Search

Sunitinib is an effective treatment for patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) but ultimately resistance occurs. The aim of this study was to investigate sunitinib resistance in RCCs and to develop therapeutic combination strategies with targeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT).We studied two RCC models, analyzed Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) and AXL/MET expression and performed therapy studies in Balb/cnu/nu mice combining sunitinib and [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT (6.5 MBq/10 μg), specifically targeting RCC cells.pAXL and pMET were expressed in sunitinib-resistant SK-RC-52 and absent in sunitinib-sensitive NU12. NGS evaluation showed that expression of VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFD, PGF and VEGFR1,2,3 was higher and expression of VEGFC and PDGFA was lower in NU12 than in SK-RC-52.Therapy studies combining sunitinib with [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT showed that the best response in mice with “resistant” SK-RC-52 tumors was observed with two cycles of Sunitinib and [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT, probably due to increased vascular permeability by sunitinib treatment. In the “sensitive” NU12 model, two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT and two cycles of combination treatment were equally effective.Enhanced therapeutic efficacy was achieved when two agents ([177Lu]Lu-cG250 RIT and sunitinib) that on their own did not induce satisfactory response levels, are combined. Our findings provide a promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced RCC.

Anti-angiogenic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has lead to an impressive increase in progression-free survival for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC), but mRCC remains largely incurable. We combined sunitinib, targeting the endothelial cells with Girentuximab (monoclonal antibody cG250, recognizing carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) targeting the tumor cells to study the effect of sunitinib on the biodistribution of Girentuximab because combination of modalities targeting tumor vasculature and tumor cells might result in improved effect. Nude mice with human RCC xenografts (NU12, SK-RC-52) were treated orally with 0.8 mg/day sunitinib, or vehicle for 7 to 14 days. Three days before start or cessation of treatment mice were injected i.v. with 0.4 MBq/5 μg 111In-Girentuximab followed by biodistribution studies. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to study the tumor vasculature and CAIX expression and to confirm Girentuximab uptake. NU12 appeared to represent a sunitinib sensitive tumor: sunitinib treatment resulted in extensive necrosis and decreased microvessel density (MVD). Accumulation of Girentuximab was significantly decreased when sunitinib treatment preceded the antibody injection but remained unchanged when sunitinib followed Girentuximab injection. Cessation of therapy led to a rapid neovascularization, reminiscent of a tumor flare. SK-RC-52 appeared to represent a sunitinib-resistant tumor: (central) tumor necrosis was minimal and MVD was not affected. Sunitinib treatment resulted in increased Girentuximab uptake, regardless of the sequence of treatment. These data indicate that sunitinib can be combined with Girentuximab. Since these two modalities have different modes of action, this combination might lead to enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by high constitutive vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) production that induces a specific vascular phenotype. We previously reported that this phenotype may allow shedding of multicellular tumor fragments into the circulation, possibly contributing to the development of metastasis. Disruption of this phenotype through inhibition of VEGF signaling may therefore result in reduced shedding of tumor fragments and improved prognosis. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment on tumor cluster shedding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with renal cancer (n = 10, of which 8 have ccRCC) received sorafenib for 4 weeks before tumor nephrectomy. The resection specimens were perfused, and the perfundate was examined for the presence of tumor clusters. Effects of the treatment on the tumor morphology and overall survival were investigated (follow-up of 2 years) and compared with a carefully matched control group. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment induced extensive ischemic tumor necrosis and, as expected, destroyed the characteristic ccRCC vascular phenotype. In contrast to the expectation, vital groups of tumor cells with high proliferation indices were detected in postsurgical renal venous outflow in 75% of the cases. Overall survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was reduced compared to a control group, matched with regard to prognostic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neoadjuvant sorafenib therapy for ccRCC does not prevent shedding of tumor fragments. Although this is a nonrandomized study with a small patient group, our results suggest that neoadjuvant treatment may worsen survival through as yet undefined mechanisms.