and reporting systems have been developed. Which endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published and validated for use in clinical practice?, Data Sources: A systematic PUBMED literature search was performed. Data were extracted and summarized., Methods of Study Selection: na TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Twenty-two endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems have been published between 1973 and 2021, each developed for specific, and different, purposes. There still is no international agreement on how to describe the disease. Studies evaluating the different systems are summarized showing a discrepancy between the intended and the evaluated purpose, and a general lack of validation data confirming a correlation with pain symptoms or quality of life for any of the current systems. A few studies confirm the value of the ENZIAN system for surgical description of deep endometriosis. With regards to infertility, the endometriosis fertility index has been confirmed valid for its intended purpose., Conclusion: Of the 22 endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems identified in this historical overview, only a few have been evaluated for the purpose for which they were developed. The literature search was limited to PUBMED. Unpublished classification, staging or reporting systems, or those published in books were not considered. It can be concluded that there is no international agreement on how to describe endometriosis or how to classify it, and that most classification/staging systems show no or very little correlation with patient outcomes. This overview of existing systems is a first step in working towards a universally accepted endometriosis classification., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Dr. Horne reports grant funding from the MRC, NIHR, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring, Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust, Standard Life, Consultancy fees from Roche Diagnostics, AbbVie, Nordic Pharma and Ferring, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Horne has a patent Serum biomarker for endometriosis pending. Dr. Johnson reports personal fees from Abbott, Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Vifor Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, personal fees from Abbott, Guerbet, personal fees from Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Vifor Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; he is also President of the World Endometriosis Society and chair of the trust board. Dr. Missmer reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, and personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. Dr. Tomassetti reports grants, non-financial support and other from Merck SA, non-financial support and other from Gedeon Richter, non-financial support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work and without private revenue. Dr. Zondervan reports grants from Bayer Healthcare, MDNA Life Sciences, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Volition Rx, outside the submitted work; she is also a Board member (Secretary) of the World Endometriosis Society and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, Research Advisory Board member of Wellbeing of Women, UK (research charity), and Chair, Research Directions Working Group, World Endometriosis Society. The other authors had nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Different classification systems have been developed for endometriosis, using different definitions for the disease, the different subtypes, symptoms and treatments. In addition, an International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care has been published in 2017 by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) in collaboration with other organisations. An international working group convened over the development of a classification or descriptive system for endometriosis. As a basis for such system, a terminology for endometriosis was considered a condition sine qua non. The aim of the current study was to develop a set of terms and definitions be prepared on endometriosis that would be the basis for standardization in disease description, classification and research., Data Sources: The working group listed a number of terms relevant to be included in the terminology, documented currently used and published definitions, and discussed and adapted them until consensus was reached within the working group. Following stakeholder review, further terms were added, and definitions further clarified. Although definitions were collected through published literature, the final set of terms and definitions is to be considered consensus-based. After finalization of the first draft, the members of the international societies and other stakeholders were consulted for feedback and comments, which lead to further adaptations., Methods of Study Selection: na TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A list of 49 terms and definitions in the field of endometriosis is presented, including a definition for endometriosis and its subtypes, different locations, interventions, symptoms and outcomes. Endometriosis is defined as a disease characterized by the presence of endometrium-like epithelium and/or stroma outside the endometrium and myometrium, usually with an associated inflammatory process., Conclusion: The current paper outlines a list of 49 terms and definitions in the field of endometriosis. The application of the defined terms aims to facilitate harmonization in endometriosis research and clinical practice. Future research may require further refinement of the presented definitions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest A.W.H. reports grant funding from the MRC, NIHR, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring, Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust, Standard Life, Consultancy fees from Roche Diagnostics, AbbVie, Nordic Pharma and Ferring, outside the submitted work. In addition, A.W.H. has a patent Serum biomarker for endometriosis pending. N.P.J. reports personal fees from Abbott, Guerbet, Myovant Sciences, Vifor Pharma, Roche Diagnostics outside the submitted work; he is also President of the World Endometriosis Society and chair of the trust board. S.M. reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, and personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. C.T. reports grants, nonfinancial support and other from Merck SA, non-financial support and other from Gedeon Richter, non-financial support from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work and without private revenue. K.T.Z. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare, MDNA Life Sciences, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Volition Rx, outside the submitted work; she is also a Board member (Secretary) of the World Endometriosis Society and World Endometriosis Research Foundation, Research Advisory Board member of Wellbeing of Women, UK (research charity), and Chair, Research Directions Working Group, World Endometriosis Society. J.P reports personal fees from Hologic, Inc., outside the submitted work; he is also a member of the executive boards of ASRM and SRS. The other authors had nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 AAGL. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To assess the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic management of apical pelvic organ prolapse along with indicated vaginal repairs and anti-incontinence procedures., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary-care academic center, Boston, MA., Patients: Total of 112 patients seen in the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology clinics with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse., Interventions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, sacrocervico- or sacrocolpopexy along with vaginal prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures as indicated from 2013 to 2017 at Brigham & Women's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital performed by a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology team., Measurements and Main Results: Of the 112 patients, 52 were outpatient and 60 were admitted (median stay in admission group = 1 day; range 1-3). Patient baseline characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists' class, and pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage were similar between the outpatient and admitted cohorts. Most patients underwent hysterectomy at the time of the sacropexy (65.4% outpatient vs 73.3% admitted, p = .08). Concomitant apical prolapse repair was more common in the outpatient group (98.1% vs 85%, p = .02). The proportion of outpatient procedures increased from 17% in 2013 to a peak of 70% in 2016. Operating room time was shorter for the outpatient cohort (103.9 minutes vs 115.5 minutes, p = .04), but other perioperative outcomes were similar. There were no intraoperative complications. The numbers of postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations were low and similar between outpatient and admitted cohorts. No factor was predictive of admission on regression analysis., Conclusion: Laparoscopic apical prolapse repair with concomitant vaginal repairs can be performed safely as an outpatient procedure. A unique team approach may foster a shorter, more efficient procedure without compromising short-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This review seeks to establish the incidence of adverse outcomes associated with minimally invasive tissue extraction at the time of surgical procedures for myomas., Data Sources: Articles published in the following databases without date restrictions: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Trials. Search was conducted on March 25, 2020., Methods of Study Selection: Included studies evaluated minimally invasive surgical procedures for uterine myomas involving morcellation. This review did not consider studies of nonuterine tissue morcellation, studies involving uterine procedures other than hysterectomy or myomectomy, studies involving morcellation of known malignancies, nor studies concerning hysteroscopic myomectomy. A total of 695 studies were reviewed, with 185 studies included for analysis., Tabulation, Integration, and Results: The following variables were extracted: patient demographics, study type, morcellation technique, and adverse outcome category. Adverse outcomes included prolonged operative time, morcellation time, blood loss, direct injury from a morcellator, dissemination of tissue (benign or malignant), and disruption of the pathologic specimen., Conclusion: Complications related to morcellation are rare; however, there is a great need for higher quality studies to evaluate associated adverse outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: Morcellation is a technique to remove large specimens by means of small incisions and is commonly used in gynecologic procedures [1]. In this video, we demonstrate contained manual morcellation techniques in benign gynecologic surgeries., Design: Stepwise demonstration of 4 techniques with narrated video footage., Setting: Tertiary academic teaching hospital., Interventions: This video showcases 4 contained manual morcellation techniques: abdominal extraction through an umbilical "mini-laparotomy" incision, abdominal extraction through a suprapubic "mini-laparotomy" incision, transvaginal extraction through the colpotomy, and transvaginal extraction through the posterior cul-de-sac with the uterus in place. A particular strategy should be selected on the basis of appropriate patient characteristics and surgical factors [2]., Conclusion: Minimizing risk during tissue extraction is critical to minimally invasive procedures. The morcellation techniques displayed in this video allow for tissue extraction through small incisions while reducing the risk of spreading an undiagnosed malignancy., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Study Objective: To review pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy with the use of barbed suture., Design: Retrospective cohort study and follow-up survey., Setting: Single, large academic medical center., Patients: Patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with the use of barbed suture for myometrial closure between 2008 and 2016., Intervention: Laparoscopic myomectomy and a follow-up survey regarding pregnancy outcome., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 486 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy between 2008 and 2016. Of the 428 with viable contact information, 240 agreed to participate (56%). Of those who responded to the survey, 101 (42%) attempted to get pregnant, and there were 4 unplanned pregnancies. There were 110 pregnancies among 76 survey respondents. In total, of the women attempting a postoperative pregnancy, 71% had at least 1 pregnancy. Comparing the women who did and did not conceive postoperatively, the group who got pregnant was on average younger, 33.8 ± 4.5 years vs 37.5 ± 6.5 years (p = .001); had fewer myomas removed, median = 2 (range 1-9) vs median = 2 (range 1-16) myomas (p = .038); and had a longer follow-up period, 30 months ( vs 30 (11-93 months) ± 20 (p <.001). The mean time to first postoperative pregnancy was 18.0 months (range 2-72 months). Of the 110 reported postoperative pregnancies, there were 60 live births (55%), 90% by means of cesarean section. The mean gestational age at birth was 37.8 weeks. In the cohort, there were 8 preterm births, 3 cases of abnormal placentation, 2 cases of fetal growth restriction, 3 cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and 2 cases of myoma degeneration requiring hospitalization for pain control. There were no uterine ruptures reported., Conclusion: According to our findings, pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed suture are comparable with available literature on pregnancy outcomes with conventional smooth suture., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients with transabdominal cerclage in place present a management challenge in the setting of undesired pregnancy, pregnancy failure, or pre-viable pregnancy complications. Literature that guides safe surgical technique for uterine evacuation is sparse. This study sought to describe the management and safety profile of dilation and curettage (D&C) and dilation and evacuation (D&E) in patients with transabdominal cerclage., Study Design: We used hospital billing records to identify patients with history of transabdominal cerclage placed between January 1998 and August 2019. We subsequently described the patient characteristics and surgical techniques of the procedures among those who underwent uterine evacuation., Results: Of the 142 patients with an abdominal cerclage placed at our institution, fourteen had subsequent uterine aspiration for a total of 19 procedures over the study period. We describe fifteen D&C procedures in 11 patients between 5- and 12-weeks gestation, and four D&E procedures in three patients between 17- and 19-weeks gestation. Surgeons used osmotic dilators for cervical preparation and standard surgical techniques. There was one minor complication and no major complications. Three patients had procedures other than uterine evacuation., Conclusions: Dilation and curettage and D&E are reasonable potential methods of uterine evacuation in women with transabdominal cerclage., Implications Statement: This chart review suggests D&C and D&E are reasonable management options in the setting of transabdominal cerclage. Current practice guidelines should reflect the utilization of these procedures as potentially less invasive means of uterine evacuation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To describe the perioperative outcomes of various modes of myomectomy (abdominal [AM], laparoscopic [LM], or robotic [RM]) in cases of extreme myoma burden., Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: A tertiary academic center in Boston, Massachusetts., Patients: All women who underwent an AM, LM, or RM for extreme myoma burden, defined as representing the upper quartile for specimen weight (≥434.6 g) or myoma count (≥7 myomas), between 2009 and 2016., Interventions: Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected from review of medical records, including estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and complications. Univariate linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted., Measurements and Main Results: During the study period 659 women underwent myomectomy for extreme myoma burden; 47.2% of cases were AM, 28.1% LM, and 24.7% RM. Overall myoma burden differed across the 3 routes and was greatest in the AM group (mean weight: 696.2 ± 784.5 g for AM vs 586.6 ± 426.1 g for LM and 586.6 ± 426.1 g for RM; mean number: 16.8 ± 15.0 for AM vs 7.2 ± 7.0 for LM and 6.7 ± 4.7 for RM; p <.001 for both). The 3 routes differed in operative time and length of stay, with RM having the longest operative time (mean, 239.7 minutes; p <.001) and AM the longest length of stay (mean, 2.2 ± .9 days; p <.001). Other perioperative outcomes were similar across the surgical approaches. Increasing myoma burden was associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications for all surgical approaches, with a threshold of 13 myomas associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.70; p = .009). Cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing specimen weight was greater in the RM cases as compared with AM (p = .002) or LM (p = .020), whereas the cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing myoma count was lowest with AM compared with LM (p <.001) or RM (p <.001)., Conclusion: Myomectomy for extreme myomas is feasible using an abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic approach. Increased myoma burden is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications. A threshold of 13 myomas was associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications for all modes. Perioperative complication outcomes were more favorable in AM or LM over RM with increased myoma weight and AM over LM or RM with increased myoma number., (Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare symptom persistence in women with adenomyosis based on retention or removal of the cervix at the time of hysterectomy., Design: Retrospective cohort study and follow-up survey (Canadian Task Force classification xx)., Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts., Patients: Women (n = 1580) who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between 2008 and 2012 at Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital., Intervention: Retrospective chart review and follow-up survey., Measurements and Main Results: Among the 1580 women contacted, 762 (48%) responded to the postoperative symptom resolution survey. Of these 762 women, 623 agreed to participate in the study. Menopausal women or those who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were excluded. Adenomyosis was identified on histopathologic evaluation of the uterus in 171 of the remaining 443 women (39%). Compared with women without adenomyosis, those with adenomyosis were older on average (mean age, 46.6 ± 6.8 years vs 45.0 ± 5.5 years; p = .009) and more likely to report that abnormal bleeding and pain led to their hysterectomy (87.7% vs 79.8%; p = .03 and 64.9% vs 51.4%; p = .009, respectively). The rates of total and supracervical hysterectomies were similar in the 2 groups. Following surgery, women with adenomyosis were less likely than those without adenomyosis to report persistent pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.93; p = .03). Persistent bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.93; p = .94). Among women with adenomyosis, multivariable logistic regression showed no difference in persistence of symptoms with cervical removal or retention at the time of hysterectomy., Conclusion: Compared with women without adenomyosis, those with histopathologically proven adenomyosis were less likely to report persistent pain following hysterectomy. Retention of the cervix does not appear to increase the risk of symptom persistence or postprocedure patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare the number of days required to return to daily activities after laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2 tissue extraction methods: manual morcellation via colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Secondary outcomes were additional measures of patient recovery, perioperative outcomes, containment bag integrity, and tissue spillage., Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study and follow-up survey (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: Two tertiary care academic centers in northeastern United States., Patients: Seventy women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with anticipated need for manual morcellation., Interventions: Tissue extraction by either contained minilaparotomy or contained vaginal extraction method, along with patient-completed recovery diary., Measurements and Main Results: Recovery diaries were returned by 85.3% of participants. There were no significant differences found in terms of average pain at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after surgery or in time to return to normal activities. Patients in both groups used narcotic pain medication for an average of 3 days. After adjusting for patient body mass index, history of prior surgery, uterine weight, and surgeon, there were no differences found for blood loss, operative time, length of stay, or incidence of any intra- or postoperative complication between groups. All patients had benign findings on final pathology. More cases in the vaginal contained extraction group were noted to have bag leakage on postprocedure testing (13 [40.6%] vs 3 [8.3%] tears in vaginal and minilaparotomy groups, respectively; p = .003)., Conclusion: Regarding route of tissue extraction, contained minilaparotomy and contained vaginal extraction methods are associated with similar patient outcomes and recovery characteristics., (Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sterilization is the most common form of contraception used worldwide and is highly effective in preventing unintended pregnancy. Each of the available sterilization methods has unique advantages and disadvantages that influence the choice of approach for each individual patient. Salpingectomy for sterilization has become more popular in recent years, with mounting evidence suggesting a protective effect against ovarian cancers originating in the fallopian tube. At the same time, Essure hysteroscopic sterilization has come under scrutiny because of increasing reports of possible adverse effects associated with its use. Here we review clinical updates in sterilization techniques, with a focus on salpingectomy and Essure hysteroscopic sterilization., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare outcomes following umbilical minilaparotomy and suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction., Design Classification: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: Two large academic medical centers., Patients: Women who underwent a minilaparotomy for tissue extraction following a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy between 2014 and 2016., Interventions: Umbilical or suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 374 women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy with minilaparotomy, including 289 (77.3%) with an umbilical minilaparotomy and 85 (22.7%) with a suprapubic minilaparotomy. The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, parity, surgical history, procedure type, surgical approach, and surgical indication. The size of the minilaparotomy incision and the specimen weight were significantly smaller in the umbilical minilaparotomy group (mean, 3.3 ± 0.8 cm vs 4.2 ± 0.6 cm [p < .001] and 472.6 ± 357.1 g vs 683.0 ± 475.7 g [p < .001], respectively). Two women in the suprapubic minilaparotomy group sustained a bladder injury during creation of the incision. There were no other complications related to the minilaparotomy in either group. Postoperative outcomes related to the minilaparotomy incision were compiled using the medical record and a follow-up survey. Of the 374 women in this cohort, 163 responded to a detailed survey about their minilaparotomy incision (response rate, 43.5%). With regard to the minilaparotomy, 52.7% of women reported incisional symptoms; 25.9% had increased pain at the incision, 8.3% had an incisional infection, and 2.7% reported an incisional hernia. There was no significant between-group difference in incisional outcomes; however nearly 3 times as many women in the umbilical minilaparotomy group reported concerns about incisional hernia (3.1% vs 1.2%; p = .833). These findings were maintained in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. No patient or procedure characteristics were significantly associated with the development of hernia., Conclusion: There were no significant difference in incisional symptoms, pain, or infection following umbilical minilaparotomy vs a suprapubic minilaparotomy for tissue extraction. Although not statistically significant, the rate of incisional hernia was higher at the umbilical site compared with the suprapubic site., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An independent roll-down ring can be used to improve exposure during contained tissue extraction. We have used this technique in approximately 50 cases to date with good success. In this article we briefly describe our technique., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The combination of a thorough physical examination and imaging with either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or pelvic ultrasound are important in the preoperative planning for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). A 2-dimensional (2D) rendering of the pathology by imaging does not always accurately represent intraoperative findings. The detailed topographical relationship and extent of surrounding tissue invasion can be better appreciated by 3-dimensional (3D) modeling. A 49-year-old patient with history of endometriosis and persistent pain underwent preoperative MRI that showed features consistent with DIE endometriosis. Surgery was performed, and the findings were documented. A 3D printed model of the DIE was generated from the MRI and retrospectively compared with intraoperative findings. The 3D model demonstrated both the laterality and spatial relationship of the endometriotic nodule to the posterior uterine wall and rectum. Three-dimensional printing of DIE may be a beneficial adjunct to 2D imaging and can identify further structural relationships to support surgical planning., (Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To evaluate perioperative outcomes and symptom resolution in women undergoing removal of the Essure device for device-attributed symptoms., Design: Retrospective case series and follow-up patient survey (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: Large academic medical center., Patients: Fifty-two women who underwent laparoscopic or hysteroscopic Essure removal between 2012 and 2016., Interventions: Women underwent one of four procedures: laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and bilateral salpingectomy (BS), laparoscopic BS and cornuectomy, laparoscopic Essure removal and BS, or hysteroscopic Essure removal and laparoscopic BS., Measurements and Main Results: Fifty-two women who underwent Essure removal were asked to complete a survey regarding symptom resolution and quality of life following the procedure. Thirty-two women (61.5%) responded to the survey. Seventy-five percent (24/32) reported almost total or total improvement in quality of life, 56.3% (18/32) for sex life, 53.1% (17/32) for pelvic pain, and 65.6% (21/32) for daily activities. The majority of women reported some degree of improvement in all four domains queried (87.5%, 28/32). When asked about their symptoms in general, 31.3% (10/32) of women reported ongoing or worse symptoms after Essure removal. All procedures took approximately one hour (mean 65 min, SD 33 min), were associated with minimal blood loss (mean 31 mL, SD 17), and had no perioperative complications., Conclusion: Essure removal is a procedure that may be effective for treating most women with symptoms attributed to the device. Patients should be counseled that some symptoms may persist or even worsen following surgery., (Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes associated with the use of 3 techniques for tissue removal at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy., Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: An academic hospital in Boston, MA., Patients: Women who underwent a laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy involving tissue morcellation in 2014., Interventions: One of 3 morcellation techniques: electronic power morcellation (PM), manual vaginal morcellation via the vagina (VM), or manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (ML)., Measurements and Main Results: Of the 297 cases included in this study (137 myomectomies, 62 total laparoscopic hysterectomies, and 98 laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies), 96% of the cases were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons using conventional laparoscopy. Containment bags were used at the time of tissue extraction in 77% of the cases. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were similar in all groups. In hysterectomy cases, the average specimen size was largest in the ML group (591 ± 419 g in the ML group compared with 368 ± 293 g in the PM group and 449 ± 175 g in the VM group, p = .0009). After multivariate regression, no significant difference was found in blood loss, length of stay, or complications. The operative time was shorter in the PM group compared with the ML group by 16 minutes (mean = 140 minutes [95% confidence interval, 130-149 minutes] compared with 156 [95% confidence interval, 146-167], p = .02); this association remained significant once additionally adjusting for the use or nonuse of containment bags (p = .05)., Conclusion: We did not detect a significant difference between the 3 morcellation techniques when comparing the perioperative complications although the longest operative times were noted for the minilaparotomy approach. All 3 morcellation techniques represent viable options for tissue extraction at the time of minimally invasive surgery., (Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cystoscopy can be used to diagnose urologic injuries at the time of gynecologic surgery. Current cystoscopy setup involves removing the indwelling catheter placed for the procedure and assembling a multicomponent cystoscope. The objective of this study was to evaluate and report on our initial experience with CystoSure (Emmy Medical, Holliston, MA), a new Food and Drug Administration-approved device designed to facilitate perioperative diagnostic cystoscopy. The CystoSure catheter is an 18F quad-port silicone transurethral catheter with a central sealed port for the cystoscope and a side port that allows for bladder filling. A retrospective chart review was performed of women who underwent benign laparoscopic or robotic gynecologic surgery with cystoscopy at Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA, from May 1, 2015, to August 31, 2015. Thirty women underwent cystoscopy during the study period. The CystoSure catheter is placed at the beginning of the procedure. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was the most common procedure, representing 90% of cases (27/30). Using the CystoSure system, full bladder survey and bilateral ureteral jets were easily evaluated in 87% (26/30) of the patients. Of the 26 cystoscopies performed successfully, 1 intravesical suture was diagnosed and addressed. In the remaining 4 patients, the 18F CystoSure catheter was too large for the urethral orifice, and a 16F catheter was used for the case. The CystoSure device allows for minimal setup and efficient performance of diagnostic cystoscopy postgynecologic surgery., (Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To report the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) at a high-volume tertiary care hospital, to evaluate the risk of conversion during LM, and to analyze the associated risk factors., Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II)., Patients: All patients who underwent LM and AM in a tertiary academic center in Boston, Massachusetts between 2009 and 2012., Intervention: Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Robot-assisted laparoscopy was considered a subtype of LM., Results: A total of 966 patients underwent myomectomy during the study period, including 731 LM cases (75.67%) and 235 AM cases (24.33%). Compared with patients undergoing LM, those undergoing AM had more myomas removed and heavier specimens (mean number of myomas, 12.60 vs 3.54, p ≤ .001; mean weight, 592.75 g vs 263.4 g, p ≤ .001). Conversion was necessary in 8 LM cases (1.09%). All conversions were reactive in nature and were associated with greater blood loss (mean, 1381.25 vs 167.95 mL; p ≤ .001) and longer hospital stay (mean, 3.13 vs 0.55 days; p ≤ .001) compared with cases without conversion. Factors associated with conversion included both the number and the weight of myomas removed (mean number, 9.75 vs 3.48, p = .003; mean weight, 667.9 vs 259.25 g, p = .015), especially with myomas weighing >500 g (odds ratio = 8.551; p = .005)., Conclusion: The risk of conversion for LM was low (1.09%) in this cohort, and was associated both with the number and the weight of myomas removed. LM is a feasible approach for surgical management of myomas in the majority of cases; however, when myomas are expected to weigh >500 g, it may be prudent to consider referring those cases to specialized centers with highly experienced teams., (Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Safe tissue removal is a challenge for minimally invasive procedures such as myomectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, or total hysterectomy of a large uterine specimen. There is concern regarding disruption or dissemination of tissue during this process, which may be of particular significance in cases of undetected malignancy. Contained tissue extraction techniques have been developed in an effort to mitigate morcellation-related risks., Objective: The objective of the study was to quantify perioperative outcomes of contained tissue extraction using power morcellation, specifically evaluating parameters of tissue or fluid leakage from within the containment system., Study Design: This was a study including a multicenter prospective cohort of adult women who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy using a contained power morcellation technique. Blue dye was applied to the tissue specimen prior to removal to help identify cases of fluid or tissue leakage from within the containment system., Results: A total of 76 patients successfully underwent the contained power morcellation protocol. Mean time for the contained morcellation procedure was 30.2 minutes (±22.4). The mean hysterectomy specimen weight was 480.1 g (±359.1), and mean myomectomy specimen weight was 239.1 g (±229.7). The vast majority of patients (73.7%) were discharged home the same day of surgery. Final pathological diagnosis was benign in all cases. Spillage of dye or tissue was noted in 7 cases (9.2%), although containment bags were intact in each of these instances., Conclusion: Findings are consistent with prior work demonstrating the feasibility of contained tissue extraction; however, further refinement of this technique is warranted., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify challenges that impede wider adoption of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery and assessing whether the current training programs are addressing these challenges adequately., Methods: A survey was designed to examine barriers to adoption of laparoscopy for practicing gynecologists. The survey was piloted on gynecologic surgeons and was further refined following their feedback. Finally, the survey was deployed to 4273 gynecologists across the United States via e-mail using the national database of the American Medical Association. Respondents were grouped into two categories based on how often they report referral of patients for laparoscopy. Demographics, training, and practice characteristics were compared using Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Participants rated factors that were thought to limit laparoscopy use on a 5-point Likert scale; median values of these scores were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum tests., Results: We received 210 responses (29% of people who opened the e-mail and 93% of those who opened the survey). Physicians who perform their own laparoscopies were on average younger and tended to be more subspecialized. Some of the most highly rated limiting factors included lack of adequate surgical volume, reluctance of managing unexpected surgical scenarios, difficulty with video-eye-hand coordination, altered depth perception, and laparoscopic suturing., Conclusion: This survey identified barriers to adoption of laparoscopic surgical techniques beyond what has previously been identified. Based on these findings, novel simulation and continuing medical education curricula can be created to address the primary barriers in order to increase laparoscopic approach to surgery among gynecologists., (Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcervical sterilization is a minimally invasive option for permanent contraception with high reported rates of patient satisfaction. A small percentage of women subsequently choose to have the tubal inserts removed due to regret or perceived side effects. There is limited information with regard to the improvement in the symptom profile following surgical removal of the tubal inserts. We present a retrospective case series of 11 women who underwent surgical removal of Essure by hysteroscopy, salpingectomy, and/or hysterectomy. The predominant symptom at presentation was pain (n = 10; 90.91%), as well as bleeding (n = 6; 54.54%) and/or dyspareunia (n = 5; 45.45%). After surgical removal, the majority of patients (n = 8; 72.72%) reported an improvement of their symptoms. However, 3 (27.27%) patients continued to have persistent symptoms after surgery. Before surgical removal of Essure, it is important to thoroughly discuss the risk of continuing symptoms with patients., (Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to design and validate a new assessment tool for laparoscopic vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer., Design: A primary grading tool was constructed including a novel checklist component and a previously validated global rating scale. A four-step validation process was then undertaken. Face validity was determined by a survey of a panel of experts in the field of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Content validity was assessed via analysis of consistency and variability of the experts' ratings, and items were removed or rephrased according to the experts' comments., Participants: Overall, five novices and five expert laparoscopic surgeons were videotaped performing suture closure of a latex vaginal cuff model in a box trainer. The videotapes were reviewed by two raters. Discriminate validity, along with interrater and intrarater reliabilities, was assessed by analysis of the video ratings., Setting: The Simulation, Training, Research, and Technology Utilization System center at Brigham and Women's Hospital, a tertiary medical center in Boston, MA., Results: The final assessment tool is presented., Conclusion: We have validated an assessment tool for vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer., (Copyright © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes, particularly operative time, between uncontained and in-bag power morcellation of uterine tissue at the time of laparoscopic surgery., Design: Canadian Task Force classification II-3., Setting: Academic tertiary care hospitals., Patients: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy who required morcellation of uterine tissue for specimen extraction., Interventions: Outcomes among patients who had in-bag power morcellation were compared with outcomes among patients who had traditional power morcellation. The technique for in-bag morcellation entails placing the specimen into a large containment bag within the abdomen, insufflating the bag within the peritoneal cavity, and then using a power morcellator to remove the specimen from inside the bag., Measurements and Main Results: The cohort consisted of 85 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with morcellation of uterine tissue. Prospective data collected from 36 patients who underwent in-bag morcellation were compared with retrospective data collected from the immediately preceding 49 patients who had uncontained power morcellation. Baseline demographics were comparable between the 2 groups although women who underwent in-bag morcellation were on average older than the open morcellation group (mean age in years [standard deviation], 49.19 [1.12] vs 44.06 [8.93]; p = .01). The mean operating room time was longer in the in-bag morcellation group (mean time in minutes [standard deviation], 119.0 [55.91] vs 93.13 [44.90]; p = .02). The estimated blood loss, specimen weight, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complication rate did not vary between the 2 groups. Operative times did not vary significantly by surgeon. There were no cases of malignancy or isolation bag disruption., Conclusions: In-bag power morcellation, a tissue extraction technique developed to reduce the risk of tissue dissemination, results in perioperative outcomes comparable with the traditional laparoscopic approach. In this cohort, the mean operative time was prolonged by 26 minutes with in-bag morcellation but may potentially be reduced with further refinement of the technique., (Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare differences in trends in reported surgical experience of residents in obstetrics and gynecology in the United States insofar as abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy., Design: Retrospective analysis of the national case log reports from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for obstetrics and gynecology cases logged as "surgeon" from 2002 to 2012 (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: AGCME-accredited residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology., Participants: Eleven thousand five hundred and eight graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology (n = 11 508)., Measurements and Main Results: Since 2008, when the ACGME began reporting the 4-year cumulative hysterectomy case load statistics for graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, there has been no significant change in the mean (SD) number of hysterectomies performed by residents from 118.1 (38.0) cases in 2008-2009 to 116.1 (31.0) cases in 2011-2012 (p = .16; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.78 to 4.78). During the past decade, however, the total number of reported abdominal hysterectomies consistently decreased from 89.1 (34.2) cases in 2002-2003 to 59.1 (21.0) cases in 2011-2012 (28% decrease; p <.001; 95% CI, 27.7-32.3). The number of vaginal hysterectomies also trended down from 34.9 (19.2) cases to 19.4 (9.0) cases (40% decrease; p <.001; 95% CI, 14.3-16.7). The ACGME did not report the number of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed by residents until 2008-2009, when residents reported performing 23.4 (17.0) cases. From 2008 to 2012, this number increased to 38.5 (20.0) cases (72% increase; p <.001; 95% CI, 13.6-16.6). The proportion of reported laparoscopic hysterectomies performed with robotic assistance was not separately reported., Conclusions: Although the overall number of hysterectomies reported by residents has remained stable since 2008, the predominant modes of hysterectomy during the past decade have changed substantially, with laparoscopic hysterectomy comprising an increasingly large proportion of resident experience. As laparoscopic hysterectomy has become more common, reported cases of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies have decreased. Additional statistics on the percentage of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed using robotic assistance would be valuable to additionally analyze the effect of this new technology on resident training., (Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To evaluate risk of leakage and tissue dissemination associated with various contained tissue extraction (CTE) techniques., Design: In vitro study (Canadian Task Force classification: II-1)., Setting: Academic hospital simulation laboratory., Intervention: Beef tongue specimens weighing 400 to 500 g were stained using 5 mL indigo carmine dye and morcellated under laparoscopic guidance within a plastic box trainer. CTE was performed via 3 different techniques: a stitch-sealed rip-stop nylon bag and multi-port approach; a one-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag and multi-port approach; or a 1-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag and single-site approach. Four trials of each CTE method were performed and compared with an open morcellation control. All bags were insufflated to within 10 to 25 mmHg pressure with a standard CO2 insufflator. Visual evidence of spilled tissue or dye was recorded, and fluid washings of the box trainer were sent for cytologic analysis., Measurements and Main Results: Blue dye spill was noted in only 1 of 12 CTE trials. Spillage was visualized from a seam in 1 of the 4 stitch-sealed rip-stop nylon bags before morcellation of the specimen. The only trial in which gross tissue chips were visualized in the box trainer after morcellation was the open morcellation control. However, cytologic examination revealed muscle cells in the open morcellation washings and in the washings from the trial with dye spill. Muscle cells were not observed at cytologly in any of the other samples., Conclusion: CTE did not result in any leakage or tissue dissemination with use of the single-site or multi-port approach when using a 1-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings in an in vivo context and to evaluate use of alternate bag options for specimen containment., (Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In-bag morcellation seems to be a viable alternative to open power morcellation and offers the advantage of minimal to no spillage of tissue or fluids during morcellation. We report our initial experience and technique using this approach., (Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic suturing with or without barbed suture for myomectomy or hysterectomy. We used a systematic electronic search strategy of published literature using the following databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, and OVID MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations databases. The following medical subject heading terms, key words, and their combinations were used: laparoscopy, myomectomy, hysterectomy, and barbed suture. Studies in which women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy using barbed suture or conventional suture were selected. The main outcome measures chosen for the current meta-analysis were operative time, suturing time, estimated blood loss or change in hemoglobin level, and degree of suturing difficulty. The results of the meta-analysis studies were expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Compared with the use of conventional suture, the total operative time of laparoscopic myomectomy (SMD = -0.58; 95% CI, -0.88 to -0.28) and the suturing time to close the uterine incision (SMD = -1.38; 95% CI, -1.86 to -0.90) were significantly reduced with the use of barbed suture. Meta-analysis on laparoscopic hysterectomy shows that the time to suture the vaginal vault, the total operative time, and the estimated blood loss were comparable with or without the use of barbed suture. The degree of suturing difficulty was reported in 2 randomized trials. Compared with the use of conventional suture, the degree of suturing difficulty was lower with the use of barbed suture (SMD = -1.39; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.95). The use of barbed suture facilitates laparoscopic suturing of myomectomy incision and closure of the vaginal vault. Its use is associated with a reduced operative time of laparoscopic myomectomy., (Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To compare closure times, cuff healing, and postoperative dyspareunia between barbed and traditional sutures during laparoscopic total hysterectomy., Design: A randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I)., Setting: A university hospital., Patients: Sixty-three women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy., Interventions: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed using standard techniques. The vaginal cuff closure method was randomized to barbed suture (Quill; Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vancouver, Canada) or standard suture (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ). The time required for cuff closure was documented. Patients were examined postoperatively to assess cuff healing, and a standardized sexual function questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively., Measurements and Main Results: The mean vaginal cuff closure time was 10.4 minutes versus 9.6 minutes in the barbed versus standard suture group (p = .51). Cuff healing appeared similar between the 2 groups. Rates of dyspareunia, partner dyspareunia, and sexual function were similar in both groups at 3 months postoperatively. Vaginal cuff closure times were significantly faster among attendings compared with residents/fellows (7.1 vs. 12.8 minutes, respectively; p < .0001). The study was designed to have a statistical power of 80% to detect a difference of 5 minutes in cuff closure time between the 2 groups (α level of 0.05)., Conclusion: Laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure times are similar when using barbed sutures and braided sutures., (Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare operative time and intra- and postoperative complications between total laparoscopic hysterectomy and robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy., Study Design: This study was a blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at 2 institutions. Subjects consisted of women who planned laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Preoperative randomization to total laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy was stratified by surgeon and uterine size (> or ≤12 weeks). Validated questionnaires, activity assessment scales, and visual analogue scales were administered at baseline and during follow-up evaluation., Results: Sixty-two women gave consent and were enrolled and randomly assigned; 53 women underwent surgery (laparoscopic, 27 women; robot-assisted, 26 women). There were no demographic differences between groups. Compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy, total case time (skin incision to skin closure) was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group (mean difference, +77 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 33-121; P < .001] as was total operating room time (entry into operating room to exit; mean difference, +72 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 14-130; P = .016). Mean docking time was 6 ± 4 minutes. There were no significant differences between groups in estimated blood loss, pre- and postoperative hematocrit change, and length of stay. There were very few complications, with no difference in individual complication types or total complications between groups. Postoperative pain and return to daily activities were no different between groups., Conclusion: Although laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomies are safe approaches to hysterectomy, robotic-assisted hysterectomy requires a significantly longer operative time., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this series we discuss the feasibility of hand-assisted approach to laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy. The hand-assisted approach is a useful technique bridging the benefits of minimally invasive surgery and an open approach. We present the largest series to date of 15 patients: 10 hand-assisted hysterectomies and 5 myomectomies. All 15 cases were performed by the team of surgeons at a large academic medical center in the northeastern United States. We provide a detailed description of the hand-assisted technique along with patient demographic data, surgical outcomes, and complications. Operating times ranged from 86 to 269 minutes, and estimated blood loss ranged from 30 to 4000 mL. On the basis of preliminary outcomes, the hand-assisted technique appears to be beneficial in challenging laparoscopic cases, yet careful patient selection and vigilance are required to ensure successful outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement in the prevention of recurrent preterm birth., Study Design: We conducted a multicenter cohort study with retrospective Dutch (32 patients) and Boston (34 patients) cohorts who had undergone preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Eligible patients had at least 1 second/third trimester fetal loss or delivered at <34 weeks of gestation because of cervical insufficiency and/or a short or absent cervix. Primary outcome was delivery of an infant at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and pregnancy outcomes and patients' satisfaction (Dutch cohort)., Results: Surgical outcomes of 66 patients were excellent, with 3 minor complications. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage, 35 pregnancies were evaluated. Twenty-five patients (71.4%) delivered at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation; 3 patients (8.6%) experienced a second-trimester fetal loss. The total fetal survival rate was 90.0%., Conclusion: Preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage shows encouraging and favorable perinatal outcomes in patients with a poor obstetric history., (Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate the necessity of routine patient positioning in steep Trendelenburg in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery performed for benign indications., Design: Descriptive study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2)., Setting: University-affiliated community hospital., Patients: Twenty women undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery for benign indications., Intervention: Robotic-assisted total hysterectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, myomectomy, and sacrocolpopexy., Measurements and Main Results: Demographic data and perioperative variables were recorded including age, body mass index, procedure type, console time, perioperative complications, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, and degree of Trendelenburg position. The degree of Trendelenburg position was measured at the end of each procedure using an electronic level. The surgeons were blinded to the degree of Trendelenburg used. All procedures were performed successfully without conversion to laparotomy. All patients were discharged to home within 24 hours. No perioperative complications were noted. The mean (SD; 95% CI) Trendelenburg position used in this cohort was 16.4 (4.1; 14.4-18.3) degrees. Patient body mass index was 28.5 (5.3; 26.1-31.1). Median console time was 87.5 (27-112) minutes., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted benign gynecologic surgery can be effectively performed without use of the steep Trendelenburg position. The practice of routine adherence to steep Trendelenburg positioning in benign gynecologic robotic surgery should be questioned., (Copyright © 2012 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This case series describes the feasibility of orifice-assisted small-incision surgery (OASIS), a novel technique that may incorporate benefits of single-incision and natural-orifice surgery while minimizing issues such as instrument crowding and interaction of optical access with operative instrumentation. In our multiple-site series, we included patients from a large academic medical center in the northeastern United States and a private gynecology clinic in India. Between the 2 centers, a total of 14 patients (5 with benign disease and 9 with oncologic disease) underwent the following procedures: OASIS total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. The initial 14 cases were safely completed. Oncologic clearance was consistent with specialty norms. Operating time ranged from 60 to 150 minutes, and estimated blood loss ranged from 10 to 500 mL. Detailed procedure descriptions and videos are provided. Based on preliminary case series experience, OASIS seems to be a safe and feasible addition to the advanced minimally invasive surgeons' armamentarium for both benign and oncologic cases., (Copyright © 2012 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preterm delivery remains a primary cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. One cause of preterm birth is cervical incompetence. In women with a shortened or absent cervix or in those in whom previous vaginal cerclage failed, abdominal cerclage may be recommended. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. Thirty-one eligible studies were selected. Six studies (135 patients) reported on the laparoscopic approach, and 26 (1116 patients) on the abdominal approach. Delivery of a viable infant at 34 weeks of gestation or more varied from 78.5% (laparoscopic) to 84.8% (abdominal). Second-trimester fetal loss occurred in 8.1% (laparoscopic) vs 7.8% (abdominal), with no reported third-trimester losses (laparoscopic) vs 1.2% (abdominal). We conclude that abdominal cerclage is associated with excellent results as treatment of cervical incompetence, with high fetal survival rates and minimal complications during surgery and pregnancy. Further studies are needed to differentiate which method is superior., (Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)